solrac
11-12-2007, 06:14 PM
I love it. $4.2 million in one day. I contributed $100 on Nov 5th. (As well as $100 prior, and I plan to do so again on Dec. 16th.)
But here's the part that confuses me. The $4.2 million was raised by around 30,000 supporters, all the stories seem to say.
30,000.
That's like, nothing. I mean it is great, but isn't 30,000 absolutely zilch? I mean, how many households in America have the internet? 50 million? (I'm not sure but if must be up there.)
If 1% of the internet (say at 50 million online) supported Ron Paul, that would be 500,000 supporters. I'm sure a lot more than 1% support Ron Paul. Almost ALL of Ron Paul's support stems from the Internet.
So why were there only 30,000 donors on Nov 5th? I can't believe I was among such a small group, and it is an honor. I am POSITIVE ABOUT IT.
BUT --- Well I mean Dane Cook gets almost that many people in JUST ONE of his sort of funny very ridiculous concerts.
Ron Paul must have way more support online than Dane Cook did with his 1 million myspace friends.
Why aren't there like... 500,000 donors? Why isn't Ron Paul raising like 10, 20, 30 million dollars in money bomb days?
To me, a group of 30,000 donors is just not enough to change America. America has a population of about 300 MILLION PEOPLE. 30,000 donors is 1 tenth of 1 percent of the population.
Why don't more celebrities care, or do anything? Or corporate sponsors? Why doesn't Google just put a ron paul banner on their home page? Why doesn't some big rock star drop lots of hints, or get photographed wearing a Ron Paul t-shirt?
If 75% of americans (or whatever the stat is) are displeased with George Bush / Iraq, why are only 0.01% of them supporting Ron Paul? I understand the media does not mention his name, but SO MANY PEOPLE have the Internet!
Why doesn't Jim Rogers (multi billionaire, supports Ron Paul) just on a whim put up a 2000 x 1000 square foot Ron Paul banner up on some huge building in LA or New York, like they do for movie advertisements or Fashion ads?
Thanks for any insight!
But here's the part that confuses me. The $4.2 million was raised by around 30,000 supporters, all the stories seem to say.
30,000.
That's like, nothing. I mean it is great, but isn't 30,000 absolutely zilch? I mean, how many households in America have the internet? 50 million? (I'm not sure but if must be up there.)
If 1% of the internet (say at 50 million online) supported Ron Paul, that would be 500,000 supporters. I'm sure a lot more than 1% support Ron Paul. Almost ALL of Ron Paul's support stems from the Internet.
So why were there only 30,000 donors on Nov 5th? I can't believe I was among such a small group, and it is an honor. I am POSITIVE ABOUT IT.
BUT --- Well I mean Dane Cook gets almost that many people in JUST ONE of his sort of funny very ridiculous concerts.
Ron Paul must have way more support online than Dane Cook did with his 1 million myspace friends.
Why aren't there like... 500,000 donors? Why isn't Ron Paul raising like 10, 20, 30 million dollars in money bomb days?
To me, a group of 30,000 donors is just not enough to change America. America has a population of about 300 MILLION PEOPLE. 30,000 donors is 1 tenth of 1 percent of the population.
Why don't more celebrities care, or do anything? Or corporate sponsors? Why doesn't Google just put a ron paul banner on their home page? Why doesn't some big rock star drop lots of hints, or get photographed wearing a Ron Paul t-shirt?
If 75% of americans (or whatever the stat is) are displeased with George Bush / Iraq, why are only 0.01% of them supporting Ron Paul? I understand the media does not mention his name, but SO MANY PEOPLE have the Internet!
Why doesn't Jim Rogers (multi billionaire, supports Ron Paul) just on a whim put up a 2000 x 1000 square foot Ron Paul banner up on some huge building in LA or New York, like they do for movie advertisements or Fashion ads?
Thanks for any insight!