PDA

View Full Version : File under "Never talk to cops" - marine biologist facing 20 years for filming whales.




Anti Federalist
01-17-2012, 09:07 AM
Another one in the net

Thou shalt not watch whales eating
Jan 14th 2012 | LOS ANGELES | from the print edition

http://www.economist.com/node/21542772

ONE of the unforgettable experiences to be had in California is to go whale watching in Monterey Bay. Nancy Black, a licensed marine biologist, is one of the scientists who lead these commercial outings, besides doing her own whale research. As Lawrence Biegel, her lawyer, tells it, one day Ms Black was in her research boat with assistants when killer whales attacked a pod of grey whales and killed a calf. Its blubber floated to the surface, and the killer whales were about to feed on it. Seizing this opportunity to film their behaviour, Ms Black threaded ropes through some pieces of blubber, then lowered a camera underwater.

For this, Ms Black might now face up to 20 years in prison and half a million dollars in fines, after a federal grand jury indicted her this month. Little about the charges makes common sense. The federal law in question is the 1972 Marine Mammal Protection Act, which was intended to save dolphins, seals and whales from being killed and harassed. The law also banned feeding these animals, on the theory that doing so might compromise their ability to forage naturally in future. Feeding is what Ms Black is now accused of.

She says she was using the protocols she had learned from the federal agencies that are now investigating her to observe a natural feeding that was already in progress.

Just as ridiculous, says Mr Biegel, is the accusation, increasingly common in federal cases, that Ms Black lied to the authorities, which carries its own prison terms. Ms Black always edits the commercial videos of her whale outings to make them more interesting. When investigators demanded footage, she gave them one of these edited videos. Prosecutors now claim that she had tampered with evidence.

To Harvey Silverglate, the author of “Three Felonies a Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent”, this is par for the course in America’s federal justice system today. A couple of trends have combined to threaten justice and liberty. First, federal statutes are often so poorly written and so vague that they are in effect incomprehensible. This gives excessive discretion to bureaucrats and prosecutors, with their own career ambitions, who apply them haphazardly.

Second, federal law has been moving away from mens rea (“guilty mind”), a common-law tradition that suggests that a person who had no idea he was breaking a law should not be accused of doing so. With bloated federal legislation and without mens rea you can accuse most people of something or other, says Mr Silverglate. The question should be, he says, whether charges are reasonable when they run “counter to all human instinct and experience”.




-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[mod edit] must-read article from George Will on this case, this is completely bizarre and scary:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/george-will-blowing-the-whistle-on-leviathan/2012/07/27/gJQAAsRnEX_story.html

Lafayette
01-17-2012, 09:16 AM
How did they find out about this in the first place? Some government bureaucrat mistakenly click on one of her videos while looking for bestiality porn ?

Anti Federalist
01-17-2012, 09:18 AM
How did they find out about this in the first place? Some government bureaucrat mistakenly click on one of her videos while looking for bestiality porn ?

I'll bet money that she is one of these people that vomits up every little detail of her life, under her real name, onto Farcebook.

Including the video.

After all, what does she have to be paranoid about?

"I'm not doing anything wrong..."

Busted.

youngbuck
01-17-2012, 12:54 PM
I'll bet money that she is one of these people that vomits up every little detail of her life, under her real name, onto Farcebook.

Including the video.

After all, what does she have to be paranoid about?

"I'm not doing anything wrong..."

Busted.

I'll bet it was something along those lines too. I'm not paranoid or overly secretive, but nowadays people should exercise some common sense restraint when it comes to posting personal information online.

Krugerrand
01-17-2012, 01:17 PM
I'll bet money that she is one of these people that vomits up every little detail of her life, under her real name, onto Farcebook.

Including the video.

After all, what does she have to be paranoid about?

"I'm not doing anything wrong..."

Busted.

She didn't' like Sea World:

But Tilly’s ultimate value may lie in his being more than just an educator. He is SeaWorld’s largest, oldest male and he has sired 14 calves — making him the park’s top stud. So in biological and economic terms Tilly is essentially one of the animal kingdom’s most valuable defendants. “SeaWorld is a for-profit organization,” said Nancy Black, a marine biologist with Monterey Bay Whale Watch in Monterey, Calif. “That’s a big money-making animal.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/26/us/26whale.html


According to the Tribune, there is a decades-long history of trainers being injured by killer whales, leading some observers to contend that marine mammals should not be kept in captivity.

