ATTACK ROMNEY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[robertwerden]

This is where we go for the knock out.

What ever Ron Paul was holding back for the last 6 months by not attacking Romney until the only alternative to Romney was Ron Paul, needs to be unleashed now!

With all the lies the media and the GOP spread about Ron Paul, I think now is the time for some payback.
It is ON!!!!!!!

[PolicyReader]

I agree, now is the time to go after Romney. Might I suggest posting this idea to the campaign suggestions section for greatest chance it'll get seen by someone Official. :)

[robertwerden]

And i'm not talking about a slick commercial, I'm talking about an attack that will be the end of his campaign.
I wan't the world to hate Romney, and Id like to see him under investigation for fraud with the way Bain leveraged companies and made profits from their failures. Something on the level of him facing jail time.

[alucard13mmfmj]

Yes. Ron's campaign NEEDS to do something right now because the dust settles from Santorum's exit. Romney is the only target now. I will be dissapointed if nothing is done.

[Muttley]

Time to slam this prick NOW!

[PolicyReader]

And i'm not talking about a slick commercial, I'm talking about an attack that will be the end of his campaign.
I wan't the world to hate Romney, and Id like to see him under investigation for fraud with the way Bain leveraged companies and made profits from their failures. Something on the level of him facing jail time.

Do we have any means to do something like that? If there's actionable evidence of criminal activities then by all means it should be acted on.

Is there anything within the scope of a political campaign that we have which the official campaign could act on? Or for that matter if there is direct proof of criminal activity have the proper authorities been contacted?

[frickettz]

Yes, yes, YES! But... would Ron do it? If the campaign slacks now in this pivotal moment then I have no choice but to conclude that they're not serious about winning. :/

We don't need any evidence of criminal wrong doing, just slam him for his record, and HARD. The campaign's been talking all along that the strategy has been to attack their "anti-romney" opponents to position themselves as Romney's biggest opponent. Time to carry that into fruition.

[eleganz]

Romney used government subsidies and handouts to make profits in his own company and in the Olympics as well and took credit for it by pretending he was a savior and business genius.

[jbuttell]

make it so. Just think, if Romney stumbles at all, look who's right on his heals...

[speciallyblend]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nY31ZH6hAFI<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nY31ZH6hAFI">
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nY31ZH6hAFI (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nY31ZH6hAFI)

[69360]

And i'm not talking about a slick commercial, I'm talking about an attack that will be the end of his campaign.
I wan't the world to hate Romney, and Id like to see him under investigation for fraud with the way Bain leveraged companies and made profits from their failures. Something on the level of him facing jail time.

Ron has already come out in support of what Mitt did at Bain. FWIW I agree.

[alucard13mmfmj]

At any rate, it is a win win situation to attack Romney.

Attacking Romney might take a few votes away from Romney... BUT the most important thing is if Romney attacks Ron, especially with ads. If Romney attacks Ron, then Ron will be on the radar. It does not matter if Romney has tens of millions to Ron's few million dollars. What matters right now is being on the radar and letting people know that the race is not over and theres other candidates to choose from.

Ron attacking Romney and Romney responding by attacking Ron is what we want to happen.

[robertwerden]

Ron has already come out in support of what Mitt did at Bain. FWIW I agree.
Ron does not know the details, he simply said he would rather go after him on his record. If Ron knew what Romney had done at Bain, he never would have said that.

[jmdrake]

Attack Romney and Obama at the same time. Run a commercial showing all of the tea party anger over Obamacare. Then splice in Romney talking about how Romneycare was the "blueprint" for Obamacare. Then ask "Who do you really want to take the fight to Obama?" Oh, and throw a little "etch-a-sketch" reference in there.

[XTreat]

Here are your transaction details:
Donation amount: $20.12
Transaction date/time: 2012-04-10 15:44:35
Transaction ID: 43F75061UT399762V

[ctiger2]

YES! Drive a stake right thru this vampires heart right now!

[PolicyReader]

Attack Romney and Obama at the same time. Run a commercial showing all of the tea party anger over Obamacare. Then splice in Romney talking about how Romneycare was the "blueprint" for Obamacare. Then ask "Who do you really want to take the fight to Obama?" Oh, and throw a little "etch-a-sketch" reference in there.
I agree.


Here are your transaction details:
Donation amount: $20.12
Transaction date/time: 2012-04-10 15:44:35
Transaction ID: 43F75061UT399762V
(emphasis mine)
+rep

[mport1]

Ron Paul seems to still want to play nice so people within the campaign will have to start getting aggressive. They really need to tear Romney apart.

[hammy]

It's time to destroy this fake. Can we get a google ad pool together?

[maxoutco]

Run a commercial showing a image of a huge Goldman Sach's bank, and it producing clones every four years of past year presidents. Of course, Obama being 2008 and then Romney being 2012. Then state its about time we break the establishment cycle, and end it with everything amazing about Ron Paul and why he is different.

[digitaldean]

Half of the people who vote for Mitt are doing so because they think he has the best chance to beat Obama. Paul needs an ad that shows his crowds vs Mitts crowds and the amount of support he gets vs Mitt (also the people in trees). And ask if Republicans want to win in November or not.

[EBounding]

Even his "Big Texas" ad is really gentle to Romney. He slams Santorum as a debt ceiling raising liberal, Gingrich as a moon colony, and Romney....a Massachusetts Moderate???

[Teenager For Ron Paul]

PUMMEL mittens on his explicit support for the NDAA. Put it in an ad. It shows he's openly opposed to civil liberties and the constitution.

[JJ2]

PUMMEL mittens on his explicit support for the NDAA. Put it in an ad. It shows he's openly opposed to civil liberties and the constitution.

THIS. An entire ad just about the NDAA and Romney's support of it, with the clip of him saying in the debate that he would have signed it and praising it as good and necessary.

[Drex]

MITT ROMNEY KILLED MY CAT & I WANT JUSTICE MEOW!

