PDA

View Full Version : DRUDGE: NEWT'S EX UNLOADS -- NETWORK DEBATES ETHICS OF RELEASE.




Pages : [1] 2

hueylong
01-18-2012, 06:01 PM
Headline at drudge.

sluggo
01-18-2012, 06:02 PM
Ethics? Networks?

Back In Black
01-18-2012, 06:03 PM
Oh boy

hueylong
01-18-2012, 06:03 PM
ABC. Ethics of releasing interview before primary.

archangel689
01-18-2012, 06:03 PM
What a bunch of shit.

thoughtomator
01-18-2012, 06:04 PM
How about the ethics of withholding information that they know primary voters want to know about?

sailingaway
01-18-2012, 06:04 PM
Ethics? Networks?

Who knew?

alucard13mmfmj
01-18-2012, 06:05 PM
newts ex? is that the ex that had cancer?

sailingaway
01-18-2012, 06:05 PM
How about the ethics of withholding information that they know primary voters want to know about?

Need to if it touches on character. Or he could pull out of the race.

hueylong
01-18-2012, 06:05 PM
They'll have to release it now that it's on Drudge.

The One
01-18-2012, 06:06 PM
Anti-climactic...I just lost wood.

jersdream
01-18-2012, 06:06 PM
If there is ANY meat to this story, it only helps Romney.

hueylong
01-18-2012, 06:07 PM
Romney is going to have his own problems -- Millions in the Caymans.

Lucille
01-18-2012, 06:08 PM
Ethics? They have no problem "reporting" blatant falsehoods about Ron Paul.

bubbleboy
01-18-2012, 06:09 PM
bye bye Newty.

lasenorita
01-18-2012, 06:09 PM
Like I posted in another thread, maybe it's something related to Newt's corruption?


Newt Gingrich was under FBI investigation for bribery (http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/317440)


Little known to the American public Newt Gingrich and his then wife Marianne were the subject of a US Justice Department criminal investigation in the late 1990s involving a $10 million bribe of the world’s largest private arms dealer, Sarkis Soghanalia.

Unaware that Soghanalian was an FBI informant, it is alleged that Marianne Gingrich whilst working for the Israel Export Development Corporation (IEDC) tried to facilitate a bribe to the tune of $10 million so that her husband could use his influence to lift the arms embargo against Iraq in order for Soghanalian to collect an outstanding payment of $54 million from Saddam Hussein.

jkob
01-18-2012, 06:10 PM
Now they have ethics?

reduen
01-18-2012, 06:11 PM
Ethics? They have no problem "reporting" blatant falsehoods about Ron Paul.

Exactly! They better come out with it.....

thoughtomator
01-18-2012, 06:11 PM
whoah

dbill27
01-18-2012, 06:11 PM
She spoke to ABCNEWS reporter Brian Ross for two hours. Her explosive revelations are set to rock the campaign. But now a "civil war" has erupted inside of the network, an insider claims, on exactly when the confession will air!

ABCNEWS suits determined it would be "unethical" to run the Marianne Gingrich interview so close to the South Carolina Primary.

Havax
01-18-2012, 06:11 PM
www.drudgereport.com

2-man race.

SchleckBros
01-18-2012, 06:11 PM
:eek:ABCNEWS suits determined it would be "unethical" to run the Marianne Gingrich interview so close to the South Carolina Primary.

InTradePro
01-18-2012, 06:11 PM
Question.

Even if 'the interview' it's not aired is the fact that an interview exists enough to tip Newt's campaign to nose dive?

reduen
01-18-2012, 06:11 PM
Liberty PAC need to get on this right away!!!

ElizabethR
01-18-2012, 06:12 PM
Oh man he's got the Cain Syndrome! I hope they release it omggg

JohnGalt23g
01-18-2012, 06:12 PM
Question.

Even if 'the interview' it's not aired is the fact that an interview exists enough to tip Newt's campaign to nose dive?

It might. But having it air tomorrow night would be a lot more helpful :toady:

nasaal
01-18-2012, 06:12 PM
Question.

Even if 'the interview' it's not aired is the fact that an interview exists enough to tip Newt's campaign to nose dive?
No, people will assume it is smear until they see it. See no evil hear no evil kinda thing.

archangel689
01-18-2012, 06:13 PM
Unethical. Not Gona air it. Yeah it's unethical not to air it what the fuck.

abstrusezincate
01-18-2012, 06:13 PM
The word confession is interesting. It sounds like the ex-wife was part of some known wrongdoing.

Lucille
01-18-2012, 06:13 PM
:eek:ABCNEWS suits determined it would be "unethical" to run the Marianne Gingrich interview so close to the South Carolina Primary.

Maybe in opposite world! I think most voters would agree that it would be unethical NOT to air it before the primary!

LisaNY
01-18-2012, 06:13 PM
scumbags. Our media is worse than North Korea.

TheTexan
01-18-2012, 06:13 PM
Interesting. After Cain, and now Gingrich, maybe people will learn better than to trust liars.

tsetsefly
01-18-2012, 06:13 PM
3 top things it could be, all of which would not surprise me:

1. He is a racist (constantly said racist remarks)
2. Abortion
3. Bribery charges
and just for fun:
4. SOmething involving prostitutes

Havax
01-18-2012, 06:14 PM
It's only "ethical" to air anti-Paul material as fact immediately when it's completely conjecture.

Shelton88
01-18-2012, 06:14 PM
ABC doesnt look like they will release it to the people. once agian media bias at its finest

sailingaway
01-18-2012, 06:14 PM
Liberty PAC need to get on this right away!!!

no. We don't know what the 'bombshell' is, it might just be petty stuff that makes him look mean spirited which we all know, already. There is a concept about 'being more prejudicial than probative'. I have no idea why they would want to hide it, so I can't say.

nasaal
01-18-2012, 06:14 PM
It isn't over. We need to do very well in SC and he prevents that grand finish. He'll be out sure, but only after he has caused enough damage.

Babylon
01-18-2012, 06:14 PM
She spoke to ABCNEWS reporter Brian Ross for two hours. Her explosive revelations are set to rock the campaign. But now a "civil war" has erupted inside of the network, an insider claims, on exactly when the confession will air!

ABCNEWS suits determined it would be "unethical" to run the Marianne Gingrich interview so close to the South Carolina Primary.

She's already spilled her guts.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/12/30/1050139/-Marianne-Gingrichs-take
(Just one interview... there are others.)

At this point, if she comes out with something too bizarre, it won't be credible as she didn't mention it before.

I think it will two hours of an ex-wife rolling her eyes, saying he cheated on her, blah, blah, blah....
I feel for the lady.
But, at the same time, apparently nobody in this country gives a shit about infidelity in marriage(s).

(I added the 's' for the benefit of those out there who might believe in polygamy... just trying to be fair.)

Kords21
01-18-2012, 06:15 PM
Unethical? These "news" networks are big hypocrites. If they had footage/proff that Ron Paul wrote those newsletters it'd be out in the open yesterday. But, when it comes to an establishment figure like Newt, um we'll just sit on it, we don't want to bite the hand that feeds us. If ABC doesn't release this, then whatever credibility they may have in people's eyes will be shot. For better or worse, their wagon is now hitched to Newt.

kahless
01-18-2012, 06:15 PM
:eek:ABCNEWS suits determined it would be "unethical" to run the Marianne Gingrich interview so close to the South Carolina Primary.

Yet ABC News has in large headline plastered across their front page "Romney Parks Millions in Cayman Islands". So I guess ethics only applies to candidate of the suits choice. Clearly the suits were in the tank for Gingrich.

CasualApathy
01-18-2012, 06:15 PM
The speculation alone will probably hurt Newt though, on the bright side.

unknown
01-18-2012, 06:16 PM
Ethics? Networks?

