Someone Asked (Do You Agree?) [Archive] - Ron Paul Forums / Liberty Forest

View Full Version : Someone Asked (Do You Agree?)

dolphin

10-22-2011, 07:05 AM

Why haven't more people taken up the fight? Why haven't the majority of the American people woken up to what is going on? I really don't know why I wrote this, but I just felt an urging to. Maybe it came off as just another rant, but I hope you got something from this.

You asked..

I have spent a considerable number of years putting the pieces of the puzzle together.

What I have posted in this thread for you is some of the best of the best.

Absorb all of it and decide for yourself.

IMPLIMINTED BY TAVISTOCK AND THE FOUNDATIONS (RAND/TAVISTOCK)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUYCBfmIcHM&feature=player_embedded

Post: The RAND Corporation Exposed

What is a think tank and how can a mere research institution actually shape the society it claims to be studying? Join us this week on The Corbett Report as we head down into the nuclear bunker with the boys from RAND to unearth the secrets of the research institution that has molded our world for the past 60 years.

Audio Only Podcast (Listen while you surf and post)
http://www.corbettreport.com/episode-175-the-rand-corporation-exposed/

Cuban-born journalist and author Alex Abella was allowed exclusive access inside the RAND Corporation to view their archives. What he discovered was a plot driven by mad scientists, behaviorists, and generals who were intent on starting world war three and fleecing the American people in the process. Once he was a skeptic on the subject of conspiracy theories and the new world order, but after his work with the RAND Corporation he is now convinced that this top secret think tank has been pulling the strings of American government for at least 60 years.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3zGE0VrVkk&feature=player_embedded

“We’re all the bastard children of RAND and we don’t even know it,” remarks Abella, as he charts how RAND started off as an organization centered around building new weapons for the military but ultimately expanded into politics, science, history and economics and was closely allied with the Ford, Rockefeller and Carnegie foundations. RAND’s decision in the 50′s to re-model the globe towards a new world order changed everything, with the development of “rational choice theory,” which turned people from being citizens into consumers, as rights and responsibilities were replaced with choices and people’s lives slowly came to be dominated not by integrity or what they stood for, but by what they spent their money on.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGYLzQLFULM&feature=player_embedded

RAND’s ultimate goal was to have technocrats running every aspect of society in pursuit of a one world government that would be administered under “the rule of reason,” a ruthless world where efficiency was king and men were little more than machines, which is why RAND studied the social sciences because they were at a loss to work out how to deal with people and how human beings did not always act in their own predictable self-interests. There is no place for love, empathy or selflessness in the new world order that RAND and the Ford Foundation are working to create, and patriotism and altruism are adversarial to their aims.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0iV9NR25h8&feature=player_embedded

Abella explains how RAND was instrumental in developing the strategy behind the use of nuclear weapons, and how they actively promoting nuking the entirety of Eastern Europe as well as China in case of problems in Western Europe, a policy that could easily have sparked off a catastrophic nuclear holocaust. RAND researchers believed that as long as 10 million Americans survived a nuclear war, the war was won.

Abella notes how RAND saw the United Nations as a template for one world government but that a new organization controlled by the U.S. would eventually supersede the UN and become the de facto world government, which is why RAND researchers such as John Williams advocated pre-emptive nuclear strikes on the Soviet Union, to make sure the United States would be the only country with the supreme power to impose its will on the rest of the world.

Speaking on the topic of false flag attacks, Abella notes that the staged Gulf of Tonkin attack and the planned Operation Northwoods false flag were both initially proposed in RAND documents, highlighting the total immorality with which RAND war games its scenarios, many of which are ethically repugnant in that they nonchalantly promote the genocide of entire populations with little regard for the consequences. Abella explains how RAND truly is a shadow government because it serves as a revolving door between the two, and how RAND is the cradle of the military-industrial complex and the birthplace of the technocratic elite that we are now fighting against.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivA9pcMg_-M&feature=player_embedded

dolphin

10-22-2011, 07:06 AM

The Century of the self

Basically, the Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief - or even the hope of belief - that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution. Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy.

