View Full Version : Government Vaccination Agenda: Parents Fighting Back

03-07-2012, 10:37 AM
Government Vaccination Agenda: Parents Fighting Back

Dave Bohon
The New American (http://thenewamerican.com/culture/education/11104-parents-fighting-against-govt-vaccination-agenda)
Tue, 06 Mar 2012 09:46 CST

A Detroit mother is fighting mad after school officials defied her specific instructions and gave her daughter four vaccinations, including one that has been linked to adverse physical reactions and even death in its recipients.

Sighle Kinney told Detroit's WXYZ News that her 14-year-old daughter was pulled out of class at Marcus Garvey Academy on January 30, and administered vaccinations for hepatitis A, seasonal influenza, meningitis, and HPV (Human Papillomavirus, a sexually-transmitted disease) by nurses from St. John Providence Health System, the company that operates the school's clinic.

Kinney was furious with the school and the nurses, explaining that she had never given her consent for the vaccinations, and had even signed a form specifying that she did not want the school to administer unnecessary medical treatment to her daughter. "I told them - if she falls, give her a Band Aid, or if she has a headache, give her an aspirin - that's it," she recalled.

"She comes home, hands me the envelope with the shot record in it that they gave her at school," Kinney recalled of the day the school nurses defied her orders. "And when I looked at it I said, 'What is this?' And she was like, 'They gave me shots, and they took blood, and they took urine.'"

The mother said that she was adamant to officials about protecting her daughter from vaccines, particularly the HPV vaccine, which, according to some sources has been linked to thousands of adverse reactions and scores of deaths (www.sanevax.org).

"Why would they give you an HPV vaccine?" Kinney recalled asking her daughter. "I never wanted you to have an HPV vaccine. And as far as you getting injections, you have your own private physician. I don't need them to do that in school for you."

A week after receiving the vaccinations, Kinney's daughter came down with a rash that spread over her body - what her family doctor determined was an adverse reaction to one or more of the shots. She missed a week of school and her mother became concerned over potential long-term conditions because of the vaccines.

"I'm angry with everybody," Kinney told the news network. "How are you going to overlook something like this? You injected my child with medicine I never wanted her to have."

Officials with the Detroit public school system issued a meandering statement absolving themselves of blame. "The staff at the clinic must maintain confidentiality with the students and the parents of the students," the statement read. "Detroit Public Schools staff members are not informed of any services that are provided for any students, and this policy is regularly communicated by the clinic staff to the school staff. All paperwork or parent permission slips are provided to students who are instructed by the clinic to return it directly to the nurse."

Additionally, the statement explained that upon learning of the problem, the school's principal "was immediately responsive to the mother and instructed her to take her very serious concerns to [St. John]...."

The understandably worried officials of St. John Providence Health Systems released their own statement concerning the situation, assuring the press that they were "aware of a situation involving a student treated at the health clinic at the Marcus Garvey Academy. We will meet with the student's family to ensure that the issue is addressed appropriately."

While school vaccination has been a tradition for decades, and some shots are required before kids can even get into school, Kenney is among a growing number of parents who are backing away from demands that children be immunized for everything from chicken pox and polio to HPV. Some parents simply forget or find it easier to hedge on getting the shots their school districts require. But other moms and dads are skeptical about how necessary the vaccinations are, and some are opting out because of potential dangers and other concerns they have about the substances schools want to inject into their children's bodies.

For example, a Billings, Montana, mom recently challenged a recommendation from her children's school that 11- and 12-year-old students receive a Gardasil immunization for HPV. Interestingly, as in the case of the Detroit schools, the drug was being administered by a private medical contractor with an apparent financial incentive, in this case Montana's RiverStone Health.

"My issue is with the drug - period," Tabatha Pearson told the Billings Gazette. "I believe the school and RiverStone Health are encouraging the kids to be sexually active."

Other parents are concerned at the number of vaccines kids are getting nowadays, and the reports suggesting that some of them might be responsible for a rise in such maladies as autism. USA Today reported that in some states, by the time children reach six years old they have been poked by needles some two dozen times, beginning in infancy. The potential cumulative effect of that barrage of immunizations has many parents worried.

