View Full Version : Peter Schiff takes on the 99%
cubical
10-26-2011, 06:52 PM
http://mrctv.org/videos/peter-schiff-takes-99
2young2vote
10-26-2011, 08:57 PM
Oh wow that is amazing. I love Peter. I wish Ron had his debate skills.
hazek
10-26-2011, 09:01 PM
Heh I would have never done that. Who's to say one of those doesn't go apeshit on his ass..
Plus they're not even capable of understanding what he's telling them because they lack reasoning skills and economic literacy. It's like trying to explain to a 3year old how to form a sentence..
Napolitanic Wars
10-26-2011, 09:03 PM
I couldn't see anything in the video because Peter's HUGE BALLS were blocking my view. :D I hope Peter uses this footage if he runs for Senate again.
flightlesskiwi
10-26-2011, 09:26 PM
lady:
i'm an entrepreneur like you
Schiff:
how many people do you employ? i employ 150 people.
lady:
i'm in the mortgage business. [whatever that means, i don't know] i wish i could say i employ 150 people.
Schiff:
why don't you go out and do it? why aren't you pulling your fair share?
good on you Mr. Schiff!!
sevin
10-26-2011, 09:35 PM
I've become a huge Peter Schiff fan lately. No one can debate him and win. He's amazing.
jclay2
10-26-2011, 10:08 PM
Mad props to peter schiff. He doesn't take any crap from anyone. Try to debate him and he will completely own you.
Warrior_of_Freedom
10-26-2011, 10:50 PM
Because letting one person represent an entire group is what us Ron Paulers are all about, right? We complain when we get unfair coverage, or the media uses a crazy Ron Paul supporter (Like a Neo Nazi) to represent the whole, but when it's another group, we criticize all we want. I won't criticize the OWS people because I'm sitting here on my ass typing this message, while there's a bunch of people sleeping on the pavement in protest. They are all there for different reasons anyway, so it's not intelligent to let that loudmouth woman represent the "99%" or whatever.
This is a great example of divide and conquer in practice.
Cutlerzzz
10-26-2011, 10:55 PM
Schiff has done this to dozens of people now.
BrendenR
10-26-2011, 11:03 PM
Because letting one person represent an entire group is what us Ron Paulers are all about, right? We complain when we get unfair coverage, or the media uses a crazy Ron Paul supporter (Like a Neo Nazi) to represent the whole, but when it's another group, we criticize all we want. I won't criticize the OWS people because I'm sitting here on my ass typing this message, while there's a bunch of people sleeping on the pavement in protest. They are all there for different reasons anyway, so it's not intelligent to let that loudmouth woman represent the "99%" or whatever.
This is a great example of divide and conquer in practice.
The hypocrisy with some people on here astounds me. Everyone says they're above the political bullshit, and gets so upset when Ron is misrepresented. Then when it's the opposition being misrepresented, everyone jumps on it like flies on shit, it's like their critical thinking skills go out the window when the get the chance to 'attack!'. Disgusts me. It's so antithetical to the way Paul operates and the way we all should.
Not particularly talking about this thread, just needed to vent.
Peter is amazing.
Freshwater
10-27-2011, 12:23 AM
Screw what I said in the other topic, this was amazing. Good for Schiff.
CUnknown
10-27-2011, 12:36 AM
Because letting one person represent an entire group is what us Ron Paulers are all about, right? We complain when we get unfair coverage, or the media uses a crazy Ron Paul supporter (Like a Neo Nazi) to represent the whole, but when it's another group, we criticize all we want. I won't criticize the OWS people because I'm sitting here on my ass typing this message, while there's a bunch of people sleeping on the pavement in protest. They are all there for different reasons anyway, so it's not intelligent to let that loudmouth woman represent the "99%" or whatever.
This is a great example of divide and conquer in practice.
+1
I think Schiff did a good job debating, and this is a debate we need to have. But... there is something seriously wrong with the country, and we all know it. You can't knock the protestors. We all are on our own paths, learning as we go. Some might be misinformed, but in any group you're going to find misinformed and/or stupid people. Yes, they need to be educated, but the protestors are doing what needs to be done -- get out in the street, try to make something happen. We should stand with them.
psi2941
10-27-2011, 03:57 AM
to be fair and honest does peter really fall under the 1%? of course if you include his money that he manages yea his in the 1% but if you only take what he owns. i don't think he be in the 1% more like the 5%
Seraphim
10-27-2011, 04:30 AM
He's still 1%.
