PDA

View Full Version : NH PPP Poll 12/20: Romney 35%, Paul 19%, Gingrich 17%




Lavitz
12-19-2011, 10:39 PM
Didn't see a thread for this.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2011/12/romney-dominating-new-hampshire.html#more

Mitt Romney - 35%
Ron Paul - 19%
Newt Gingrich - 17%
Jon Huntsman - 13%
Michele Bachmann - 5%
Rick Santorum - 3%
Rick Perry - 2%
Gary Johnson - 1%

Edit: Yes, I know I got the date wrong in the thread title :p

tsetsefly
12-19-2011, 10:41 PM
2nd place, now we need those Flip flopping mitt ads to start rolling!

rideurlightning
12-19-2011, 10:42 PM
Is NH winner take all?

tsai3904
12-19-2011, 10:46 PM
Is NH winner take all?

No, it's proportional to candidates who get at least 10%.

Agorism
12-19-2011, 10:46 PM
Romney's lead is just way too large like newt's was in IA.

I think no way to winNH without going negative.

rideurlightning
12-19-2011, 10:53 PM
No, it's proportional to candidates who get at least 10%.

Well that's good news if we can't pull off a win. I think we can though with the boost from Iowa.

South Park Fan
12-19-2011, 10:56 PM
Romney's lead is just way too large like newt's was in IA.

I think no way to winNH without going negative.

We can't successfully go negative against Romney's past ideological stances; Paul is tied with Romney among voters who care about issue positions. Romney only has such a large lead because he's overwhelmingly considered the most electable. Beating Romney in IA will narrow the gap, but unless Paul is just going to run ads showing that he polls best with independents I don't see how negative advertising will help.

PauliticsPolitics
12-19-2011, 10:57 PM
FORUM SEARCH FAIL.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?339789-PPP-NH-Poll-Romney-35-Paul-19-Gingrich-17&highlight=publicpolicypolling

(http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?339789-PPP-NH-Poll-Romney-35-Paul-19-Gingrich-17&highlight=publicpolicypolling)Do you really think RPF is 11 hours behind the news?

Fermli
12-19-2011, 11:00 PM
I thought PPP was releasing a national poll today. What happened to that?

BringBackLiberty
12-19-2011, 11:04 PM
Hopefully we can pull a victory in Iowa and get that momentum rolling. I'm really mixed on the going negative idea, although it seems to have been extremely effective on Newt. Anyway, stay positive people! This one poll at the present time doesn't mean it's over yet! By the way first post. Ron Paul 2012!

FriedChicken
12-19-2011, 11:35 PM
The campaign has got some really good intel, I feel pretty confident in them making a decision on attacking Mitt heavily - I think they probably will.
Also - isn't NH a place we really need to sell to the anti-war crowd? I think a lot of Huntman's supporters might switch over to us if we play our cards right. Maybe some Bachmann fans (light duty ones) will come over after she is beaten in Iowa.

Agorism
12-19-2011, 11:39 PM
We can't successfully go negative against Romney's past ideological stances; Paul is tied with Romney among voters who care about issue positions. Romney only has such a large lead because he's overwhelmingly considered the most electable. Beating Romney in IA will narrow the gap, but unless Paul is just going to run ads showing that he polls best with independents I don't see how negative advertising will help.


Put an ad together like the serial hypocrisy ad for NH.

South Park Fan
12-20-2011, 12:13 AM
Put an ad together like the serial hypocrisy ad for NH.

Do you think that attacking his flip-flopping would be effective anyway since it would show how easily he would be attacking in the general election?

RPit
12-20-2011, 12:16 AM
Spread the word yourself that Ron is the most electable as he does the best with independents. Here's a flyer to give out.

http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/7629/defeatingobama.png

RickyJ
12-20-2011, 12:17 AM
Romney's lead is just way too large like newt's was in IA.

I think no way to winNH without going negative.

I disagree. Going negative may hurt Romney but it can also hurt Paul. Paul can just speak about what he has done and compare that to what Romeny has done and let the chips fall where they may.

Agorism
12-20-2011, 12:19 AM
I disagree. Going negative may hurt Romney but it can also hurt Paul. Paul can just speak about what he has done and compare that to what Romeny has done and let the chips fall where they may.

If we had done that in Iowa, Gingrich would be where he is at nationally or in the south in the 40's.

Karsten
12-20-2011, 12:20 AM
Romney's lead is just way too large like newt's was in IA.

I think no way to winNH without going negative.

Yeah, and we got rid of Gingrich's quickly.
No reason we can't do the same here.

BamaAla
12-20-2011, 12:24 AM
If we can pull of the win in Iowa, New Hampshire looks to be in play! This has been a good few days. Look for the gloves to come off in the next few days; don't get complacent, and don't let your guard down.

Maximus
12-20-2011, 12:25 AM
Go positive, win Iowa, GOTV, we'll win NH