[twomp]

THIS. An entire ad just about the NDAA and Romney's support of it, with the clip of him saying in the debate that he would have signed it and praising it as good and necessary.

AGREED! NDAA needs to be in an AD and it needs to spread wide and far. It's a shame that media hides it, it's an even bigger shame that the campaign doesn't shed more light on it!

[jolynna]

Paul Singer, Romney's biggest billionaire backer, is the lowest form of humanity existing. (imo)

Here's a video about Singer and the relationship between Singer and Romney
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SL_0eqe4ago&feature=fvst

Greg Palast from the BBC writes this about Paul Singer and Romney:
http://www.gregpalast.com/romneys-billionaire-vulturepaul-singer-the-gops-baddie-sugar-daddie/#more-5692

In my opinion.

[jolynna]

Romney on liberty:

Romney is the Godfather of spy centers and national IDs. While governor of Massachusetts, Romney implemented the first national ID carding which uses facial identification as well as the nation's first homeland state "intelligence center".

From the article Little Brothers Are Watching: The Example of Massachusetts
http://truth-out.org/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=2906:little-brothers-are-watching-the-example-of-massachusetts

As lead governor on homeland security issues at the National Governors Association and a member of the DHS Homeland Security Advisory Council, Romney was ardent about enlisting the public "to be on the lookout for information which may be useful" and expanding government surveillance: "Are we wiretapping, are we following what's going on, are we seeing who's coming in, who's coming out, are we eavesdropping, carrying out surveillance on those individuals that are coming from places that have sponsored domestic terror?"[4]

So, it is not surprising that Massachusetts had two of the earliest fusion centers in the country. The Commonwealth Fusion Center (CFC) was established under the supervision of the state police in 2004 without any public notice or legislative process. The Boston Regional Intelligence Center (BRIC) was set up the following year, also under cover of official silence.


Since his days as governor of Massachusetts, Romney's interest in spy centers continues. Romney's connection with spy centers in China as reported by the New York Times and Salon:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/16/world/asia/bain-capital-tied-to-surveillance-push-in-china.html?hp and
http://www.salon.com/2012/03/16/big_romney_is_watching_you/

I think the Chinese spy centers strongly resemble this one in Utah:
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/all/1.

In my opinion.



AND JUST FIXED LINKS THAT HAD BEEN MOVED.

[jolynna]

THIS. An entire ad just about the NDAA and Romney's support of it, with the clip of him saying in the debate that he would have signed it and praising it as good and necessary.

Here's a link to the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1yY3NCiMVQ

[PolicyReader]

More for use on mitt

Let's get all of these out today.
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/405903_319048628133894_142326439139448_869376_1212 23620_n.jpg


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUSrZfzbj3U


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h49vdsxjWes


The above three items ready for re-tweets

https://twitter.com/#!/ToddHunter4/status/189858671386304512

https://twitter.com/#!/ToddHunter4/status/189859083724140544

https://twitter.com/#!/ToddHunter4/status/189858006324871168

[Endthefednow]

To Ron Paul yes it is time to go on the Attack!!!!!!!!!!!:eek:

[PolicyReader]

http://youtu.be/oKvnQU-XfTg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKvnQU-XfTg&feature=related
Share with Santorum supporters. Share with anyone who knows how bad the NDAA is. Share with anyone who needs another reminder of how Obama and Romney are the Goldman Sach candidate.

[jolynna]

Romney advocates spending $8.3 trillion MORE on the Pentagon than Obama wants to spend.Obama is presently spending almost a trillion dollars a year! http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/recalculating-romneys-four-percent-gimmick/

What ROMNEY ADVOCATES SPENDING every SINGLE YEAR just on military (going on $2 trillion) is MORE than the United States estimates getting in TOTAL federal tax revenue for all of 2011. http://www.usgovernmentrevenue.com/yearrev2011_0.html

I don't want THAT.

In my opinion.

[Eric39]

I think this is was the Hold thread was meant for.

They have all fallen and the battlefield is cleared to two.

I was starting to think we may never see this fateful day...


ATTACK!!!

flip floppin about to have his votes droppin

[ClydeCoulter]

Go Here (coffeewithchess' Romney Attach Ads) and Make Them VIRAL, Watch, Like, TWEET, Facebook them!

SANTORUMS OUT, Attack Romney, Make These Vids GO VIRAL, Click Here !

[PolicyReader]

Go Here (coffeewithchess' Romney Attach Ads) and Make Them VIRAL, Watch, Like, TWEET, Facebook them!

SANTORUMS OUT, Attack Romney, Make These Vids GO VIRAL, Click Here !

"You must spread some reputation around before giving it to ClydeCoulter again"

Tweets ready for retweet in the twitter thread or previous page of this thread, simple and easy folks lets get this done :D

[jolynna]

Romney is anti internet freedom.

In his white paper, Romney underlines the importance of cybersecurity and marks it as one of eight actions for the first 100 days. According to the paper, he would “order a full interagency initiative to formulate a unified national strategy to deter and defend against the growing threats of militarized cyber-attacks, cyber-terrorism, cyber-espionage, and private-sector intellectual property theft.” ...

...Back in October, Romney introduced his Foreign Policy and National Security Advisory Team. Among more than 20 advisers are Michael Chertoff, currently chairman of the Chertoff Group and former U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security (and an EWI board member); and Michael Hayden, former director of the CIA and NSA. In an interview with National Journal, Hayden indicated that cybersecurity is one of the issues he discussed with the Romney camp and that his future advice would mirror his public statements on the issue. Hayden is in favor of a stronger, more centralized federal office to oversee cybersecurity and would like to see the NSA taking a more active role in protecting U.S. networks.
http://www.ewi.info/campaign-2012-presidential-candidates-cybersecurity

Romney's Massachusetts BRIC center generated dozens of ACLU documented cases in which the government has engaged in improper domestic spying on ordinary residents engaged in protected political activities -- such as anti-war causes, environmental protection, and religious worship. http://privacysos.org/talks/Crose/big_brother

In my opinion.