1% of the US pop. is about 3.1 Million people. There are not 3.1 million people ruling over the USA. Much less.
The real ruling elite is closer to 0.05% - many of which in-fight and are not on the same side (as each other anyway - their common thread is that they fight about who owns YOU).
Schiff is a rich ass dude by American standards...by world standards he's a friggin' pharoah. I love it because he's EARNED it, unlike the top 0.05% who simply feed off the labor off others through their centralized counterfitting operation.
to be fair and honest does peter really fall under the 1%? of course if you include his money that he manages yea his in the 1% but if you only take what he owns. i don't think he be in the 1% more like the 5%
Schifference
10-27-2011, 04:31 AM
People only hear what they want to hear. If Schiff was running for Senate in CT again he would not get elected. It does not matter if what people say makes sense or not. The way I see it the planet is overpopulated. What was once a vast resourceful land is now asphalt, concrete, housing and infrastructure. Soon all of us will be out of work and we will all want a handout. Manufacturing is gone forever. Machines and robots will do the jobs if manufacturing comes back to the states. Can't even drink the milk from your own cow anymore. Too many regulations but no practical way to survive without the mighty $$$. When your employer lets you go how you gonna survive? How you going to heat your home or feed your family? Once you receive your last paycheck and have no way to provide for yourself or your family who will you turn to? Face it the problem is far beyond a debt crisis. If you think capitalism and the free market will once again make this country great, think again. There is no need or little need for human labor. How will you pay for or acquire your necessities? The day of over consumption is almost over. Everybody is broke and the jobs are disappearing and we have no way to pay for food, shelter, clothing, and heat and can't live off the land anymore. Not to mention parents no longer have wealth to pass on to their children.
Seraphim
10-27-2011, 04:32 AM
Most of what you said is false.
Overpopulated? Wrong.
Can't get out of this through liberty and free markets? Wrong.
I get that things are a fucking mess...but giving up ASSURES failure.
Additionally if you are worried about these things, get to work. Go get a job, ANY JOB.
Next, TAKE OUT A LOAN FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS. Solar/geothermal systems for your house. A greenhouse to grow much of your own food year round. A chicken coup.
FIX YOUR LOANS AT THESE LOW INTEREST RATES. Make the min. payments, use your extra cash TO BUY SILVER.
Work hard, sit tight and this paper game will blow up. You will be rewarded for becoming self sufficient and saving your money in tangible commodities.
If this sounds too hard for you, bite the bullet and get back in line State Slave #4567689
People only hear what they want to hear. If Schiff was running for Senate in CT again he would not get elected. It does not matter if what people say makes sense or not. The way I see it the planet is overpopulated. What was once a vast resourceful land is now asphalt, concrete, housing and infrastructure. Soon all of us will be out of work and we will all want a handout. Manufacturing is gone forever. Machines and robots will do the jobs if manufacturing comes back to the states. Can't even drink the milk from your own cow anymore. Too many regulations but no practical way to survive without the mighty $$$. When your employer lets you go how you gonna survive? How you going to heat your home or feed your family? Once you receive your last paycheck and have no way to provide for yourself or your family who will you turn to? Face it the problem is far beyond a debt crisis. If you think capitalism and the free market will once again make this country great, think again. There is no need or little need for human labor. How will you pay for or acquire your necessities? The day of over consumption is almost over. Everybody is broke and the jobs are disappearing and we have no way to pay for food, shelter, clothing, and heat and can't live off the land anymore. Not to mention parents no longer have wealth to pass on to their children.
Professor8000
10-27-2011, 05:22 AM
That video is pure gold.
Would anyone care to address this, from the comments section, especially the part I've made bold?
He may pay more of his "income" in taxes than the people he was speaking
to, but
>>>I'd wager that most of his actual income is from capital gains,
which is taxed lower than anything those people are likely paying<<<
(unless they're un- or underemployed, in which case it's a stupid
comparison anyway).
Then he changes the subject completely and talks about "How many
employees does she have?" What an illogical argument! He is saying
that because his status differs in this regard (he employs people, she
doesn't) that he therefore deserves special treatment. Let's see him
try to run his business without employees...
He scores so very high on my bullshit meter. Slick dog. And that's how
he can make so much money from not producing any product whatsoever.
