PDA

View Full Version : Obama Ordered to Georgia Court to Prove Nat Born Citizenship




IcyPeaceMaker
01-22-2012, 06:10 PM
http://media.ledger-enquirer.com/static/images/lelogo_final.png


Georgia judge orders Obama to appear in Atlanta court

A Georgia judge has ordered President Barack Obama to appear in court in Atlanta Thursday for a hearing on a complaint that says Obama isn’t a natural-born citizen and can’t be president.

Orly Taitz, the California attorney who brought the legal challenge to Obama’s name on the March Georgia presidential primary ballot, says this is what she has been working for over the last three years.

“This will be 100 times bigger than Watergate,” she said Saturday morning, referring to the scandal that brought down President Richard Nixon in 1974.

“There are high ranking judges and federal officials who are involved in this cover up. The ramifications of this trial will be enormous.”

Taitz said she expects the president’s legal team to fight his appearance in the Georgia court.

“But he’s in a catch-22,” she said. “If he is appealing this decision, then he looks guilty. The whole nation understands this man is a fraud.”

Taitz has led the “Birther” movement that insists Obama is not a natural-born U.S. citizen. She is also familiar to Georgia courts.

Taitz represented two soldiers in U.S. District Court in Columbus who sought to avoid deployment by arguing Obama wasn’t the commander-in-chief because he wasn’t eligible to be president.

Federal Judge Clay Land warned Taitz against filing a frivolous suit, then fined her $20,000 after he denied the second claim.

This is one of many such lawsuits that have been filed across the country, so far without success.

A Georgia resident made the complaint, which is intended to keep Obama’s name off the state’s ballot in the March presidential primary.

An Obama campaign aide fail and such complaints around the country have no merit.

The hearing is set for Thursday before an administrative judge. Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi on Friday denied a motion by the president’s lawyer to quash a subpoena that requires Obama to show up.

The Office of State Administrative Hearings handles disputes between the public and state agencies.

For example, if the state Department of Revenue wants to revoke a business owner’s alcohol license, the owner could appeal to the Office of State Administrative Hearings.

It also handles ballot disputes.

Read more here: http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/2012/01/22/1902723/birther-movement-georgia-judge.html#storylink=cpy

IcyPeaceMaker
01-22-2012, 06:11 PM
The Story has gone viral: http://www.google.com/search?q=Georgia+judge+orders+Obama+to+appear+in+A tlanta+court+&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

ShaneEnochs
01-22-2012, 06:13 PM
holy shit

freneticentropy
01-22-2012, 06:15 PM
What is this? How is it a campaign suggestion? Orly Taitz is crazy, Paul has already dismissed this birther nonsense, and the issue is a huge loser. Steer clear.

cjm
01-22-2012, 06:21 PM
“This will be 100 times bigger than Watergate,” she said Saturday morning, referring to the scandal that brought down President Richard Nixon in 1974.


Oh wow. "Watergate" needs to be explained? I guess I'm older than I thought. :(

Bruno
01-22-2012, 06:27 PM
The Story has gone viral: http://www.google.com/search?q=Georgia+judge+orders+Obama+to+appear+in+A tlanta+court+&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

Indeed. Amazing. Might want to get some popcorn for this.

IcyPeaceMaker
01-22-2012, 06:28 PM
What is this? How is it a campaign suggestion? Orly Taitz is crazy, Paul has already dismissed this birther nonsense, and the issue is a huge loser. Steer clear.

Who might the Dems replace him with? Watch this video, he is using a Connecticut SSN (a felony) and he never lived in that state. Much more in the video. If GA is successful, EVERY state will follow.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqp-KbGOh-M&feature=related

Bruno
01-22-2012, 06:30 PM
Wrong forum, though.

IcyPeaceMaker
01-22-2012, 06:34 PM
Wrong forum, though.
Will a mod please move this thread to the appropriate forum.
Thanks

ShaneEnochs
01-22-2012, 06:37 PM
Does this local judge have such power though? I'd think it would have to come from congress...

JJ2
01-22-2012, 07:36 PM
Does this local judge have such power though? I'd think it would have to come from congress...

The lawsuit is only to remove his name from the Georgia primary ballot.

IcyPeaceMaker
01-22-2012, 08:14 PM
The lawsuit is only to remove his name from the Georgia primary ballot.
If he falls in GA, every other state will follow, he will be removed from participating in the election.

qh4dotcom
01-22-2012, 08:15 PM
What is this? How is it a campaign suggestion? Orly Taitz is crazy, Paul has already dismissed this birther nonsense, and the issue is a huge loser. Steer clear.

