PDA

View Full Version : Republican Senators say slash jobs, not defense spending !




Dianne
02-02-2012, 02:05 PM
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/02/02/republican-senators-slash-jobs-instead-of-defense-spending/

A group of Republican Senators will propose on Thursday a bill to stop mandatory defense spending cuts triggered by the failure of the congressional super committee, putting in its place a plan to reduce the number of federal workers and freeze the pay of others.

The proposal would save about $127 billion in 2013 by forcing government agencies into an attrition scheme, blocking them from hiring unless three workers retire for every two new hires. It would also block any and all pay raises until June of 2014, according to CNN, which cited unnamed congressional staffers.

The plan would preserve high dollar defense contracts for weapons-makers while forcing the government’s workforce to shrink by about 5 percent. It’s being called the “Down Payment to Protect National Security Act of 2012,” and Republicans said they plan to introduce it in a press conference later Thursday.

President Barack Obama has said he opposes any attempt to undo the blanket spending cuts mandated by the super committee. Republicans claim their plan would also protect some domestic programs from spending cuts, which may help woo some Democratic support.

Federal worker pay has been frozen for the last two years. House Republicans voted on Wednesday to continue that freeze for a third year.

The cuts were at the center of a budget battle in Washington last year that led credit ratings agency Standard & Poor’s to downgrade the United States’ credit rating for the first time ever. Lawmakers agreed to a compromise in the debt limit fight that calls for $2.1 trillion in cuts over the next decade. Part of that compromise was forming a super committee that would identify $1.5 trillion to cut from government spending, which it failed to do.

If lawmakers cannot agree on where to make those cuts, $1.2 trillion will be automatically withdrawn from federal spending next year, and half of it will come from the Pentagon. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has warned against such a dramatic, across-the-board cut to national defense, saying that a “hasty” move would make the U.S. less secure.

Edward
02-02-2012, 02:09 PM
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/02/02/republican-senators-slash-jobs-instead-of-defense-spending/

A group of Republican Senators will propose on Thursday a bill to stop mandatory defense spending cuts triggered by the failure of the congressional super committee, putting in its place a plan to reduce the number of federal workers and freeze the pay of others.

The proposal would save about $127 billion in 2013 by forcing government agencies into an attrition scheme, blocking them from hiring unless three workers retire for every two new hires. It would also block any and all pay raises until June of 2014, according to CNN, which cited unnamed congressional staffers.

The plan would preserve high dollar defense contracts for weapons-makers while forcing the government’s workforce to shrink by about 5 percent. It’s being called the “Down Payment to Protect National Security Act of 2012,” and Republicans said they plan to introduce it in a press conference later Thursday.

President Barack Obama has said he opposes any attempt to undo the blanket spending cuts mandated by the super committee. Republicans claim their plan would also protect some domestic programs from spending cuts, which may help woo some Democratic support.

Federal worker pay has been frozen for the last two years. House Republicans voted on Wednesday to continue that freeze for a third year.

The cuts were at the center of a budget battle in Washington last year that led credit ratings agency Standard & Poor’s to downgrade the United States’ credit rating for the first time ever. Lawmakers agreed to a compromise in the debt limit fight that calls for $2.1 trillion in cuts over the next decade. Part of that compromise was forming a super committee that would identify $1.5 trillion to cut from government spending, which it failed to do.

If lawmakers cannot agree on where to make those cuts, $1.2 trillion will be automatically withdrawn from federal spending next year, and half of it will come from the Pentagon. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has warned against such a dramatic, across-the-board cut to national defense, saying that a “hasty” move would make the U.S. less secure.

Ron wants to slash these jobs, too. He just doesn't want to "redistribute the wealth" back to the military.

Zippyjuan
02-02-2012, 02:27 PM
Yep- despite political claims, they too are not interested in a balanced budget or any actual net budget cuts- especially in an election year.

Cutting defense spending will reduce jobs the same as any other budget cuts. I have troubles with their math too. They want to offset $600 billion in defense cuts (the estimated DOD share of the automatic cuts) with $125 billion accomplished via atrition?

HOLLYWOOD
02-02-2012, 02:37 PM
CNN report... they will always push the Marxist agenda. :rolleyes:

There aren't any true cuts... "We Projected the FY2013 defense budget was going to increase 15%, so we mad an announcement to cut defense spending by 13%! A HUGE CUT in our security!" :rolleyes:

Jack Cafferty covered this one the "Situation Room" yesterday. His statement was right on the money...

http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2012/02/01/should-congress-undo-the-super-committees-automatic-spending-cuts/


February 1st, 2012 03:00 PM ET


Should Congress undo the super committee's automatic spending cuts? (http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2012/02/01/should-congress-undo-the-super-committees-automatic-spending-cuts/)


FROM CNN's Jack Cafferty:


The U.S. is on a collision course with financial disaster.

The Congressional budget office is out with a grim report suggesting the deficit for 2012 will top $1 trillion for the fourth year in a row.

The CBO also gives a worst-case scenario in which Congress extends all the current Bush-era tax cuts and undoes the super committee's automatic spending cuts. More on that in a minute.
If those two things happen - which is entirely possible in an election year - the U.S. could add another $4.7 trillion to the national debt over the next five years.
Keep in mind we're already $15 trillion in debt. That means we could be looking at a $20 trillion national debt by 2017, and some think even this is a rosy scenario.
Back to the not-so-super committee - remember when the 12 members couldn't come to an agreement on deficit spending cuts? Well that set into motion an automatic $1.2 trillion dollars in cuts.
Not so fast. Congress is busy trying to find a way to undo those spending cuts.
Politico reports that Republicans and a handful of Democrats have vowed to unravel these cuts - which would hit defense and domestic programs equally next January.
There are currently several measures floating around Capitol Hill aimed at doing just that.
President Obama has said he will veto any measure to override the automatic spending cuts unless Congress can give him a "balanced" plan to cut the deficit.
It's really quite sad. Our children's future is being thrown in the garbage so the Washington politicians can continue to steal the public's money. And no one seems too interested in stopping the madness - at least not during an election year. Re-election always Trumps the general welfare these days.

Here’s my question to you: Should Congress undo the super committee's automatic spending cuts?

Tune in to the Situation Room at 5pm to see if Jack reads your answer on air.
And, we love to know where you’re writing from, so please include your city and state with your comment.


Russ in PA
Congress should stand behind Ron Paul as President so that we can get an adult to set the spending and foreign affairs priorities in Washington. Congress should also pass Ron Paul's bill to allow competing currencies and to allow the use of gold/silver coins without taxation, so that we can put an end to the Federal Reserver and the immoral fiat money system that is currently enriching those at the top at the expense of all the rest of us.
Ron Paul in 2012...
February 1, 2012 at 1:36 pm |