PDA

View Full Version : $5 Trillion Tax Hike Coming




John F Kennedy III
04-09-2012, 01:38 PM
$5 Trillion Tax Hike Coming

Bob Adelman
thenewamerican.com
April 9, 2012

Back in February when the Congress voted to extend the payroll tax “holiday” to the end of the year, the Washington Post was the first to notice the tsunami of tax increases coming next year. But then Lori Montgomery began to add up all the other taxes that will increase on January 1, 2013, and called it “Taxmageddon.”

Here is a partial list of taxes that will increase unless Congress intervenes:
• The 2001 and 2003 Bush “tax cuts” expire
• Taxes on investment income
• Estate and gift taxes
• Income taxes
• Marriage penalty returns
• Child credit drops
• Taxes on first $8700 of wages increase by 50 percent
• Payroll taxes go from 4.2 percent back to 6.2 percent

But that is only a start. The Heritage Foundation did an in-depth analysis of all the tax increases scheduled for next year and found that Lori forgot some:
• The Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) will increase in size and reach
• Five new Obamacare taxes will start
• Some 50 “tax extenders” will go away
• Small business owners can no longer write off business equipment purchases immediately

Adding them all together, the total is $500 billion. And that’s just in 2013. Over the next decade, the tax increases will exceed $5 trillion.

The effect of this tidal wave is already having a dampening effect on the economy. Curtis Dubay, the author of the Heritage study, wrote:

Families, businesses, and investors need to know how much tax they will pay in the future before making important economic decisions. The uncertainty caused by Taxmageddon means they are stuck in neutral while they wait for President Obama and Congress to act. This is slowing job creation and stopping many of the millions of unemployed Americans from going back to work.

Sucking half a trillion dollars out of the economy is going to have a severe negative impact on growth. Mark Zandi of Moody’s Analytics estimates that the nation’s GDP (Gross Domestic Product) would be reduced by at least three percent. Considering that current estimates of growth are less than that, these tax hikes could push the economy back into recession.

And then there’s the IRS and its problems. If Congress changes nothing, the IRS is fully prepared with the new rules and rates and forms. But if Congress waits until the last possible moment to address the issue, then, according to IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman, “you could have a real disaster in the filing season where there’s total confusion.” Few have much sympathy for any problems the IRS might have, but it’s possible that the tax filing date scheduled for April of 2013 might have to be pushed back, exacerbating the deficit because of the delay in collecting the taxes.

Politically, President Obama thinks he is holding the ace of spades: He has said he will veto any bill that extends the Bush tax cuts unless those cuts are eliminated for the highest income earners. White House Deputy Press Secretary Amy Brundage said, “The president has made clear that he will veto any bill that extends the Bush-era tax rates for the wealthiest 2 percent of individuals.” Liberal Senator Charles Shumer (D-N.Y.) said that “politically it’s going to be very harmful [for the Republicans] to say, ‘I’m not for something like the Buffet Rule’, when even 60 percent of Republicans are for it.”

And then there’s the debt ceiling, currently at $16.4 trillion. With government spending continuing out of control, that limit could be reached before November, forcing Congress to address the issue. The last time Congress extended the debt ceiling it almost shut down the government before a spending-cut compromise was enacted at the last minute.

If the issue can be delayed until after the election, then a “lame duck” Congress will be forced to deal with it. And if the President is reelected, then he holds all the cards: no more pressure from citizens to get in his way and a Congress stymied in its ability to bring sanity and respect for the Constitution back into play. If the President isn’t reelected, he has little motivation to make things easier for the incoming Congress or for the taxpayer.


article here:
http://www.infowars.com/5-trillion-tax-hike-coming/

originally here:
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/congress/11442-5-trillion-tax-hike-coming

KingNothing
04-09-2012, 04:02 PM
Adding them all together, the total is $500 billion. And that’s just in 2013. Over the next decade, the tax increases will exceed $5 trillion.



And over the next century, the tax increases will exceed $50 trillion!

*panics*

*bangs pots and pans*

*runs and hides*




Taxes will probably go up a little. You're being silly if you think that Barry and this Democratic Party will be known as Those Who Made the Middle Class Pay Significantly More. It won't happen. If taxes actually do increase, it will come after brutal demagoging, class-warfare and panderng to the have-nots.

CaptainAmerica
04-09-2012, 04:04 PM
http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110717203319/adventuretimewithfinnandjake/images/e/ee/Tumblr_lizif2cnPn1qi7hkko1_500.gif

nothing makes sense anymore...

Danke
04-09-2012, 04:10 PM
And over the next century, the tax increases will exceed $50 trillion!

*panics*

*bangs pots and pans*

*runs and hides*




Taxes will probably go up a little. You're being silly if you think that Barry and this Democratic Party will be known as Those Who Made the Middle Class Pay Significantly More. It won't happen. If taxes actually do increase, it will come after brutal demagoging, class-warfare and panderng to the have-nots.

Don't forget the inflation tax.

Philosophy_of_Politics
04-09-2012, 04:54 PM
Lol. They think they're going to actually be able to collect it from me. Poor souls.

You can't collect taxes on spending I never approved of.

John F Kennedy III
04-09-2012, 04:55 PM
Don't forget the inflation tax.

