PDA

View Full Version : National Review neo-cons may be Dr. Paul's worst enemy! NR also accused of racism!




jemuf
12-24-2011, 02:56 PM
The neo-cons at the National Review (NR) are leading the charge against Dr. Paul.

NR's Rich Lowry wrote a 100% biased article "A ‘blame America first’ Republican". I emailed a rebuttal to NR's Rich Lowry at comments.lowry@nationalreview.com & letters@nypost.com

National Review has a racist past IF Paul does. William F. Buckley, NR's, founder is accused of racist writings dating back to the 60's. From 2007: www.brinklindsey.com/?p=131

How do we, sane Americans, distinguish between racist and provocative?

Austrian Econ Disciple
12-24-2011, 05:23 PM
Boy would I love to see the day when The Freeman has a higher subscriber base than those statist imperial tools National Review.

jemuf
12-25-2011, 03:05 PM
National Review is making all kinds of friends this week. The interesting thing about Dr. Paul's candidacy is the long-term damage "conservative" organizations like Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, and National Review are doing to themselves. They are losing credibility, and what they're doing to Paul will not increase subscribers.

The nephew of National Review's founder effectively broke with the prominent conservative magazine (National Review) after its editors published an editorial this week praising Mitt Romney and Jon Huntsman as worthy Republican presidential nominees.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/12/17/nephew-national-reviews-founder-blasts-magazine-over-romney-huntsman-comments/