PDA

View Full Version : John Bolton would seriously consider serving under President Paul




pauladin
01-10-2012, 11:35 AM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/think-tanked/post/bolton-changes-mind-on-ron-paul-would-seriously-consider-serving-administration/2012/01/10/gIQAj2I8nP_blog.html

zHorns
01-10-2012, 11:36 AM
LOL

mosquitobite
01-10-2012, 11:38 AM
LOL
wait - that's not big enough!

LOL!!!

rblgenius
01-10-2012, 11:39 AM
Lol At the "UPDATE"

freejack
01-10-2012, 11:39 AM
Update 11:24: Bolton emails: “Although the likelihood of such a scenario is remote, I would serve to try to persuade Ron Paul toward a more realistic posture in defending the United States and its worldwide interests.”

I feel like I just got Bolton-rolled.

ross11988
01-10-2012, 11:39 AM
Ron Paul would have no problem considerating NOT letting this scumbag serve under him.

anaconda
01-10-2012, 11:40 AM
Maybe he had a change of heart and is now part of The Revolution.

floridasun1983
01-10-2012, 11:41 AM
Is John hedging his bets? LOL. He won't be asked anyway so who cares.

Krugerrand
01-10-2012, 11:43 AM
Bolton emails: “Although the likelihood of such a scenario is remote, I would serve to try to persuade Ron Paul toward a more realistic posture in defending the United States and its worldwide banker's interests.”

corrected.

Jack Bauer
01-10-2012, 11:43 AM
Maybe he had a change of heart and is now part of The Revolution.

lol

V3n
01-10-2012, 11:44 AM
I take it as a sign of Establishment job-seekers starting to show some respect to Ron Paul, while the update was to keep his foot in the door of the Establishment.

Still it's a good sign.

speciallyblend
01-10-2012, 11:44 AM
ron paulin ,this is huge, to have someone like bolton come around to us:) it is not perfect but this is SO HUGE ON ALL LEVELS, advisors are just that. We have a Commander In Chief Ron Paul 2012 Common Sense

liveandletlive
01-10-2012, 11:44 AM
he goes on to say he would change Ron Paul's mind for a more "realistic" foreign policy. (most likely doing the same thing we've been doing) What kind of so called diplomat is this, this is just pathetic

RonPaulCult
01-10-2012, 11:45 AM
Yeah and I would seriously consider dating [insert name of crazy hot chick that I have no chance with]

green73
01-10-2012, 11:46 AM
lol

McChronagle
01-10-2012, 11:47 AM
ron paulin ,this is huge, to have someone like bolton come around to us:) it is not perfect but this is SO HUGE ON ALL LEVELS, advisors are just that. We have a Commander In Chief Ron Paul 2012 Common Sense

it doesnt seem like he coming around to us. it sounds like he just wants to stay so he can implement HIS opinions, not because hes turned the corner.

Tyler_Durden
01-10-2012, 11:47 AM
I take it as a sign of Establishment job-seekers starting to show some respect to Ron Paul, while the update was to keep his foot in the door of the Establishment.

Still it's a good sign.

He heard the: "See this room. 2/3 of us gone under Ron Paul" Pentagon hot mic.

phideaux-deux
01-10-2012, 11:48 AM
Bolton needs a job. He'd work for Hugo Chavez if it paid enough.

COpatriot
01-10-2012, 11:49 AM
http://shechive.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/1272348532_original-lol.gif?w=238&h=211

PastaRocket848
01-10-2012, 11:50 AM
i'd seriously consider kicking john bolton in the balls if given the chance.

Warrior_of_Freedom
01-10-2012, 11:51 AM
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/3779/obamacookie.jpg

Okaloosa
01-10-2012, 11:54 AM
We need to shore up more republican support. I will take it from where I can get it. This is better than Huntsman saying he would have a hard time voting for Ron Paul.

karat32
01-10-2012, 11:59 AM
Bolton is very anti UN and in his mind Pro America I guess

iamse7en
01-10-2012, 12:00 PM
I can see the headlines now:

PNAC, neocon spokesman for the military-industrial complex joins Ron Paul cabinet

These people lie so much that it becomes FIRST nature.

Delivered4000
01-10-2012, 12:01 PM
He will be seriously considered























NOT

Krugerrand
01-10-2012, 12:08 PM
Bolton is very anti UN and in his mind Pro America I guess

I had an positive first impression of the guy because of that sentiment. He isn't anti-UN because of what's wrong with the UN ... he's anti-UN because it sometimes stands up to his globalist ideas.

Hoax
01-10-2012, 12:10 PM
That's great news. I think he'd do a wonderful job managing a research station in Antarctica under a Paul administration.

phideaux-deux
01-10-2012, 12:13 PM
That's great news. I think he'd do a wonderful job managing a research station in Antarctica under a Paul administration.

