View Full Version : We don't need media coverage
Incrimsonias
12-19-2011, 07:04 AM
Better to go under the radar at this point.
matt0611
12-19-2011, 07:08 AM
I agree, if we're in a bit of a lead I rather just have this stay quiet until Iowa. Once we win Iowa the media WILL cover us (and not in a good way for the most part).
We just need more call from home, more donating, talking to people, etc
Keep our foot on the gas until Iowa.
slamhead
12-19-2011, 07:57 AM
Like the neo-cons ignoring the CIA and 9/11 commission report the MSM ignores us at their own peril.
vechorik
12-19-2011, 08:04 AM
We just need more call from home, more donating, talking to people, etc
Keep our foot on the gas until Iowa.
Yep -- especially "call from home"
Elwar
12-19-2011, 08:07 AM
We are two weeks from the first days of voting...
The trend for those popping up in the polls has been a cycle of a month to rise and fall.
If such a trend gives Ron Paul a bump, he will have won Iowa and New Hampshire within that month.
Winning Iowa and New Hampshire would completely change that whole dynamic.
Report the good news. Prepare for the bad. Stick to phone calls.
Elwar
12-19-2011, 08:08 AM
There are also no more debates between now and Iowa.
CaptUSA
12-19-2011, 08:14 AM
I agree. Paul should lay a little low. Anything he says now will be used to suggest he's dangerous. They see his rise and they want to end it precipitously.
Stick with ads, grassroots phoning, strong fundraising, and of course... CAROL PAUL!!!
NOW IS THE TIME!!!
klamath
12-19-2011, 08:18 AM
I bumped the thread I started in august on this very same subject.
Badger Paul
12-19-2011, 08:21 AM
Too late for that. If anything the media is going to be attacked for not covering Paul in their arrogance about his chances.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.