PDA

View Full Version : LoL - Fighting fascism with fascism.




Anti Federalist
03-11-2012, 12:44 PM
LOL - Irony is dead, it really is.

Jane Fonda using military readiness and effectiveness to prove her point.

Mecha, epic, massive, facepalm.




FCC should clear Limbaugh from airwaves

http://edition.cnn.com/2012/03/10/opinion/fonda-morgan-steinem-limbaugh/

By Jane Fonda, Robin Morgan and Gloria Steinem, Special to CNN
March 10, 2012 -- Updated 1845 GMT (0245 HKT)

Editor's note: Jane Fonda, Robin Morgan, and Gloria Steinem are the Co-Founders of the Women's Media Center.

(CNN) -- Ironically, the misogyny Rush Limbaugh spewed for three days over Sandra Fluke was not much worse than his regular broadcast of sexist, racist and homophobic hate speech:

--Women cabinet members are "Sex-retaries."

--"The NAACP should have riot rehearsal. They should get a liquor store and practice robberies."

--The National Organization for Women is "a bunch of whores to liberalism."

--[Said to an African American female caller]: "Take that bone out of your nose and call me back."

These are just a few samples from the arsenal of degrading language Limbaugh deploys on women, people of color, lesbians and gays, immigrants, the disabled, the elderly, Muslims, Jews, veterans, environmentalists and so forth.

Limbaugh doesn't just call people names. He promotes language that deliberately dehumanizes his targets. Like the sophisticated propagandist Josef Goebbels, he creates rhetorical frames -- and the bigger the lie the more effective -- inciting listeners to view people they disagree with as sub-humans. His longtime favorite term for women, "femi-nazi," doesn't even raise eyebrows anymore, an example of how rhetoric spreads when unchallenged by coarsened cultural norms.

At least this most recent incident has turned a spotlight back on the vile, damaging statements Limbaugh has been promulgating for years. His sponsors are dropping him; his stations have begun to follow suit. VoteVets, a coalition of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans, released a statement by female vets, including Katherine Scheirman, former chief of medical operations in the U.S. Air Forces, demanding that the American Forces Network drop Limbaugh from its programming.

They state, "Our entire military depends on troops respecting each other -- women and men. There simply can be no place on military airwaves for sentiments that would undermine that respect."

That makes this a fitting time to inquire of his syndicator, Clear Channel Communications, whether it intends to continue supporting someone who addicts his audience to regular doses of hate speech. Clear Channel's Premiere Radio Networks Inc., which hosts Limbaugh's program, has defended his recent comments.

If Clear Channel won't clean up its airways, then surely it's time for the public to ask the FCC a basic question: Are the stations carrying Limbaugh's show in fact using their licenses "in the public interest?"

Spectrum is a scarce government resource. (Since when did government own the airwaves? - AF)

Radio broadcasters are obligated to act in the public interest and serve their respective communities of license. In keeping with this obligation, individual radio listeners may complain to the FCC that Limbaugh's radio station (and those syndicating his show) are not acting in the public interest or serving their respective communities of license by permitting such dehumanizing speech.

The FCC takes such complaints into consideration when stations file for license renewal. For local listeners near a station that carries Limbaugh's show, there is plenty of evidence to bring to the FCC that their station isn't carrying out its public interest obligation. Complaints can be registered under the broadcast category of the FCC website: http://www.fcc.gov/complaints

This isn't political. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: :rolleyes::rolleyes:

While we disagree with Limbaugh's politics, what's at stake is the fallout of a society tolerating toxic, hate-inciting speech. For 20 years, Limbaugh has hidden behind the First Amendment, or else claimed he's really "doing humor" or "entertainment." He is indeed constitutionally entitled to his opinions, but he is not constitutionally entitled to the people's airways.

It's time for the public to take back our broadcast resources. Limbaugh has had decades to fix his show. Now it's up to us.

heavenlyboy34
03-11-2012, 12:58 PM
So much wrong with this, I don't know where to start. I just have to facepalm. http://www.straferight.com/photopost/data/500/medium/double-facepalm.jpg

FrankRep
03-11-2012, 01:21 PM
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/dam/assets/120310050958-fonda-hedshot-left-tease.jpg


Jane Fonda:


Jane Fonda, November 21, 1970, University of Michigan:



“If you understood what communism was, you would hope, you would pray on your knees that we would some day become communist. . . ."

"I, a socialist, think that we should strive toward a socialist society, all the way to communism.”



SOURCES:

http://frontpagemag.com/2009/10/05/jane-fonda/
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1326
http://www.1stcavmedic.com/Fonda-Admitted-Socialist.htm
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000404/bio

FrankRep
03-11-2012, 01:29 PM
Jane Fonda, being a Socialist, would be offended if you called her a Fascist.

heavenlyboy34
03-11-2012, 01:33 PM
Jane Fonda, being a Socialist, would be offended if you called her a Fascist. IIRC, she's moved in a more fascist direction in recent years, but I could be mistaking her for someone else.

Anti Federalist
03-11-2012, 01:46 PM
Jane Fonda, being a Socialist, would be offended if you called her a Fascist.

Big Government teaming up with Big Business to silence somebody's political speech is fascism as far as I'm concerned.

Ugh, and I feel so dirty defending Limbaugh on this, but, right is right.

PaulConventionWV
03-11-2012, 02:39 PM
LOL - Irony is dead, it really is.