[parocks]

It's time to destroy this fake. Can we get a google ad pool together?

People should make the ads, and then they can vote with their dollars.

Google Ads are not the only way to get on tv. Talk to the Cable companies, you can buy channels in small markets or large markets, you can target a state where there's a primary coming up.

[PolicyReader]

People should make the ads, and then they can vote with their dollars.

Google Ads are not the only way to get on tv. Talk to the Cable companies, you can buy channels in small markets or large markets, you can target a state where there's a primary coming up.
+rep

[MJU1983]

See: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?317883-Calling-all-tubers!!-Needed-Updated-version-of-quot-Mitt-Romney-has-a-truth-problem-quot

[JohnDLG]

Romney is a northeast liberal who actually signed a gun ban.

This should be pointed out in any attacks in states that have good gun rights laws.

[jolynna]

Romney is a northeast liberal who actually signed a gun ban.

This should be pointed out in any attacks in states that have good gun rights laws.

On guns:

As governor, Romney quadrupled gun licensing fees.

In January 2006, Romney said he owned a gun – then two days later admitted he did not and the gunbelonged to his son.

Romney bragged about being member of the NRA but later revealed he didn’t join until August 2006, justbefore launching his presidential campaign.

Romney recently said he’s “been a hunter pretty much all my life” but later admitted he hunted only twice inhis life, later clarifying remarks by claiming he has hunted “small varmints … more than two times.”

In 2006 press conference, Romney claimed he had been hunting “many times” after returning from quail hunting.

[PolicyReader]

bump

[jolynna]

Romney on SPENDING.

The $700,000,000 Stimulus Plan Mitt Romney WON'T TALK ABOUT
http://www.salon.com/2012/02/27/the_stimulus_plan_that_romney_forgot/

Romney: 'I know HOW to get federal money.'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuQDLvNGM-Q

[jolynna]

Romneycare WAS THE blueprint for Obamacare. Romney, HIMSELF, was the one who ABSOLUTELY and FORCEFULLY insisted on individual mandates in Massachusetts (overriding arguments from his legislature who questioned the mandate part). It wasn't Massachusetts' Democrats who wanted mandates to force ALL to buy insurance, it was Romney HIMSELF. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8JvG9iE_is

[jolynna]

Romney Supervised Medical Testing Company Guilty Of Massive Medicare Fraud...he admits he was aware of wrongdoing and and says he fixed the problem before he sold the company.

Did he report the fraud to any authority? No.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/01/21/romney-supervised-medical-testing-company-guilty-of-massive-medicare-fraud/

[jemuf]

People should make the ads, and then they can vote with their dollars.

Google Ads are not the only way to get on tv. Talk to the Cable companies, you can buy channels in small markets or large markets, you can target a state where there's a primary coming up.

Google is the cheapest and easiest way to get on TV. I can't believe that no one on this forum has started a campaign to create a Google TV ad.

I've suggested it a couple of times to crickets. I don't know how to make content, but I would donate $ to the effort.

If no one is doing what's easy and cheap then they're not going to do something that is harder and more expensive.

[tom7126]

This is Ron Paul's moment. With Santorum out of the picture, he has a serious chance to challenge Romney in total votes. Cali ahoy

[J_White]

YES, the time is now !!
attack Romney and keep pushing the meme that he is the same as Obama !!
OFFENSE !! OFFENSE !!

[jolynna]

Mitt Romney is either bordering on crazy or is the most easily flustered and shameless person ever. (In my opinion)
Is Romney Crazy? - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZS2ga1dSSU

[PolicyReader]

YES, the time is now !!
attack Romney and keep pushing the meme that he is the same as Obama !!
OFFENSE !! OFFENSE !!
+rep

[PolicyReader]

Google is the cheapest and easiest way to get on TV. I can't believe that no one on this forum has started a campaign to create a Google TV ad.

I've suggested it a couple of times to crickets. I don't know how to make content, but I would donate $ to the effort.

If no one is doing what's easy and cheap then they're not going to do something that is harder and more expensive.
I can't create video either but I really agree that it's a good idea.

[jointhefightforfreedom]

Bump !

Definitely Need to attack bigtime !!!

We need so much negative press out there that msm can't ignore.

If people are embarrassed to say they are voting for Romney then we win !

[PolicyReader]

Romney used government subsidies and handouts to make profits in his own company and in the Olympics as well and took credit for it by pretending he was a savior and business genius.

As requested, a new comparison fact sheet with just Romney and Paul on it. Hopefully former Santorum and Gingrich supporters will read this and make the only logical conclusion about who to support.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/88814478/Paul-vs-Romney

Also for use against Mitt (http://cvrp2012.com/2012/04/11/afghanistan-war-veteran-to-romneyyoure-not-fit-to-be-commander-in-chief-of-americas-armed-forces/) (linkable too long for a hand out)

Do we have a thread to gather all our romeny related material?

Some resources :)

[coffeewithchess]

For the remainder of the states, as much of a comparison to President Obama would be great as well...remind the Fox News viewers that Romney is just like the current President, which they despise.

If I could finish my video projects without my computer sounding like it's going to explode...and without making so many edits...I would already have three finished.

[PolicyReader]

For the remainder of the states, as much of a comparison to President Obama would be great as well...remind the Fox News viewers that Romney is just like the current President, which they despise.

If I could finish my video projects without my computer sounding like it's going to explode...and without making so many edits...I would already have three finished.

Yes a three way comparison showing the similarities of Obama/Romney and the contrast to Paul.

[Paul Or Nothing II]

I've said it before & I'll say again, it's alright to attack others but we MUST present Ron Paul as the ONLY Republican that can beat Obama because Paul is the ONLY one who can snatch enough Independents & Democrats away from Obama!