Sorry man, he hasn't completely dismissed it, he's "open-minded about looking at all of that."...he even flip-flopped on it

Ron Paul: Obama's Constitutional Eligibility To Be President Is Irrelevant - 4/20/11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Porel0FMEHU

"We should know the truth and we should follow the rule, we should follow the law, we should follow what the Constitution says about who is qualified to be President. So, I am very open-minded about looking at all of that."
- Ron Paul
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoQ3kO9xzcs#t=1m30s

IcyPeaceMaker
01-22-2012, 08:36 PM
This from The canada Free Press:

Since the most powerful people in America fear the wrath of Obamanation, maybe you should too! They are indeed a dangerous bunch, after all…

Every member of the Supreme Court, every member of congress, every member of the Joint Chiefs, most members of the DOD, CIA, FBI, Secret Service and state run media, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS, NPR, MSNBC, Fox and print news, knows that Barack Hussein Obama does NOT meet Article II – Section I constitutional requirements for the office he holds. By his own biography, there is NO way he can pass the test. The hard evidence is so far beyond overwhelming, it is ridiculous.

But not ONE member of America’s most powerful people will dare confront Obama and his anti-American cabal on the subject. The Constitution does NOT stand. Do you think there is no reason for this?

The Basic Facts
Barack Hussein Obama is foreign born, period (Kenya)
Regardless of his birth place, his parents had foreign loyalties (strike 2)
He has foreign loyalties, demonstrated in every policy decision (strike 3)
He’s not Christian, but Muslim
He’s not “black,” but Arab
There is NO U.S. birth certificate, other than the forged COLB
NO Hawaiian hospital will confirm his birth place (he has named two)
His policies are designed to destroy the Constitutional Republic, not to uphold or defend (strike 4)
He won’t go away without a blood bath

These are the basic facts as they exist today. This is the basis for where we are headed…

MUCH more: http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12999

rockerrockstar
01-23-2012, 10:29 PM
There will always be doubt about Obama's birth place even when he gives proof. What can the man do to prove it to people that will make up anything in there heads to believe it was a fake. I think Ron Paul is smart to stay away form this Birthers conspiracy.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthcertificate.asp

http://www.snopes.com/politics/graphics/birth.jpg

Warrior_of_Freedom
01-23-2012, 10:36 PM
The lawsuit is only to remove his name from the Georgia primary ballot.Vermin Supreme can win Georgia then?!

freneticentropy
01-24-2012, 01:34 AM
Barack Hussein Obama is foreign born, period (Kenya)
Regardless of his birth place, his parents had foreign loyalties (strike 2)
He has foreign loyalties, demonstrated in every policy decision (strike 3)
He’s not Christian, but Muslim
He’s not “black,” but Arab
There is NO U.S. birth certificate, other than the forged COLB
NO Hawaiian hospital will confirm his birth place (he has named two)
His policies are designed to destroy the Constitutional Republic, not to uphold or defend (strike 4)
He won’t go away without a blood bath


This is all sickening fear mongering and race baiting. There is a good reason Paul doesn't inject himself into this crap. He released his long form birth certificate. His birth was announced in the frickin' local Honolulu newspapers, for christs sakes. Harping on this makes us look: bitter, racist, and stupid. How about we stick to attacking Obama on the issues? There's plenty of material there, trust me.

maxxgraphix
01-25-2012, 08:43 AM
The case is to define "Natural Born Citizen". It has been defined before in courts as being born of two American citizen parents. Obama was not. That's all, nothing more.

Feeding the Abscess
01-25-2012, 09:27 AM
The case is to define "Natural Born Citizen". It has been defined before in courts as being born of two American citizen parents. Obama was not. That's all, nothing more.

Legislation says otherwise.

JJ2
01-25-2012, 04:39 PM
Legislation says otherwise.

What legislation?

Feeding the Abscess
01-25-2012, 05:39 PM
What legislation?

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/1401.html


The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:

(a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;

(b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe: Provided, That the granting of citizenship under this subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such person to tribal or other property;

(c) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person;

(d) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States;

(e) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person;

(f) a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States;

(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person

(A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or
(B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 288 of title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; and

(h) a person born before noon (Eastern Standard Time) May 24, 1934, outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States of an alien father and a mother who is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, had resided in the United States.

JJ2
01-25-2012, 08:48 PM
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/1401.html

That doesn't say "natural-born citizen." A natural born citizen is someone who is born a citizen by nature, not just by some legal statute.

I sure hope we don't get to the point where anchor babies are allowed to run for President.