PDA

View Full Version : New Microchip Knows Your Location To Within Centimeters




John F Kennedy III
04-10-2012, 01:37 PM
New Microchip Knows Your Location To Within Centimeters

Forget a chip in your forehead – the ‘mark of the beast’ is the cell phone

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Tuesday, April 10, 2012

The development of a new microchip for cell phones that knows the user’s location to within a few centimeters confirms the fact that contrary to biblical fears about mandatory implantable microchips, people have willingly exchanged their privacy for convenience and that the cell phone itself is the de facto “mark of the beast”.

http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/broadcom_chip_bcm2049.jpg

“Broadcom has just rolled out a chip for smart phones that promises to indicate location ultra-precisely, possibly within a few centimeters, vertically and horizontally, indoors and out,” reports MIT Technology Review.

“In theory, the new chip can even determine what floor of a building you’re on, thanks to its ability to integrate information from the atmospheric pressure sensor on many models of Android phones. The company calls abilities like this “ubiquitous navigation,” and the idea is that it will enable a new kind of e-commerce predicated on the fact that shopkeepers will know the moment you walk by their front door, or when you are looking at a particular product, and can offer you coupons at that instant.”

Over 82% of Americans own cell phones, with around half of these being smart phones. In the near future, the majority of Americans will own smart phones that will have the ability to track their location down to a few centimeters.

With the effort to legally establish surveillance drones as a legitimate tool in domestic law enforcement, authorities could save a lot of time and money by simply requesting cell phone companies provide real-time tracking of suspects via their smart phones.

Indeed, Apple, Google and Microsoft have all been caught secretly tracking the physical locations of their users and saving that information to a file. How long is it before such data is instantly available to law enforcement bodies on demand, just as governments are legislating that ISPs and cell phone companies divulge our web browsing histories, email, texts and call information?

Biblical fears about the ‘mark of the beast’ being an implantable microchip forcibly injected into our foreheads have proven to be off base. Coercion was not necessary because people have been enticed into willingly giving up their privacy for convenience.

Indeed, paranoia about not being able to buy or sell without the ‘mark’ is now coming full circle with the increasing use of cell phones as payment gateways linked to credit cards.

Peer pressure and cultural brainwashing has also played a role – someone who doesn’t own a cell phone will find it almost impossible to operate in the modern world unless they live like a recluse or make a living by running a farm in the middle of nowhere.

The ‘Internet of things’ – where every appliance is connected to the world wide web – has been hailed by spooks as a green light for ubiquitous panopticon-style surveillance of the individual.

Broadcom’s new microchip will also make it easier for industry to accelerate plans to use Minority Report-style targeted advertising against consumers.

“The use case [for Bluetooth beacons] might be malls,” says Scott Pomerantz, vice president of the GPS division at Broadcom,. “It would be a good investment for a mall to put up a deployment—perhaps put them up every 100 yards, and then unlock the ability for people walking around mall to get very precise couponing information.”

The only way that technology can advance without destroying basic human rights in the process is if strong new legislation is passed increasing the penalties against both industry and government for using such technology to spy on users. However, the opposite is happening, with each new technological leap being dovetailed by aggressive efforts on behalf of the state to eviscerate what little privacy rights we have left.


original article here:
http://www.infowars.com/new-microchip-knows-your-location-to-within-centimeters/

azxd
04-10-2012, 02:06 PM
The only way that technology can advance without destroying basic human rights in the process is if strong new legislation is passed increasing the penalties against both industry and government for using such technology to spy on users.

Paul Joseph Watson of InfoWars advocating for larger government.

angelatc
04-10-2012, 02:09 PM
You know, if I wanted to read every single article that Infowars published, I'd actually read Infowars.

brandon
04-10-2012, 02:09 PM
Man, I hate being loosely associated with these paranoid technophobes. This is the kind of thing that needs to be shunned by the libertarian movement.

John F Kennedy III
04-10-2012, 02:27 PM
Paul Joseph Watson of InfoWars advocating for larger government.

:rolleyes:

Lishy
04-10-2012, 02:28 PM
You know, if I wanted to read every single article that Infowars published, I'd actually read Infowars.
This.

Infowars links the articles they site, supposedly. Link those things instead of infowars!

John F Kennedy III
04-10-2012, 02:28 PM
You know, if I wanted to read every single article that Infowars published, I'd actually read Infowars.

Yet you waste time posting in InfoWars threads?

John F Kennedy III
04-10-2012, 02:29 PM
Man, I hate being loosely associated with these paranoid technophobes. This is the kind of thing that needs to be shunned by the libertarian movement.

LOL. What a joke.

The AJ haters are out in force today. Keep the laughs coming guys.

John F Kennedy III
04-10-2012, 02:30 PM
This.

Infowars links the articles they site, supposedly. Link those things instead of infowars!

Why?

brandon
04-10-2012, 02:39 PM
LOL. What a joke.

The AJ haters are out in force today. Keep the laughs coming guys.

The first paragraph essentially says " A new microchip is the mark of the beast"

Come on man....really? Do you think transistors are reptilian eggs too?

TexanRudeBoy
04-10-2012, 02:50 PM
Why?

Because they're tabloidy, sensationalized headlines that are often nothing like the facts read. Tons of fear mongering and profiteering.

seraphson
04-10-2012, 03:45 PM
Well. My frank and honest position on "Smart" phones is they're yet another rather useless shitty gadget that tries to substitue already existing technologies that do the job better. I do however understand with utmost sincerity that we need something to blow these abundant FRNs on. I mean, if we didn't buy all this stupid useless shit how else would we meet the perpetual growth and debt that's required to keep our debt-based monetary system going?

DamianTV
04-10-2012, 07:05 PM
Man, I hate being loosely associated with these paranoid technophobes. This is the kind of thing that needs to be shunned by the libertarian movement.

It isnt the technology itself that bothers me. It is how it is being used.

When Gene Roddenberry first invisioned the Star Trek Tricorder, I never once imagined it not only being available within my lifetime, but being used to tell others information about me that I didnt give them permission to have.