Yes, Romney needs to be attacked to the fullest but remember, Romney's biggest strength is his "electability", SO WE NEED SOMEONE EVEN MORE "ELECTABLE" THAN HIM TO CUT HIS VOTES! Most people that vote for him, don't do it because they're unaware of his flip-floppiness, they vote him because they THINK that he's the only one that "can beat Obama" & this is what we need to thwart by presenting Ron Paul as the ONLY guy that CAN beat Obama, due to his appeal across political spectrum!



Anyways, here's some ammo -


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIeekoQfqVU

[thoughtomator]

Unless there's a different ace up someone's sleeve, there should be a full-on assault on Romneycare and Obamacare. Tell the GOP that if it votes Romney it is voting for Obamacare. There's no issue like it that unites everyone aligned with the GOP and it plays well with independents too.

[speciallyblend]

I've said it before & I'll say again, it's alright to attack others but we MUST present Ron Paul as the ONLY Republican that can beat Obama because Paul is the ONLY one who can snatch enough Independents & Democrats away from Obama!

Yes, Romney needs to be attacked to the fullest but remember, Romney's biggest strength is his "electability", SO WE NEED SOMEONE EVEN MORE "ELECTABLE" THAN HIM TO CUT HIS VOTES! Most people that vote for him, don't do it because they're unaware of his flip-floppiness, they vote him because they THINK that he's the only one that "can beat Obama" & this is what we need to thwart by presenting Ron Paul as the ONLY guy that CAN beat Obama, due to his appeal across political spectrum!



Anyways, here's some ammo -


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIeekoQfqVU

can you try to tackle that in 50 words? for national delegate speech? should i make a thread ? would love to see what you would write:) please im me if you do so i do not miss it:)

[speciallyblend]

Unless there's a different ace up someone's sleeve, there should be a full-on assault on Romneycare and Obamacare. Tell the GOP that if it votes Romney it is voting for Obamacare. There's no issue like it that unites everyone aligned with the GOP and it plays well with independents too.

exactly, but we should also pull out the secret plan from now until tampa:) destroy romney on issues(tonya harding style). There is only One, Ron Paul. WE CAN WIN THIS:) WAR ON ROMNEY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6T09XWRkq5M<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6T09XWRkq5M">
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6T09XWRkq5M (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6T09XWRkq5M) only one can be left standing, sorry for the pun! Ron Paul 2012

[digitaldean]

Now is the time to do this. We only have a small window of maybe 2-5 days to become the anti-Romney person in this race. Try to show how similar Mitt is to Obama in one ad. Maybe another try to show the crowds Paul gets vs Mitt with the ending being a question asking "Do republicans want to win this November?

[J_White]

agree

For the remainder of the states, as much of a comparison to President Obama would be great as well...remind the Fox News viewers that Romney is just like the current President, which they despise.

If I could finish my video projects without my computer sounding like it's going to explode...and without making so many edits...I would already have three finished.

[J_White]

correct, even the Santorum camp put out a Romney is Obama ad, why cant we do a better version of it ?
Romney wont change anything !!

http://i.imgur.com/vO2Qw.png

http://i.imgur.com/Ssear.png




Yes a three way comparison showing the similarities of Obama/Romney and the contrast to Paul.

[Freedom Patriot]

I agree attack Romney NOW!!! A lot of people are losing hope that Ron Paul will still be able to win the nomination for the Republican Party as time is severely ticking away.

[speciallyblend]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uq6Ax-zzkQ&ob=av2e<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uq6Ax-zzkQ&amp;ob=av2e">
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uq6Ax-zzkQ&amp;ob=av2e (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uq6Ax-zzkQ&ob=av2e)

[Dianne]

I wish Paul had the money to launch a nationwide campaign against Obama and Romney. You could almost show those two as "Twins". The time is now to get aggresive.

[Dianne]

correct, even the Santorum camp put out a Romney is Obama ad, why cant we do a better version of it ?
Romney wont change anything !!

http://i.imgur.com/vO2Qw.png

http://i.imgur.com/Ssear.png


I like that but on Obama and Romney, "more fraudulent bank foreclosures" .

[flynn]

This one always gets me.
http://home.comcast.net/~SWFLPatriot/ronpaul/Dr.Paul-quote.jpg

[armstrong]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fX3lE_PlNa4&feature=related

[armstrong]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FoDUwy8qwU

[armstrong]

get fired up

[csu1987]

My advice: Tell people that you know who are republicans how much of democrat romney is. Woo them with info.

[Paul Or Nothing II]

can you try to tackle that in 50 words? for national delegate speech? should i make a thread ? would love to see what you would write:) please im me if you do so i do not miss it:)

To be honest, neither am I that good in constructing speeches nor is brevity my strongest point, & 50 words is very short but here it is -

Ron Paul appeals to Republicans because he's for free markets, less debt, less taxes, balanced-budgets, sound money & pro-gun-rights; at the same time, Paul also appeals to Democrats & Independents because he's for civil liberties but against aggressive-wars & corporate-welfare so if Republicans want to unseat Obama then Paul is the ONLY wise choice

[Paul Or Nothing II]

correct, even the Santorum camp put out a Romney is Obama ad, why cant we do a better version of it ?
Romney wont change anything !!

http://i.imgur.com/vO2Qw.png

http://i.imgur.com/Ssear.png

+1

Great work but please consider some improvements; "protect others borders" should be contrasted with "protect our own borders", "crony capitalism" with "a real free market", bailout-lines should be adjusted against each other, & the biggest Obama-Romney thing was forgotten - Obamneycare :D

I like how they've been described as "isolationist", which would be correct usage of that word since Obamney do support sactions, & cutting trade & diplomacy with nations, which IS isolationism

[ClydeCoulter]

get fired up

Get Active :D

Go To RPF Web Warriors Current Tasks and see how YOU can help, there are tasks for everyone there to get involved.

[PreDeadMan]

Now that Frothy is out will there be one last debate?

