Replay: Rand Paul Destroys Newt During Hannity Interview

[SchleckBros]

Stream: http://www.kgmi.com/pages/2977035.php

Interview will start right after the commercial break.

If someone could record this and post it on Youtube that would be glorious. Rand Paul does a great job in this interview with Hannity.

[Napolitanic Wars]

Thanks. I was just looking for a clip of this.

[Chrysamere]

It doesn't take me to a stream. :(

[jct74]

It doesn't take me to a stream. :(

link at top of page, click "listen live"

[Elfshadow]

Why are they playing music??

[trey4sports]

what the fuck. this is 80s music

[jct74]

what is this shitty music? where's Hannity?

[smartguy911]

crappy music man

[degen]

groovy

[Feeding the Abscess]

It's playing adult pop?

EDIT: It would be hilarious if Hannity dumped the interview from the re-airing.

[jct74]

we got Rand-rolled, again.

[LibertyEsq]

nvm

[Elfshadow]

they said Rand Paul after break when I started listening........

[jct74]

it was Hannity right before the commercial break, he said Rand was coming up.

[SchleckBros]

Interview is about to start.

[smartguy911]

this is 1st time i got Rand Rolled

[degen]

Here it is!

[trey4sports]

finally!

[Feeding the Abscess]

Did Hannity have the interview dumped from the rebroadcast?

[Elfshadow]

Hes on.

[eric4186]

oh wow just in time. He's on now guys

[William R]

You have to listen to the entire commercial which includes some music. I'm listening to Rand now

[IterTemporis]

I am not hearing music, I am hearing Rand.

[IterTemporis]

Hannity mentioning statist again... Wow..

[Ronulus]

this is great!

[trey4sports]

Burn.

[degen]

Hannity angry that Rand brought up Newt?

[trey4sports]

Hannity is such a statist. lol

[thehungarian]

HEY GUYS NEWT IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SURPLUSES OF THE 90S

[No Free Beer]

Rand is so smart

[SchleckBros]

Hannity is about to cry. I'm loving every second of this.

[tsetsefly]

what is he saying, i hope someone puts this up on youtube....

[degen]

How can Hannity be so fooled by Newt's slick talk?

[Oddone]

How can Hannity be so fooled by Newt's slick talk?

He is Hannity.

[Feeding the Abscess]

How can Hannity be so fooled by Newt's slick talk?

He's not fooled. He's pushing the same agenda.

[thehungarian]

"His book is very good" - Hannity on Trump's new book. There you go.

[SchleckBros]

Hannity is still crying. I love you Rand!!!

[LibertyEsq]

Rand isn't destroying anything. This is just Hannity making Rand defensive about Ron and talking about Trump

[trey4sports]

god i can't stand Hannity.

[No Free Beer]

I'll say it again...

RAND IS THE MAN!

[specsaregood]

So is the bromance over between the 2?

[Oddone]

Hannity insannity

[Feeding the Abscess]

Rand isn't destroying anything. This is just Hannity making Rand defensive about Ron and talking about Trump

Started out strong, then Hannity walked all over him. As usual.

Rand's building bridges, but if you don't hold the fort on your end, where's the bridge? Bridge to Nowhere? lol

[SchleckBros]

Rand isn't destroying anything. This is just Hannity making Rand defensive about Ron and talking about Trump

He was attacking Newt in the beginning of the interview.

[degen]

Meh

[LibertyEsq]

Meh

+1

[Student Of Paulism]

Lol, aside from Sean calling him nuts for not going to the Trump debate, that went wasn't too bad. Rand stuck up for the whole FP issue pretty well, and you can almost feel Sean wanting to bite hehe.


HEY GUYS NEWT IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SURPLUSES OF THE 90S

From what i read about that, the surplus in the late 90s wasnt even intentional or planned to happen.

[zerosdontcount]

I thought it was good exposure of Ron and a reminder of Newts corruptness.

[degen]

Did anyone else catch that Rand won't be in Iowa until after the Holidays?

[Oddone]

Did anyone else catch that Rand won't be in Iowa until after the Holidays?

Yea, by Jan 1st.

[Brian4Liberty]

Pretty good interview. Rand got Hannity all excited beforehand about a "breaking news" announcement. Hey Shawn, how often are those flashing "breaking news" banners on Fox really breaking news? Hannity appreciated the use of the "breaking news" angle, so it was no big deal.

Rand called out Newt on TARP, individual health mandates, Freddie/Fannie, etc. Good segment.

[Feeding the Abscess]

Pretty good interview. Rand got Hannity all excited beforehand about a "breaking news" announcement. Hey Shawn, how often are those flashing "breaking news" banners on Fox really breaking news? Hannity appreciated the use of the "breaking news" angle, so it was no big deal.

Rand called out Newt on TARP, individual health mandates, Freddie/Fannie, etc. Good segment.

Agreed.

Wish Rand would be as strong on the foreign policy front, though.

[thehungarian]

Did anyone else catch that Rand won't be in Iowa until after the Holidays?

