Publicani
12-22-2011, 09:18 AM
What's new compared to the '08 attack? He's not called a racist, but he's accused from profiting from his newsletters containing some racist material. CNN asked him to return the money to some charity.
Why don't we moneybomb for him a million or two for this purpose?
We can think of good charitable cause to start a new charity. Something like "honesty in racial reporting," Or "Truth in News," or something else if you think it's too cheesy.
If we do it fast, it'll serve at least 3 purposes:
1. It puts to rest the notion that he profited from something politically incorrect.
2. It'll bring some additional news to him and his support. Hopefully good news.
3. This new charity could be used to pay a few people to monitor main media for bias or do something else. Maybe something like a Cato institute, only useful.
Not sure myself if it's a good idea. What do you think?
Why don't we moneybomb for him a million or two for this purpose?
We can think of good charitable cause to start a new charity. Something like "honesty in racial reporting," Or "Truth in News," or something else if you think it's too cheesy.
If we do it fast, it'll serve at least 3 purposes:
1. It puts to rest the notion that he profited from something politically incorrect.
2. It'll bring some additional news to him and his support. Hopefully good news.
3. This new charity could be used to pay a few people to monitor main media for bias or do something else. Maybe something like a Cato institute, only useful.
Not sure myself if it's a good idea. What do you think?