[speciallyblend]

To be honest, neither am I that good in constructing speeches nor is brevity my strongest point, & 50 words is very short but here it is -

Ron Paul appeals to Republicans because he's for free markets, less debt, less taxes, balanced-budgets, sound money & pro-gun-rights; at the same time, Paul also appeals to Democrats & Independents because he's for civil liberties but against aggressive-wars & corporate-welfare so if Republicans want to unseat Obama then Paul is the ONLY wise choice

i like it:) i am running for national but i really want to expose romney and try to draw santorum supporters over to vote for us over biggovgop establishment status quo romney. Hard to prepare until you get a vibe of the crowd! I just want folks to vote for our ron paul slate(top secret). So WE CAN WIN COLORADO. cd1 in colorado has a strong chance to win:) funny thing is they are gonna be watching me hehe. I was part of the crew that held the denver gop accountable and used the mic to call point of order oooo so radical:)

[PolicyReader]

To be honest, neither am I that good in constructing speeches nor is brevity my strongest point, & 50 words is very short but here it is -

Ron Paul appeals to Republicans because he's for free markets, less debt, less taxes, balanced-budgets, sound money & pro-gun-rights; at the same time, Paul also appeals to Democrats & Independents because he's for civil liberties but against aggressive-wars & corporate-welfare so if Republicans want to unseat Obama then Paul is the ONLY wise choice
+rep

[jolynna]

For the Record: Mitt Romney Is Obama - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyolbpbeAMI&feature=youtu.be

[alucard13mmfmj]

Now that Frothy is out will there be one last debate?

lol, i dunno if we should use his nickname anymore.. =s

there probably wont be a debate, unless Ron and/or Newt calls Romney out on national TV

[withronnow]

Now that Frothy is out will there be one last debate?

I'm going for Paul now Santorum is out, but I don't get why so many people insult him personally with that name. It isn't proper or mature.

[alucard13mmfmj]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olILVp-J7Y8

[jolynna]

Romney: 'I'm not going to WASTE time checking on Ben Bernacke.'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mirnaaG3WFk&feature=youtu.be

IF you LOVE the way Bernacke is handling the economy choose Romney or Obama.

In my opinion.

[Paul Or Nothing II]

I'm going for Paul now Santorum is out, but I don't get why so many people insult him personally with that name. It isn't proper or mature.

Well, insults are nothing compared to the fact that he wants to kill people, take away their liberties & privacy by use of government force!

May be it's not nice but then people should have freedom of speech & others should avail their freedom to ignore that which they find distasteful!

I've seen people say all sorts of stuff about Paul too, I just ignore it a lot of times! That's life!

[Paul Or Nothing II]

i like it:) i am running for national but i really want to expose romney and try to draw santorum supporters over to vote for us over biggovgop establishment status quo romney. Hard to prepare until you get a vibe of the crowd! I just want folks to vote for our ron paul slate(top secret). So WE CAN WIN COLORADO. cd1 in colorado has a strong chance to win:) funny thing is they are gonna be watching me hehe. I was part of the crew that held the denver gop accountable and used the mic to call point of order oooo so radical:)

As I've said before, most of the "Romney-vote" is basically "anti-Obama-vote" by those who think he's "most electable" & "can beat Obama"; and "Santorum-vote" is basically "anti-Obamney-vote" as they're mostly conservatives who realize that Romney IS Obama so again, it all comes down to BEATING OBAMA

And that's why presenting Ron Paul as the ONLY one that can beat Obama is what we MUST do, Ron will snatch away quite a chunk of Obama's "peace-bloc" as well as civil-liberties-bloc; while since Romney IS Obama, there's no point in Republican Party nominating him, that will greatly disenfranchise significant numbers of Republican-voters as many are already expressing their dislike for establishment & media shoving Romney down Republicans' throats & that will ENSURE a loss for the Repubs & another Obama-term :(

[jolynna]

I'm going for Paul now Santorum is out, but I don't get why so many people insult him personally with that name. It isn't proper or mature.

Welcome withronnow!!!!!!!! Glad to have you!

and + rep for your comment

[kkzoog]

I'm going for Paul now Santorum is out, but I don't get why so many people insult him personally with that name. It isn't proper or mature.

Ron has been called all sort of names too.... just ignore all that and work on what matters.

[jolynna]

The BEST video I'VE found about Romney and NDAA. Shows Mitt being asked about it twice and HOW he responded:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4b80VZjzEw&feature=youtu.be

[jolynna]

This got retweeted a LOT.

My records as Governor are gone. I ordered staff to destroy computer hard drives after buying them for $100,000. http://reut.rs/saIVsQ #gop

[jolynna]

Going through my notes and tweets, Romney has NOT been vetted by the media at all.

Between taking millions of dollars from horrible billionaire Paul Singer that stole money from dying cancer patients and that blackmailed starving people in the Congo, being like Obama economically (except he wants to spend a trillion more on the Pentagon annually) in favoring federal spending for EVERYTHING (especially bailing out TBTF banks), being a Big Brother on Steroids that has been attacked dozens of times by the ACLU for his domestic spying while governor and that STILL owns and backs spy centers, to wanting to end internet freedom, to backing torture and secret prisons and unlimited detention...I don't see how ANYBODY could vote for Romney.

The ONLY thing Romney has going for him is that Obama is also guilty of most of the above. So neither Romney OR Obama can call out the other for the things that SHOULD matter.

Sad.

In my opinion.

[Ivash]

Well, insults are nothing compared to the fact that he wants to kill people, take away their liberties & privacy by use of government force!

May be it's not nice but then people should have freedom of speech & others should avail their freedom to ignore that which they find distasteful!

I've seen people say all sorts of stuff about Paul too, I just ignore it a lot of times! That's life!

You catch more flies with honey than with vinegar.

[PolicyReader]

I'm going for Paul now Santorum is out, but I don't get why so many people insult him personally with that name. It isn't proper or mature.

Ron has been called all sort of names too.... just ignore all that and work on what matters.

Welcome withronnow!!!!!!!! Glad to have you!

and + rep for your comment
^This covers it from my corner. Welcome to the forums withronnow.

