PDA

View Full Version : U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham endorses Ron Paul! [Just a Joke]



knarf
11-04-2011, 04:05 PM
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/293928_152848394802951_100002333731098_283989_9419 87792_n.jpg

this picture was taken at the Labor Day Parade, Chapin SC, 2011!

I could not believe he posed for a picture with me, Brian Frank.

It sure looks like he loves that balloon, maybe it brings back childhood memories!
FreeTraveler
11-04-2011, 04:09 PM
That's a picture, not an endorsement. Please retitle.
lib3rtarian
11-04-2011, 04:11 PM
Yeah, big deal. Don't raise false hopes man.
RDM
11-04-2011, 04:18 PM
Isn't he a war monger anyways?
low preference guy
11-04-2011, 04:21 PM
some of you are way too serious
knarf
11-04-2011, 04:22 PM
some of you are way too serious

yeah, just a joke!
Travlyr
11-04-2011, 04:28 PM
some of you are way too serious
And far too many are not nearly serious enough. Innocent people are getting killed by REMOTE control game like computer controlled bombs while others are dying a slow death from starvation. That is serious.
trey4sports
11-04-2011, 04:41 PM
pretty funny!
realtonygoodwin
11-04-2011, 05:24 PM
And far too many are not nearly serious enough. Innocent people are getting killed by REMOTE control game like computer controlled bombs while others are dying a slow death from starvation. That is serious.

I am not sure why the fact that we use remote drones to bomb targets matters. Does it make some kind of difference if we used manned aircraft? Like, is using a Reaper drone inherently worse than using an A-10 Warthog?
RileyE104
11-04-2011, 07:00 PM
You should have had him hold the Ron Paul Revolution side facing the camera!
Travlyr
11-04-2011, 07:13 PM
I am not sure why the fact that we use remote drones to bomb targets matters. Does it make some kind of difference if we used manned aircraft? Like, is using a Reaper drone inherently worse than using an A-10 Warthog?
I think it is chicken shit. I prefer Obama fight his own battles. If he wants somebody dead, then why doesn't he challenge them to a duel? Instead he hires 19 year old kids who have played video war games as kids to use chicken shit remote control bombing devices to take out the "bad guys" and whoever else happens to be in the area. It would be a bigger deal to you too if the hunted animals lived next door to you.
realtonygoodwin
11-04-2011, 08:58 PM
So, you would prefer he put more Americans in immediate danger?
Pizzo
11-04-2011, 09:03 PM
So, you would prefer he put more Americans in immediate danger?
Drone attacks do put us in danger.
Travlyr
11-05-2011, 06:24 AM
So, you would prefer he put more Americans in immediate danger?
No. Killing people is barbaric. Using robots to kill people is even more barbaric and a dangerous trend. When the drones start flying over America you'll understand.
realtonygoodwin
11-05-2011, 12:25 PM
I guess we will just agree to disagree.
Travlyr
11-05-2011, 12:48 PM
I guess so.

Drones Over America: Tyranny at Home (http://www.rutherford.org/articles_db/commentary.asp?record_id=661)
realtonygoodwin
11-06-2011, 06:31 PM
My point isn't that drones won't fly over America.

My point is that if you are going to kill people in combat, it makes more sense to kill them from a distance than face to face, generally. There is no need to put American troops in danger, so why do it?
Toureg89
11-06-2011, 08:57 PM
I am not sure why the fact that we use remote drones to bomb targets matters. Does it make some kind of difference if we used manned aircraft? Like, is using a Reaper drone inherently worse than using an A-10 Warthog?
its the fact of Graham supporting more such war measures, as oppose to Paul, who does not.

so, Graham endorsing Paul would essentially be a reversal of a position that leads to the killing of others.