Should we use the term 'liberal war propoganda" re Iran?

[sratiug]

Linking the Wilsonian CFR's call for Iran war to liberal media propoganda with that terminology certainly struck a nerve on my radio call in today. What do y'all think?

[unknown]

I'm thinkin just "war propaganda" is fine. Maybe add "similar to Iraq".

[libertythor]

I think that liberal war propaganda is a good term, depending on your audience.

[CaptainAmerica]

I do prefer liberal war propaganda, and call nation building liberal as well. Liberal nation building.

[low preference guy]

what about Obama's war propaganda?

[sratiug]

I think that liberal war propaganda is a good term, depending on your audience.
Yeah, this "conservative" talk radio, and they had already said the socialist takeover of America traced back to Wilson. So I ilinked the CFR to Wilson and identified it as the source of the liberal war pro
poganda.

[heavenlyboy34]

I think that liberal war propaganda is a good term, depending on your audience. The more appropriate word is fascist/neoconservative, but use whatever works on your audience.

[Dianne]

liberal war prop... although we do know the truth... liberal will bring the old crocodiles out of their nest.

[sratiug]

liberal war prop... although we do know the truth... liberal will bring the old crocodiles out of their nest.


This host loves to bash liberals. Liberals this and liberal that all the time.

[RickyJ]

Elite war propaganda is better to say.

[cindy25]

progressive war propaganda is better, and mention Wilson a lot, might swing the Beck vote

[James Madison]

Probably too confusing for the average voter.

[Mini-Me]

I agree with using any truthful pejoratives that will mix well with your audience. "Liberal war propaganda" is a perfectly acceptable reference to Wilsonian policies, and "neoconservative war propaganda" is also obviously valid.

[Captain Shays]

Progressive Wilsonian foreign policy works great.

[cajuncocoa]

And be sure to stress that they're doing exactly what progressives want them to do when they shill for war in the M.E. Ask them why Obama hasn't brought all of the troops home yet.

[Highstreet]

I agree with using any truthful pejoratives that will mix well with your audience. "Liberal war propaganda" is a perfectly acceptable reference to Wilsonian policies, and "neoconservative war propaganda" is also obviously valid.

Yep!

We should all be putting them "to the LEFT of Obama on Foreign Policy"!!!

The Liberals invented interventionist foreign policy because they think we can afford to micro manage the international scene.

[twomp]

Too bad both those wars were started by a so called "conservative". Obama is about as Liberal/Progressive as Bush is a conservative. Labels are stupid. Consider that if Ron Paul wanted to win the nomination he would need so called "liberal" voters like me from California.

[king_nothing_]

I think he definitely needs to fight back harder against the usage of the idiotic phrase "left of Obama on foreign policy." Right when that is said, before saying anything else, he needs to point out the absurdity of such a statement, and talk about how the original conservative stance was non-intervention, and the original progressive stance was interventionism. He needs to point out that interventionism and military adventurism are absolutely contrary to actual, true conservatism, and anyone who characterizes him as being "left of Obama on foreign policy" is very confused about what conservatism actually is.