[PolicyReader]

https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/530366_338478152877216_114364638621903_887804_1966 70668_n.jpg

[parocks]

I'm going for Paul now Santorum is out, but I don't get why so many people insult him personally with that name. It isn't proper or mature.

There's no point to it now either. Santorum is out of the race. We really should be welcoming to supporters of everybody. Except Romney.

So, attack Romney, and don't be nasty about anybody else but Romney.

[jmdrake]

Even his "Big Texas" ad is really gentle to Romney. He slams Santorum as a debt ceiling raising liberal, Gingrich as a moon colony, and Romney....a Massachusetts Moderate???

Well to be fair he did throw in an "etch-a-sketch" reference. But his earlier ad where he attacking Gingrich and Santorum for "playing with toys" in reference to their etch-a-sketch stump speeches kind of mutes that a bit. The etch-a-sketch should have drawn a picture of Romney.

[parocks]

As I've said before, most of the "Romney-vote" is basically "anti-Obama-vote" by those who think he's "most electable" & "can beat Obama"; and "Santorum-vote" is basically "anti-Obamney-vote" as they're mostly conservatives who realize that Romney IS Obama so again, it all comes down to BEATING OBAMA

And that's why presenting Ron Paul as the ONLY one that can beat Obama is what we MUST do, Ron will snatch away quite a chunk of Obama's "peace-bloc" as well as civil-liberties-bloc; while since Romney IS Obama, there's no point in Republican Party nominating him, that will greatly disenfranchise significant numbers of Republican-voters as many are already expressing their dislike for establishment & media shoving Romney down Republicans' throats & that will ENSURE a loss for the Repubs & another Obama-term :(

"And that's why presenting Ron Paul as the ONLY one that can beat Obama is what we MUST do,"

Or, attack Romney, pointing out all the things about Romney that make him not electable.

Romney is unelectable because ___________ .

[Maltheus]

The etch-a-sketch should have drawn a picture of Romney.

A picture of Romney with the Constitution. The etch-sketch zooms in on the Constitution, and the question is asked, "hasn't this already been shaken up enough?"

[jolynna]

Mitt Romney is unelectable because he is FINE with HIGH GAS PRICES - http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/101946/mitt-romney-massachusetts-governor-gas-prices-renewable-energy
(Responsible for Massachusetts gas tax hike in 2003)

Romney is unelectable because he lies. About EVERYTHING. All the time - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fP849AIu6o&feature=youtu.be

If Obama is unelectable because his "progressive" views make him too much of a socialist/communist, Mitt Romney is unelectable because he holds enough of the same views to be a card carrying member of the SAME PARTY...or he DID when it was to his benefit. The fight with Bill O'Reilly in this video about why Romneycare in Massachusetts DESERVED a $450 million FEDERAL BAILOUT is pretty good - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OQoBxZZPqU&feature=youtu.be

Mitt Romney is unelectable because he is OWNED by the WORST of Wall Street - http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-02-14/private-equity-rallies-around-mitt-romney-s-dodd-frank-cure.html

[sailingaway]

Mitt Romney is unelectable because he is FINE with HIGH GAS PRICES - http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/101946/mitt-romney-massachusetts-governor-gas-prices-renewable-energy
(Responsible for Massachusetts gas tax hike in 2003)

Romney is unelectable because he lies. About EVERYTHING. All the time - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fP849AIu6o&feature=youtu.be

If Obama is unelectable because his "progressive" views make him too much of a socialist/communist, Mitt Romney is unelectable because he holds enough of the same views to be a card carrying member of the SAME PARTY...or he DID when it was to his benefit. The fight with Bill O'Reilly in this video about why Romneycare in Massachusetts DESERVED a $450 million FEDERAL BAILOUT is pretty good - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OQoBxZZPqU&feature=youtu.be

Mitt Romney is unelectable because he is OWNED by the WORST of Wall Street - http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-02-14/private-equity-rallies-around-mitt-romney-s-dodd-frank-cure.html

I posted an unofficial ad in another thread, which is pretty good, but too long.

[jolynna]

Romney is unelectable because to this day he is defending Romneycare which HAD TO BE FEDERALLY BAILED OUT & is 50% federally funded and has resulted in Massachusetts having the highest health care costs in the nation - http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/01/26/romneys-big-healthcare-lie/

Here is a video which includes Romney arguing with Bill O'Reilly why bailing out the Massachusetts Health Care with $450 million isn't that big of a deal http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OQoBxZZPqU&feature=youtu.be

[parocks]

Mitt Romney is unelectable because he is FINE with HIGH GAS PRICES - http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/101946/mitt-romney-massachusetts-governor-gas-prices-renewable-energy
(Responsible for Massachusetts gas tax hike in 2003)

Romney is unelectable because he lies. About EVERYTHING. All the time - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fP849AIu6o&feature=youtu.be

If Obama is unelectable because his "progressive" views make him too much of a socialist/communist, Mitt Romney is unelectable because he holds enough of the same views to be a card carrying member of the SAME PARTY...or he DID when it was to his benefit. The fight with Bill O'Reilly in this video about why Romneycare in Massachusetts DESERVED a $450 million FEDERAL BAILOUT is pretty good - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OQoBxZZPqU&feature=youtu.be

Mitt Romney is unelectable because he is OWNED by the WORST of Wall Street - http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-02-14/private-equity-rallies-around-mitt-romney-s-dodd-frank-cure.html

Yeah. Property of Goldman Sachs.

Romney is the 1%. Americans don't like the 1%.

Good stuff.

[parocks]

Romney is unelectable because to this day he is defending Romneycare which HAD TO BE FEDERALLY BAILED OUT & is 50% federally funded and has resulted in Massachusetts having the highest health care costs in the nation - http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/01/26/romneys-big-healthcare-lie/

Here is a video which includes Romney arguing with Bill O'Reilly why bailing out the Massachusetts Health Care with $450 million isn't that big of a deal http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OQoBxZZPqU&feature=youtu.be

To win, we have to be able to hammer Obama on Obamacare. Romney is the ONLY Republican who can't. That makes Romney unelectable.