And coming soon....carbon tax.

matt0611
04-09-2012, 04:58 PM
$5 Trillion Tax Hike Coming

Bob Adelman
thenewamerican.com
April 9, 2012

Back in February when the Congress voted to extend the payroll tax “holiday” to the end of the year, the Washington Post was the first to notice the tsunami of tax increases coming next year. But then Lori Montgomery began to add up all the other taxes that will increase on January 1, 2013, and called it “Taxmageddon.”

Here is a partial list of taxes that will increase unless Congress intervenes:
• The 2001 and 2003 Bush “tax cuts” expire
• Taxes on investment income
• Estate and gift taxes
• Income taxes
• Marriage penalty returns
• Child credit drops
• Taxes on first $8700 of wages increase by 50 percent
• Payroll taxes go from 4.2 percent back to 6.2 percent

But that is only a start. The Heritage Foundation did an in-depth analysis of all the tax increases scheduled for next year and found that Lori forgot some:
• The Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) will increase in size and reach
• Five new Obamacare taxes will start
• Some 50 “tax extenders” will go away
• Small business owners can no longer write off business equipment purchases immediately


Would someone kindly explain what changes are being made to the above bolded categories?

gerryb
04-09-2012, 05:05 PM
Would someone kindle explain what changes are being made to the above bolded categories?

Sure -- it's all in the IRS code -- just gotta read the 13,000 pages before they update it next year :D

John F Kennedy III
04-09-2012, 08:17 PM
This is crazy.

phill4paul
04-09-2012, 08:25 PM
Why even put a number on anything at this point?

Seraphim
04-09-2012, 08:44 PM
Central planners need far reaching $$ stats to create their models of economic control.


Why even put a number on anything at this point?

Pauls' Revere
04-09-2012, 08:57 PM
Time to barter.

Pauls' Revere
04-09-2012, 10:39 PM
Looks like Obamacare will hike up the deficit too and will be higher than originally forecast. Gee what a surprise!

http://news.yahoo.com/study-obamas-health-care-law-raise-deficit-025042189.html

Officially, the health care law is still projected to help reduce government red ink. The Congressional Budget Office, the government's non-partisan fiscal umpire, said in an estimate last year that repealing the law actually would increase deficits by $210 billion from 2012-2021.

The CBO, however, has not updated that projection. If $210 billion sounds like a big cushion, it's not. The government has recently been running annual deficits in the $1 trillion range.

The White house dismissed the study in a statement late Monday. Presidential assistant Jeanne Lambrew called the study "new math (that) fits the old pattern of mischaracterizations" about the health care law.

Blahous, in his 52-page analysis released by George Mason University's Mercatus Center, said, "Taken as a whole, the enactment of the (health care law) has substantially worsened a dire federal fiscal outlook.

DamianTV
04-10-2012, 02:07 AM
Why even put a number on anything at this point?

The numbers dont have any actual meaning because they dont reflect anything of value any more. The "Numbers Game" we see going on is just a Dog and Pony Show intended to make people Worry and Entertain the masses. The Numbers are more akin to doing Magic. Magic is based on Illusion, Misdirection and Perception. If they dont report the Numbers, the Illusion disappears and we can then see the man standing behind the curtain that we are not supposed to pay any attention to, only this time, he isnt going to give the Cowardly Lion Courage, the Tin Man a Heart, or the Scarecrow a Brain.

Liberty74
04-10-2012, 05:52 AM
And coming soon....carbon tax.

Let's just name that the anti-human leftist tax since basically it's a tax on life.

Bearice
04-10-2012, 07:08 AM
Paying Taxes in similar to giving a Gun to a monkey. The monkey will fire the gun anywhere.

JorgeStevenson
04-10-2012, 11:28 AM
Would someone kindly explain what changes are being made to the above bolded categories?

Off the top of my head -

Bush tax cuts, which are set to expire, did the following:

- Lowered capital gains rate to 15% or 0% depending on your income, lowered taxes on dividends to your capital gains rate rather than your ordinary income marginal tax rate
- Significantly increased the federal AEA (applicable exclusion amount) for the federal estate tax
- Lowered marginal tax rates across the board

The AEA for the estate tax is essentially the amount of money your estate can have without triggering the estate tax. If the Bush tax cuts expire, the AEA is going to be pretty ridiculously low (i.e. $1M), and you are going to see a lot of upper-middle income families having to pay the estate tax. Right now, the AEA is around $5M.

Estate tax is already a ridiculous concept. It taxes things that you've already been taxed on - i.e. the wealth you've built through your income & capital gains, your real estate, life insurance proceeds, etc. The truly wealthy hardly pay any estate tax, as it can be avoided through careful maneuvering of assets through various trusts. The federal government generates very little revenue from the estate tax. We definitely don't need to be having upper-middle class families wasting their nest eggs on estate planners.

seraphson
04-10-2012, 12:02 PM
Why even put a number on anything at this point?

Indeed. I think we should replace the $ symbol for ∞.

Zippyjuan
04-10-2012, 04:02 PM
Want some more numbers?

$500 billion would get you half way to a balanced budget (this year's expected shortfall is estimated to be just under $1 trillion) if those numbers are correct. If spending stays where it is now and those tax changes don't occur we will add $10 trillion to the debt in the next 10 years- taking us to $25 trillion (a 67% increase).