RonPaul101.com
12-15-2011, 11:04 PM
Is that the anchor to which the GOP establishment is going to take against Ron Paul? Really? It's an even weaker argument than the one that existed against Iraq. So wait, we should move towards going to war with Iran because they MIGHT go to war with Israel?
Please. If Iran somehow, in some imaginary future, bombed the US, President Paul would unleash the closest definition to "hell" on Iran it would shock everyone. He. Will. Defend. America. That said, they pose no threat at all. They certainly don't even pose the level of threat that the Pakistanis do and WE fund their military with foreign aid.
If this country's voters are foolish enough to go against voting for Paul because he doesn't want ANOTHER preemptive war, then I am moving out.
Please. If Iran somehow, in some imaginary future, bombed the US, President Paul would unleash the closest definition to "hell" on Iran it would shock everyone. He. Will. Defend. America. That said, they pose no threat at all. They certainly don't even pose the level of threat that the Pakistanis do and WE fund their military with foreign aid.
If this country's voters are foolish enough to go against voting for Paul because he doesn't want ANOTHER preemptive war, then I am moving out.