NDAA Section 1021 vs. 1031 Discrepancy......

[Tyler_Durden]

I completely missed this yesterday and it didn't catch my attention until the Ron Paul Facebook page was updated with the video and this comment:


"Floor Speech on repealing section 1021 of the NDAA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tg69QM1yXQQ#!"

Here's the problem. It's Section 1031 that addresses the "indefinite detention."

Section 1021 addresses Availability of funds for maritime ships. It's a completely different section altogether.

I don't like this discrepancy at all. I think it's important for someone to let Paul know since he specifically addressed 1021 in Congress yesterday.....

See S. Bill 1867 Here (http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112s1867pcs/pdf/BILLS-112s1867pcs.pdf)


See him address Section 1021 here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tg69QM1yXQQ&feature=youtube_gdata_player

[nano1895]

Wikipedia has it at 1021

Here's the version of the bill wikipedia has it at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr1540enr/pdf/BILLS-112hr1540enr.pdf

[Tyler_Durden]

Agh! Gotcha. They changed it from the original version. Sigh of relief.

The original version was 1031.
The final version has it at 1021.

[Tyler_Durden]

MOD please kill the thread....

[affa]

Agh! Gotcha. They changed it from the original version. Sigh of relief.

The original version was 1031.
The final version has it at 1021.

Yep, it's intentionally an utterly confusing mess imo.

[Mini-Me]

Unless the bill changed, Tyler_Durden is correct! It's section 1031, according to the link to the actual bill that he posted.
EDIT: Ahhhh, the bill DID change.

[Tyler_Durden]

MOD please kill the thread....

The doctor is smarter than me. He had it right. MOD kill the thread.

:)