futfut
01-09-2012, 09:02 AM
From the huffington post:
"When The Huffington Post contacted the poster of the video through YouTube to ask why they created the video and whether they had any formal association with the Paul campaign, NHLiberty4Paul replied: "Sorry, campaign has asked me not to speak to reporters."
The Paul campaign disavowed the ad Friday. "The video is disgusting. Whoever put it up should remove it immediately," Paul spokesman Jesse Benton said to CNN."
Entire article:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/06/huntsman-denounces-video-_n_1189285.html
There is so much fallacies in their reporting, it's incredible. How do they deduce from a single youtube account that it comes from a "group" of Paul Supporters.
The real story is why the media picks a random video from youtube without verifying the source and makes the headlines with it. And there is a giant hole in their story. The Huffington Post claimed to have contact the youtube user named "NHLiberty4Paul " and asked him if he had any relation with the Paul campaign. The user replied with a comical response: "Sorry, campaign has asked me not to speak to reporters.*"
The Paul campaign completely disavowed the video, so why the video is still not removed after 4 days?
And why a video that has received so much bad press would not be removed by the "alleged" supporter if he wanted the best for the campaign.
Well the explanation is obvious for anyone with half a brain. It's a blatant smear job.
"When The Huffington Post contacted the poster of the video through YouTube to ask why they created the video and whether they had any formal association with the Paul campaign, NHLiberty4Paul replied: "Sorry, campaign has asked me not to speak to reporters."
The Paul campaign disavowed the ad Friday. "The video is disgusting. Whoever put it up should remove it immediately," Paul spokesman Jesse Benton said to CNN."
Entire article:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/06/huntsman-denounces-video-_n_1189285.html
There is so much fallacies in their reporting, it's incredible. How do they deduce from a single youtube account that it comes from a "group" of Paul Supporters.
The real story is why the media picks a random video from youtube without verifying the source and makes the headlines with it. And there is a giant hole in their story. The Huffington Post claimed to have contact the youtube user named "NHLiberty4Paul " and asked him if he had any relation with the Paul campaign. The user replied with a comical response: "Sorry, campaign has asked me not to speak to reporters.*"
The Paul campaign completely disavowed the video, so why the video is still not removed after 4 days?
And why a video that has received so much bad press would not be removed by the "alleged" supporter if he wanted the best for the campaign.
Well the explanation is obvious for anyone with half a brain. It's a blatant smear job.