Google Drops 'Frothy' Website

[RonPaulFanInGA]

http://www.balloon-juice.com/2012/02/29/google-juggles-santorum/

Google manually drops SpreadingSantorum.com to fourth in its search, below Santorum's campaign website and his Wikipedia page.

[eduardo89]

I think it's good. That website was just vulgar.

[kill the banks]

I think it's good. That website was just vulgar.

hmmm well so is Ricky

[BuddyRey]

That's ridiculous. Privately-owned websites should be free to exercise complete independence from outside political pressure. I bet Pretty Ricky cut 'em a fat check.

[thoughtomator]

Privately-owned websites like Google?

If I were the decision maker there I'd make the same decision - let's face facts, people looking for info on "Santorum" are NOT looking for a site like that one.

[eduardo89]

That's ridiculous. Privately-owned websites should be free to exercise complete independence from outside political pressure. I bet Pretty Ricky cut 'em a fat check.

Google is a privately owned website, they can do whatever they want to their search results.

[cajuncocoa]

hmmm well so is RickyUh-huh! :D

[cajuncocoa]

Update: when I Google "Santorum", it's still 2nd on the list.

[Sola_Fide]

I'm all for making parodies of candidates....but I don't like having the appearance of being on the political side of homosexuals.

[eduardo89]

I'm all for making parodies of candidates....but I don't like having the appearance of being on the political side of homosexuals.

+1

[dannno]

I'm all for making parodies of candidates....but I don't like having the appearance of being on the political side of homosexuals.


+1


...embarassing..

:rolleyes:

[eduardo89]

...embarassing..

:rolleyes:

Not as embarrassing as arguing with women that you know better than they do about the pleasure or pain cervical stimulation causes...

[jmdrake]

Not as embarrassing as arguing with women that you know better than they do about the pleasure or pain cervical stimulation causes...

LOL PWND!

[dannno]

Not as embarrassing as arguing with women that you know better than they do about the pleasure or pain cervical stimulation causes...

Why is this so difficult to understand?

I never tried to argue with a woman that I knew better than they do about the pain or pleasure cervical stimulation caused for HER, I was arguing that not every woman is the same and that many, if not most women do enjoy cervical stimulation. I haven't seen any evidence that I'm wrong.

[dannno]

The vast majority of homosexuals want to end the wars overseas, why is it that we can't be on their side politically?? We have to be pro-war because most homosexuals are anti-war? We have to define our political beliefs as being the opposite of homosexuals? The insinuations that come from the original statement are ridiculous.

[ropo]

I'm all for making parodies of candidates....but I don't like having the appearance of being on the political side of homosexuals.

The homosexuals aren't a political side, stop being so collectivist

[tttppp]

http://www.balloon-juice.com/2012/02/29/google-juggles-santorum/

Google manually drops SpreadingSantorum.com to fourth in its search, below Santorum's campaign website and his Wikipedia page.

Booo

[Voluntary Man]

So long, Frothy. We hardly knew thee.

[Sola_Fide]

The homosexuals aren't a political side, stop being so collectivist

What I said is not collectivism.

There is an authoritarian movement in this country to encapsulate homosexuality into law and culture.

You should be fighting this influence just like I as a Christian fight the influence of "Christian statism".

[eduardo89]

Why is this so difficult to understand?

I never tried to argue with a woman that I knew better than they do about the pain or pleasure cervical stimulation caused for HER, I was arguing that not every woman is the same and that many, if not most women do enjoy cervical stimulation. I haven't seen any evidence that I'm wrong.

Yes you were...




I haven't been with a ton of women, but when one is lucky enough, they can almost never count the number of orgasms I give them in a night with their 10 fingers. I figure i know more about it than most women, but I'm willing to listen if someone thinks I'm wrong..

[dannno]

The homosexuals aren't a political side, stop being so collectivist

+rep

[eduardo89]

The homosexuals aren't a political side, stop being so collectivist

You can't deny there isn't a homosexual agenda to push their lifestyle into the mainstream and have it codified into law as "normal".

[dannno]

Yes you were...

The logic is that since I've had sex with more than one woman, and since every woman is ONLY one woman who has probably never had that type of sex with ANOTHER woman, that my experiences with sexual encounters should be considered at least as valid as a single woman's experience with her own sexuality.