I think that might be a good idea. A lot of people don't make up their minds until the last minute and seeing as Rand has high favorables with conservatives having him go there for the home stretch we may get the most bang for the buck.

[Austrian Econ Disciple]

Lol, aside from Sean calling him nuts for not going to the Trump debate, that went wasn't too bad. Rand stuck up for the whole FP issue pretty well, and you can almost feel Sean wanting to bite hehe.



From what i read about that, the surplus in the late 90s wasnt even intentional or planned to happen.

What surpluses? The debt went up every year in the 1990s. There was never any surplus. This myth needs to be shattered. In fact, ever year in the 1990s had a deficit. Period. Those are the facts. Don't let them use the stupid GDP to Debt ratio crap. It's an obfuscation and manipulative tool.

[damiengwa]

Did anyone else catch that Rand won't be in Iowa until after the Holidays?

its like the game of chess, you don't develop your queen until the end of the game when its most powerful and least vulnerable.

[FreedomProsperityPeace]

What surpluses? The debt went up every year in the 1990s. There was never any surplus. This myth needs to be shattered. In fact, ever year in the 1990s had a deficit. Period. Those are the facts. Don't let them use the stupid GDP to Debt ratio crap. It's an obfuscation and manipulative tool.The funny thing is, Republicans were saying that back when Dems were crowing about Clinton creating a surplus and Bush destroying it. Now that Newt is in there, they buy right into the reality of a surplus. :rolleyes:

[Polskash]

its like the game of chess, you don't develop your queen until the end of the game when its most powerful and least vulnerable.

Nice analogy.

[jct74]

If anyone else missed the first few minutes after hearing the shitty music and turning off the stream, another station will have the Rand interview coming up in 20 minutes.
http://www.whp580.com/main.html

[degen]

Oh God I can't believe I left Hannity's show on. Frank Luntz is on gushing about Newt.

[jmdrake]

Lol, aside from Sean calling him nuts for not going to the Trump debate, that went wasn't too bad. Rand stuck up for the whole FP issue pretty well, and you can almost feel Sean wanting to bite hehe.

Did Rand bring up the fact that Romney isn't going? If not he should have. I would have put Hannity on the spot and asked him if he thought Romney was nuts as well.

[Esoteric]

Oh God I can't believe I left Hannity's show on. Frank Luntz is on gushing about Newt.

FUCK YOU Frank!

[rp713]

t00b?

[PauliticsPolitics]

t00b?
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?336022

[Esoteric]

HAHAHH!!! RAND TROLLED HANNITY! It doesn't get much better, really.

[Brett85]

Started out strong, then Hannity walked all over him. As usual.

Rand's building bridges, but if you don't hold the fort on your end, where's the bridge? Bridge to Nowhere? lol

How did Hannity "walk all over him?" You must have been listening to a different interview than I was.

[Anti Federalist]

http://gonewengland.about.com/library/graphics/cards/gotchacard.jpg

[unknown]

How can Hannity be so fooled by Newt's slick talk?

Hannity, Rush, Oreilly, theyre gate keepers for the establishment...

[LibertyEagle]

How did Hannity "walk all over him?" You must have been listening to a different interview than I was.

He didn't.

Dude just doesn't like Rand and doesn't miss an opportunity to run him down.

[deadfish]

Rand is such a genius. As someone said, he is playing Chess here.

Hannity: "This is a healthy thing"

Rand is a freaking ninja

[gosmo]

He didn't.

Dude just doesn't like Rand and doesn't miss an opportunity to run him down.

What? Hannity loves Rand..

[LibertyEsq]

What? Hannity loves Rand..

I think LibertyEagle was referring to the poster

[gosmo]

I think LibertyEagle was referring to the poster

Oh I see what he was referring to now. Gotcha.

[Verrater]

Tube?

[eproxy100]

What surpluses? The debt went up every year in the 1990s. There was never any surplus. This myth needs to be shattered. In fact, ever year in the 1990s had a deficit. Period. Those are the facts. Don't let them use the stupid GDP to Debt ratio crap. It's an obfuscation and manipulative tool.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3b/USDebt.png

[PauliticsPolitics]

Tube?
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?336022

[Feeding the Abscess]

How did Hannity "walk all over him?" You must have been listening to a different interview than I was.

The declaration of war issue, for one.

He was strong during the Newt segment, though, as I mentioned earlier.

[The Free Hornet]

(those big-ass graphs above)


09/30/1999 5,656,270,901,615.43
09/30/1998 5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 4,411,488,883,139.38
09/30/1992 4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 3,233,313,451,777.2

http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histdebt/histdebt_histo4.htm

According to other sources (http://quaap.com/D/clinton-surplus-factcheck.html), the debt went up. Not only did Clinton/Newt pilfer social security trust funds, they benefited from the dot-com boom (extra income tax, capital gains - nevermind if most of it disappeared in by 2001). Nor does it appear Federal outlays decreased under Newt - the pace appears similar to other years:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:US_Federal_Outlay_and_GDP_linear_graph.svg