To do this they called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the ‘oppressive’ order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus—‘continuing the work of the Western Marxists by other means’ as one of their members noted.To further the advance of their ‘quiet’ cultural revolution - but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future - the School recommended (among other things):

1. The creation of racism offences.
2. Continual change to create confusion
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity
6. The promotion of excessive drinking
7. Emptying of churches
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits10. Control and dumbing down of media
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family

One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of ‘pansexualism’ - the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women.

To further their aims they would:

• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and take away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls
• abolish all forms of male dominance - hence the presence of women in the armed forces
• declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors’
· merging or reversing the sexes or sex roles;
· abolishing the family as we know it’

Munzenberg summed up the Frankfurt School’s long-term operation thus:
‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.'

The School believed there were two types of revolution: (a) political and (b) cultural. Cultural revolution demolishes from within. ‘Modern forms of subjection are marked by mildness’.
They saw it as a long-term project and kept their sights clearly focused on the family, education, media, sex and popular culture.

Defector KGB agent who was trained in subversion techniques. He explains the 4 basic steps to socially engineering entire generations into thinking and behaving the way those in power want them to.
It's shocking because our nation has been transformed in the exact same way, and followed the exact same steps.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlpODYhnPEo&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeMZGGQ0ERk&feature=player_embedded

dolphin

10-22-2011, 07:08 AM

dolphin

10-22-2011, 07:21 AM

TAVISTOCK

“The ideology of American foundations was created by the Tavistock Institute...study the effect of shellshock on British soldiers who survived World War I... to establish the breaking point of men under stress, under the direction of the British Army Bureau of Psychological Warfare...its prophet, Sigmond Freud,...Tavistock's pioneer work in behavioral science along Freudian lines of controlling humans...Tavistock Institute developed the mass brain-washing techniques which were first used experimentally on American prisoners of war in Korea...All Tavistock and American foundation techniques have a single goal---to break down the psychological strength of the individual and render him helpless to oppose the dictators of the World Order.”

At Tavistock, German refugee, Kurt Lewin originated the anti-Germany propaganda campaign to “turn the American public against Germany and involve us in World War II...James Paul Warburg, son of Paul Warburg who wrote the Federal Reserve Act, and nephew of Max Warburg who had financed Hitler, set up the Institute for Policy Studies to promote [LSD]... and the New Left counter-culture.”

“[The] National Training Laboratories... operation revolves around the particular form of Tavistock degenerate psychology known as ‘group dynamics,’ developed by German Tavistock operative Kurt Lewin...In a Lewinite brainwashing group, a number of individuals from varying backgrounds and personalities, are manipulated by a ‘group leader’ to form a ‘consensus’ of opinion, achieving a new ‘group identity.’ The key to the process is the creation of a controlled environment, in which stress is introduced (sometimes called dissonance) to crack an individual's belief structure. Using the peer pressure of other group members, the individual is cracked, and a new personality emerges with new values. The degrading experience causes the person to deny that any change has taken place...

At the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Finance & Commerce, the indoctrinated are taught how to produce cooked statistics known as econometrics from the Wharton Econometric Forecasting Associates.

At the Institute For The Future they work to manipulate government to control large groups of people, writing position papers advocating destabilizing actions intended to be negative catalysts for change in America, such as

“liberalizing abortion laws, drug usage and that cars entering an urban area pay tolls, teaching birth control in public schools, requiring registration of firearms, making use of drugs a non-criminal offense, legalizing homosexuality.”

The Stanford Research Institute “emphasis on mind control research and future sciences... Stanford Research is plugged into at least 200 smaller think tanks doing research into every facet of life in America...At present Stanford's computers are linked with 2500 sister research consoles.”
At the Rand Research and Development Corporation, “there are literally thousands of highly important companies, government institutions and organizations that make use of RANDS's services...brainwashing remains the primary function of RAND.”