???

brandon
01-18-2012, 06:16 PM
Shiiiiiit. I love drudge.

Lucille
01-18-2012, 06:16 PM
We should email bomb them and demand they air it. The press owes it to the voters.

gworrel
01-18-2012, 06:16 PM
Ethics? Networks?

lol

opinionatedfool
01-18-2012, 06:17 PM
Romney is going to have his own problems -- Millions in the Caymans.

He needs to get pressure to release the documents... NOW! April doesn't do anything for us.

Clem Kadiddlehopper
01-18-2012, 06:19 PM
But the networks had no problem attempting to smear Ron Paul as a racist on the eve of the Iowa primary.

ShaneEnochs
01-18-2012, 06:19 PM
Romney is laughing his head off right now.

angelatc
01-18-2012, 06:19 PM
ABC. Ethics of releasing interview before primary.

As opposed to holding onto it in case they need it in the general, no doubt.

Steele
01-18-2012, 06:19 PM
Reading between the lines, this story was leaked to Drudge after the suits decided to keep it under wraps. That means, others will be after Marianne Gingridge to get the story ABC suits want to suppress.

Freedomluvinmamma30
01-18-2012, 06:19 PM
In the long run, if Ron Paul can go the distance, he can get the nomination. It is only time for these nominees to implode and for new people to come to the cause of liberty.

The One
01-18-2012, 06:20 PM
Newt's ex-wife thinks he's an asshole and has bad things to say about him. Sorry, I'm not impressed. This is true of 99% of divorced men. Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.

Paulite
01-18-2012, 06:20 PM
A decision was tentatively made to air the interview next Monday, after all votes have been counted.

rfbz
01-18-2012, 06:20 PM
Here's what I don't understand...so it's unethical to release it before the South Carolina primary. But if they release it after the South Carolina primary then they're releasing it right before the Florida primary. So what's the difference???

Paulite
01-18-2012, 06:21 PM
NEWT EX-WIFE UNLOADS ON CAMERA; NETWORK DEBATES 'ETHICS' OF AIRING BEFORE SC PRIMARY

**Exclusive**
Wed Jan 18 2012 18:47:14 ET

Marianne Gingrich has said she could end her ex-husband's career with a single interview. Earlier this week, she sat before ABCNEWS cameras, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

She spoke to ABCNEWS reporter Brian Ross for two hours. Her explosive revelations are set to rock the campaign. But now a "civil war" has erupted inside of the network, an insider claims, on exactly when the confession will air!

ABCNEWS suits determined it would be "unethical" to run the Marianne Gingrich interview so close to the South Carolina Primary, a curious decision, one insider argued, since the network has aggressively been reporting on other candidates.

A decision was tentatively made to air the interview next Monday, after all votes have been counted.

MORE

http://drudgereport.com/flash2.htm

dancjm
01-18-2012, 06:21 PM
EX-WIFE OF 18 YEARS: NEWT NOT FIT TO BE PRESIDENT...
DURING LEWINSKY, CLINTON WARNED CHEATING NEWT 'YOU'RE ALOT LIKE ME'...

Libertea Party
01-18-2012, 06:21 PM
But the networks had no problem attempting to smear Ron Paul as a racist on the eve of the Iowa primary.

Only 20 year old newsletters that no one talked about the whole year neeeeeeeeeeed to be talked about everywhere on the eve of the primary. That's only ethical, the public needs to re-know etc.

AlexAmore
01-18-2012, 06:21 PM
Haha Palin you fucked up. Nice timing. I'm so sick of Newt. I'm glad he's getting the Cain treatment. This will get him out sooner than later.

HeyArchie
01-18-2012, 06:21 PM
If Paul wasn't in the race, they'd run it with no conscience.

Babylon
01-18-2012, 06:22 PM
A decision was tentatively made to air the interview next Monday, after all votes have been counted.

if the lady has something to say, she can say it.
Why does she need to wait for ABC to air her interview?

I don't think there is anything there.

HeyArchie
01-18-2012, 06:23 PM
Here's what I don't understand...so it's unethical to release it before the South Carolina primary. But if they release it after the South Carolina primary then they're releasing it right before the Florida primary. So what's the difference???
Maybe because Newt has a better chance in SC? Idk... good question.

dbill27
01-18-2012, 06:23 PM
Drudge updated, something bout lewinsky era stuff

Libertea Party
01-18-2012, 06:23 PM
The speculation alone will probably hurt Newt though, on the bright side.

This is the state that elected Nikki Haley. http://www.google.com/search?q=nikki+haley+affair

daviddee
01-18-2012, 06:24 PM
...

jtbraine
01-18-2012, 06:25 PM
Repm,m,m,,m

InTradePro
01-18-2012, 06:25 PM
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash2.htm

Kords21
01-18-2012, 06:26 PM
Maybe because Newt has a better chance in SC? Idk... good question.

Newt has a chance in SC, Romney pretty much has Florida all sewn up so it won't make a difference besides margin of victory at that point.

low preference guy
01-18-2012, 06:26 PM
and just for fun:
4. SOmething involving prostitutes

sounds plausible

Lord Xar
01-18-2012, 06:26 PM
GET ON THE HORN and CONTACT ABC NEWS and tell them that the voters have a right to know. And that by withholding this information is unethical.

Jtorsella
01-18-2012, 06:26 PM
Go to drudgereport.com/flash.htm
really weird.

robskicks
01-18-2012, 06:27 PM
I think it probably has something to do with homosexual tendencies.

archangel689
01-18-2012, 06:28 PM
It's different if it's in shell corporations


Only because of the "perception" of having bank accounts outside the USA is evil.

Sadly, a presidential candidate can not say, "Yes, I have a portion of my wealth outside the USA, because I have no faith that at some point the US Govt will not seize it or institute a wealth tax".

It is a no-no for politicians to advise US citizens to not be susceptible to asset seizure or lawsuits.

Most any good CPA/Financial Planner that is dealing with HNW will absolutely recommend diversifying country risk... It is not illegal.

sailingaway
01-18-2012, 06:28 PM
This is the state that elected Nikki Haley. http://www.google.com/search?q=nikki+haley+affair

they didn't believe it of her. Gingrich is slimy and easy to believe bad things of.

nasaal
01-18-2012, 06:28 PM
If Carol had something bad to say about Paul, they'd find a way to splash it onto every computer screen in America and every news channel.

CableNewsJunkie
01-18-2012, 06:28 PM
For the sake of the SC voters' dignity, they should release it ASAP.

Think about how many people will be ashamed, embarrased, and humiliated to find out this information AFTER they cast their vote for Newt - and then realize their vote was wasted. :eek:

bolil
01-18-2012, 06:28 PM
This is outrageous. Perhaps a more efficient route would be to attempt contact with Marianne. How tho... how? Unless they have some kind of exclusivity contract with her...

dbill27
01-18-2012, 06:28 PM
Newsflash guys! Abc has never considered not airing it! They leaked the story so there's pressure on them publicly now, when it's a dirty interview they can claim they didn't want to air it but it was leaked

Kords21
01-18-2012, 06:29 PM
For the sake of the SC voters' dignity, they should release it ASAP.

Think about how many people will be ashamed, embarrased, and humiliated to find out this information AFTER they cast their vote for Newt - and then realize their vote was wasted. :eek:

Then ABC would learn firsthand the term "Blowback"

sailingaway
01-18-2012, 06:29 PM
Go to drudgereport.com/flash.htm
really weird.