CNN quotes marine biologist Nancy Black of Monterey Bay Wildlife Watch as saying that putting such an enormous animal in a tank causes it to become very “stressed out.”
http://www.globalethics.org/newsline/2010/03/01/marine-mammals/

Delivered4000
01-17-2012, 03:39 PM
Wow. Just wow.

kahless
01-17-2012, 04:16 PM
If I was on the jury not only would she be "not guilty", I would ask that the state pay her damages related to prosecutorial misconduct.

aGameOfThrones
01-17-2012, 04:41 PM
Nancy Black....


"One of the fifth amendment's basic functions is to protect innocent men who otherwise might be ensnared by ambiguous circumstances. Truthful responses of an innocent witness, as well of those of a wrongdoer, may provide the government incriminating evidence from the speakers own mouth." ~ Ohio v. Reiner

KCIndy
01-17-2012, 04:51 PM
I'll bet money that she is one of these people that vomits up every little detail of her life, under her real name, onto Farcebook.

Including the video.

After all, what does she have to be paranoid about?

"I'm not doing anything wrong..."

Busted.


Wouldn't surprise me a bit.

I'm going to file this one to present, garnished and on a silver platter, to the next simpering fool who laughs at my privacy concerns and says, "I don't care if they search me/my stuff/my email/my house/my kids because after all, I've got nothing to hide. I'm not a criminal!"

Yeah. Sure.

DamianTV
01-17-2012, 05:24 PM
It depends on their definition of "Criminal", which is constantly changing, becoming ever increasingly difficult to be a "Law Abiding Citizen". If anyone in the Government wanted to, they could come up with something to charge you with. But digging that hard many times is too much effort so they just LIE, unsuprisingly. And if anyone wants to know something about Privacy, ask the Jews, then think to yourself about our kids and the mentality they have about Privacy in general. Im sure their answers will be truly frightening to us, because as adults, we understand the consequences of what our children think to be an outdated, useless, and completely trivial Right.

Just read my sig.

jct74
07-31-2012, 11:12 PM
How did they find out about this in the first place? Some government bureaucrat mistakenly click on one of her videos while looking for bestiality porn ?

George Will wrote a good column on this case a few days ago which explains how the whole thing started. Apparently one of her colleagues "whistled" at a whale and another person then squawked to the feds about it, which led to a fishing expedition pursued against this lady and her life savings being drained and scientific career being ruined. Totally bizarre and scary shit, this is really messed up.



Blowing the whistle on the federal Leviathan

By George F. Will, Published: July 27

SAN FRANCISCO

The huge humpback whale whose friendliness precipitated a surreal seven-year — so far — federal hunt for criminality surely did not feel put upon. Nevertheless, our unhinged government, with an obsession like that of Melville’s Ahab, has crippled Nancy Black’s scientific career, cost her more than $100,000 in legal fees — so far — and might sentence her to 20 years in prison. This Kafkaesque burlesque of law enforcement began when someone whistled.

Black, 50, a marine biologist who also captains a whale-watching ship, was with some watchers in Monterey Bay in 2005 when a member of her crew whistled at the humpback that had approached her boat, hoping to entice the whale to linger. Back on land, another of her employees called the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to ask if the whistling constituted “harassment” of a marine mammal, which is an “environmental crime.” NOAA requested a video of the episode, which Black sent after editing it slightly to highlight the whistling. NOAA found no harassment — but got her indicted for editing the tape, calling this a “material false statement” to federal investigators, which is a felony under the 1863 False Claims Act, intended to punish suppliers defrauding the government during the Civil War.

A year after this bizarre charge — that she lied about the interaction with the humpback that produced no charges — more than a dozen federal agents, led by one from NOAA, raided her home. They removed her scientific photos, business files and computers. Call this a fishing expedition.

...

read more:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/george-will-blowing-the-whistle-on-leviathan/2012/07/27/gJQAAsRnEX_story.html

Czolgosz
08-01-2012, 12:01 AM
What's the likelihood she votes big government at every turn?

RickyJ
08-01-2012, 01:08 AM
She must have turned down a banker for a date. There is a reason they are targeting her, and it has nothing to do with feeding whales.

XTreat
08-01-2012, 06:19 AM
\\