At Tavistock, Alexandre Kojève’s studies of Hegelian dialectics provided the final pieces of the puzzle for the plotters seeking to force the new fascist ideology on to the unsuspecting American people. It was Kojève’s interpretations of “Hegel through the lens of Marx,” in his "End of History" thesis that produced the “clash of civilization” theory of Francis F-u-k-uyama.

Using the dialectic method, they constructed a credible “bogeyman,” in the form of Islamic terrorism, with which to herd the frightened American sheeple right into a war in the Middle East where their Christian Belief system which was married to the Jewification of foreign policy would lead to embracing the defence of Israel who would logically appear to be the antithesis of the Islamists.

Since the 9/11 attacks the Islamists have been inflated into an almost supernatural menace. A dark whisper campaign has nearly succeeded in equating all Islam with terrorism. The echo chamber of the corporate media has amplified their reputations as terrorists by focusing on their former exploits against the Soviets in Afghanistan.

The coining of the deceptive term “Islamofascists” linked Islamic ideology to the Nazis, providing the propagandistic ammunition needed for the brainwashing campaign. In the indoctrinated neo-fascist ideology, modeled after Hitlers's National Socialism, liberals are traitors, the enemies of the growing police state, while anti-liberals (conservatives) are the new anti-Semitic super-patriot agitators.

Their mind-numbing campaign of fear and intimidation created a state of dissonance within the minds of the targeted American populace, making the people susceptible to suggestion. Utilizing the brainwashing methods of group dynamics, they made this new paradigm the new national “consensus.”

Hyper-patriotism became a guilt weapon, used to bludgeon the new fascist group identity into the scrambled conscious of post 9/11 America. The historical lessons taught by a WW2 refugee George Mosse (mentor of neoconservative agitator Michael Ledeen) on the psychological and political indoctrination skills used by the Nazi propagandists, showed the way to the fascist transformation of American political parties, using the new mythology of Islamofascism.

The object of that government/media campaign was to make the people easily suggestible through the psychology of “learned helplessness.” The mixture of hyped patriotism, guilt, fear and helplessness made Americans true sheeple, who could only trust the new fascistic government to shepherd us to safety past all those scary Muslims.

According to another psychologist, Martin Seligman, the author of “Learned Optimism” (the alleged psychological antidote to learned helplessness), human minds can be trained to passively accept unpleasant situations,

“...nullifying the natural reactions, which normally cause attempts to escape or to control the situation. It is a state of deep depression, brought on by prolonged immersion in a reality of learned helplessness...A person with learned helplessness easily gives in her/his goals if s/he failed few times in achieving them. Such persons show apathy, no motivation, depression and pessimism.”

The American military is now developing virtual reality computer simulations, based on the theory of learned helplessness, to help it plan psy-ops operations to help it manipulate the populations of entire nations.

The intent is to “...test multiple courses of action to anticipate and shape behaviors of adversaries, neutrals, and partners. By applying theories of economics and human psychology, its developers believe they can predict how individuals and mobs will respond to various stressors...

They try to anticipate how stressed-out populations can be manipulated by increasing the fear and anxiety-induced helplessness, through the introduction of panic-causing events.”

The A. I. thinking of the massive computer simulations used in the program is based upon the theories of Israeli-American cognitive psychologist Daniel Kahneman.

dolphin

10-22-2011, 07:22 AM

The Brainwashing of America

The “neocons” had inherited the corporate/government machinery that had been taken over by previous agents, incorporating the brainwashing techniques developed from the psychiatric methods created by mostly psychologists. [7] They had developed their theories of psychotherapy and social engineering through their study of deviant human nature and anti-Semitism in Nazi psychological indoctrination in the heart of fascist Europe. The social scientists studied the world which had been distorted by fascist nationalism, seeking to create a science to manipulate personalities, hoping to change the fascist mindset, so that it might truly happen “never again.”

The corporate government propagandists who had studied their work on the aberrant psychology of the worst of all human beings developed highly coercive manipulative group psychotherapy techniques. The therapeutic conditioning which had been created by Sigmund Freud and his associates became the foundation for brainwashing techniques and a reverse conditioning process, intended to produce a new generation of fascists here in America and wherever else it was to be used. Now variants of these psy-ops techniques are being used in every strata of society, to control and to manipulate large groups of people, most notably through advertising, government disinformation and the “entertainment” industry.

