PDA

View Full Version : Final ARG Poll (January 8-9)




JJ2
01-10-2012, 03:51 AM
Here's the final ARG poll results (for what it's worth):

Romney 37 (-3)
Huntsman 18 (+1)
Paul 17 (+1)

http://americanresearchgroup.com/pres2012/primary/rep/nh/

AngryCanadian
01-10-2012, 03:55 AM
Polls can be always wrong.

Student Of Paulism
01-10-2012, 03:56 AM
Lol...why even give ARG any attention, it is obvious their polls are garbage and pander to the 'blocker game' the MSM is trying to play right now.

Jtorsella
01-10-2012, 03:56 AM
Polls can be always wrong.
Arg is a crappy polling agency, but that and Insider Advantage were the only two to show us in third in Iowa. We do not have this locked up.

PauliticsPolitics
01-10-2012, 03:59 AM
I am not one the people on here who say polls are all garbage. I find most polls to be accurate and fair enough.
BUT...
ARG has proven to be garbage over and over again.
ARG is Garbage.

Chowder
01-10-2012, 04:00 AM
I guess the question is, what are the U.S people more interested in come today; polls or liberty?

impaleddead
01-10-2012, 04:01 AM
I think ARG is compensating for the Diebold factor in their polling.

Svenskar_för_Ron_Paul
01-10-2012, 04:09 AM
What's wrong with ARG?

Dsylexic
01-10-2012, 04:12 AM
bottomline: it cant get worse than this.so hope for the best,while this will deflate us ,it will not kill us

Student Of Paulism
01-10-2012, 04:26 AM
bottomline: it cant get worse than this.so hope for the best,while this will deflate us ,it will not kill us

The scary thing about NH when compared to IA and the RCP average, is that Santorum was about 5% below Ron, then won by the same amount. Now, we conveniently have the same crap aagin. RCP avg in NH shows f'ing Huntsman at 5% below Ron, and yea, he we go again :rolleyes:

Already heard all the horror stories in IA, about the missing truck no one was able to spot that was holding some of the final precinct tallies, then the story about Mitt and Rick's campaign observers who then decided to come to an 'agreement' to what the final tally should be, since something had 'come up missing' toward the end of the caucus... (Karl Rove reported this).

It's obvious that Ron got f'd out of winning IA, and NH is even more corrupt when you combine the damn machines they use. Their SoS (who is as corrupt as you can get) already told Town Clerks there that 'counting is optional', which basically means, DON'T COUNT THEM :rolleyes:

Kevin Smyth
01-10-2012, 04:42 AM
Why is anyone voting for Huntsman?

ItsTime
01-10-2012, 04:43 AM
Why is anyone voting for Huntsman?

Still confused about that one.

Student Of Paulism
01-10-2012, 04:46 AM
Yeah, thats what ill never understand. The trolls always love saying Ron is unelectable, yet Huntsman isn't? He has as much chance at being potus as Fred Flintstone does.

Slacker
01-10-2012, 04:49 AM
Why is anyone voting for Huntsman?
He's dreamy. http://i.imdb.com/Photos/CMSIcons/emoticons/love/love1.gif

jersdream
01-10-2012, 04:53 AM
Yeah, thats what ill never understand. The trolls always love saying Ron is unelectable, yet Huntsman isn't? He has as much chance at being potus as Fred Flintstone does.

In a head to head poll with Obama. Huntsman trails by 7, Paul by 1....Paul beats Obama with independents by 7, Huntsman trails Obama by 2 with them.

Diurdi
01-10-2012, 04:56 AM
Will there be a Suffolk tracking poll out today?