"Many of the vaccines are unnecessary and public health officials don't honestly know ... the effect of giving so many vaccines to such small children..." Jennifer Margulis, an Oregon mother of four, told USA Today.

One West Virginia nurse who said she never had any previous concerns about immunizations got a medical exemption for her two young sons after they both developed severe reactions from vaccinations they received at school. "I thought everything would be safe and fine," she recalled to WTRF News in Wheeling, West Virginia. But the "safe" vaccinations proved anything but that for her two boys. "They describe it as Encephalopathy of the brain," she explained of their resulting illness. "There is permanent damage there."

Many states begrudgingly allow parents to opt out of immunizations for their kids for medical reasons. Religious and philosophical reasons are a tougher sell, but an increasing number of parents are citing these as reasons for pulling their kids out of the vaccination lines. Alaska has the highest opt-out rate at nearly 9 percent, followed by Colorado at 7 percent, Minnesota at 6.5 percent, and Vermont and Washington at 6 percent.

While health experts warn that the hike in non-immunized kids places the population at risk for a return of a range of diseases, some parents argue that the risk from vaccine-preventable disease is lower than the health risks for their children from immunization. Many of those choosing to opt out of vaccinating their children are middle-class, college educated parents who have a healthy distrust of the pharmaceutical industry responsible for the vaccines they are told are crucial to the health of their children.

Typical of that number is Michele Pereira, an Oregon mom who is a registered nurse and married to an anesthesiologist. She noted that while her children have had some of the required vaccinations, she and her husband have said no to others. "I wouldn't be one to say I am absolutely certain these things are hurting our children," Pereira said. But, she added, "I feel like there are enough questions out there that I don't want to take the chance."

Dana Tankell, a chiropractor in San Diego who has never vaccinated either of her school-aged daughters, said that parents are finally beginning to do their own research on the issue, rather than relying on the fear tactics and pat answers of health officials and pharmaceutical marketing campaigns. "I feel like people are getting smarter," she told Investigative News Source. "They're standing up for themselves and they're making decisions based on knowledge instead of following everybody else."

Predictably, some states are targeting individuals who help parents opt out of vaccines for their children. As reported by The New American, Patricia Finn, a vaccine rights attorney in New York state, has been threatened with the loss of her license to practice law, and has been ordered to hand over a complete list of her clients, a list Mike Adams of NaturalNews.com predicted New York Child Protective Services would use to "terrorize the parents who have sought legal help in opting out of dangerous vaccines."

03-07-2012, 10:59 AM
I am in California and I opted my daughter out of the required hepatitis A and HPV vaccine when she was in the 8th grade. I got the nastiest phone call from the school nurse telling how horrible a parent I was. I had already contacted my family physician and he said they were not necessary and recommended against them. The nurse had told me that she would be waiting for me when I came to sign the papers. I am glad she chickened out as she would have gotten a piece of my mind.

In California the shots where lobbied for by the pharma industry. The HPV shot cost $100 alone.

03-07-2012, 08:27 PM
Jon Rappoport Interviews Ex-Vaccine Researcher

Jon Rappoport

Q: You were once certain that vaccines were the hallmark of good medicine.

A: Yes I was. I helped develop a few vaccines. I won't say which ones.

Q: Why not?

A: I want to preserve my privacy.

Q: So you think you could have problems if you came out into the open?

A: I believe I could lose my pension.

Q: On what grounds?

A: The grounds don't matter. These people have ways of causing you problems, when you were once part of the Club. I know one or two people who were put under surveillance, who were harassed.

Q: Harassed by whom?

A: The FBI.

Q: Really?

A: Sure. The FBI used other pretexts. And the IRS can come calling too.

Q: So much for free speech.

A: I was "part of the inner circle." If now I began to name names and make specific accusations against researchers, I could be in a world of trouble.

Q: What is at the bottom of these efforts at harassment?

A: Vaccines are the last defense of modern medicine. Vaccines are the ultimate justification for the overall "brilliance" of modern medicine.

Q: Do you believe that people should be allowed to choose whether they should get vaccines?

A: On a political level, yes. On a scientific level, people need information, so that they can choose well. It's one thing to say choice is good. But if the atmosphere is full of lies, how can you choose? Also, if the FDA were run by honorable people, these vaccines would not be granted licenses. They would be investigated to within an inch of their lives.