[coffeewithchess]

To win, we have to be able to hammer Obama on Obamacare. Romney is the ONLY Republican who can't. That makes Romney unelectable.

There's a lot of issues to hammer on...but knowing what we do so far, real issues don't matter. Romney and Obama could argue over the color of grass, and that could win/lose the election depending on the delivery style.

[J_White]

Attack Romney NOW !

[jolynna]

Romney is unelectable. No OTHER candidate, GOP or Democrat, running for POTUS scores as LOW on the ACLU Civil Liberty report card. Page 8 of http://www.aclulibertywatch.org/ALWCandidateReportCard.pdf

[jolynna]

Mitt Romney: The Man Who Likes Mandates http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/man-who-likes-mandates_634000.html

[parocks]

There's a lot of issues to hammer on...but knowing what we do so far, real issues don't matter. Romney and Obama could argue over the color of grass, and that could win/lose the election depending on the delivery style.

Well, I"m talking about making electablility arguments. Those sentences are 30 second tv spot type arguments. I'm not disputing what you're saying about grass or whatever, just saying that

"Romney can't attack Obamacare because of Romneycare"

is something that voters will believe and they will think that being unable to hurt Obama on Obamacare will make Romney less electable.

[parocks]

Who are Romney's advisors? Zakheim and Chertoff. These are Bush's foreign policy advisors. People got sick of Bush's foreign policy and that meant losses in 2006 and 2008. People are not going to vote for a return to Bush's foreign policy. That makes Romney unelectable.

[PolicyReader]

"Romney can't attack Obamacare because of Romneycare"
https://twitter.com/#!/ToddHunter4/status/190330885554442240

Done and done.

[alucard13mmfmj]

still waiting for something to happen to slam romney... yep yep.

[speciallyblend]

Well, I"m talking about making electablility arguments. Those sentences are 30 second tv spot type arguments. I'm not disputing what you're saying about grass or whatever, just saying that

"Romney can't attack Obamacare because of Romneycare"

is something that voters will believe and they will think that being unable to hurt Obama on Obamacare will make Romney less electable.

bingo don traper;)

[coffeewithchess]

Here's my latest...can make changes, and add more to it later. But getting the general layout to work, took FOREVER on my computer:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJfbeW9yIok

[PolicyReader]

Here's my latest...can make changes, and add more to it later. But getting the general layout to work, took FOREVER on my computer:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJfbeW9yIok
+rep

[parocks]

Mitt Romney is in the top 1% of the top 1%. Unacceptable to many swing voters.
#unelectable

The Super Rich don't appeal to as many voters as the Global Elites and the MSM think.
#unelectable

With Romney, expect more bailout money to Goldman Sachs. Voters don't want.
#unelectable

Conservatives hate Obama, but many Conservatives also hate Romney. Some will stay home. #unelectable

[parocks]

https://twitter.com/#!/ToddHunter4/status/190330885554442240

Done and done.

cool. You know, it wouldn't be a bad idea to spread the idea of filling up twitter with the #unelectable for Romney.

[jolynna]

Romney is unelectable because -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LoW1GIabn88&feature=related

<Short 3 minute video discussing how people vote from their gut & emotion rather than because of a politician's stances on issues and why these talking heads think Romney can't win.>

[jllundqu]

Yes. Ron's campaign NEEDS to do something right now because the dust settles from Santorum's exit. Romney is the only target now. I will be dissapointed if nothing is done.

I love Ron Paul and his message, but anyone who thinks that Ron Paul will attack the Romney Campaign is not thinking logically. I can't wait to see the convention and the total amount of delegates RP has, but this thing is all but done. The American people are too sheepish and dumb... they will be RUNNING to Romney's camp now.

Don't get me wrong, I am forking over even more for the 4/15 Money Bomb, but the Paul campaign doesn't have the balls to attack anyone now. They know its over.

[coffeewithchess]

I love Ron Paul and his message, but anyone who thinks that Ron Paul will attack the Romney Campaign is not thinking logically. I can't wait to see the convention and the total amount of delegates RP has, but this thing is all but done. The American people are too sheepish and dumb... they will be RUNNING to Romney's camp now.

Don't get me wrong, I am forking over even more for the 4/15 Money Bomb, but the Paul campaign doesn't have the balls to attack anyone now. They know its over.

Honest question...
If RP's campaign is not attacking Romney, why do they need money? RP staying in the race does not require much money at all, as he is already on the ballots in all the states.
If this is a delegate strategy, most of that is coming from the grassroots now.

So, the campaign either needs to bring down the full weight of the Constitution upon Romney's Big Government Self via ads, or RP needs to simply thank his supporters...continue to go around the country talking/spreading the message, and put the money/efforts from grassroots to candidates elsewhere now.

[jolynna]

Mitt Romney is unelectable because he has anger issues. Is this who you want controlling a NUCLEAR DETONATOR?>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dwpc-hCNUSY&feature=related

[jllundqu]

Honest question...
If RP's campaign is not attacking Romney, why do they need money? RP staying in the race does not require much money at all, as he is already on the ballots in all the states.
If this is a delegate strategy, most of that is coming from the grassroots now.

So, the campaign either needs to bring down the full weight of the Constitution upon Romney's Big Government Self via ads, or RP needs to simply thank his supporters...continue to go around the country talking/spreading the message, and put the money/efforts from grassroots to candidates elsewhere now.

^^^^THIS^^^^

[tommyrp12]

THE BIG DIG ! http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?344112-the-BIG-DIG

[tommyrp12]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQTZL_6_B14

[jolynna]

I love Ron Paul and his message, but anyone who thinks that Ron Paul will attack the Romney Campaign is not thinking logically. I can't wait to see the convention and the total amount of delegates RP has, but this thing is all but done. The American people are too sheepish and dumb... they will be RUNNING to Romney's camp now.

