Paul's Record as Dr. No Speaks for Itself

[kathy88]

What better conservative to hold presidential veto powers than "Dr. No"? It's true that Paul doesn't fit the traditional mold of a Republican nominee for president. Good. We expect our Republicans to be beholden to the Kristolites and embrace the refrain that well-tailored Brooks Brothers digestibility trumps the record. Then we nominate the wrong candidates.


http://www.jsonline.com/news/opinion/pauls-record-as-dr-no-speaks-for-itself-5i4pbeo-145232195.html

[kathy88]

As for the criticism that Kristol - and so many others - have of Paul's foreign policy, I offer Paul's own words: "I am convinced that there are more threats to American liberty within the 10-mile radius of my office on Capitol Hill than there are on the rest of the globe."

I am, too. Let Mitt Romney run against Mahmoud Ahmadinejad; Ron Paul should have your vote to run against Barack Obama.

Loved this article.