Just found this from 4 years ago:

[LandonCook]

Just found this from 4 years ago:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/landonwalsh/2228774561/sizes/l/in/photostream/

http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2235/2228774561_ecd4db3222_b.jpg

[The One]

Promoting RP's endorsement of RR is dangerous because RP later criticized RR...somewhat harshly. RP supported RR originally but was disappointed later on when RR's walk didn't match his original talk.

[LandonCook]

Promoting RP's endorsement of RR is dangerous because RP later criticized RR...somewhat harshly. RP supported RR originally but was disappointed later on when RR's walk didn't match his original talk.

Maybe be true in a debate with people to put up blowback... But not as much on material... Either way man that was a confusing sentence.

[anewvoice]

Even so, Ron Paul was disappointed in what was done, not what was said. I imagine that is why he harkens back to W circa 2000, no nation building, what was said not what was done. Ron Paul will be the one who does what he says.

[The One]

Even so, Ron Paul was disappointed in what was done, not what was said. I imagine that is why he harkens back to W circa 2000, no nation building, what was said not what was done. Ron Paul will be the one who does what he says.

Right, but it's real easy for another candidate to come behind this with a "look what Ron Paul said about Reagan" ad that makes RP look like a flip-flopper if somebody's not around to explain the whole story.

[Aratus]

ronald reagan during his econd term was not as hands on when being in charge.
his health issues were impacting his presidency even though the public was not
aware of any drastic change or shift. government was being run by committee.