Ron Paul is a "top tier" candidate

[Cleaner44]

Ron Paul can no longer be labeled a "long shot" candidate. He has clearly surpassed John McCain and is now a "top tier" candidate. I have created a website to support this statement.

On this website I have gathered as much evidence as I could to prove the point. I would appreciate any feedback that might help improve it.

Please visit www.thecaseforronpaul.com and spread the word!

[Sematary]

Ron Paul can no longer be labeled a "long shot" candidate. He has clearly surpassed John McCain and is now a "top tier" candidate. I have created a website to support this statement.

On this website I have gathered as much evidence as I could to prove the point. I would appreciate any feedback that might help improve it.

Please visit www.thecaseforronpaul.com and spread the word!

Check some of the news stuff in the philly rally area.

[dseisner]

Great site. Thank you!

[austin356]

Ron Paul can no longer be labeled a "long shot" candidate. He has clearly surpassed John McCain and is now a "top tier" candidate. I have created a website to support this statement.

On this website I have gathered as much evidence as I could to prove the point. I would appreciate any feedback that might help improve it.

Please visit www.thecaseforronpaul.com and spread the word!




If the entire Federal government wanted to show the case for Ron Paul, they could not do a better job than you did. Top work. Will forward this.

[AlexMerced]

I added you link to my wiki

[curtisag]

Read this, and tell me the person leading in the polls this early wins.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/12/17/opinion/polls/main589167.shtml

[American]

you need some google ads on your site, looks great.!

[jrich4rpaul]

great site!

[AlexMerced]

Read this, and tell me the person leading in the polls this early wins.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/12/17/opinion/polls/main589167.shtml

how did Kerry Pull that off... ?

[llepard]

Ron Paul can no longer be labeled a "long shot" candidate. He has clearly surpassed John McCain and is now a "top tier" candidate. I have created a website to support this statement.

On this website I have gathered as much evidence as I could to prove the point. I would appreciate any feedback that might help improve it.

Please visit www.thecaseforronpaul.com and spread the word!

NICE JOB!!!!!

I book marked it.

[AlexMerced]

blah, to many days to wait for the youtube debates

[Cindy]

Nice job. I book marked it too.

The only thing I would add is some more emphasis on what the meetup groups are doing to show an example of how many thousands of unpaid volunteers are out there spending their own money ( millions) and time ( part time to full time hours) on grassroots campaigning, which is not reflected in Pauls HQ staff numbers or FEC donations raised.

In addition, what really makes an impression on me, is how many meetups are also being formed in other countries around the world.

Of course, there are also international organizational forums like this one with thousands of members, which are running alongside of and in co-operation with meetup groups.

Some impressive meetup/grassroots sponcered activities are the airplane banners, radio and TV ads, DVD production and distribution, billboards, parade entries, and Paint the Town events, and campaign merchandise stores.

These promotional activities cost a lot of money and take a lot of peoples time and none of this is reflected in or accounted for in pofficial stats found at what the official campaign recieves and spends, let alone has staffed.

[PINN4CL3]

I don't know if this is something you might want to include:


How a 'Third-Tier' Candidate Wins the Primary by Kathryn Muratore

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig7/muratore5.html



It's basically a chart that shows that even with 5% of the national poll, Ron could win because his supporters are more motivated, and more likely to vote. It's math, so certain people may see it as more convincing, even though some of the assumptions are a little sketchy.

[justinc.1089]

I think those numbers about Paul winning are somewhat correct because when I did the numbers for SC myself, I came out with nearly the exact same numbers. In fact, my percentages WERE exactly the same with Paul winning. The only difference is that I placed Giuliani in SC with only 8% and Romney with whatever Giuliani had on that (21%?). So I think for the percentages that is correct. Its very encouraging that it said the same thing I came up with on my own.:D

[CurtisLow]

Great job Cleaner44 and welcome to the Ron Paul forums!

[Cleaner44]

Great job Cleaner44 and welcome to the Ron Paul forums!

Thanks for visiting the site and I am glad to be here. It really is great to feel like you are making a difference in this country!

[Arklatex]

nice website