Jane Fonda using military readiness and effectiveness to prove her point.

Mecha, epic, massive, facepalm.




FCC should clear Limbaugh from airwaves

http://edition.cnn.com/2012/03/10/opinion/fonda-morgan-steinem-limbaugh/

By Jane Fonda, Robin Morgan and Gloria Steinem, Special to CNN
March 10, 2012 -- Updated 1845 GMT (0245 HKT)

Editor's note: Jane Fonda, Robin Morgan, and Gloria Steinem are the Co-Founders of the Women's Media Center.

(CNN) -- Ironically, the misogyny Rush Limbaugh spewed for three days over Sandra Fluke was not much worse than his regular broadcast of sexist, racist and homophobic hate speech:

--Women cabinet members are "Sex-retaries."

--"The NAACP should have riot rehearsal. They should get a liquor store and practice robberies."

--The National Organization for Women is "a bunch of whores to liberalism."

--[Said to an African American female caller]: "Take that bone out of your nose and call me back."

These are just a few samples from the arsenal of degrading language Limbaugh deploys on women, people of color, lesbians and gays, immigrants, the disabled, the elderly, Muslims, Jews, veterans, environmentalists and so forth.

Limbaugh doesn't just call people names. He promotes language that deliberately dehumanizes his targets. Like the sophisticated propagandist Josef Goebbels, he creates rhetorical frames -- and the bigger the lie the more effective -- inciting listeners to view people they disagree with as sub-humans. His longtime favorite term for women, "femi-nazi," doesn't even raise eyebrows anymore, an example of how rhetoric spreads when unchallenged by coarsened cultural norms.

At least this most recent incident has turned a spotlight back on the vile, damaging statements Limbaugh has been promulgating for years. His sponsors are dropping him; his stations have begun to follow suit. VoteVets, a coalition of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans, released a statement by female vets, including Katherine Scheirman, former chief of medical operations in the U.S. Air Forces, demanding that the American Forces Network drop Limbaugh from its programming.

They state, "Our entire military depends on troops respecting each other -- women and men. There simply can be no place on military airwaves for sentiments that would undermine that respect."

That makes this a fitting time to inquire of his syndicator, Clear Channel Communications, whether it intends to continue supporting someone who addicts his audience to regular doses of hate speech. Clear Channel's Premiere Radio Networks Inc., which hosts Limbaugh's program, has defended his recent comments.

If Clear Channel won't clean up its airways, then surely it's time for the public to ask the FCC a basic question: Are the stations carrying Limbaugh's show in fact using their licenses "in the public interest?"

Spectrum is a scarce government resource. (Since when did government own the airwaves? - AF)

Radio broadcasters are obligated to act in the public interest and serve their respective communities of license. In keeping with this obligation, individual radio listeners may complain to the FCC that Limbaugh's radio station (and those syndicating his show) are not acting in the public interest or serving their respective communities of license by permitting such dehumanizing speech.

The FCC takes such complaints into consideration when stations file for license renewal. For local listeners near a station that carries Limbaugh's show, there is plenty of evidence to bring to the FCC that their station isn't carrying out its public interest obligation. Complaints can be registered under the broadcast category of the FCC website: http://www.fcc.gov/complaints

This isn't political. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: :rolleyes::rolleyes:

While we disagree with Limbaugh's politics, what's at stake is the fallout of a society tolerating toxic, hate-inciting speech. For 20 years, Limbaugh has hidden behind the First Amendment, or else claimed he's really "doing humor" or "entertainment." He is indeed constitutionally entitled to his opinions, but he is not constitutionally entitled to the people's airways.

It's time for the public to take back our broadcast resources. Limbaugh has had decades to fix his show. Now it's up to us.

Maybe he should be charged with "hate crimes."

PaulConventionWV
03-11-2012, 02:41 PM
Big Government teaming up with Big Business to silence somebody's political speech is fascism as far as I'm concerned.

Ugh, and I feel so dirty defending Limbaugh on this, but, right is right.

Well, it's good that his sponsors are dropping him. That's the free market in effect.

donnay
03-11-2012, 02:43 PM
I wonder why Jane ever divorced Ted Turner?

They are all a bunch of swine. It's the false left/right paradigm at it's best.

libertyjam
03-11-2012, 02:49 PM
Not so surprising - Fascism, socialism, communism- all just one big tent. Welcome to the Hegelian dialectic.

Gene Edward Veith, Jr. pointed out many of the elements that communism and fascism held in common:

“The influence of Marxist scholarship has severely distorted our understanding of fascism. Communism and fascism were rival brands of socialism. Whereas Marxist socialism is predicated on an international class struggle, fascist national socialism promoted a socialism centered in national unity. [And in fact, Both movements were "revolutionary socialist ideologies." Going on,] Both communists and fascists opposed the bourgeoisie. Both attacked the conservatives. Both were mass movements, which had special appeal for the intelligentsia, students, and artists, as well as workers. Both favored strong centralized governments and rejected the free economy and the ideals of individual liberty. [And finally,] Fascists saw themselves as being neither of the right nor the left. They believed that they constituted a third force synthesizing the best of both extremes” [Gene Edward Veith, Jr., Modern Fascism: Liquidating the Judeo-Christian Worldview, p. 26].

Also see-
Obama the Socialist Fascist Communist
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig10/lazarowitz8.1.1.html