Intellectual refugees from Europe, who had fled to America and England from Nazi Germany and Austria, brought different elements of the new Nazism with them, which they later formulated into their specialized sciences by interpreting their own personal experiences and research. The neoconservative students of those scholars fashioned their research into a science of political indoctrination, based on their combined knowledge of fascist tactics of deception and intimidation. The neoconservatives didn’t build the government machinery; they merely inserted themselves into the driving seats and forced the American people to line-up quietly behind them. Through fear and terrorist intimidation, they forced the people to accept a fascist/racist ideology that they would never willingly accept otherwise.

They had inherited a government of self-seeking “public servants” who had stopped serving the public long ago, most of which had been indoctrinated with new ideologies at foundations (mostly associated with the Tavistock Institute). Their mentors, the WW2 era psychologists and social scientists who were key players in the history of Tavistock, had done their preparatory work very well, from their seats on the thousands of think tanks and foundations. The Tavistock Institute is a $6 Billion a year network of Foundations in the U.S., consisting of ten major institutions, 400 subsidiaries, and 3000 other study groups and think tanks. It is funded by a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation. From these positions of power, they applied the manipulative psychological techniques that had been developed by Sigmund Freud and his students.

Sigmund Freud (avowed atheist with admitted Oedipal impulses toward his own mother) considered mankind to be the vilest of all of God’s creation. Freud’s work reflected his own repugnant beliefs:

“The individual is essentially an enemy of society and has instinctual urges that must be restrained to help society function. ‘Among these instinctual wishes are those of incest, cannibalism, and lust for killing.’ His view of human nature is that it is anti-social, rebellious, and has high sexual and destructive tendencies. The destructive nature of humans sets a pre-inclination for disaster when humans must interact with others in society. ‘For masses are lazy and unintelligent; they have no love for instinctual renunciation, and they are not to be convinced by argument of its inevitability; and the individuals composing them support one another in giving free rein to their indiscipline.’ So destructive is human nature, he claims, that ‘it is only through the influence of individuals who can set an example and whom masses recognize as their leaders that they can be induced to perform the work and undergo the renunciations on which the existence of civilization depends.’ All this sets a terribly hostile society that could implode if it were not for civilizing forces and developing government...” - From The Future Of An Illusion, by Sigmund Freud.

Freud equates religion with an instinctual drive, the product of a childlike mind:

“Religion is an outshoot of the father-complex, and represents man's helplessness in the world, having to face the ultimate fate of death, the struggle of civilization, and the forces of nature. He views [belief in] God as a child-like ‘longing for [a] father.’ In his words ‘...gods...must exorcize the terrors of nature, they must reconcile men to the cruelty of Fate, particularly as it is shown in death, and they must compensate them for the sufferings and privations which a civilized life in common has imposed on them’." - Future Of An Illusion

The psychologists and social scientists associated with Tavistock have woven the degenerate ideas of Freud into the neoconservative ideology. There they have implemented their mass-conditioning techniques as part of the plan to create a fascist America and a fascist world. The plans for us are almost completed.

“The ideology of American foundations was created by the Tavistock Institute...study the effect of shellshock on British soldiers who survived World War I... to establish the breaking point of men under stress, under the direction of the British Army Bureau of Psychological Warfare...its prophet, Sigmond Freud,...Tavistock's pioneer work in behavioral science along Freudian lines of controlling humans...Tavistock Institute developed the mass brain-washing techniques which were first used experimentally on American prisoners of war in Korea...All Tavistock and American foundation techniques have a single goal---to break down the psychological strength of the individual and render him helpless to oppose the dictators of the World Order.”

At Tavistock, German refugee, Kurt Lewin originated the anti-Germany propaganda campaign to “turn the American public against Germany and involve us in World War II...James Paul Warburg, son of Paul Warburg who wrote the Federal Reserve Act, and nephew of Max Warburg who had financed Hitler, set up the Institute for Policy Studies to promote [LSD]... and the New Left counter-culture.”