Just moving digital money around, skimming from the top, giving himself
massive bonuses in the form of stock.
He didn't come down to Zuccotti Park to talk with those people.
Whenever that woman spoke -- trying to answer his friggin' question --
he cut her off. The entire time he didn't listen to one thing anyone
said, except to look for his opportunity to plant his utter BS,
illogical soundbites.
Seraphim
10-27-2011, 05:59 AM
to Tod:
My response;
So we should punish entrepreneurs who risk THEIR capital even more?
The answer is obviously no. That is so self defeating.
Tell that guy something like:
"Ok so in a time where strong capital and jobs are desperately needed, you want to raise taxes on investments that help create these jobs? SELF DEFEATING NONSENSE.
bluesc
10-27-2011, 08:19 AM
This made the front page of The Blaze. Schiff is getting tons of exposure lately. When he gets a big interview about this, he should plug Ron.
No1ButPaul08
10-27-2011, 08:28 AM
I doubt that most of his income is through capital gains. I would think most of his income comes from providing services through Europac.
silverhandorder
10-27-2011, 08:53 AM
Can we figure out how Schiff's taxes break down? Because I don't know and I am being challenged on this too.
Diurdi
10-27-2011, 09:19 AM
Heh I would have never done that. Who's to say one of those doesn't go apeshit on his ass..
Plus they're not even capable of understanding what he's telling them because they lack reasoning skills and economic literacy. It's like trying to explain to a 3year old how to form a sentence..
His goal is not to convince the person he is debating, but to convince the audience.
brandon
10-27-2011, 09:25 AM
to be fair and honest does peter really fall under the 1%? of course if you include his money that he manages yea his in the 1% but if you only take what he owns. i don't think he be in the 1% more like the 5%
Definitely, he's probably in the top 0.01%. You only need an annual household income of about $180,000 to be in the top 5%
enoch150
10-27-2011, 03:09 PM
Can we figure out how Schiff's taxes break down? Because I don't know and I am being challenged on this too.
He testified before Congress in September and laid it out. It's at the 14 minute mark of part 1.
99% of his income is taxed at the marginal rate -
35% Federal Income tax
3% SS and related taxes
7% State income tax
He then mentioned property taxes and sales taxes, but didn't give a percentage, but figure 5% to round it to 50%.
He also said he employs 150 people, but would employ 1,000 more if he could. He said the SEC fined him $15,000 and cost him $500,000 in legal fees because he hired to many people, then they ordered him to impose a hiring freeze for the last three years.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLmD9TeUC54
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZbQGpf3D_Q
Part 2 is even better than part 1, imo.
heavenlyboy34
10-27-2011, 03:20 PM
Oh wow that is amazing. I love Peter. I wish Ron had his debate skills.
+a zillion That lady got absolutely pwned. :cool:
stone cold schiff. love it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vZr9c1zYaOE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=UGL-Ex1CD1c
ronpaulforchange
10-27-2011, 05:58 PM
lol i'm making popcorn. this is very fun to watch.
bluesc
10-27-2011, 06:03 PM
Wtf is up with the top comments? Arguing against deregulation? Arguing for the FDA? Moderate libertarians indeed.
Seraphim
10-27-2011, 06:13 PM
WOW the black guy at 8 mins of the bottom video...
Schiff: everybody in this park wants lower prices.
Most people nod...
Loud mouth: NO WE DONT..."
...what the fuck?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vZr9c1zYaOE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=UGL-Ex1CD1c
Steven Douglas
10-27-2011, 06:29 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=UGL-Ex1CD1c
Go to 02:13 - I would have loved to have been there to take over this part of the debate and take this issue on with Schiff (I don't think Schiff would disagree, so much as stand corrected).
Man: "I haven't given you anything? Everybody in this park has contributed to your fat...ass...bank account!"
Schiff: "How do you figure?"
STOP THE VIDEO.
Neither Schiff nor the man making the charge understood the irony at play here, since neither seemed to know why that charge was precisely true, and dead on the mark in a way that is highly explicable.
If Schiff has taken out any kind of loans, or has a history of credit in any form with any commercial bank, the value of that credit, quite literally, was siphoned from everybody in that park, assuming all of them relied on so much as a single dollar for their existence. If you had a coffee can at home with ten crumpled dollar bills and some change, its value was being steadily siphoned away by the Fed and all the commercial banks. The people in that park really did contribute to Schiff, and all others like him, albeit in ways which most of them are completely unaware.