Q: There are medical historians who state that the overall decline of illnesses was not due to vaccines.

A: I know. For a long time, I ignored their work.

Q: Why?

A: Because I was afraid of what I would find out. I was in the business of developing vaccines. My livelihood depended on continuing that work.

Q: And then?

A: I did my own investigation.

Q: What conclusions did you come to?

A: The decline of disease is due to improved living conditions.

Q: What conditions?

A: Cleaner water. Advanced sewage systems. Nutrition. Fresher food. A decrease in poverty. Germs may be everywhere, but when you are healthy, you don't contract the diseases as easily.

Q: What did you feel when you completed your own investigation?

A: Despair. I realized I was working a sector based on a collection of lies.

Q: Are some vaccines more dangerous than others?

A: Yes. The DPT shot, for example. The MMR. But some lots of a vaccine are more dangerous than other lots of the same vaccine. As far as I'm concerned, all vaccines are dangerous.

Q: Why?

A: Several reasons. They involve the human immune system in a process that tends to compromise immunity. They can actually cause the disease they are supposed to prevent. They can cause other diseases than the ones they are supposed to prevent.

Q: Why are we quoted statistics which seem to prove that vaccines have been tremendously successful at wiping out diseases?

A: Why? To give the illusion that these vaccines are useful. If a vaccine suppresses visible symptoms of a disease like measles, everyone assumes that the vaccine is a success. But, under the surface, the vaccine can harm the immune system itself. And if it causes other diseases -- say, meningitis -- that fact is masked, because no one believes that the vaccine can do that. The connection is overlooked.

Q: It is said that the smallpox vaccine wiped out smallpox in England.

A: Yes. But when you study the available statistics, you get another picture.

Q: Which is?

A: There were cities in England where people who were not vaccinated did not get smallpox. There were places where people who were vaccinated experienced smallpox epidemics. And smallpox was already on the decline before the vaccine was introduced.

Q: So you're saying that we have been treated to a false history.

A: Yes. That's exactly what I'm saying. This is a history that has been cooked up to convince people that vaccines are invariably safe and effective.

Q: Now, you worked in labs. Where purity was an issue.

A: The public believes that these labs, these manufacturing facilities are the cleanest places in the world. That is not true. Contamination occurs all the time. You get all sorts of debris introduced into vaccines.

Q: For example, the SV40 monkey virus slips into the polio vaccine.

A: Well yes, that happened. But that's not what I mean. The SV40 got into the polio vaccine because the vaccine was made by using monkey kidneys. But I'm talking about something else. The actual lab conditions. The mistakes. The careless errors. SV40, which was later found in cancer tumors -- that was what I would call a structural problem. It was an accepted part of the manufacturing process. If you use monkey kidneys, you open the door to germs which you don't know are in those kidneys.

Q: Okay, but let's ignore that distinction between different types of contaminants for a moment. What contaminants did you find in your many years of work with vaccines?

A: All right. I'll give you some of what I came across, and I'll also give you what colleagues of mine found. Here's a partial list. In the Rimavex measles vaccine, we found various chicken viruses. In polio vaccine, we found acanthamoeba, which is a so-called "brain-eating" amoeba.

Simian cytomegalovirus in polio vaccine. Simian foamy virus in the rotavirus vaccine. Bird-cancer viruses in the MMR vaccine. Various micro-organisms in the anthrax vaccine. I've found potentially dangerous enzyme inhibitors in several vaccines. Duck, dog, and rabbit viruses in the rubella vaccine. Avian leucosis virus in the flu vaccine. Pestivirus in the MMR vaccine.

Q: Let me get this straight. These are all contaminants which don't belong in the vaccines.

A: That's right. And if you try to calculate what damage these contaminants can cause, well, we don't really know, because no testing has been done, or very little testing. It's a game of roulette. You take your chances. Also, most people don't know that some polio vaccines, adenovirus vaccines, rubella and hep A and measles vaccines have been made with aborted human fetal tissue. I have found what I believed were bacterial fragments and poliovirus in these vaccines from time to time -- which may have come from that fetal tissue. When you look for contaminants in vaccines, you can come up with material that IS puzzling. You know it shouldn't be there, but you don't know exactly what you've got. I have found what I believed was a very small "fragment" of human hair and also human mucus. I have found what can only be called "foreign protein," which could mean almost anything. It could mean protein from viruses.

