PDA

View Full Version : Should We Try Multiple Smaller Money Bombs?




centure7
02-15-2012, 10:47 AM
What do you think of a series of many smaller money bombs dedicated towards specific targeted states? Or, a series of smaller money bombs dedicated towards certain days where clusters of states are holding votes?

Looking at the upcoming primaries schedule, its hard for me to see a way of making another major money bomb that the campaign could exploit effectively. Super Tuesday is the next upcoming series of votes, but there is not very much time between this money bomb and Super Tuesday.

I think it would be more beneficial to Paul to have a bunch of small money bombs for targeted caucus states (or primaries where we could do well) including:
Washington, Votes on March 3 - Our #1 Chance of getting a *clear* #1 finish.
Alaska, Idaho, North Dakota, Voting March 6th, Super Tuesday
Wyoming, Kansas, Virgin Islands, Guam March 10th
Hawaii, March 13th
Puerto Rico, March 18th
Texas, April 3
Pennsylvania, April 24
Nebraska & Oregon, May 15
Montana & California, June 5

Lastly, these mini-money bombs could be adapted to fit in with any mega-money bombs by holding them on the same day but within a certain time frame of that day, like a 2-hour "prime time" timeslot. These money bombs would potentially raise more overall dollars than otherwise by getting people in the state they live in extra excited about a money bomb that relates especially to them.

thesnake742
02-15-2012, 10:51 AM
One for each of the 5 departments cut under the Ron Paul budget.

sailingaway
02-15-2012, 11:16 AM
That is what these are, multiple smaller ones. A million is 'smaller'.