Yes it is, but how did you stumble on that?

robskicks
01-18-2012, 06:30 PM
Newsflash guys! Abc has never considered not airing it! They leaked the story so there's pressure on them publicly now, when it's a dirty interview they can claim they didn't want to air it but it was leaked

whats a dirty interview persay

dancjm
01-18-2012, 06:30 PM
Newsflash guys! Abc has never considered not airing it! They leaked the story so there's pressure on them publicly now, when it's a dirty interview they can claim they didn't want to air it but it was leaked

Good spot.

sailingaway
01-18-2012, 06:30 PM
This is outrageous. Perhaps a more efficient route would be to attempt contact with Marianne. How tho... how? Unless they have some kind of exclusivity contract with her...

We don't want to get anywhere near it if it is nasty. Let it come out from ABC.

captain
01-18-2012, 06:30 PM
if the lady has something to say, she can say it.
Why does she need to wait for ABC to air her interview?

I don't think there is anything there.


Exactly. Surely some other "networks" will grab onto this--but then maybe not--maybe they are all in bed together with the same boss. She can go to anyone and offer an interview....if ABC will wait, then she needs to go to someone else that will expose it today.

Jtorsella
01-18-2012, 06:30 PM
Yes it is, but how did you stumble on that?
I just played around with the Url and thought they might use the same format for other breaking news. I honestly have no idea what it means.
Do you? It kind of reminds me of the seven dwarves. I am still in wtf mode.

dancjm
01-18-2012, 06:31 PM
Gingrich canceled a press conference on Wednesday to deal with the matter.

"He believes that what he says in public and how he lives don't have to be connected," Marianne Gingrich, Newt's wife of 18 years, explained to ESQUIRE last year. "When you try and change your history too much, and try and recolor it because you don't like the way it was or you want it to be different to prove something new ... you lose touch with who you really are."

thesnake742
01-18-2012, 06:31 PM
Newsflash guys! Abc has never considered not airing it! They leaked the story so there's pressure on them publicly now, when it's a dirty interview they can claim they didn't want to air it but it was leaked

Then whats with all this ethics talk? Wouldnt that cast a negative light on them? Would they really want to stage that?

kill the banks
01-18-2012, 06:32 PM
when I hit drudge first time on flash it said something about 10$ million kick back on an arms deal ... did anyone see that ... ? newt fixed a deal

ScotTFO
01-18-2012, 06:32 PM
Hopefully someone will offer her a shitload of money so they can air the interview in the next day or so on a competitive network

bolil
01-18-2012, 06:32 PM
We don't want to get anywhere near it if it is nasty. Let it come out from ABC.
good point had not thought it through.

TheTexan
01-18-2012, 06:32 PM
It may have nothing to do with ethics. They may have just some garbage that ends up being nothing, and are holding on to it, so the Newter gets some negative press before the primary. i.e., they want Romney to win.

We'll see I guess.

dbill27
01-18-2012, 06:32 PM
Then whats with all this ethics talk? Wouldnt that cast a negative light on them? Would they really want to stage that?

They can claim they debated it and found it unethical to air and but for a leak they would have kept it quiet.

Dr.3D
01-18-2012, 06:33 PM
Exactly. Surely some other "networks" will grab onto this--but then maybe not--maybe they are all in bed together with the same boss. She can go to anyone and offer an interview....if ABC will wait, then she needs to go to someone else that will expose it today.
That's what I'm thinking. Some other network is going to spoil the ABC exclusive.

affa
01-18-2012, 06:33 PM
Newsflash guys! Abc has never considered not airing it! They leaked the story so there's pressure on them publicly now, when it's a dirty interview they can claim they didn't want to air it but it was leaked

ding ding ding ding

TheLasersShadow
01-18-2012, 06:35 PM
We all knew that this was going to come out eventually so why are they waiting to release this? A journalists job is to find a story, get all the details including evidence and witnesses on record, THEN report the damn story... Screw timing THE FACT THEY ARE HAVING THIS INTERNAL CONVERSATION IS PROOF OF HOW NON-JOURNALISTIC THEY REALLY ARE, PROOF THEY ARE IN FACT VERY POLITICALLY INVOLVED. Otherwise they'd just release it, if it's the truth and they didn't try to compensate her for this then it's more than legitimate!

Schiff_FTW
01-18-2012, 06:35 PM
Airing this Monday is the best possible outcome for us. We want Gingrich to win South Carolina over Romney. It is the only chance to derail Romney.

affa
01-18-2012, 06:36 PM
$10 million arms deal would certainly seal the deal. i'd be more than happy to see Newt go down for that.

texasbelle
01-18-2012, 06:36 PM
Airing this Monday is the best possible outcome for us. We want Gingrich to win South Carolina over Romney. It is the only chance to derail Romney.

Yes this^^^ I agree with...

sailingaway
01-18-2012, 06:37 PM
Airing this Monday is the best possible outcome for us. We want Gingrich to win South Carolina over Romney. It is the only chance to derail Romney.Not sure I agree. It will play out however it does, though.

kathy88
01-18-2012, 06:37 PM
Maybe it was written into the divorce decree that she could never discuss this? Then it would be unethical because it would be violation of a court order?

rprprs
01-18-2012, 06:38 PM
deleted....sorry I as in error

cstarace
01-18-2012, 06:39 PM
Airing this Monday is the best possible outcome for us. We want Gingrich to win South Carolina over Romney. It is the only chance to derail Romney.
Absolutely. Once Gingrich wins South Carolina, and Romney is no longer the "inevitable nominee", let whatever ethical bomb this interview is explode afterwards. Gingrich drops out, Perry drops out, and it's Santorum, Romney and Paul. Santorum very well could drop out after SC as well.

Agorism
01-18-2012, 06:39 PM
links to the levin books?

Lord Xar
01-18-2012, 06:39 PM
If you read more about that bribery case you find out that the Likud Party (neo-con connections to Israel) were gonna be the money holders for newt. Terrible how those neo-cons have fucked everything up.

kill the banks
01-18-2012, 06:40 PM
$10 million arms deal would certainly seal the deal. i'd be more than happy to see Newt go down for that.

the 10$ M was just newts part or a huge payoff for a much larger deal in Iraq arms exchange ... to suppress the law standing at the time ... it was just there on drudge for few minutes and when I went back it was changed ?.. geez

TheTexan
01-18-2012, 06:41 PM
I'd also prefer Gingrich to win SC over Romney, but I just don't see that happening. I view Gingrich as the kind of guy you can claim to support, but when you actually put pen to ballot you can't bring yourself to do it without barfing up breakfast.

constitutionalism
01-18-2012, 06:41 PM
If Carol had something bad to say about Paul, they'd find a way to splash it onto every computer screen in America and every news channel.

heaven forbid!!

The One
01-18-2012, 06:41 PM
That's still there too, when I checked. Just not the Headline story.


$10 million dollar kickback = small news

Newt's wife thinks he's an asshole = big news

constitutionalism
01-18-2012, 06:42 PM
I'd also prefer Gingrich to win SC over Romney, but I just don't see that happening. I view Gingrich as the kind of guy you can claim to support, but when you actually put pen to ballot you can't bring yourself to do it without barfing up breakfast.
bulimics for Gingrich!!

jordie
01-18-2012, 06:42 PM
ABCNEWS suits determined it would be "unethical" to run the Marianne Gingrich interview so close to the South Carolina Primary.

A decision was tentatively made to air the interview next Monday, after all votes have been counted.

I can bet you this was made by the suits before someone came running up to them "It's already on drudge!". I bet someone was msging drudge from the meeting room, so none of them knew the outside world knew until after the decision was made. Now it's out I bet they will change their mind.

bluesc
01-18-2012, 06:42 PM
This is BS.

AhuwaleKaNaneHuna
01-18-2012, 06:42 PM
As opposed to holding onto it in case they need it in the general, no doubt.

indeed......

