PDA

View Full Version : Why are people saying that RP's 4.3 million raising isn't confirmed?




dude58677
11-06-2007, 06:06 AM
The thermometer is electronic and automated. How can it be wrong?

Ready2Revolt
11-06-2007, 06:07 AM
Remember when then said that Ron Paul was spamming the text votes after debates, despite common sense and logic indicating otherwise? Same thing different day.

Corydoras
11-06-2007, 06:11 AM
The New York Times didn't put in a disclaimer.

But I think with this weird Hillary stuff about donors with menial jobs who are mysteriously out of the country when reporters come looking for them, some of the media are putting in a disclaimer on our achievement in case large numbers of credit card numbers are stolen. We're "internet people," and "internet people" are all hackers, right?
:rolleyes:

ne1buthilary
11-06-2007, 06:11 AM
because there is no way for them to officially confirm it until the filing at the end of the quarter. it is also probably an msm tactic to instill doubt.

speciallyblend
11-06-2007, 06:13 AM
I like to think,its because they are the horses ass

hard@work
11-06-2007, 06:22 AM
Relax guy. Because it's not confirmed.

AceNZ
11-06-2007, 06:30 AM
It's the tone of the comments that's weird. Like on the Wolf Blitzer show, where the reporter woman says something like "if you can believe their online reporting system" -- casting doubt on the integrity of the campaign.

dude58677
11-06-2007, 07:01 AM
It's the tone of the comments that's weird. Like on the Wolf Blitzer show, where the reporter woman says something like "if you can believe their online reporting system" -- casting doubt on the integrity of the campaign.


But all the other campaigns are honest, esp Hilliary and Rudy Guillani. Pathetic!!

Bradley in DC
11-06-2007, 07:05 AM
They're referring to the lack of FEC reporting on it. They're just being responsible reporters--we want that (for a change ;)). :)

thomj76
11-06-2007, 07:08 AM
Fox Morning just did snippet.. No mention of disclaimer. I haven't seen the disclaimer on the scroll. The reporter also mentioned that Ron Paul wins the text message polls, and no mention of spamming.

stevedasbach
11-06-2007, 07:08 AM
The thermometer is electronic and automated. How can it be wrong?

diebold machines are electronic and automated.

Mr. White
11-06-2007, 07:09 AM
The thermometer is electronic and automated. How can it be wrong?

I've got some voting machines I'm looking to sell...

dude58677
11-06-2007, 07:14 AM
diebold machines are electronic and automated.

Well it seems that the MSM doesn't like new technology:

1) They prefer paper ballots over electronic ballots.
2) They claim that internet support is meaningless.
3) They prefer NASA's heated reentry over Burt Rutan's "feathered configuration" for reentry.
4) They don't like cell phone polls but instead like landline phones better.

rfbz
11-06-2007, 07:18 AM
I also notice that they say "Ron Paul says he raised..." instead of "Ron Paul raised.."

I really doubt if it were Giuliani, they'd be saying "Giuliani claims to have raised.."

Ron Paul Fan
11-06-2007, 07:19 AM
Journalistic integrity

:D:p:D:p:D:p:rolleyes::rolleyes::D:p