Q: Alarm bells are ringing all over the place.

A: How do you think I felt? Remember, this material is going into the bloodstream without passing through some of the ordinary immune defenses.

Q: How were your findings received?

A: Basically, it was, don't worry, this can't be helped. In making vaccines, you use various animals' tissue, and that's where this kind of contamination enters in. Of course, I'm not even mentioning the standard chemicals like formaldehyde, mercury, and aluminum which are purposely put into vaccines.

Q: This information is pretty staggering.

A: Yes. And I'm just mentioning some of the biological contaminants. Who knows how many others there are? Others we don't find because we don't think to look for them. If tissue from, say, a bird is used to make a vaccine, how many possible germs can be in that tissue? We have no idea.We have no idea what they might be, or what effects they could have on humans.

Q: And beyond the purity issue?

A: You are dealing with the basic faulty premise about vaccines. That they intricately stimulate the immune system to create the conditions for immunity from disease. That is the bad premise. It doesn't work that way. A vaccine is supposed to "create" antibodies which, indirectly, offer protection against disease. However, the immune system is much larger and more involved than antibodies and their related "killer cells."

Q: The immune system is?

A: The entire body, really. Plus the mind. It's all immune system, you might say. That is why you can have, in the middle of an epidemic, those individuals who remain healthy.

Q: So the level of general health is important.

A: More than important. Vital.

Q: How are vaccine statistics falsely presented?

A: There are many ways. For example, suppose that 25 people who have received the hepatitis B vaccine come down with hepatitis. Well, hep B is a liver disease. But you can call liver disease many things. You can change the diagnosis. Then, you've concealed the root cause of the problem.

Q: And that happens?

A: All the time. It HAS to happen, if the doctors automatically assume that people who get vaccines DO NOT come down with the diseases they are now supposed to be protected from. And that is exactly what doctors assume. You see, it's circular reasoning. It's a closed system. It admits no fault. No possible fault. If a person who gets a vaccine against hepatitis gets hepatitis, or gets some other disease, the automatic assumption is, this had nothing to do with the vaccine.

Q: In your years working in the vaccine establishment, how many doctors did you encounter who admitted that vaccines were a problem?

A: None. There were a few who privately questioned what they were doing. But they would never go public, even within their companies.

Q: What was the turning point for you?

A: I had a friend whose baby died after a DPT shot.

Q: Did you investigate?

A: Yes, informally. I found that this baby was completely healthy before the vaccination. There was no reason for his death, except the vaccine. That started my doubts. Of course, I wanted to believe that the baby had gotten a bad shot from a bad lot. But as I looked into this further, I found that was not the case in this instance. I was being drawn into a spiral of doubt that increased over time. I continued to investigate. I found that, contrary to what I thought, vaccines are not tested in a scientific way.

Q: What do you mean?

A: For example, no long-term studies are done on any vaccines. Long-term follow-up is not done in any careful way. Why? Because, again, the assumption is made that vaccines do not cause problems. So why should anyone check? On top of that, a vaccine reaction is defined so that all bad reactions are said to occur very soon after the shot is given. But that does not make sense.

Q: Why doesn't it make sense?

A: Because the vaccine obviously acts in the body for a long period of time after it is given. A reaction can be gradual. Deterioration can be gradual. Neurological problems can develop over time. They do in various conditions, even according to a conventional analysis. So why couldn't that be the case with vaccines? If chemical poisoning can occur gradually, why couldn't that be the case with a vaccine which contains mercury?

Q: And that is what you found?

A: Yes. You are dealing with correlations, most of the time.Correlations are not perfect. But if you get 500 parents whose children have suffered neurological damage during a one-year period after having a vaccine, this should be sufficient to spark off an intense investigation.

Q: Has it been enough?

A: No. Never. This tells you something right away.

Continued... (http://www.oasisadvancedwellness.com/learning/interview-ex-vaccine-researcher.html)