“[The] National Training Laboratories... operation revolves around the particular form of Tavistock degenerate psychology known as ‘group dynamics,’ developed by German Tavistock operative Kurt Lewin...In a Lewinite brainwashing group, a number of individuals from varying backgrounds and personalities, are manipulated by a ‘group leader’ to form a ‘consensus’ of opinion, achieving a new ‘group identity.’ The key to the process is the creation of a controlled environment, in which stress is introduced (sometimes called dissonance) to crack an individual's belief structure. Using the peer pressure of other group members, the individual is cracked, and a new personality emerges with new values. The degrading experience causes the person to deny that any change has taken place...

At the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Finance & Commerce, the indoctrinated are taught how to produce cooked statistics known as econometrics from the Wharton Econometric Forecasting Associates.

At the Institute For The Future they work to manipulate government to control large groups of people, writing position papers advocating destabilizing actions intended to be negative catalysts for change in America, such as

“liberalizing abortion laws, drug usage and that cars entering an urban area pay tolls, teaching birth control in public schools, requiring registration of firearms, making use of drugs a non-criminal offense, legalizing homosexuality.”

The Stanford Research Institute “emphasis on mind control research and NOT future sciences... Stanford Research is plugged into at least 200 smaller think tanks doing research into every facet of life in America...At present Stanford's computers are linked with 2500 sister research consoles.”

At the Rand Research and Development Corporation, “there are literally thousands of highly important companies, government institutions and organizations that make use of RANDS's services...brainwashing remains the primary function of RAND.”

At Tavistock, Alexandre Kojève’s studies of Hegelian dialectics provided the final pieces of the puzzle for the plotters seeking to force the new fascist ideology on to the unsuspecting American people. It was Kojève’s interpretations of “Hegel through the lens of Marx,” in his "End of History" thesis that produced the “clash of civilization” theory of Francis F-u-k-uyama.

Using the dialectic method, they constructed a credible “bogeyman,” in the form of Islamic terrorism, with which to herd the frightened American sheeple right into a war in the Middle East where their Christian Belief system which was married to the Jewification of foreign policy would lead to embracing the defence of Israel who would logically appear to be the antithesis of the Islamists.

Since the 9/11 attacks the Islamists have been inflated into an almost supernatural menace. A dark whisper campaign has nearly succeeded in equating all Islam with terrorism. The echo chamber of the corporate media has amplified their reputations as terrorists by focusing on their former exploits against the Soviets in Afghanistan.

The coining of the deceptive term “Islamofascists” linked Islamic ideology to the Nazis, providing the propagandistic ammunition needed for the brainwashing campaign. In the indoctrinated neo-fascist ideology, modeled after Hitlers's National Socialism, liberals are traitors, the enemies of the growing police state, while anti-liberals (conservatives) are the new anti-Semitic super-patriot agitators.

Their mind-numbing campaign of fear and intimidation created a state of dissonance within the minds of the targeted American populace, making the people susceptible to suggestion. Utilizing the brainwashing methods of group dynamics, they made this new paradigm the new national “consensus.”

Hyper-patriotism became a guilt weapon, used to bludgeon the new fascist group identity into the scrambled conscious of post 9/11 America. The historical lessons taught by a WW2 refugee George Mosse (mentor of neoconservative agitator Michael Ledeen) on the psychological and political indoctrination skills used by the Nazi propagandists, showed the way to the fascist transformation of American political parties, using the new mythology of Islamofascism.

The object of that government/media campaign was to make the people easily suggestible through the psychology of “learned helplessness.” The mixture of hyped patriotism, guilt, fear and helplessness made Americans true sheeple, who could only trust the new fascistic government to shepherd us to safety past all those scary Muslims.