The reason I believe Schiff would most likely stand corrected: I already know that he is vehemently opposed to crony-capitalism in all its forms, and it doesn't get more crony-capitalist than the Fed, commercial banks, and artificial fractional reserve-based increases in the fictitious money supply.
The man claiming that he contributed to Schiff's bank account was absolutely correct, but for reasons he was not aware, just as Ronald Reagan was absolutely correct when he said, "Inflation is as violent as a mugger, as frightening as an armed robber and as deadly as a hit man." Inflationary monetary practices rob the poor to middle classes most of all - those who rely on cash, and must consume most of what they earn. And the value that is literally stolen from them is tantamount to a selective, preferential transfer, or redistribution, of wealth from the poor to the rich.
Working Poor
10-27-2011, 07:04 PM
:Arguing for the FDA? :eek:
cubical
10-27-2011, 10:51 PM
Go to 02:13 - I would have loved to have been there to take over this part of the debate and take this issue on with Schiff (I don't think Schiff would disagree, so much as stand corrected).
STOP THE VIDEO.
Neither Schiff nor the man making the charge understood the irony at play here, since neither seemed to know why that charge was precisely true, and dead on the mark in a way that is highly explicable.
If Schiff has taken out any kind of loans, or has a history of credit in any form with any commercial bank, the value of that credit, quite literally, was siphoned from everybody in that park, assuming all of them relied on so much as a single dollar for their existence. If you had a coffee can at home with ten crumpled dollar bills and some change, its value was being steadily siphoned away by the Fed and all the commercial banks. The people in that park really did contribute to Schiff, and all others like him, albeit in ways which most of them are completely unaware.
The reason I believe Schiff would most likely stand corrected: I already know that he is vehemently opposed to crony-capitalism in all its forms, and it doesn't get more crony-capitalist than the Fed, commercial banks, and artificial fractional reserve-based increases in the fictitious money supply.
The man claiming that he contributed to Schiff's bank account was absolutely correct, but for reasons he was not aware, just as Ronald Reagan was absolutely correct when he said, "Inflation is as violent as a mugger, as frightening as an armed robber and as deadly as a hit man." Inflationary monetary practices rob the poor to middle classes most of all - those who rely on cash, and must consume most of what they earn. And the value that is literally stolen from them is tantamount to a selective, preferential transfer, or redistribution, of wealth from the poor to the rich.
Reaching a bit here.
dannno
10-27-2011, 11:51 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=UGL-Ex1CD1c
Kid getting interrupted by Schiff:
I am not a RAMP so that you can do an olley in front of your camera!!
Peter Schiff:
What's a meme?
:D I can barely contain myself!!
heavenlyboy34
10-27-2011, 11:59 PM
Go to 02:13 - I would have loved to have been there to take over this part of the debate and take this issue on with Schiff (I don't think Schiff would disagree, so much as stand corrected).
STOP THE VIDEO.
Neither Schiff nor the man making the charge understood the irony at play here, since neither seemed to know why that charge was precisely true, and dead on the mark in a way that is highly explicable.
If Schiff has taken out any kind of loans, or has a history of credit in any form with any commercial bank, the value of that credit, quite literally, was siphoned from everybody in that park, assuming all of them relied on so much as a single dollar for their existence. If you had a coffee can at home with ten crumpled dollar bills and some change, its value was being steadily siphoned away by the Fed and all the commercial banks. The people in that park really did contribute to Schiff, and all others like him, albeit in ways which most of them are completely unaware.
The reason I believe Schiff would most likely stand corrected: I already know that he is vehemently opposed to crony-capitalism in all its forms, and it doesn't get more crony-capitalist than the Fed, commercial banks, and artificial fractional reserve-based increases in the fictitious money supply.
The man claiming that he contributed to Schiff's bank account was absolutely correct, but for reasons he was not aware, just as Ronald Reagan was absolutely correct when he said, "Inflation is as violent as a mugger, as frightening as an armed robber and as deadly as a hit man." Inflationary monetary practices rob the poor to middle classes most of all - those who rely on cash, and must consume most of what they earn. And the value that is literally stolen from them is tantamount to a selective, preferential transfer, or redistribution, of wealth from the poor to the rich.
