Bad piece: FOX LOL: Where's Ron Paul?

[soulcyon]

foxnews.com/politics/2012/04/04/paul-campaign-making-fewer-stops-but-still-rolling/

The Ron Paul "revolution" has gotten awfully quiet.
The Republican presidential candidate, whose past two bids for the presidency turned him into a cult hero among college students and libertarians alike, appears to be winding down on the trail. His operation went dark for a total of 18 days last month, holding no campaign events. So far this month, he's held just one.


lmao @ fox. They conveniently ignore the 30+ campus stops that RP has scheduled.

Don't even bother clicking, I'm just posting this as a record to how hard the MSM tries to shut out RP.

[ShaneEnochs]

Someone ought to write a letter.

Or a thousand.

[sailingaway]

Where is he? At Chico:

http://distilleryimage9.instagram.com/149e2ad07e0011e1989612313815112c_7.jpg

The question is, where is FOX?

[FSP-Rebel]

Ron's told the press a thousand times that he's working on a delegate strategy. Sooooo, in this interim his staff and volunteers are working on getting the supporters out to the conventions. But, ah yes, Fox and co aren't reporting on the convention outcomes. Heads up Fox! He's campaigning in Cali right now and you can still make it if you get your head out of your ass.

[Constitutional Paulicy]

http://profy.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/images/phil1/2/mademoticon.gif

[Jingles]

Where is he? At Chico:

http://distilleryimage9.instagram.com/149e2ad07e0011e1989612313815112c_7.jpg

The question is, where is FOX?

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++"You cannot give Reputation to the same post twice"

[chudrockz]

Too late, I already had searched Ron Paul on google and clicked it. SIGH.

I've reached a conclusion: these hit pieces, their authors, and their authors' bosses, are not guilty of sloppy reporting. They're not guilty of factual errors. They are LYING. They are, in fact, guilty of treason.

[TruckinMike]

Too late, I already had searched Ron Paul on google and clicked it. SIGH.

I've reached a conclusion: these hit pieces, their authors, and their authors' bosses, are not guilty of sloppy reporting. They're not guilty of factual errors. They are LYING. They are, in fact, guilty of treason.As already stated in another post of mine: I'll smile when I hear that they have been found guilty of treason, but I'll cheer when I see their limp bodies dangling from a noose. Normally I'm anti-death penalty, but in the case of media and government employees I'll compromise my principles --- you know, like they do.:)

[mike6623]

They keep saying he has never won a primary, did he not win the virgin islands popular vote?

[Weston White]

Well, can you really blame the constant state of confusion of the MSM? I mean Rep. Ron Paul, MD is fairly difficult to see when he’s surrounded by all those tens-of-thousands of adoring supporters at most all of his events.

[Bnewfield]

I'm sure Ron Paul could get more media coverage if he would compromise his values in exchange for corporate money (like all the bigger candidates do) but he has INTEGRITY.

[kahless]

foxnews.com/politics/2012/04/04/paul-campaign-making-fewer-stops-but-still-rolling/


lmao @ fox. They conveniently ignore the 30+ campus stops that RP has scheduled.

Don't even bother clicking, I'm just posting this as a record to how hard the MSM tries to shut out RP.

I am hoping the Foxnews mole can tell who is writing these anti-Paul propaganda pieces.