According to another psychologist, Martin Seligman, the author of “Learned Optimism” (the alleged psychological antidote to learned helplessness), human minds can be trained to passively accept unpleasant situations,

“...nullifying the natural reactions, which normally cause attempts to escape or to control the situation. It is a state of deep depression, brought on by prolonged immersion in a reality of learned helplessness...A person with learned helplessness easily gives in her/his goals if s/he failed few times in achieving them. Such persons show apathy, no motivation, depression and pessimism.”
The American military is now developing virtual reality computer simulations, based on the theory of learned helplessness, to help it plan psy-ops operations to help it manipulate the populations of entire nations.

The intent is to “...test multiple courses of action to anticipate and shape behaviors of adversaries, neutrals, and partners. By applying theories of economics and human psychology, its developers believe they can predict how individuals and mobs will respond to various stressors...

They try to anticipate how stressed-out populations can be manipulated by increasing the fear and anxiety-induced helplessness, through the introduction of panic-causing events.”

The A. I. thinking of the massive computer simulations used in the program is based upon the theories of Israeli-American cognitive psychologist Daniel Kahneman.

dolphin

10-22-2011, 07:22 AM

There will be, in the next generation or so, there will be methods of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution."
Aldous Huxley, Tavistock Group, California Medical School, 1961

At this link is the actual AUDIO of Huxeley' entire address
http://dpg.lib.berkeley.edu/webdb/mrc/search_vod?keyword=Aldous+Huxley

I contend that Huxeley plagerized the policy and research papers produced by the think tanks and foundations. His brother Julien was the head of UNESCO and its a no brainer he had access to them.

It is normal for people to react when there’s a problem. Often they blame people improperly like their fathers, mothers, girlfriends, boyfriends or people around them. The drugs divert them so their critical thinking doesn’t develop to a level where they can understand complex issues. Drugs create a rift between older generations and young people and tend to break up families. When people are emotionally hurt by broken families, they can’t think straight. This leaves them insecure, paranoid and open to manipulation.

In the case of many of the legal psychiatric prescription medications being doled out like candy the long term effects actually cause permanent damage to the frontal lobe and an ensuing loss in higher brain functions.

People mistakingly think the drugs help them because they don't feel as depressed when what is really happening is they simply don't think anymore. It is in effect a mild chemicle lobotomy. Depression is a higher brain function telling your concious mind that something is wrong. You don't want people to figure out what is wrong because God forbid they might wake up and do something to fix the problem. Something the couch therapist psychologist used to help people accomplish.

Psychology has been taken over by Psychiatry. Psychology concentrated on helping the individual understand themselves and the world arround them. Psychiatry concentrates simply on behavioral modification and operates on the principles of suppressing the symptom of the problem.

The added benifits include shortened lifespan due to the myriad of health complications which supports the depopulation agenda and a population that becomes enslaved to the dependency of the drugs results in the willing enslavement of people who trade their productivity for a continued supply of the drugs.

Drug abuse in communities is not random. Someone wants us to be pacified and to push us to have a total social breakdown. They want our brains, morals and ambition destroyed. They want our Indigenous youth to be criminalized and minimized. Drug abuse creates misfits and society dropouts who are supposed to be discarded and discredited. It stops us from campaigning for our social and political rights.

It’s an old strategy.

Going back to the 1830s Britain was the world’s major drug trafficker. The Europeans were jealous of the Chinese. They had so many beautiful items like silk, porcelain, spices, etc. Britain only had wool to trade, which the Chinese did not need. The Europeans had to get silver to trade with China. They also had tobacco from Turtle Island. To increase demand for tobacco they cut it with opium from India. Before long, huge numbers around the trading ports in Canton [the modern city of Guangzhou] were addicted. Silver began draining out of China and ruining the economy.

The Chinese emperor passed a law forbidding the import of opium. They wrote to Queen Victoria asking her to control her nationals and stop the illegal trade. The Chinese announced all opium would be seized and burned. U.S. traders ignored the ban and brought in a shipment to Canton. It was confiscated and burned in public.