This all has brought the primaries, the candidates and media coverage/lack there of, to a whole new level of WTF?

ABC, NEWT, CESS POOL I need to go take a shower.

The One
01-18-2012, 06:44 PM
indeed......

This all has brought the primaries, the candidates and media coverage/lack there of, to a whole new level of WTF?

ABC, NEWT, CESS POOL I need to go take a shower.


Good point Ahuwalekananehuna.

daviddee
01-18-2012, 06:44 PM
...

affa
01-18-2012, 06:45 PM
the 10$ M was just newts part or a huge payoff for a much larger deal in Iraq arms exchange ... to suppress the law standing at the time ... it was just there on drudge for few minites and when I went back it was changed ?.. geez

somebody linked to something here that basically said the wife orchestrated a $10 million kickback to Newt so that he could influence laws that would allow the biggest arms dealer in the world (can't remember name) to collect $58 million or so in money Saddam Hussein owed him.
still rumor as of now, but it was linked to in one of the many threads here on this drudge siren event.

InTradePro
01-18-2012, 06:46 PM
Newsflash guys! Abc has never considered not airing it! They leaked the story so there's pressure on them publicly now, when it's a dirty interview they can claim they didn't want to air it but it was leaked

Good point!

MJU1983
01-18-2012, 06:50 PM
I am surprised how easily people are still duped...so much for the Tea Party. LOL

NEWT GINGRICH? SERIOUSLY PEOPLE?

Dr.3D
01-18-2012, 06:50 PM
The real pressure on ABC is that some other network gets another interview and airs it before they do.

nowwearefree
01-18-2012, 06:50 PM
I know all MSM are crap
but i don't think CBS and ABC gets enough "credit" for what they've done
FOX news is known to be a laughing stock to most young people, yet a lot of time, ABC and CBS are in fact much much worse
much more bias (yes that is possible) than FOX

no wonder people see CNN as trust worthy, because compare to these other bunch of crap, CNN still has tiny bit of credentials

back to topic, ABC all of a sudden think it is unethical , what a joke really

Okie RP fan
01-18-2012, 06:51 PM
Levin is in panic mode trying to defend Mitt (Cayman Islands) and Newt (Marianne).

Also, Fox Nation has a story up over this and people are in full defense mode for Newt.

Okie RP fan
01-18-2012, 06:53 PM
I know all MSM are crap
but i don't think CBS and ABC gets enough "credit" for what they've done
FOX news is known to be a laughing stock to most young people, yet a lot of time, ABC and CBS are in fact much much worse
much more bias (yes that is possible) than FOX

no wonder people see CNN as trust worthy, because compare to these other bunch of crap, CNN still has tiny bit of credentials

back to topic, ABC all of a sudden think it is unethical , what a joke really

The ENITRE MSM is crap.

ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC, MSNBC all display progressive bias.

Fox New is the only detractor, and they display a neocon, establishment Republican bias.

All report their own facts.

Nirvikalpa
01-18-2012, 06:54 PM
Levin is in panic mode trying to defend Mitt (Cayman Islands) and Newt (Marianne).

Also, Fox Nation has a story up over this and people are in full defense mode for Newt.

Haha, and how many of them would you bet were all over the Bill Clinton sex scandal?

cstarace
01-18-2012, 06:54 PM
http://static01.mediaite.com/med/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Picture-139.png

blazeKing
01-18-2012, 06:55 PM
I agree with dbill ... abc wanted this out so the pressure increases on them to release it..so they don't look bad when they put it out. Drudge is the best way to get something out immediately. This will be coming out tomorrow.

affa
01-18-2012, 06:55 PM
TPTB torpedo'd Huntsman to divert attention from Tom Davis endorsing Ron Paul.

TPTB just torpedo'd Newt to divert attention from Mitt and the Cayman Islands (and he's annoying and too big for his britches).

End Goal - Romney 'wins'.

/theory.

sailingaway
01-18-2012, 06:56 PM
somebody linked to something here that basically said the wife orchestrated a $10 million kickback to Newt so that he could influence laws that would allow the biggest arms dealer in the world (can't remember name) to collect $58 million or so in money Saddam Hussein owed him.
still rumor as of now, but it was linked to in one of the many threads here on this drudge siren event.

the link said he was being investigated for those allegations, not that it was true, I believe.

UtahApocalypse
01-18-2012, 06:56 PM
Gingrich canceled a press conference on Wednesday to deal with the matter.

Read more: http://nation.foxnews.com/newt-gingrich/2012/01/18/drudge-newt-ex-unloads-abccould-sink-himabc-debates-airing-primary#ixzz1jrSR1vSF


so he must have an idea that this ship is being captained by the Italian captain.......

grizzums
01-18-2012, 06:57 PM
Regarding this story? Hmmmm...

http://www.dcbureau.org/201112136815/national-security-news-service/newt-gingrich-marianne-and-the-arms-dealera-buried-fbi-investigation.html

liveandletlive
01-18-2012, 06:57 PM
Cayman Island Mitt should be the headline, this is so blatant

sailingaway
01-18-2012, 06:57 PM
Absolutely. Once Gingrich wins South Carolina, and Romney is no longer the "inevitable nominee", let whatever ethical bomb this interview is explode afterwards. Gingrich drops out, Perry drops out, and it's Santorum, Romney and Paul. Santorum very well could drop out after SC as well.
Why would Gingrich drop out after he won SC? I think you aren't thinking his part through.

archangel689
01-18-2012, 06:59 PM
Blah blah. If they hide the caymans we bring it back. There's plenty of crap on flopney. Chicken hawk out of the race sooner than later I say. If they were sacrificing a rook why would it be Newttles and not Fairy

daviddee
01-18-2012, 07:01 PM
...

Paulitics 2011
01-18-2012, 07:02 PM
Blah blah. If they hide the caymans we bring it back. There's plenty of crap on flopney. Chicken hawk out of the race sooner than later I say.

Agreed. Ron can mention it in a debate.

This Newt thing is important.

Lord Xar
01-18-2012, 07:02 PM
Blah blah. If they hide the caymans we bring it back. There's plenty of crap on flopney. Chicken hawk out of the race sooner than later I say. If they were sacrificing a rook why would it be Newttles and not Fairy

Yup. RON JUST HAS TO BRING THIS UP IN THE DEBATES OR CREATE ADS

cstarace
01-18-2012, 07:02 PM
Why would Gingrich drop out after he won SC? I think you aren't thinking his part through.
If the content of the interview is truly "career ending", Gingrich wouldn't have any choice, would he?

sailingaway
01-18-2012, 07:04 PM
If the content of the interview is truly "career ending", Gingrich wouldn't have any choice, would he?

In that case it would be unethical to NOT release it. I have to assume it is just personal stuff for them to be conflicted, but maybe I am ascribing too high of a motive....

archangel689
01-18-2012, 07:04 PM
Debate or attack ad or both it's coming

dbill27
01-18-2012, 07:04 PM
If the content of the interview is truly "career ending", Gingrich wouldn't have any choice, would he?

You're giving Gingrich human-like characteristics like shame and humility. Big mistake

zweezey
01-18-2012, 07:06 PM
ABC thinks it's unethical to unload this new information before SC? BS. They did that with paul and his newsletters// Gingritch is a disgrace to all Americans, and unelectable . What a disgusting man. I always knew how he treated his wife.

archangel689
01-18-2012, 07:07 PM
If the content of the interview is truly "career ending", Gingrich wouldn't have any choice, would he?

Because its the grinch. He won't be sunk until he's sunk.

rprprs
01-18-2012, 07:08 PM
Love the new pic Drudge has with the story...

http://i295.photobucket.com/albums/mm139/rprprs/newt.jpg

cstarace
01-18-2012, 07:08 PM
In that case it would be unethical to NOT release it. I have to assume it is just personal stuff for them to be conflicted, but maybe I am ascribing too high of a motive....
Perhaps it's personal stuff that could be career-ending. The possibility of abortion was brought up. Anything that's potentially worse than cheating on your cancer-ridden wife could be pretty explosive.