Kinda-sorta. It's true that commercial banks deal in fungible goods (money) and can lend it out. But this is how an economy grows! It's not as if other depositors in a bank are being screwed if part of their deposit is being used for a loan. Every informed member of a bank knows how this works. The only way Schiff could be "siphoning" from those people is if he were using non-fungible goods (such as coats and hats or whatever). This is banking 101. Schiff's book "How an economy grows and why it crashes" is a good read, as are just about any Austrian book on banking such as "The Mystery of Banking".
LayZayFaire
10-28-2011, 05:02 AM
Reaching a bit here.
A bit?
Steven Douglas
10-28-2011, 11:52 AM
Kinda-sorta. It's true that commercial banks deal in fungible goods (money) and can lend it out. But this is how an economy grows! It's not as if other depositors in a bank are being screwed if part of their deposit is being used for a loan.
Nowhere did I refer to the [non-inflationary] lending of actual bank deposits to others. That can very much help the economy grow. However, the sentence that you put in bold was followed by:
If you had a coffee can at home with ten crumpled dollar bills and some change, its value was being steadily siphoned away by the Fed and all the commercial banks.
The value of that money is affected as well in the process. There are very specific reasons why the value of fiat currency is absolutely guaranteed to erode over time, and thus cannot simply be stored in a mattress - and why the opposite is true of the value of a fungible commodity like gold or silver that is stored under that same mattress.
While a fiat currency may be manufactured "out of thin air", there is real value transferred to that newly introduced currency which did not "come from nothing", and part of which never, ever returns to its original source(s).
The money I referred to is not a bank deposit, and yet its value is not only lent out to others, but actually siphoned away and perpetually redistributed in a way that never returns to that "money".
Also, seeing this as a "bit of a reach" is what has killed us in the long run. The value siphoning that occurs by any inflationary practice is spread out over the entire money supply, but affects most the money that is in circulation. Their individual "contributions" to Schiff's account are miniscule. Negligible even. That is not the point. When seen in the aggregate, it has created an economic environment where we simply accept the fact that value of the currency is in a slow and perpetual freefall, that you will need more money next year than you did last year, and that those who labor and those who live on fixed or low incomes are always the last to respond, and see their prices adjusted. They are always the losers in the equation.
Now, about that "helps the economy grow" meme. If a perpetual theft, however small and spread out over the aggregate, is indeed occurring, are we really just going to jump past that little technicality, only to debate the merits of theft, as we refer to it euphemistically as something else - the end somehow justifying the means? I suppose we are, even amongst those who appear on the surface to be in favor of "sound money", because it is precisely that kind of "elastic" thinking that caused so many others before us to sweep little inconvenient details like that under the rug, and positioned the Fed as the root cause of so many evils to begin with.
What if you said to everyone, up front, "One way to help the economy grow is by instituting an invisible tax -- on everybody. This will be privately controlled, with absolutely no representation, and no recourse to anybody, and it will result in a redistribution of wealth. But it will help the economy grow. All in favor?"
Except for the "all in favor?" part, do you now argue that this has not taken place, and is not the system we are now living under? Is there something that Ron Paul, Ludwig Von Mises and others wrote that is in contention here?
Becker
10-28-2011, 12:09 PM
stupid question : what's the cut off point for assets between 1% and 2%-99%?
Jtorsella
10-28-2011, 01:58 PM
I love how the one guy's retort to the accusation that their all communists is "That's not the collective (will)." At 14:05.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGL-Ex1CD1c&feature=channel_video_title
Kind of contradictory, no?
