VonDerBerg
12-07-2011, 03:48 PM
I don't know if this was posted already but I think it's worth a re-post anyway.
This is probably one of the better RP foreign policy articles I've read in terms of not scaring people. I think it can have a much stronger appeal to those who are scared Dr. Paul would just sit back while somebody nukes us. This sounds kind of weird but I think the wording will comfort all of the foreign policy skeptics.
For example: "The cornerstone of peace and the common defense is deterrence. Ron Paul would embrace a retaliatory capability sufficient to destroy every living thing in any country complicit in an actual or imminent attack on the United States. He would deploy troops and weapons systems capable of foiling any acts of war targeting Americans on American soil."
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/12/06/billions-for-defense-but-not-one-cent-for-empire/#ixzz1ft6DriDj
This is probably one of the better RP foreign policy articles I've read in terms of not scaring people. I think it can have a much stronger appeal to those who are scared Dr. Paul would just sit back while somebody nukes us. This sounds kind of weird but I think the wording will comfort all of the foreign policy skeptics.
For example: "The cornerstone of peace and the common defense is deterrence. Ron Paul would embrace a retaliatory capability sufficient to destroy every living thing in any country complicit in an actual or imminent attack on the United States. He would deploy troops and weapons systems capable of foiling any acts of war targeting Americans on American soil."
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/12/06/billions-for-defense-but-not-one-cent-for-empire/#ixzz1ft6DriDj