jemuf
12-24-2011, 02:56 PM
The neo-cons at the National Review (NR) are leading the charge against Dr. Paul.
NR's Rich Lowry wrote a 100% biased article "A ‘blame America first’ Republican". I emailed a rebuttal to NR's Rich Lowry at comments.lowry@nationalreview.com & letters@nypost.com
National Review has a racist past IF Paul does. William F. Buckley, NR's, founder is accused of racist writings dating back to the 60's. From 2007: www.brinklindsey.com/?p=131
How do we, sane Americans, distinguish between racist and provocative?
NR's Rich Lowry wrote a 100% biased article "A ‘blame America first’ Republican". I emailed a rebuttal to NR's Rich Lowry at comments.lowry@nationalreview.com & letters@nypost.com
National Review has a racist past IF Paul does. William F. Buckley, NR's, founder is accused of racist writings dating back to the 60's. From 2007: www.brinklindsey.com/?p=131
How do we, sane Americans, distinguish between racist and provocative?