Guess who is missing?

[nbhadja]

http://silenceisdefeat.org/~chris/blog/images/foxnewskipsronpaul.jpg

Ron Paul with 9.1%....

Good point I should have mentioned this is a few months old, but still its pretty low of Fox. I thought they just would ignore the poll, not exclude Ron Paul from it.

Anyways i found it from this blog- http://www.nolanchart.com/article278.html
It talks about how the media's BS tactics. It is very insightful.

[hornet]

lol, look at the bottom of that...'storm expected to pass'.........buddy i don't think so!

[mwkaufman]

Including Tommy Thompson in that is still pretty egregious but this is from three months ago and we can't dwell on it now. We needed a top three and double digit finish to make news anyways.

[Liberty]

Proof for doubters.

[Grandson of Liberty]

This is quite anger-inducing. I had to come down off the ceiling to type this. At this point I think they are just trying to amuse themselves and saying, "boy this is REALLY gonna tick them off!"

Fair and balanced "journaganda."

[manny]

It will make victory taste even sweeter...

[Furis]

I HATE FOX NEWS!!! Hated them before seeing this, but that pretty much cements it.

Not a fan of the Communist News Network either but they are doing a better job of not manipulating people.

[Korey Kaczynski]

I HATE FOX NEWS!!! Hated them before seeing this, but that pretty much cements it.

Not a fan of the Communist News Network either but they are doing a better job of not manipulating people.

Why do people rag on CNN? Granted, they're not exactly great, either, but it's not like they're one the level of Fox "News."

[Goldwater Conservative]

It seems they also left off the Tank man.

And why is a guy who hadn't declared yet (Fred) even on there, especially when he did worse than two of the people missing?

[freelance]

So, what will FOX do when Ron Paul wins the nomination? Will they openly support Hillary the way they openly supported Lieberman against Lamont?