The Americans got the British to declare war on China. The “Opium War” was to defend the “right” of drug dealers. The Chinese were not warlike. They did not have a big army to defend themselves from the British. The British won the war and forced the Chinese to give them a lot of land around Hong Kong. This has since been returned to them. China was forced to make opium legal along with unrestricted propagation of Christianity. The affect was devastating.

A lot of research was done on how a few were able to defeat a population of millions through drugs. In the end the Chinese regained their independence. Shouldn’t we ask why the U.S. is in Afghanistan? It is the source of over 90% of the world’s opium! Does somebody want the whole world to be stoned! The Taliban prior to the invasion had wiped out its production and today it is back again in full production.

In the 1940’s, British writer Aldous Huxley, who wrote “Brave New World”, went to the U.S. He recruited Allen Watts who became the guru of a nationwide Zen Buddhist cult in California in the 1950s and 1960s. He founded the “Pacifica Foundation” which sponsored two radio stations that pushed the “Liverpool sound”. This was the British imported “hard” rock twang of the Rolling Stones, the Beatles and the Animals. They also pioneered “acid rock” and eventually “psychotic punk rock”.

In 1943 LSD was developed by Albert Hoffman, a chemist at Sandoz A.B. – a Swiss pharmaceutical owned by banker, S.G. Warburg. [He’s a Federal Reserve shareholder]. British and U.S. intelligence were directly involved.

The book “Aquarian Conspiracy” described how new age philosophy was blended with the promotion of the drug culture. “The introduction of major psychedelics in the 1960s was largely attributable by the Central Intelligence Agency CIA’s investigation for possible military use”. It was codenamed “MK Ultra”.

In the 1960s kids in the U.S. were protesting against the Vietnam War. The U.S. establishment did not know what to do. On May 4, 1970, the National Guard shot four kids at Kent State University in Ohio. They were protesting against the U.S. invasion of Cambodia ordered by President Nixon. The shooting was meant to quell the demonstrations against the war. It didn’t work.

To divert the youth, a national drug movement was started. The 1968 mega concert at Woodstock in Sullivan County New York was part of the drug and “free love” movement sponsored by companies like Capitol Records. In New York City the “Ed Sullivan Show” displayed these groups nationwide to promote the drug culture.

For the U.S. to continue its warmongering it had to corrupt and destroy its opposition, the youth. According to recently released CIA documents, Allen Dulles, the then head of the CIA, purchased over 100 million doses of LSD – most of which flooded the streets of the USA during the late 1960s. [Illuminaticonspiracyarchives.com].

The plan is for every instinct for survival to be controlled by drugs. The drugs produced naturally by the body are being replaced by drugs being manufactured by the multi-national corporations.

Today, as a result of 911, the climate of fear has been promoted over the U.S. and Canada. The kids are told that fear can be shut out by going into this false artificial world created by drugs, pills and music. The kids lose touch with reality and are not able to understand or cope with social abuse.

Today multi-national corporations and pharmaceuticals have control of recording companies, music, radio stations, television programming, films, mainstream news [msn] and advertising [almost total mind control]. A common theme is U.S. based “ghetto rap”. They are producing these themes for the vulnerable minds of the young people to confuse and control them. The kids learn to switch into rap and drug culture talk. Computers, games and cell phones are programmed to take them into this world.

It is normal for people to react when there’s a problem. Often they blame people improperly like their fathers, mothers, girlfriends, boyfriends or people around them. The drugs divert them so their critical thinking doesn’t develop to a level where they can understand complex issues. Drugs create a rift between older generations and young people and to break up families. When people are emotionally hurt by broken families, they can’t think straight. This leaves them insecure, paranoid and open to manipulation by big business.

Drugs have replaced the residential school program as a means of committing genocide. The difference is that they’ve persuaded our youth to commit the crimes on themselves. Anyone who wants to get out of it can if they are determined. Elders are there to counsel them. While they are off the drugs they start talking to them and get them back into reality and with their families. After treatment they need help and support and to occupy themselves.