That's it! I was trying to think of the American equivalent to Gorbachev sending somebody to Siberia.

jsem
01-10-2012, 12:17 PM
LOL!

Didn't Newt say he was going to ask Bolton to be his State Secretary?

Philadelphia76
01-10-2012, 12:17 PM
We need to shore up more republican support. I will take it from where I can get it. This is better than Huntsman saying he would have a hard time voting for Ron Paul.

It wouldn't surprise me if at least some of the folks in the GOP "establishment" are softening their stances on Dr. Paul (e.g. rather than savaging him- take the approach of: "He's a good man that's bringing new blood to the party- but we need to have an "honest" discussion with him and his followers on foreign policy") in the interests of resurrecting the Reagan-Republican "Big Tent" philosophy.

They've thrown evangelicals quite a few bones through the years and collect their votes like clockwork. Why not with Libertarian-inclined Republicans (e.g. GOP platform to target several overseas bases for closure, a dramatic scaling down of foreign aid, and add the elimination of the department of education back to the platform)? Not saying it will work (I'm sure most of us want to see us out of Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan for good and the Patriot Act repealed at a minimum)- but I sincerely doubt EVERY member of the GOP establishment wants to end up in a marginalized Neo-Con bunker with Kristol, Santorum & Co. while the whole country gets turned over to independents, non-GOP libertarians and most of all liberal democrats...

That said- Bolton has always struck me as a guy with a completely unapologetic view that the US should operate proactively and aggressively throughout the globe to confront any and all "threats". Just damn near impossible to imagine that matching up with Dr. Paul in any way...

RDM
01-10-2012, 12:21 PM
That's it! I was trying to think of the American equivalent to Gorbachev sending somebody to Siberia.

Actually Nome, Alaska is the closest U.S. Territory to the Soviet Union.

Carole
01-10-2012, 12:23 PM
Update 11:24: Bolton emails: “Although the likelihood of such a scenario is remote, I would serve to try to persuade Ron Paul toward a more realistic posture in defending the United States and its worldwide interests.”
By Allen McDuffee | 10:28 AM ET, 01/10/2012

Really?

C_J_Burns
01-10-2012, 12:26 PM
I think Dr. Paul should in some form or fashion gesture that he's open to this and welcomes the support... I think people are anti-Paul for two reasons 1. Genuine dislike. 2. Fear of being out of step w/ everyone else. ....Honestly, if you put yourself in their shoes RP people seem like a cult, not b/c we are, but b/c we are portrayed that way in their 'circle'. Let's not forget Dr. Paul IS incorruptible so being seen w/ a few 'hawk-ish' establishment types will gain us more support than it will lose us, IMO


He can really ramp up his Pro- National Defense platform if he get those type of endorsements..

Okaloosa
01-10-2012, 12:34 PM
I think Dr. Paul should in some form or fashion gesture that he's open to this and welcomes the support... I think people are anti-Paul for two reasons 1. Genuine dislike. 2. Fear of being out of step w/ everyone else. ....Honestly, if you put yourself in their shoes RP people seem like a cult, not b/c we are, but b/c we are portrayed that way in their 'circle'. Let's not forget Dr. Paul IS incorruptible so being seen w/ a few 'hawk-ish' establishment types will gain us more support than it will lose us, IMO


He can really ramp up his Pro- National Defense platform if he get those type of endorsements..

Yes, we already have independents. We need republicans. Once Ron Paul picks up more republicans in polls against Obama he will be the most electable in every general election poll.

Robben
01-10-2012, 12:36 PM
Ron Paul is right. Use their own lack of principles against them.

Brian4Liberty
01-10-2012, 12:44 PM
LOL!

Didn't Newt say he was going to ask Bolton to be his State Secretary?

And wasn't it illegal for Newt to do that? Funny how that issue dissapeared.

ExPatPaki
01-10-2012, 12:46 PM
I had an positive first impression of the guy because of that sentiment. He isn't anti-UN because of what's wrong with the UN ... he's anti-UN because it sometimes stands up to his globalist ideas.

Exactly. Hezbollah is also justifiably anti-UN.

sailingaway
01-10-2012, 12:48 PM
snort.

Dary
01-10-2012, 12:52 PM
Maybe he thinks that he could avoid prosecution if he were to serve.

Kluge
01-10-2012, 12:52 PM
Well. I just want Dr. Paul to know I'd seriously consider an invitation to serve on the Innovation Renewal in Technology board - you know, I'd be willing to start it from scratch. But whatever, I'm not really sure he's someone I'd want to work for.