View Full Version : Paul close to 2nd in NV Entrance poll
rp2012win
02-04-2012, 05:10 PM
http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/primaries/epolls/nv
It's close though. Could still get 2nd. Other metrics besides age and sex show a tie and some have ron slightly ahead. He trails going by the age and sex metrics though.
PaleoPaul
02-04-2012, 05:10 PM
He was first in an entrance poll in Iowa...;)
Johncjackson
02-04-2012, 05:11 PM
Santorum in single digits, Ha. WTF was up with those polls showing that dude beating Ron?
pauliticalfan
02-04-2012, 05:12 PM
Where are you seeing him in third? Among whites, yes, but I think we can make up that 1% among the 10% that are non-white.
UtahApocalypse
02-04-2012, 05:13 PM
I knew 3 days ago when they started pumping Paul would be 2nd that we would be third. They wanted to set up a failure.
Havax
02-04-2012, 05:14 PM
Edit:
Men= 53%
Women= 47%
Ron
(14)(.47) + (23)(.53)= 18.77
Newt
(21)(.47) + (18)(.53)= 19.41
Difference= .64%
For an entrance poll, thats statistically insignificant
pauliticalfan
02-04-2012, 05:14 PM
It's gonna be close though.
CTRattlesnake
02-04-2012, 05:14 PM
Yeah i did the math
Paul is trailing Gingrich by about .6%
BUT these are ENTRANCE polls, not EXIT polls, which are notoriously less reliable
Gingrich 21% women 18% men
Paul 14% women 23% men
averaged =
Gingrich 19.5%
Paul 18.5%
1% difference
A bit closer than that. More men voted.
CTRattlesnake
02-04-2012, 05:17 PM
Gingrich 21% women 18% men
Paul 14% women 23% men
averaged =
Gingrich 19.5%
Paul 18.5%
1% difference
Not how the math works, more men than women
Men= 53%
WOmen= 47%
Ron
(14)(.47) + (23)(.53)= 18.77
Newt
(21)(.47) + (18)(.53)= 19.41
Difference= .64%
For an entrance poll, thats statistically insignificant
Havax
02-04-2012, 05:17 PM
Good news about entrance polls this time around: Paul campaigned and had organization in Nevada
Bad news about entrance polls: Paul was overpolled in Iowa because undecideds went to Santorum last minute...but that's because the media was pumping him.
Liberty74
02-04-2012, 05:20 PM
He was first in an entrance poll in Iowa...;)
Wrong, they were dead on the money. The first entrance poll numbers didn't have a big enough sample. Once they did, dead on.
Johncjackson
02-04-2012, 05:20 PM
Well, aren't these caucuses supposed to have the advantage of the activists speaking on behalf of their preferred candidate before voting takes place? Isn't the "entrance" prior to the speeches/voting? If so, wouldn't the speeches presumably have at least >0% influence on the actual voting? If not, I guess there is no point publicly speaking on behalf of candidates.
Wrong, they were dead on the money. The first entrance poll numbers didn't have a big enough sample. Once they did, dead on.
No, once the results come in, they weight the numbers to reflect the results.
bluesc
02-04-2012, 05:23 PM
Found the "Were the Campaign Ads Important to Your Vote?" interesting. Ron outspent Romney in Nevada overall since Jan 1st yet Romney leads that category by a huge, huge margin. He only outspent Ron in NV since last Friday. Maybe the campaign is airing ads too early.
rp2012win
02-04-2012, 05:25 PM
What is shocking about the entrance poll is that for the first time, after 5 states, gingrich is doing better with women than men. Like paul, gingrich has always done best win men, and paul leads men by 5. In a turn of events, it's now the women that are bringing gingrich up. Wow we have back luck lol
SCOTUSman
02-04-2012, 05:25 PM
Young people didn't show up, wtf.
jasonxe
02-04-2012, 05:27 PM
women......i don't get it. A female needs to explain this to me.
bluesc
02-04-2012, 05:27 PM
Young people didn't show up, wtf.
They never do, it's stupid to rely on them.
Young people never show up. 10% max.
UtahApocalypse
02-04-2012, 05:30 PM
Young people didn't show up, wtf.
They never do, it's stupid to rely on them.
which could be why we won't win.
Johncjackson
02-04-2012, 05:35 PM
women......i don't get it. A female needs to explain this to me.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/04/mitt-romney-and-ron-paul-_n_1183530.html
"female athletes who came to the event with the intent of hearing Ron Paul speak -- but when they spotted the Romney boys onstage, they instantly forgot about Paul. Katie, a softball player, said the boys were "yummyyy," while another professed that 31-year-old Craig Romney was the hottest. And they weren't just checking out the Romney sons -- one girl interviewed was also quite taken with Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum, who she claimed was "kind of hot."
Personally, I know very few females ( at least younger than my grandmother) who aren't teenagers at heart. They may develop faster/better than males in a lot of ways, but making a reasoned/informed decision about politics is not one of them, IMHO. See Also from article- money/status/fame instantly make ugly men "hot" to women, while men have more reliable judgments of things. If you want someone to honestly tell you how something/someone looks or who a trustworthy man is, ask a man.
unknown
02-04-2012, 05:55 PM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/04/mitt-romney-and-ron-paul-_n_1183530.html
"female athletes who came to the event with the intent of hearing Ron Paul speak -- but when they spotted the Romney boys onstage, they instantly forgot about Paul. Katie, a softball player, said the boys were "yummyyy," while another professed that 31-year-old Craig Romney was the hottest. And they weren't just checking out the Romney sons -- one girl interviewed was also quite taken with Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum, who she claimed was "kind of hot."
Personally, I know very few females ( at least younger than my grandmother) who aren't teenagers at heart. They may develop faster/better than males in a lot of ways, but making a reasoned/informed decision about politics is not one of them, IMHO. See Also from article- money/status/fame instantly make ugly men "hot" to women, while men have more reliable judgments of things. If you want someone to honestly tell you how something/someone looks or who a trustworthy man is, ask a man.
Ok so hows that explain women's support for Newt? Hes a fat fvck.
Id like to see the "sexies" who think that Newt is a looker.
Ok so hows that explain women's support for Newt? Hes a fat fvck.
Women like the biggest jerks. XD
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.