Also, you're making the assumption that the media actually has any sense of ethics. ABC will do whatever is in the best interest of ABC.

Bruno
01-18-2012, 07:08 PM
Newt and Slick Willy also smoked cigars and drank whiskey in the White House, swapping stories of their affairs.

Schiff_FTW
01-18-2012, 07:09 PM
Gingrich has no staying power after South Carolina. He isn't even on the ballot in his home state.

InTradePro
01-18-2012, 07:09 PM
ABC thinks it's unethical to unload this new information before SC? BS. They did that with paul and his newsletters// Gingritch is a disgrace to all Americans, and unelectable . What a disgusting man. I always knew how he treated his wife.

Yes. So not a matter of ethics.

Justinfrom1776
01-18-2012, 07:09 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqNjsG5nBVs

Bruno
01-18-2012, 07:09 PM
so he must have an idea that this ship is being captained by the Italian captain.......

Timely wit!

rp2012win
01-18-2012, 07:09 PM
My guess: She released to ABC "The Newt Tapes" and he says some really fucked up shit

Created4
01-18-2012, 07:11 PM
Watch Palin now start back tracking from Newt big time...

tsetsefly
01-18-2012, 07:12 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqNjsG5nBVs

haha, love anti-flag!!!

McChronagle
01-18-2012, 07:13 PM
Agreed. Ron can mention it in a debate.

This Newt thing is important.

i dont see ron attacking him for it because i do believe ron would say we should be allowed more freedom with our money. correct me if im wrong.

rp2012win
01-18-2012, 07:14 PM
Greta just weighed in on gretawire...she said it could be explosive and ABC should not release it yet.

blazeKing
01-18-2012, 07:15 PM
I mean...this is a 2 HOUR INTERVIEW

2 HOURS

That's a lot of time to air grievances.

CasualApathy
01-18-2012, 07:16 PM
It will probably be condenced down to about 30-60 min for television though.

UtahApocalypse
01-18-2012, 07:16 PM
I mean...this is a 2 HOUR INTERVIEW

2 HOURS

That's a lot of time to air grievances.

ABC will find a very specific 3 mins that will probably leave out everything good.

Peace&Freedom
01-18-2012, 07:17 PM
As much as we may grimace at the thought of it, if Paul can't win SC, it really would be preferable for Newt to squeak out a win over Romney, than for Mitt to win it. It would break the narrative that Mitt has the race wrapped up, and the mythos that the winner of SC is unstoppable. We do need for Newt to then be knocked out of the race by his ex's revelations, and for Paul to get about 23% or more to match his other early primary performances. So, we will have by that point a thinned out field, the frontrunner humbled, and a clear path for Paul to win the upcoming caucuses.

Merk
01-18-2012, 07:18 PM
I bet another network would offer her some cash for a nice sit down before the primary to scoop ABC.

MsDoodahs
01-18-2012, 07:20 PM
Greta just weighed in on gretawire...she said it could be explosive and ABC should not release it yet.

Shows what a shithead Greta is, now, doesn't it?

hueylong
01-18-2012, 07:21 PM
P&F is right. Newt winning SC helps interrupt the Romney narrative.

tsetsefly
01-18-2012, 07:21 PM
Greta just weighed in on gretawire...she said it could be explosive and ABC should not release it yet.

Off course she would... why ruin his run now? Although not bad for us if he wins and then this is released and is as explosive as advertised...

KramerDSP
01-18-2012, 07:24 PM
Howard Kurz is tweeting that his sources say there is nothing new in the Gingrich interview that Marianne hasn't said before, but that it is explosive because it becomes a TV story and just before the primary.

blazeKing
01-18-2012, 07:24 PM
Newt winning SC makes him the anti-Romney candidate..it doesn't help us

CasualApathy
01-18-2012, 07:27 PM
Newt winning SC makes him the anti-Romney candidate..it doesn't help us

Agreed, and the campaign has been working very hard to sell this as a 2-man race, so they must agree as well.

cstarace
01-18-2012, 07:28 PM
Newt winning SC makes him the anti-Romney candidate..it doesn't help us
Not if the information within this interview is as game-changing as it's being hyped up to be.

rideurlightning
01-18-2012, 07:29 PM
If it was US they would have aired it. Assholes.

cartemj06
01-18-2012, 07:30 PM
if this could sink newt, and the strategy people would know the implications of that for paul, this would be on the air right now. I have to agree that this is the "cover" for the Mittens money meltdown.

low preference guy
01-18-2012, 07:30 PM
Newt was born in Indonesia?

Pisces
01-18-2012, 07:31 PM
Dave Weigel just tweeted the following:

DEVELOPING: Responding to ABC News, Newt Gingrich challenges ex-wife to 7 Lincoln-Douglas style debates.

CasualApathy
01-18-2012, 07:32 PM
Not if the information within this interview is as game-changing as it's being hyped up to be.

Newt has been going after Romney hard, so his voters are going to be poisoned towards Romney, I very much doubt he will get a majority of them.

bronc_fan23
01-18-2012, 07:32 PM
AP The Associated Press
AP source: ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife, likely to air segment a night before S.C. primary: apne.ws/Acgr11 -CC


http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_ABC_GINGRICH_EX_WIFE?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-01-18-20-09-05

Brian4Liberty
01-18-2012, 07:32 PM
Reading between the lines, this story was leaked to Drudge after the suits decided to keep it under wraps. That means, others will be after Marianne Gingridge to get the story ABC suits want to suppress.


if the lady has something to say, she can say it.
Why does she need to wait for ABC to air her interview?

I don't think there is anything there.


The real pressure on ABC is that some other network gets another interview and airs it before they do.


This is outrageous. Perhaps a more efficient route would be to attempt contact with Marianne. How tho... how? Unless they have some kind of exclusivity contract with her...

Hmmm. She could go to any news outlet with the story, unless there was an exclusivity contract. That would be very convenient. What if ABC paid her well and never aired the piece at all?

Brian4Liberty
01-18-2012, 07:33 PM
Dave Weigel just tweeted the following:

DEVELOPING: Responding to ABC News, Newt Gingrich challenges ex-wife to 7 Lincoln-Douglas style debates.

Lol! Now that's classic! :D

CasualApathy
01-18-2012, 07:34 PM
Hmmm. She could go to any news outlet with the story, unless there was an exclusivity contract. That would be very convenient. What if ABC paid her well and never aired the piece at all?

Well, they HAVE to air it now.