Don't get me wrong, I am forking over even more for the 4/15 Money Bomb, but the Paul campaign doesn't have the balls to attack anyone now. They know its over.

No anti-unprovoked war or pro-liberty candidate should EVER stand by silently without PROTEST when the potential leader beats the drums for starting WWIII and says he supports stripping Americans of their liberties.

“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
― Ron Paul

For Ron Paul to say nothing would be a nod of approval about what SHOULD MATTER MOST, according to everything Ron Paul has said or written. Whether he wins or loses the nomination, Ron Paul has to speak out against assaults on life and civil liberty.

In my opinion.

[PolicyReader]

This could be useful

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVRtO7RxiuE

[PolicyReader]

https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/562544_418085531552335_110312852329606_1537584_163 7063707_n.jpg

[J_White]

There is a thread in the so-called Campaign Suggestion Box about attacking Romney,
please make your views heard in that thread also - maybe the campaign will take some action on it.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?371378-ATTN-CAMPAIGN-Please-act-ASAP-to-draw-a-sharp-contrast-between-Mitt-and-Ron

[floridasun1983]

Honest question...
If RP's campaign is not attacking Romney, why do they need money? RP staying in the race does not require much money at all, as he is already on the ballots in all the states.
If this is a delegate strategy, most of that is coming from the grassroots now.

So, the campaign either needs to bring down the full weight of the Constitution upon Romney's Big Government Self via ads, or RP needs to simply thank his supporters...continue to go around the country talking/spreading the message, and put the money/efforts from grassroots to candidates elsewhere now.That's the real question. If Ron doesn't attack Romeny now then we have to wonder if we've been strung along, because this is it.

[Paul Or Nothing II]

"And that's why presenting Ron Paul as the ONLY one that can beat Obama is what we MUST do,"

Or, attack Romney, pointing out all the things about Romney that make him not electable.

Romney is unelectable because ___________ .

Making Romney seem less electable doesn't necessarily make Ron more electable; but making Ron seem more electable would make him seem more electable!

I'm not saying, we shouldn't attack, I'm just saying that the PRIMARY FOCUS should be on bringing out Ron's better electability over others due to his appeal across the political spectrum because media has the mainstreamers brainwashed to think he's unelectable so if it's left uncountered then they'll continue to perceive him in the same light irrespective of how much Romney is attacked

Bottomline is most want Obama out, so tell them how Ron CAN beat Obama!

[jolynna]

Bottomline is most want Obama out, so tell them how Ron CAN beat Obama!

I think we've got to do BOTH!

Hillary didn't hesitate to point out that Obama wouldn't be the best person to answer a 2 a.m. call. Ron Paul shouldn't hesitate to point out his opponents shortcomings either.

Many don't like Romney,just because of a gut feeling, but they rationalize that because he seems like a weak person he won't be dangerous. Since the mainstream is saying Ron Paul has radical ideas and Romney comes across as bland and is only dissed because he is a flip-flopper (that doesn't sound very scary), the uncomfortable feelings people get from Romney's persona get pushed down and people vote for what they think is safe.

That Romney is bland/safe needs to be dispelled. He would be a scary and dangerous president, just like Obama, with his push for war and stripping American citizens of their liberties. Plus both Obama and Romney would prop up the TBTF banks in a heartbeat (http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/banking-financial-institutions/219505-romney-im-not-looking-to-break-up-big-banks) and debt would continue to pile up to the point of no return.

I think Ron Paul's PLUSES need to be pushed. Many don't know of Ron Paul's electability and that MOST EVERY economic expert agrees that Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate who grasps the desperation of the situation America faces. Or that he's the only one who HAS a viable plan to fix the mess we are in.

I think people can't get ENOUGH information. They need to know why it IS in their best interest to vote for Ron Paul because of what he wants to do. And, people also need to know of the bad consequences that come with their "other" choices.


In my opinion.

[Paul Or Nothing II]

I think we've got to do BOTH!

Hillary didn't hesitate to point out that Obama wouldn't be the best person to answer a 2 a.m. call. Ron Paul shouldn't hesitate to point out his opponents shortcomings either.

Many don't like Romney,just because of a gut feeling, but they rationalize that because he seems like a weak person he won't be dangerous. Since the mainstream is saying Ron Paul has radical ideas and Romney comes across as bland and is only dissed because he is a flip-flopper (that doesn't sound very scary), the uncomfortable feelings people get from Romney's persona get pushed down and people vote for what they think is safe.

That Romney is bland/safe needs to be dispelled. He would be a scary and dangerous president, just like Obama, with his push for war and stripping American citizens of their liberties. Plus both Obama and Romney would prop up the TBTF banks in a heartbeat (http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/banking-financial-institutions/219505-romney-im-not-looking-to-break-up-big-banks) and debt would continue to pile up to the point of no return.

I think Ron Paul's PLUSES need to be pushed. Many don't know of Ron Paul's electability and that MOST EVERY economic expert agrees that Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate who grasps the desperation of the situation America faces. Or that he's the only one who HAS a viable plan to fix the mess we are in.

I think people can't get ENOUGH information. They need to know why it IS in their best interest to vote for Ron Paul because of what he wants to do. And, people also need to know of the bad consequences that come with their "other" choices.


In my opinion.

Again, I don't have a problem with exposing Romney & pointing out how dangerous a president he'd be & how similar he's to Obama BUT the PRIORITY for us should be to dispel the "unelectability" myth that's been peddled against Ron Paul; we need to make him seem THE MOST ELECTABLE, the rest of the issues can be supplementary; if the voters see an electable conservative option then they'll jump ship & most will desert Romney anyway

We need to stop thinking like a Paul-supporter, & try to think about the general Primary voters & their thought-process, & ousting Obama IS their priority, no matter what!

[PaulSoHard]

Question: does anyone know what's going on with RevPAC these days?