sevin
10-28-2011, 03:00 PM
My favorite part is the woman who claims to be part of the 1% and only pays 10% of her income in taxes. Schiff says, "Would you like to pay 50% like me?" and of course she walks right into it and says, "Yes." But when he tells her to write a bigger check to the IRS, she changes the subject. LOL
jct74
10-28-2011, 04:55 PM
Peter has gone totally viral. Check out all of this media coverage from high-traffic sites.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/watch-successful-ceo-and-financial-expert-peter-schiff-take-on-the-99-at-occupy-wall-street/
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/part-2-ceo-peter-schiff-fields-questions-from-occupy-wall-street-protesters/
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/10/26/fun-peter-schiff-confronts-occupy-wall-street-protesters/
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/10/27/double-the-fun-peter-schiff-versus-occupy-wall-street-round-two/
http://biggovernment.com/reasontv/2011/10/27/peter-schiff-at-occupywallstreet-walmart-doesnt-hold-a-gun-to-your-head/
http://reason.com/blog/2011/10/27/peter-schiff-at-occupy-wall-st
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/10/28/financial-strategist-the-1-percent-gave-workers-weekends-child-labor-laws/
http://www.mediaite.com/online/one-per-center-peter-schiff-visits-occupy-wall-street-produces-18-minutes-of-civility/
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/281485/peter-schiff-and-occupy-wall-street-veronique-de-rugy
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/peter-schiff-other-members-of-the-1percent-confront-occupy-wall-street/2011/10/28/gIQA7qn5OM_blog.html
http://www.cnsnews.com/blog/joe-schoffstall/fdr-was-barack-obama-his-day-ceo-schiff-tells-occupy-protesters
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=47139
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/businessman-peter-schiff-debates-occupy-wall-street_604049.html
http://nation.foxnews.com/wall-street-protests/2011/10/26/peter-schiff-schools-occupy-i-employ-150-people-how-many-do-you-employ
http://nation.foxnews.com/peter-schiff/2011/10/27/double-fun-peter-schiff-versus-occupy-wall-street-round-two
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/10/27/peter_schiff_takes_on_occupy_wall_street_protester s_again.html
The coverage is very positive too. Hot Air (http://hotair.com/archives/2011/10/27/double-the-fun-peter-schiff-versus-occupy-wall-street-round-two/) calls him an "Austrian-school ninja". The Mediaite (http://www.mediaite.com/online/one-per-center-peter-schiff-visits-occupy-wall-street-produces-18-minutes-of-civility/) article especially heaps on the praise, here is an excerpt:
Euro Pacific Capital head Peter Schiff paid a visit to Occupy Wall Street this week. I know: Groan, right? Another pundit type with a camera shows up, finds the biggest noobs down there, makes them look foolish, edits out the answers that he doesn’t like, puts it on YouTube, and conservatives post it on their Facebook walls and send to friends, laughing at the uninformed masses. But guess what? Schiff’s video was probably the most fair and insightful “guy takes a trip to Occupy Wall Street” video we’ve seen so far. It’s also a hefty 18 minutes long.
Yes, Schiff was trying to prove his own point, but he also gave the protesters a chance to be more than just dirty hippies shouting things. And some of them came across as smart and well-informed. The piece could have been “Jaywalking.” Instead, it was the closest we’ve seen to a civil discussion in front of a camera down there. Armed with a sign that read, “I am the 1%: Let’s Talk,” Schiff invited people to argue their points against him. Instead of disagreeing and then violently shutting them down with talking points before moving on to the next person, Schiff — at least, more often than not — somewhat agreed with parts of their argument, but then steered their anger in the right direction. He didn’t want banks bailed out. He thinks college is too expensive. He warned people about the housing bubble. He told a homeless veteran that he wasn’t in favor of the wars. Part of his point, however, was that people should be upset with the government and not with Wall Street. There probably weren’t many people whose minds were changed — either by talking to Schiff or watching the video — on either side. But the video at least breaks from the annoying “gotcha” stunts that we’ve seen so far.
Check him out on Huckabee (http://www.europac.net/events/dont_miss_peter_schiff_fox_news_%E2%80%A2_8pm) tomorrow night and Fox & Friends (http://www.europac.net/events/dont_miss_peter_schiff_fox_news_channe_%E2%80%A2_8 am) Monday morning BTW.
Athan
10-28-2011, 07:33 PM
I couldn't see anything in the video because Peter's HUGE BALLS were blocking my view. :D
Lol. Word.
ClayTrainor
10-28-2011, 07:36 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vZr9c1zYaOE
I can see Andrew Schiff standing behind the black guy!
matt0611
10-28-2011, 09:14 PM
I don't think its in that video because I think there's two, but anyway, there's one part where Peter says to a woman.
"I'm employing 150 people and paying more income tax than probably all of you put together, I'm doing my part, what are you doing?
It shut he up real good.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y28yFxLydzU&feature=share
Ricky201
10-29-2011, 02:06 PM
I don't think its in that video because I think there's two, but anyway, there's one part where Peter says to a woman.
"I'm employing 150 people and paying more income tax than probably all of you put together, I'm doing my part, what are you doing?
It shut he up real good.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y28yFxLydzU&feature=share
Lol...she looked royally pissed off. Loved her reaction and I love how Peter keeps on going.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.