PATTERN: The YouTube Shills Tell Us Their Next Move

[ronpaulfan]

On YouTube, the Shill spammers usually say similar things to what the media spins. It is possible the shill spams PRECEED the media spin (to plant seeds of doubt before reinforcing with media hitpieces).

Just within the last few hours, I've noticed a LOT of shills spamming how Ron Paul raising this money is bad for the Republican party because it will cause Hillary to win. They're saying Ron Paul will now become a viable 3rd party candidate that will divide Republican votes and prevent Ghouliani/Romulus from winning.

If the media spin it that way tomorrow, we'll know.....

*kisses my tin-foil hat* :D

[Duckman]

Well, the best solution for that is for the Republicans to NOMINATE Ron Paul! No third party candidacy, problem solved!

If I hear that crap on talk radio, that's what I'm going to call in and say.

[Naraku]

Calling him a viable third-party candidate that can spoil the election is just more free publicity and only a few steps and poll numbers away from a Republican nominee. ;)

[Duckman]

Plus, I've got little problem with saying that if the Republican party wants to marginalize and laugh at Ron Paul, then I will sit back and enjoy laughing at them while they get marginalized in the general election.

What's the threshold beneath which the Republicans won't get matching funds? :D

[Lord Xar]

On YouTube, the Shill spammers usually say similar things to what the media spins. It is possible the shill spams PRECEED the media spin (to plant seeds of doubt before reinforcing with media hitpieces).

Just within the last few hours, I've noticed a LOT of shills spamming how Ron Paul raising this money is bad for the Republican party because it will cause Hillary to win. They're saying Ron Paul will now become a viable 3rd party candidate that will divide Republican votes and prevent Ghouliani/Romulus from winning.

If the media spin it that way tomorrow, we'll know.....

*kisses my tin-foil hat* :D

I saw that too!

Its hard to decipher, but I am sure if one actually follows the posts and such we can see the pattern AND who these people really support.

the technique to me seems that these people are actually Shillary supporters fermenting dissent by having Republicans turn on their own, thus dismantling the party moreso.

I think they are socialist/liberals trying to use the Ron Paul to splinter the party further.

It is called fear. For someone who is an 'ant' and not worth it - they sure are spamming, aren't they?

[moonbat]

I've been posting "Proud Ron Paul Republican" in my comments on youtube today.

[ronpaulyourmom]

No offense but maybe the Youtube idiots simply point out the obvious conclusion that people from their perspective tend to draw...

Youtube is immediate, MSM is delayed by a day or more. Hence your imagined causation; if you're claiming as much anyway, I'm not exactly clear on that.

[fj45lvr]

Republicans HAVE almost zero chance of winning without Paul as nominee anyhow....unless they falseflag and pump up the fear.

[michaelwise]

Don't underestimate how much money they've got invested in their candidates. Their sinister brains will come up with every trick up their sleeves, and then some.

[johngr]

Republicans HAVE almost zero chance of winning without Paul as nominee anyhow....unless they falseflag and pump up the fear.

It wouldn't work a second time. Some people would not be so trusting this time around and would doubt the source of the attack. Others would be pissed off about incompetence (and "poking around hornets' nests") like they should have been after the first one. No more than 20-30% would rally around those obviously corrupt bastards, especially with Hillary out-Bushing Bush. The political reaction (assuming elections) would be the same as Spain's after the train bombings. The false flaggers seriously miscalculated there. Of course Hillary is annointed anyway.

[freelance]

No offense but maybe the Youtube idiots simply point out the obvious conclusion that people from their perspective tend to draw...

Youtube is immediate, MSM is delayed by a day or more. Hence your imagined causation; if you're claiming as much anyway, I'm not exactly clear on that.

IF I were TPTB, I would run all trial balloons on YouTube first. That way, they can throw anything they want against the wall and see what sticks. Marketing people will tell you, "test, test, test." What better way to test and get instant results than YouTube!

Look how well instant feedback worked with ad #1 vs. ad #2.

[Proemio]

IF I were TPTB, I would run all trial balloons on YouTube first. That way, they can throw anything they want against the wall and see what sticks. Marketing people will tell you, "test, test, test." What better way to test and get instant results than YouTube!

Look how well instant feedback worked with ad #1 vs. ad #2.

You are indubitably correct in that assessment.

I count on the boilerroom handlers to continue listening to their marketing gurus' approach. It's way to slow for the contest of wits, taking place in today's instant exchange environment, dominating the ageless "Battle of Ideas".

Besides, there is no need for us to 'market test' the idea of freedom - instinct will suffice...

[RPatTheBeach]

popping up today? Wasn't CNN doing a segment on this last night? If memory serves me it was The Wolf, Cafferty, some chick, and some other weird looking CNN talking head. They acknowledged the fundraising and started talking about RP running 3rd party, not republican. Only one who didn't was Cafferty.