[dannno]

You can't deny there isn't a homosexual agenda to push their lifestyle into the mainstream and have it codified into law as "normal".

They are only doing that because they are scared of people who want their relationships outlawed, their activities outlawed or who want to create laws that make them unequal citizens.

[kathy88]

I'm all for making parodies of candidates....but I don't like having the appearance of being on the political side of homosexuals.

Seriously? The website was a "homosexual agenda?" It was a freaking joke.

I am STRONGLY on the political side of any homosexuals who feel as I do, that the FEDERAL Government has no business violating individual liberties. End of story. This collectivist bullshit people spout on this website is worse than reading HuffPo sometimes.

[kathy88]

The logic is that since I've had sex with more than one woman, and since every woman is ONLY one woman who has probably never had that type of sex with ANOTHER woman, that my experiences with sexual encounters should be considered at least as valid as a single woman's experience with her own sexuality.

But we digress.

[dannno]

The logic is that since I've had sex with more than one woman, and since every woman is ONLY one woman who has probably never had that type of sex with ANOTHER woman, that my experiences with sexual encounters should be considered at least as valid as a single woman's experience with her own sexuality.

Ok, "at least as valid" is a pretty strong phrase, but consider that some women DON'T LIKE oral sex.. Some women love getting oral sex, in fact some like getting it for 2 hours or more straight..

So this was like a woman coming out and saying, "women don't like oral sex, they just pretend to like it in pornos.. all the women you had oral sex with just pretended to like it.."

The point is not all women are the same, so to take the word of a single woman about what all women do or do not like vs. someone who has been with several and knows what each of them liked, well, you get the idea.

[jmdrake]

Seriously? The website was a "homosexual agenda?" It was a freaking joke.

I am STRONGLY on the political side of any homosexuals who feel as I do, that the FEDERAL Government has no business violating individual liberties. End of story. This collectivist bullshit people spout on this website is worse than reading HuffPo sometimes.

Ummm....the guy that made this "joke" website is very much part of the homosexual agenda. And he once said "I wish all republicans were dead".


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTOtpzg7LQQ

Such attacks on Santorum from such morons only gain support for Santorum among a lot of people we're trying to win over.

[jmdrake]

They are only doing that because they are scared of people who want their relationships outlawed, their activities outlawed or who want to create laws that make them unequal citizens.

Now you're being just as collectivist as anyone else.

[DerailingDaTrain]

I'm all for making parodies of candidates....but I don't like having the appearance of being on the political side of homosexuals.

Outright Libertarians, GOProud, Log Cabin Republicans, nuff said.


You can't deny there isn't a homosexual agenda to push their lifestyle into the mainstream and have it codified into law as "normal".

I'd consider it pretty normal. It's been going on for thousands of years in almost every society and while I'm heterosexual I don't see a problem with homsexuals being allowed to live their lives and be considered "normal". That just sounds wrong...like you're trying to make them less of a person. I can get if you don't like thinking about two men being with each other but it has nothing to do with you so I can't see why anyone would care.

[Massachusetts]

It's still close enough to the top to make an impact. It is pretty hilarious.

[hells_unicorn]

I'm all for making parodies of candidates....but I don't like having the appearance of being on the political side of homosexuals.

I don't think such an appearance is necessarily apparent unless a given person wants it to be there, and Paul simply not wanting to kill all the gays the way a segment of Santorum's base might want to could be extrapolated as being on the political side of homosexuals from such a person. I frankly find the website unfunny and think that the moron who created it has a bright future of corrective surgery for a prolapsed anus if his brand of humor is any indication of his lifestyle, and given his politics I wouldn't be surprised if he'd like to force all of us hardworking Christian folk to pay for it.

[deadfish]

The Santorum definition was funny at first but I'm really tired of it now. It's just the same joke over and over and over...

[Feeding the Abscess]

I'm all for making parodies of candidates....but I don't like having the appearance of being on the political side of homosexuals.

Then why do you support Ron Paul? An openly homosexual individual ran his effing campaign and convinced him to run last cycle, and worked with Ron for twenty years.