MMXII
01-18-2012, 07:36 PM
AP source: ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife, likely to air segment 2 nights before SC primary

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/ap-source-abc-interviewed-gingrich-ex-wife-likely-to-air-segment-a-night-before-sc-primary/2012/01/18/gIQAJFqI9P_story.html

rprprs
01-18-2012, 07:37 PM
ABC is undoubtedly trying to build up hype for huge ratings when it does air.

rp2012win
01-18-2012, 07:37 PM
AP source: ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife, likely to air segment 2 nights before SC primary

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/ap-source-abc-interviewed-gingrich-ex-wife-likely-to-air-segment-a-night-before-sc-primary/2012/01/18/gIQAJFqI9P_story.htmlLOL so they will be airing the hit piece while CNN is doing the debate

CasualApathy
01-18-2012, 07:39 PM
LOL so they will be airing the hit piece while CNN is doing the debate

Whatevs, it will be online for those who missed it and all over the media.

cynic
01-18-2012, 07:39 PM
LOL so they will be airing the hit piece while CNN is doing the debate

That's what I was wondering...

rp2012win
01-18-2012, 07:41 PM
NVM Nightline comes on after the debate

sailingaway
01-18-2012, 07:42 PM
LOL so they will be airing the hit piece while CNN is doing the debate

Wonder if it will impact Gingrich's performance knowing it is airing as he speaks?

sailingaway
01-18-2012, 07:42 PM
NVM Nightline comes on after the debate

hm. I was getting fond of my scenario..... :(

rp2012win
01-18-2012, 07:44 PM
hm. I was getting fond of my scenario..... :(Unless they have a special air time because it comes on at 10:30 ct.

dbill27
01-18-2012, 07:44 PM
Rp should immediately air an ad in sc touting his family credentials

kill the banks
01-18-2012, 07:45 PM
I guess we wait but 1st drudge flash indicated it was a game changer credible revelation on the arms deal

tsetsefly
01-18-2012, 07:46 PM
I guess we wait but 1st drudge flash indicated it was a game changer credible revelation on the arms deal

DId anyone get a screenshot of that?

Blue
01-18-2012, 07:49 PM
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1


An ABC News executive tells The Associated Press that the network has interviewed Newt Gingrich's second wife and is likely to air the segment Thursday on "Nightline."

SilentBull
01-18-2012, 07:52 PM
Where will Newt's supporters go if this thing airs on Thursday?

GraspingForPeace
01-18-2012, 07:55 PM
Where will Newt's supporters go if this thing airs on Thursday?

Honestly, I think it depends on how well Ron does tomorrow in the debate. He NEEDS to get on the offensive.

tbone717
01-18-2012, 07:56 PM
Where will Newt's supporters go if this thing airs on Thursday?

Scattered in my opinion. If this is huge and causes Newt to drop out before Saturday, then I honestly don't know what will happen. I do know one thing, the campaign needs to be pouring every dollar and every ounce of energy into NV, ME, CO & MN. If we work hard, and play this right we can go 4 for 4 in those states and then it is a whole new ballgame.

lasenorita
01-18-2012, 07:57 PM
So Nightline will be airing a segment about Mitt Romney and the Cayman Islands tonight.


RT @BrianRoss (https://twitter.com/#!/BrianRoss): Watch Brian on @Nightline (https://twitter.com/#!/Nightline) with the latest on Mitt Romney, money and the Cayman Islands: http://abcn.ws/wZZy3O


Watch Brian on @ABCWorldNews (https://twitter.com/#!/ABCWorldNews) with the latest on Mitt Romney, money and the Cayman Islands: http://t.co/AFqPs9Lt

And then they will be airing Briann Ross' interview with Marianne Gingrich tomorrow (http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1), Thursday.

Interesting nights ahead.



Reminder: Nightline comes on at 11:35 PM. Full episodes will be available on the ABC News website (http://abcnews.go.com/watch/nightline/SH5584743).

GraspingForPeace
01-18-2012, 07:58 PM
So Nightline will be airing a segment about Mitt Romney and the Cayman Islands tonight.





And then they will be airing Briann Ross' interview with Marianne Gingrich tomorrow (http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1), Thursday.

Interesting nights ahead.



Reminder: Nightline comes on at 11:35 PM. Full episodes will be available on the ABC News website (http://abcnews.go.com/watch/nightline/SH5584743).

Both of these things are GREAT for us.

Okie RP fan
01-18-2012, 08:02 PM
We need to be cautious in thinking this will have a major effect on Newt.

Think about it. Cain's allegations didn't have too much sway on his support. However, it was the sheer amount of accusations and supposed family issues that the Cain family was experiencing, that made him drop out.

Other than that, his support thought they were cheap attacks.

Well, most of Gingrich's support will take this with a grain of salt, I bet. Depending on how bad it is, of course.

rb3b3
01-18-2012, 08:03 PM
We need to be cautious in thinking this will have a major effect on Newt.

Think about it. Cain's allegations didn't have too much sway on his support. However, it was the sheer amount of accusations and supposed family issues that the Cain family was experiencing, that made him drop out.

Other than that, his support thought they were cheap attacks.

Well, most of Gingrich's support will take this with a grain of salt, I bet. Depending on how bad it is, of course.

i was thinking the same exact thing!

Student Of Paulism
01-18-2012, 08:03 PM
Good, maybe this globalist piece of crap will finally be exposed for what he is. Maybe she has pics of him running around naked and drunk at Bohemian Grove with Henry Kissinger? Maybe some 'lemonparty' type of pic lmao.

Diashi
01-18-2012, 08:08 PM
YEEESSS Burn Gingrich! Burn!

Evangelical_Protestant
01-18-2012, 08:09 PM
We need to be cautious in thinking this will have a major effect on Newt.

Think about it. Cain's allegations didn't have too much sway on his support. However, it was the sheer amount of accusations and supposed family issues that the Cain family was experiencing, that made him drop out.

Other than that, his support thought they were cheap attacks.

Well, most of Gingrich's support will take this with a grain of salt, I bet. Depending on how bad it is, of course.

I think the difference with Cain's allegations vs. Newt's , is that Newt's are from his actual ex-wife in which everyone is aware of what Newt did, so the interview will be alot more harmful to him in my opinion. Cain's women however, were seen as people just wanting a little bit of publicity, possibly to earn money from interviews ect. , but were not taken seriously by his supporters because there wasn't a shred of evidence.

MMXII
01-18-2012, 08:09 PM
Interesting choice of words from the Gingrich campaign spokesperson regarding the interview:

'The failure of a marriage is a terrible and emotional experience for everyone involved. Anyone who has had that experience understands it is a personal tragedy filled with regrets, and sometimes differing memories of events.'

Ok. "and sometimes differing memories of events." hmmm

http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/01/marianne-gingrich-speaks-111389.html

smithtg
01-18-2012, 08:10 PM
and the GOP pundits talk about Ron being unelectable.

london bridge is falling down.. falling down..

pinkmandy
01-18-2012, 08:13 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRlj5vjp3Ko

Justinfrom1776
01-18-2012, 08:15 PM
Interview will air tomorrow night and coincide with the debate(per Politico).

http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/01/marianne-gingrich-speaks-111389.html

F3d
01-18-2012, 08:16 PM
We need to be cautious in thinking this will have a major effect on Newt.

Think about it. Cain's allegations didn't have too much sway on his support. However, it was the sheer amount of accusations and supposed family issues that the Cain family was experiencing, that made him drop out.

Other than that, his support thought they were cheap attacks.

Well, most of Gingrich's support will take this with a grain of salt, I bet. Depending on how bad it is, of course.

Depends on what is brought up, but the Cain Train got nailed hard after the third woman came forward about that affair. Considering the other two accusations, it was obvious that something was up, so it was finally derailed. Hopefully, Newt's ex newters him!

dagnybell
01-18-2012, 08:22 PM
Dave Weigel just tweeted the following:

DEVELOPING: Responding to ABC News, Newt Gingrich challenges ex-wife to 7 Lincoln-Douglas style debates.

That made me laugh out loud!!!

Paulatized
01-18-2012, 08:22 PM
Howard Kurz is tweeting that his sources say there is nothing new in the Gingrich interview that Marianne hasn't said before, but that it is explosive because it becomes a TV story and just before the primary.
Oh, that old story, everybody's heard that story, that's old news. :rolleyes: Nothing new here move along.


Maybe everyone's forgot just how corrupt Newt was, and is, and needs to be reminded. There's a whole new generation that needs to hear the Newt story.

veto
01-18-2012, 08:28 PM
Question.

Even if 'the interview' it's not aired is the fact that an interview exists enough to tip Newt's campaign to nose dive?

