Fill out this Poll so RP gets more exposure

[weatherbill]

http://www.nrsc.org/survey/

filling this poll out will help Dr PAUL.....do it!

[steph3n]

break the link please, everyone COPY AND PASTE, do not click!

[dsentell]

Copied, pasted and completed the survey!!!

[GHoeberX]

break the link please, everyone COPY AND PASTE, do not click!

Oops I forgot! I filled it in from the link! :/

Weatherbill, change the URL to
http://anonym.to/?http://www.nrsc.org/survey/

[RPinSEAZ]

Weatherbill, change the URL to
http://anonym.to/?http://www.nrsc.org/survey/


Please don't, everytime someone does that it sends alarm bells up to people's IT departments. Just break the link.

[billjarrett]

Cut pasted and filled out. Doubt mine will be counted though, I couldn't help but put Rudy Guliani as the most dangerous Democrat running.

[Goldwater Conservative]

I love how they wrote this after my survey was submitted:

* Will America under Republican leadership continue to aggressively fight the Islamic Jihadists threatening our freedom or will we turn inward and allow dangers to gather around us as we did under President Clinton?
* Will a Republican Congress working with a Republican President work together to cut wasteful spending and take steps to reduce our country's debt or will a Democrat Congress and Democrat President spend our way into further debt?
* Will President Bush's historic tax cuts be made permanent or will Democrats raise our taxes?

So apparently there is no room for Republicans who think the Islamic jihadist threat is overstated and/or that the best way to "fight" them is to secure our borders and return to a policy of strong national defense instead of nation-building which actually weakens us and makes more enemies, not less.

And when wasteful spending and debt have skyrocketed under the first GOP president with a GOP Congress since Eisenhower, that second point makes me laugh in a saddened way.

And tax cuts still seem to be the end-all, be-all of fiscal conservatism. Forget eliminating taxes or even simplifying the tax code and removing inefficiencies. It's all about lowering rates. Only socialists want to have taxes that make sense and pay for spending, I guess.

[seapilot]

I read that too. I am not too worried about the Jihadists threatening my freedom just the bueracrats that go messing with my Bill of Rights threatens freedom. They need to go into a Islamic Jihadist detox class. The dangers under Clinton was also in the U.S. with Waco and Ruby Ridge. Neocons like to attack outsiders, the socialist like to attack insiders. Anyone else feel strangely like we are the sane ones they call fruitcakes?

[Goldwater Conservative]

I read that too. I am not too worried about the Jihadists threatening my freedom just the bueracrats that go messing with my Bill of Rights threatens freedom. They need to go into a Islamic Jihadist detox class. The dangers under Clinton was also in the U.S. with Waco and Ruby Ridge. Neocons like to attack outsiders, the socialist like to attack insiders.
Yeah, and the "but what about 9/11?" argument is strange because the Bush doctrine was not a new policy, but the Republican establishment's ratification of a previously Democrat policy with the dial turned up to 11.


Anyone else feel strangely like we are the sane ones they call fruitcakes?
Definitely. I wonder if the Founding Fathers, who we know call patriots and visionaries, dealt with the same scorn from anti-revolutionaries.

[Mark Rushmore]

Couldn't help myself on the "Which Democratic candidate for president would be most harmful to the country" - had to put Giuliani. Hope it doesn't discount the Ron Paul vote ;).

Edit. Wow, I should read all the responses before I respond ;) sorry for the repeat, but well played joker#1.

[Goldwater Conservative]

Couldn't help myself on the "Which Democratic candidate for president would be most harmful to the country" - had to put Giuliani. Hope it doesn't discount the Ron Paul vote ;).

Edit. Wow, I should read all the responses before I respond ;) sorry for the repeat, but well played joker#1.

Haha, I did that too. Thanks to the first guy to mention that in this thread for the idea.

And I put Judge Andrew Napolitano of Fox News for the VP slot. He's had some great things to say about Paul and is a staunch opponent of the Patriot Act. Apparently describes himself as a pro-life libertarian.

[Cap'n Crunk]

Who are you guys putting as the VP? I put South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford

[ladyliberty]

Tancredo eeny-meeny -miny -tancredo

[Cap]

For VP only one other person other than Dr. Paul, has a 100% record on the Conservative Index and that person is Walter Jones R-N.C.