Inkblots
11-14-2011, 11:09 PM
From Elise Jordan:
Saturday’s Republican foreign-policy debate yielded only one revelation, neither comforting nor productive: When it comes to international affairs, most of the contenders offer plenty of political theater and little substance. ...
The Know Nothings and the Selective Interpreters waste our time by making us more ill-informed, which is why I’d like to see a foreign-policy debate among Mitt Romney, Ron Paul, and Jon Huntsman. Ron Paul would force a debate on our principles, and Huntsman would inject a dose of reality.
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/283170/let-s-have-real-foreign-policy-debate-elise-jordan
The article goes on to call Ron Paul a "conviction politician" and lauds his principles, but of course includes the obligatory claim that he has no chance of winning. Still, an over-all favorable column.
Saturday’s Republican foreign-policy debate yielded only one revelation, neither comforting nor productive: When it comes to international affairs, most of the contenders offer plenty of political theater and little substance. ...
The Know Nothings and the Selective Interpreters waste our time by making us more ill-informed, which is why I’d like to see a foreign-policy debate among Mitt Romney, Ron Paul, and Jon Huntsman. Ron Paul would force a debate on our principles, and Huntsman would inject a dose of reality.
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/283170/let-s-have-real-foreign-policy-debate-elise-jordan
The article goes on to call Ron Paul a "conviction politician" and lauds his principles, but of course includes the obligatory claim that he has no chance of winning. Still, an over-all favorable column.