Levin: It was Obama who required Indefinite Detainment Bill INCLUDE U.S. Citizens

[John F Kennedy III]

Levin: It was Obama who required Indefinite Detainment Bill INCLUDE U.S. Citizens

Sherrie Questioning All
December 11, 2011

Well now we know, for those who have been holding out “hope” that Obama will veto the 1031 Indefinite Detainment Bill against holding U.S. Citizens without rights to a trial or lawyer or charges for the rest of their lives…. It was Obama who required the bill have the language of U.S. Citizens being held without rights in the bill! The only reason he would veto it, is because it does not give him the absolute power as he wants!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=PLiKvSz_wX8

Obama wants absolute Dictatorial Powers and the Senate gave it to him? I posted some of his Lies during his campaign. Especially the ones about the Rights of the People, closing Gitmo and standing up for the Constitution.

Here is Senator Levin on the floor of the Senate revealing it was Obama himself who Demanded U.S. Citizens be part of the Indefinite Detainment Bill!

Please send this video to your State Representatives, especially those Republican held states – maybe they will have morals and protect their state citizens from this. I know…. it is doubtful – but we still have to try, in my opinion.

Read more (http://sherriequestioningall.blogspot.com/2011/12/senator-levin-revealed-it-was-obama-who.html)


Hyperlinks in original article:
http://www.infowars.com/levin-it-was-obama-who-required-indefinite-detainment-bill-include-u-s-citizens/

[bluesc]

Levin looks like the Penguin from Batman Returns. Disgusting man.

[eduardo89]

Levin looks like the Penguin from Batman Returns. Disgusting man.

Don't insult Oswald Chesterfield Cobblepot.

[John F Kennedy III]

Levin looks like the Penguin from Batman Returns. Disgusting man.

Agreed.

[Zippyjuan]

Even Glenn Beck at the Blaze has an article saying Obama is opposed to that.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-and-national-security-team-oppose-ndaa-indefinite-detention-bill/


Obama and National Security Team Oppose NDAA ‘Indefinite Detention’ Bill

(The Blaze/AP) — President Barack Obama has personally appealed to lawmakers for changes in a sweeping defense bill that would mandate military custody for some captured terrorism suspects, saying he needs greater flexibility to prosecute the war on terror, administration and congressional officials said Friday.


The president has led a full-court press this week by his senior national security team, including Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and FBI Director Robert Mueller, in asking for revisions to the bill as House and Senate negotiators move swiftly to complete a final version. The White House has threatened a veto of the legislation over provisions requiring military custody for captured terrorism suspects as well as other restrictions on executive authority.

Obama spoke to Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, D-Mich. Clinton and Panetta also spoke to Levin, and Mueller has met with Republican Sens. John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire, said the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private conservations.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-and-national-security-team-oppose-ndaa-indefinite-detention-bill/

[Feeding the Abscess]

Even Glenn Beck at the Blaze has an article saying Obama is opposed to that.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-and-national-security-team-oppose-ndaa-indefinite-detention-bill/

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-and-national-security-team-oppose-ndaa-indefinite-detention-bill/


saying he needs greater flexibility to prosecute the war on terror, administration and congressional officials said Friday

Obama's mad because the bill makes it up to the President's discretion as to whether these actions can occur, as opposed to it being policy that it occurs. He wants to unleash the CIA/FBI.

[John F Kennedy III]

Even Glenn Beck at the Blaze has an article saying Obama is opposed to that.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-and-national-security-team-oppose-ndaa-indefinite-detention-bill/

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-and-national-security-team-oppose-ndaa-indefinite-detention-bill/

You're using Glenn Beck as a source? Really?

[Zippyjuan]

I know- he is not really that reliable in most cases but it was interesting that they reported a piece supporting Obama on an issue. If they say he was opposed to it, then he really must have been against it. This doesn't fit the Glenn Beck theory that Obama is an imperial warmongering rights stealing dictator/ puppet.

[Humanae Libertas]

It wouldn't make a difference, NDAA or not, Obama has already illegally executed Americans'.

[John F Kennedy III]

It wouldn't make a difference, NDAA or not, Obama has already illegally executed Americans'.

Yep.

[Lucille]

McCain (http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/03/a-detention-bill-you-ought-to-read-more-carefully/37116/) has had it in the works for quite some time.


Why is the national security community treating the "Enemy Belligerent, Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010," introduced by Sens. John McCain and Joseph Lieberman on Thursday as a standard proposal, as a simple response to the administration's choices in the aftermath of the Christmas Day bombing attempt? A close reading of the bill suggests it would allow the U.S. military to detain U.S. citizens without trial indefinitely in the U.S. based on suspected activity...

It's the main reason why Nolan (http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2010/09/30/nolan-exposes-mccain%E2%80%99s-antipathy-for-civil-liberties-in-arizona-senate-debate/) ran against him in '10:


Nolan: “One of the reasons I got into this race is that right now, at this very moment Sen. McCain is a sponsor – I think the lead sponsor of Senate Bill 3081 […] a bill which would authorize the arrest and indefinite detention of American citizens without trial and without recourse. This is one of the most dangerous, evil, un-American bills that’s ever been proposed in congress and nobody who would sponsor such a bill should be sitting in a seat in the United States Senate.”

The Late David Nolan’s Indefinite Detention of U.S. Citizens Fears One Step Closer to Being Realized (http://www.thelibertypapers.org/2011/12/01/the-late-david-nolan%E2%80%99s-indefinite-detention-of-u-s-citizens-fears-one-step-closer-to-being-realized/)


Fast forward just over a year later, Sen. McCain has sponsored another piece of legislation hidden in the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2012 that is very similar.
[...]
...I have no confidence that any of the Republican challengers would veto similar legislation in the future save Gary Johnson (who is sadly very much a long shot at this point), Ron Paul, or perhaps Jon Huntsman.

We can now see that David Nolan’s concerns he expressed in the 2010 debate were well founded after all.