Yep you would think this is actually worst than putting it out now. Because if it's just something that's already been said people will say, "Oh well we already knew about this". The way it is now it will be all that is all talked about until the interview is released. Every question Newt get's from the media will be about this interview and his ex-wife. Look back at the Cain Wreck for how the media will be pouncing him.

If they really want to mess with the Grench campaign ABC will say they feel they should release the interview after the GOP primary is over. No one will vote for the man thinking the left has a loaded gun on Gingrich.

Kandilynn
01-18-2012, 08:30 PM
Unless her interview unveils something criminal, like he put out hits on people or buried someone in their backyard, I don't think it's going to make much difference. If voters cared about political inconsistencies, Mitt Romney wouldn't be the front runner.

devil21
01-18-2012, 08:31 PM
There's a debate tomorrow too so if ABC does air it, I wonder WHEN? Compete with the debate's timeslot on CNN? Interesting.

bcreps85
01-18-2012, 08:31 PM
Yep you would think this is actually worst than putting it out now. Because if it's just something that's already been said people will say, "Oh well we already knew about this". The way it is now it will be all that is all talked about until the interview is released. Every question Newt get's from the media will be about this interview and his ex-wife. Look back at the Cain Wreck for how the media will be pouncing him.

If they really want to mess with the Grench campaign ABC will say they feel that they should release after the GOP primary is over, then no one will vote for the man thinking the left has a loaded gun on Gingrich.

A lot of people in some of the comments on articles seem to be assuming it's "just dirty politics". Who knows what the majority think though. My fear is that this won't be bad enough, and then he'll play the victim, get a bunch of free face time on the news, and milk it to a win in SC. The Grinch campaign letter on Drudge makes it looks like they are going to play the "family matter privacy" card.

Some people seem to think that would be good, but I'm not sure anything could be worse than him emerging as the "Romney alternative"...

hueylong
01-18-2012, 08:33 PM
They're airing it tomorrow (Thu) apparently.

Student Of Paulism
01-18-2012, 08:34 PM
A lot of people in some of the comments on articles seem to be assuming it's "just dirty politics". Who knows what the majority think though. My fear is that this won't be bad enough, and then he'll play the victim, get a bunch of free face time on the news, and milk it to a win...

Some people seem to think that would be good, but I'm not sure anything could be worse than him emerging as the "Romney alternative"...

Well if its anything like the Nancy Pelosi 'i have stuff that will bring him down forever' crap, and it winds up being the ethics violations shit, well people wont give a shit. I mean, THEY SHOULD, but its stuff his sheepish voters know of and dont care about. Nancy failed epically with that shit she put out some months back, sure hope his ex has something better.

Lol check out my bad ass post count :D

Kords21
01-18-2012, 08:35 PM
If there were "nothing new" in the interview, then why all the controversay over it? Seems like Newt's allies are trying to brush it off as no big deal. The odds are good that there's something in there that can damage Newt.

veto
01-18-2012, 08:36 PM
A lot of people in some of the comments on articles seem to be assuming it's "just dirty politics". Who knows what the majority think though. My fear is that this won't be bad enough, and then he'll play the victim, get a bunch of free face time on the news, and milk it to a win in SC. The Grinch campaign letter on Drudge makes it looks like they are going to play the "family matter privacy" card.

Some people seem to think that would be good, but I'm not sure anything could be worse than him emerging as the "Romney alternative"...

Oh I agree that's why I was saying it's worst on Newt not being out, it could cast doubt in the voters mind hehe.

affa
01-18-2012, 08:37 PM
My fear is that this won't be bad enough, and then he'll play the victim, get a bunch of free face time on the news, and milk it to a win in SC.

It's a point of historical fact, and I am a historian, that the attacks on my character are pious baloney and the result of my enemies spending twenty trillion dollars to bring me down. Me, a teacher of history and the soon to be nominee, nothing more than a humble man trying to save this nation by knocking Obama out. I say, KILL THEM. Thank you.

Student Of Paulism
01-18-2012, 08:37 PM
Is this his 1st wife or second btw?

bcreps85
01-18-2012, 08:38 PM
If there were "nothing new" in the interview, then why all the controversay over it? Seems like Newt's allies are trying to brush it off as no big deal. The odds are good that there's something in there that can damage Newt.

To make it look like he's being attacked and rally his troops. Believe it or not, a lot of the feedback on some of these articles were suggesting that there was a media conspiracy against the Grinch and all the sorts of things that are actually proven about the bias towards Paul and non-existent in his case. It was sickening. He's manipulative...if it doesn't sink him, he could end up using it some how.

TheViper
01-18-2012, 08:39 PM
There's a debate tomorrow too so if ABC does air it, I wonder WHEN? Compete with the debate's timeslot on CNN? Interesting.
Will air on Nightline which is after the debate.

Is this his 1st wife or second btw?
2nd.

Dr.3D
01-18-2012, 08:40 PM
Lol check out my bad ass post count :D

Wut?

Posts 667

pinkmandy
01-18-2012, 08:41 PM
Is this his 1st wife or second btw?

#2

The one he was cheating on with #3 while forcing the American public to have to listen to the Lewinsky bs for months on end.

Student Of Paulism
01-18-2012, 08:41 PM
Ohh ffs, NIGHTLINE? Why so damn late!! :( Nobody is going to see this crap, especially his old retiree votes who love em so much. Most of them go to bed 6pm and wake up at 3am, ffs :rolleyes:


#2

The one he was cheating on with #3 while forcing the American public to have to listen to the Lewinsky bs for months on end.

Hahha yea, there were actually rumors that him and bill had a secret pact too, but once it got blown open, newt turned on him like the pos he is.

Lord Xar
01-18-2012, 08:42 PM
Ohh ffs, NIGHTLINE? Why so damn late!! :( Nobody is going to see this crap, especially his old retiree votes who love em so much. Most of them go to bed 6pm and wake up at 3am, ffs :rolleyes:

actually old folks go to bed late, at least I have found. They have trouble sleeping.

Dr.3D
01-18-2012, 08:42 PM
Ohh ffs, NIGHTLINE? Why so damn late!! :( Nobody is going to see this crap, especially his old retiree votes who love em so much. Most of them go to bed 6pm and wake up at 3am, ffs :rolleyes:

Yeah, that's why I hope somebody does a tube of it.

Ilhaguru
01-18-2012, 08:43 PM
Hahaha I laughed so hard when I saw this headline I spit all over my laptop!

I hope she doesn't just get Newt to drop out, but end his political career for good.

LibertyEagle
01-18-2012, 08:43 PM
Ohh ffs, NIGHTLINE? Why so damn late!! :( Nobody is going to see this crap, especially his old retiree votes who love em so much. Most of them go to bed 6pm and wake up at 3am, ffs :rolleyes:



Hahha yea, there were actually rumors that him and bill had a secret pact too, but once it got blown open, newt turned on him like the pos he is.

How about you stop insulting older voters, eh? Remember that you are voting for one of those. :rolleyes:

Lord Xar
01-18-2012, 08:45 PM
If Ron hits a home run tomorrow, Newt Support will go to Ron.

IF Ron can capitalize on SOPA and NDAA, he will syhpon votes from Romney.

sunsense
01-18-2012, 08:45 PM
Ethics.

They released info on Romney on his offshore stuff - Damn hypoctites.

hxxp://www.realchange.org/gingrich.htm

Grinch info with sources at the bottom.

What a two timing adulterous creep !

PeacePlan
01-18-2012, 08:47 PM
Hahaha I laughed so hard when I saw this headline I spit all over my laptop!

I hope she doesn't just get Newt to drop out, but end his political career for good.

