PDA

View Full Version : Rick Santorum t’s clear that Santorum, Perry, and Huntsman have the strongest animal protection records.




sailingaway
03-15-2012, 05:58 PM
Ron's is dismal.

Mind you, he usually has good reason, for example despite their statement that he voted against a ban on animal crush videos what he voted AGAINST was restriction of speech. The ACT wasn't being forbidden, the video was.

http://www.ammoland.com/2012/03/15/presidential-candidates-as-rated-by-the-antis/#axzz1pEVWOIfh


Rick Santorum: Of all the candidates who have served in Congress, Santorum was arguably the most active on animal protection issues. He earned a 60 percent on the Humane Scorecard for the 108th Congress and an 80 percent for the 109th Congress. But more importantly, he was the lead sponsor of the Pet Animal Welfare Statute (PAWS) to crack down on large-scale commercial puppy mills, and held a hearing on the bill when he was the chairman of the Senate Agriculture Committee’s Subcommittee on Research, Nutrition and General Legislation. He was also a leader in the Senate urging adequate funding for the enforcement of the Animal Welfare Act, Humane Methods of Slaughter Act, the federal animal fighting law, and other animal welfare programs. He cosponsored legislation to establish federal felony penalties for dogfighting and cockfighting, cosponsored legislation to require the addition of a bittering agent to antifreeze and engine coolant to prevent the poisoning of pets, and voted to stop the slaughter of American horses for food exports.
It’s clear that Santorum, Perry, and Huntsman (also reviewed) have the strongest animal protection records. They showed leadership and active support for our issues, and HSLF commends them for their past performance. Bachmann and Paul have demonstrated a consistent hostility or indifference to these concerns. Romney has largely been indifferent and has not been an active supporter. Gingrich has been a bit enigmatic, but he understands the power of the human-animal bond and has taken action to protect some of the most charismatic species.”—Source: http://hslf.typepad.com/political_animal/2011/12.


Read more at Ammoland.com: http://www.ammoland.com/2012/03/15/presidential-candidates-as-rated-by-the-antis/#ixzz1pEX5tDN0

James Madison
03-15-2012, 06:21 PM
lol @ Ron being 'hostile' towards animals because he doesn't think it's the state's job to regulate such things...the state must do something because the mundanes are too stupid to figure it out!

What a crock.

Anti Federalist
03-15-2012, 07:07 PM
Wow, there's nothing that these guys don't want to control.

specsaregood
03-15-2012, 07:11 PM
Wow, there's nothing that these guys don't want to control.

And more importantly, that there is nowhere that they don't want to control it. for those talking about fleeing, you have nowhere to hide.

Anti Federalist
03-15-2012, 07:17 PM
And more importantly, that there is nowhere that they don't want to control it. for those talking about fleeing, you have nowhere to hide.

Absolutely correct.

They assert worldwide, unilateral, US "do to" rights.

They can extradite you, jail you or incinerate you via drone attack, anywhere on the face of the earth, anytime they please.