Voluntary Man
03-01-2012, 11:28 AM
Recently, there has been much spin and speculation, among the loony chattering press-titutes, that Ron may have struck some sort of a backroom deal with Rmoney, to split up the ant-Rmoney vote, in order to help Rom win the nom and to secure the VP slot for Rand (or a Fed chairmanship for himself, or both). Given the history of such races, though, isn't it far more likely that the Newtered one is really Mitt's stealth stalking horse?
After all, isn't it Satonrum ("Saton," from here on) and Ggriinch who both occupy the exact same ground, the anti-Mittens(the wildcard)/anti-Ron(the "idealist") vote? Aren't the Newtant and Saton both virtually indistinguishable, not only from each other (politically, if not personally), but also indistinguishable from the run of the mill "it's MY turn" party trash that the GOP shoves down our throats election after election?
Of course, Ron's Constitutionalist/ old fashioned American conservatism is what makes him a scary anachronism to the neonned, trotskyist GOP duh-masses, but Mitt's mistrust by both the party machine and majority goes beyond his "freaky" religion; whether in reality or just in public perception, Mitt is still a wildcard to most voters, due to his numerous and frequent flip-flops on just about every conceivable issue. Even among politicians, Mitt is a flip-flopper's flip-flopper, to the point that he has succeeded in obscuring all, if any, deeply help convictions (beyond faith and family, of course).
Taking into account the actual dynamics of this primary, it becomes rather obvious that the Newt-factor is the one most likely to result in Rmoney's nomination; I wonder what Newt has been promised.
After all, isn't it Satonrum ("Saton," from here on) and Ggriinch who both occupy the exact same ground, the anti-Mittens(the wildcard)/anti-Ron(the "idealist") vote? Aren't the Newtant and Saton both virtually indistinguishable, not only from each other (politically, if not personally), but also indistinguishable from the run of the mill "it's MY turn" party trash that the GOP shoves down our throats election after election?
Of course, Ron's Constitutionalist/ old fashioned American conservatism is what makes him a scary anachronism to the neonned, trotskyist GOP duh-masses, but Mitt's mistrust by both the party machine and majority goes beyond his "freaky" religion; whether in reality or just in public perception, Mitt is still a wildcard to most voters, due to his numerous and frequent flip-flops on just about every conceivable issue. Even among politicians, Mitt is a flip-flopper's flip-flopper, to the point that he has succeeded in obscuring all, if any, deeply help convictions (beyond faith and family, of course).
Taking into account the actual dynamics of this primary, it becomes rather obvious that the Newt-factor is the one most likely to result in Rmoney's nomination; I wonder what Newt has been promised.