ConCap
01-17-2012, 08:32 AM
The Tea Party Movement has been infiltrated and corrupted.
You can not tell one Conservative from another.
It is time to turn away form ALL political parties on a federal level.
It is very easy to tell difference between those who are 100% for the Constitution and the rule of law and those who are not.
It is not easy to tell the difference between all of the different Conservatives or even if they are a Conservative at all.
Now many of the Tea Parties are distancing themselves from Dr. Paul and embracing establishment players such as Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck. Even Newt Gingrich is being courted. Watch out, Tea Party Nation: you're in danger of losing your soul! Newt Gingrich is not one of you. He is not your friend. He is an imposter. He will destroy you just like he almost single-handedly destroyed the Conservative Revolution of 1994.
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/baldwin/100212
Political parties are such a basic part of our political system today, that many people might assume the Constitution must at least mention parties in one way or another... but there is absolutely no mention of political parties anywhere in the Constitution. In fact, in the times of the Articles of Confederation, there weren't even any parties; factions, perhaps; regional blocs, yes; but no parties. Not until the Jackson and Van Buren administrations did organized parties really take hold in the American political system.
http://www.usconstitution.net/constnot.html#pparty
THE FIRST TWO SESSIONS OF CONGRESS WERE “A” POLITICAL AND ALL FRESHMEN. IT WORKED ALL RIGHT THEN, IT WILL WORK AGAIN.
Liberalism in the United States shifted, "between 1877 and 1937...from laissez-faire constitutionalism to New Deal statism, from classical liberalism to democratic social-welfarism". William Novak
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalism
It is not time to split the party or even have a party on a federal level.
It is time to split the people.
Identify those 100% for the Constitution as written and the rule of law.
And those not 100% for the Constitution as written and the rule of law.
This will be the new system.
Cut and dry.
For or Against.
If asked, who are you voting for, just say, “I’m voting for the Constitution“.
No one can argue with that. If they do, they are not Constitutional and you hit them with that.
If you stand for the Constitution, and the rule of law, you stand for everything.
If you stand for a political party, you stand for "?".
You can not tell one Conservative from another.
It is time to turn away form ALL political parties on a federal level.
It is very easy to tell difference between those who are 100% for the Constitution and the rule of law and those who are not.
It is not easy to tell the difference between all of the different Conservatives or even if they are a Conservative at all.
Now many of the Tea Parties are distancing themselves from Dr. Paul and embracing establishment players such as Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck. Even Newt Gingrich is being courted. Watch out, Tea Party Nation: you're in danger of losing your soul! Newt Gingrich is not one of you. He is not your friend. He is an imposter. He will destroy you just like he almost single-handedly destroyed the Conservative Revolution of 1994.
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/baldwin/100212
Political parties are such a basic part of our political system today, that many people might assume the Constitution must at least mention parties in one way or another... but there is absolutely no mention of political parties anywhere in the Constitution. In fact, in the times of the Articles of Confederation, there weren't even any parties; factions, perhaps; regional blocs, yes; but no parties. Not until the Jackson and Van Buren administrations did organized parties really take hold in the American political system.
http://www.usconstitution.net/constnot.html#pparty
THE FIRST TWO SESSIONS OF CONGRESS WERE “A” POLITICAL AND ALL FRESHMEN. IT WORKED ALL RIGHT THEN, IT WILL WORK AGAIN.
Liberalism in the United States shifted, "between 1877 and 1937...from laissez-faire constitutionalism to New Deal statism, from classical liberalism to democratic social-welfarism". William Novak
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalism
It is not time to split the party or even have a party on a federal level.
It is time to split the people.
Identify those 100% for the Constitution as written and the rule of law.
And those not 100% for the Constitution as written and the rule of law.
This will be the new system.
Cut and dry.
For or Against.
If asked, who are you voting for, just say, “I’m voting for the Constitution“.
No one can argue with that. If they do, they are not Constitutional and you hit them with that.
If you stand for the Constitution, and the rule of law, you stand for everything.
If you stand for a political party, you stand for "?".