I was hoping he would take the lead from Mitt - he has so much garbage he would be easy to take down later... Shine a light on Newt and he is dead... Big target..

yeshuaisiam
01-18-2012, 08:50 PM
If ABC does not air it, somebody will.... Even if they find her and tell her that ABC did not air it and if they could get the dirt and put it on youtube to drudge.. LOL. ABC can't bury, it will come out, just like Newt will out of the closet after the interview... LOL

Ilhaguru
01-18-2012, 08:50 PM
I was hoping he would take the lead from Mitt - he has so much garbage he would be easy to take down later... Shine a light on Newt and he is dead... Big target..

I am not sure what would be best, but I would love to see Newt taken down before the debate. One less dbag slandering Paul, and more time for Paul to talk.

Student Of Paulism
01-18-2012, 08:50 PM
How about you stop insulting older voters, eh? Remember that you are voting for one of those. :rolleyes:



Yea, don't worry i aint no spring chicken either (however, i don't drink Ensure nor wake up before 6am lmao) But it's no secret this demographic is Ron's bane right now.

Ilhaguru
01-18-2012, 08:53 PM
Just checked the debate is tomorrow.. .oh well

rp2012win
01-18-2012, 08:54 PM
Hannity just said on this ex wife issue: "That was 15 years ago". Hmmm weren't the newsletters that he didnt write 20 years ago? Why the double standard of statue of limitations

cindy25
01-18-2012, 08:55 PM
How about you stop insulting older voters, eh? Remember that you are voting for one of those. :rolleyes:

Nightline's audience is older; most young people are watching cable (Daily Show and Colbert)
and clips will get replayed on ABC News the next day. timing is perfect.

cindy25
01-18-2012, 08:56 PM
Just checked the debate is tomorrow.. .oh well

debate is 8-10, Nightline is 11:30; and replays of both will be on the internet

vechorik
01-18-2012, 08:58 PM
I'm sure the newspapers will be full of it as well -- that's what "old people" do -- read newspapers
(signed: An Old Person, who thinks "young people" can be funny)

Dr.3D
01-18-2012, 09:03 PM
I'm sure the newspapers will be full of it as well -- that's what "old people" do -- read newspapers
(signed: An Old Person, who thinks "young people" can be funny)

LOL, I don't even subscribe to a newspaper, I don't have time to read them. I'm too busy watching Fox news. :rolleyes:

beardedlinen
01-18-2012, 09:25 PM
I'm sure the newspapers will be full of it as well -- that's what "old people" do -- read newspapers
(signed: An Old Person, who thinks "young people" can be funny)

I'm too busy updating my FaceBook status on my iPad while frequenting local Starbucks in my gently pressed GAP khakis to be interested in your young person comment.

Jtorsella
01-18-2012, 09:27 PM
The twitter vibe from insiders is that it has been hyped and is absolutely nothing new. Apparently a rehash of the Esquire interview.

MsDoodahs
01-18-2012, 09:29 PM
The twitter vibe from insiders is that it has been hyped and is absolutely nothing new. Apparently a rehash of the Esquire interview.

Nothing new to some, but for some it will be new information.

J_White
01-18-2012, 09:31 PM
ethical ? lol.

Kords21
01-18-2012, 09:36 PM
Nothing new to some, but for some it will be new information.

The newsletters were old news, but when rehashed by the media it was big news. I don't see Newt's old baggage being any different. This interview is either all hype or something new, either way I think it'll damage Newt somehow. Look what the press did to Ron Paul in Iowa. The media has a way of bringing up old stuff and making it seem like new.

dfalken
01-18-2012, 09:40 PM
The newsletters were old news, but when rehashed by the media it was big news. I don't see Newt's old baggage being any different. This interview is either all hype or something new, either way I think it'll damage Newt somehow. Look what the press did to Ron Paul in Iowa. The media has a way of bringing up old stuff and making it seem like new.

Actually the brain dead public has about a 5 minute attention span and that is why they keep hopping from scumbag to scumbag and then back again.

nasaal
01-18-2012, 09:53 PM
Actually the brain dead public has about a 5 minute attention span and that is why they keep hopping from scumbag to scumbag and then back again.
Not just that. These videos won't be shown every 20 minutes on every news station like the newsletters were. You really kinda have to burn this into the skull of others to make it stick. I'd rather we not resort to that.

RonPaulFever
01-18-2012, 09:59 PM
Looks like it's going to air!

http://news.yahoo.com/abc-news-air-interview-gingrich-ex-wife-031808081.html

unknown
01-18-2012, 10:00 PM
The guy took $37 million to lobby for Obamacare. Took $ from Fannie and Freddie. Was charged with ethics violations as Speaker and was hit with an unprecedented $300,000 in fines.

Hes a big government Liberal whos a great liar.

Theres more?

pinkmandy
01-18-2012, 10:21 PM
Looks like it's going to air!

http://news.yahoo.com/abc-news-air-interview-gingrich-ex-wife-031808081.html

Beside that story is a link, at the very top of the list, of the false airline story.
If anyone else wants to contact yahoo, here's the contact page:
http://contributor.yahoo.com/company/contact/

I don't see anywhere to leave comments.

Marky
01-18-2012, 10:34 PM
Hahaha I laughed so hard when I saw this headline I spit all over my laptop!

I hope she doesn't just get Newt to drop out, but end his political career for good.

Do you realize how many times the Grinch has been disgraced in his career? Ethics violations. Fines. Adultery. 1.6 million from Freddie Mac. etc. etc.

He is a proven scumbag on pretty much every level yet is still popular in SC apparently.

dfalken
01-18-2012, 10:58 PM
Yeah there is the 10million dollar bribe from the Iraqi arms dealer he helped from his position in congress, and I am sure there is plenty more. The guy is a complete psycopath but what is even scarier is that a significant portion of the US population is willing to vote for him despite all this.


The guy took $37 million to lobby for Obamacare. Took $ from Fannie and Freddie. Was charged with ethics violations as Speaker and was hit with an unprecedented $300,000 in fines.

Hes a big government Liberal whos a great liar.

Theres more?

freneticentropy
01-18-2012, 11:00 PM
Bah. Santorum is going to pick up Gingrich votes, dropping Gingrich a bit and putting Santorum ahead of us. Mitt will win and Paul will be in fourth.

Hope he knocks it out of the park tomorrow night.

dfalken
01-18-2012, 11:00 PM
Do you realize how many times the Grinch has been disgraced in his career? Ethics violations. Fines. Adultery. 1.6 million from Freddie Mac. etc. etc.

He is a proven scumbag on pretty much every level yet is still popular in SC apparently.

Yup, especially amongst Muslim killing, wife cheating bible thumpers. Sad state of affairs the US is in, I really don't think the country is going to make it. If I hadn't left 4 years ago I'd for sure be making plans right about now.

Schiff_FTW
01-18-2012, 11:01 PM
Do you realize how many times the Grinch has been disgraced in his career? Ethics violations. Fines. Adultery. 1.6 million from Freddie Mac. etc. etc.

He is a proven scumbag on pretty much every level yet is still popular in SC apparently.

Unless he literally has bodies buried in his backyard I don't see how anything she says can hurt Teflon Newt.

dfalken
01-18-2012, 11:07 PM
Unless he literally has bodies buried in his backyard I don't see how anything she says can hurt Teflon Newt.

Well, when he divorced her she wrote a book which she threatened to publish. After Newt's lawyers read it they told him to give her every last penny she wanted or he would never work another day in his life. He gave her over 8 million and 50% of his income over the next 10 years. I think beyond the moral and ethical stuff, Newt has serious criminal skeletons hanging in his closet.

GrahamUK
01-18-2012, 11:29 PM
lol the article about the Iraqi arms deal has links to Jack Abramoff .... How can this guy even be running for pres ? the only running he should be doing is from the cops