It’s an uphill battle for these counselors. Drugs are being flooded into communities to stop people from thinking or asking questions. The GLOBALISTS want to be able to lure us into giving up everything we have. In many cases the youth experiment with drugs and then reject it. They get on with their lives. The oldest and the youngest are not involved. Those escaping it are able to stay in school. They are taught to deal with enticement from other kids and dealers. In any society the youth in between are vulnerable.

Marijuana is many times more powerful than it was in the 1960s. Worse they were often laced with poisen chemicles sprayed in erradication programs, but harvested and sold before the chemicles could kill the plants causing all manner of neurological damage to those smoking it.

Other drugs are even more dangerous. Some, like chrystal meth, cause brain damage after one shot. The teachers and medical personnel get children on Ritalin and other drugs. Some parents use it to shoot up. It’s vicious! Those Indigenous people who are bringing drugs into our communities have been colonized into wanting power and control over us. Thus, the push for more powerful drugs onto our people!

For this plan to be effective, they need to keep us idle and spaced out. Some government or police agents or medical personnel who say they are fighting drugs are actually promoting drugs. The whole dirty business keeps a few people rich. In some cases the dealers are co-opt to become “snitches” in exchange for protection. They purportedly supply information on us and are free to provide drugs to the community to weaken and destroy society. They’re rarely busted when there’s a “crack down” or a raid!. Why? They are integral part of the government program to keep people hooked in order to feed the prison industrial complex.

dolphin

10-22-2011, 07:33 AM

'The long range penetration strain.”

The art of subjecting a very large group of people to continued long range penetration strain was developed by scientists working out of the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations and their U. S. subsidiaries, Stanford Research and Rand Corporation, and at least another 150 research institutions here in the U.S.

Dr. Kurt Lewin, the scientist who developed this fiendish warfare, has caused the average American patriot to fret over various conspiracy theories, leaving him or her with a feeling of uncertainty and insecurity, isolated and perhaps even afraid, as he searches, but fails to understand the decay and rot caused by “THE CHANGING IMAGES OF MANKIND,” unable to identify or combat the social, moral, economic and political changes he deems undesirable and does not want, yet which increase in intensity on every hand.

Dr. Lewin’s name will not be found in any of our establishment history books which, in any event, are a record of events mostly from the side of the ruling class or the victors of wars. Therefore, it is with pride that I introduce his name to you. As mentioned before, Dr. Lewin organized the Harvard Psycho-logical Clinic and the Institute for Social Research under the auspices of the Tavistock Institute. The names do not give much indication of the purpose of the two organizations.

Remember the infamous bill to reform coinage and mint laws passed in 1827. The title of the bill was harmless enough or sounded harmless, which was the intention of its backers. Through this Act, Senator John Sherman betrayed the nation into the hands of the international bankers. Sherman allegedly sponsored the bill “without reading it.”

As we know, the bill’s true purpose was to demonetize silver and give the thieving bankers unlimited power over the credit of our nation; powers to which the bankers were clearly not entitled under the clear and unmistakable terms of the U.S. Constitution.

Kurt Lewin gave the Tavistock Institute, the Club of Rome and NATO unlimited power over America, to which no organization, entity or society is entitled. These institutions have used the usurped powers to destroy the will of the nation to resist the plans and intentions of the conspirators to rob us of the fruits of the American Revolution and steer us on a course leading directly to a New Dark Ages under a One World Government.

The Psychological Goal of Fear Mongering.

The object of the media campaign is to make the people easily suggestible through the psychology of “learned helplessness.” The mixture of hyped patriotism, guilt, fear and helplessness makes Americans true sheeple, who can only trust their new Authoritarian Police State government to shepherd them to safety past all those scary Muslims and the dangers of Nuclear and Biological attack.

According to psychologist, Martin Seligman, the author of “Learned Optimism” (the alleged psychological antidote to learned helplessness), human minds can be trained to passively accept unpleasant situations such as the imposition of a Police state and the loss of their freedoms and liberties.

“...nullifying the natural reactions, which normally cause attempts to escape or to control the situation. It is a state of deep depression, brought on by prolonged immersion in a reality of learned helplessness...A person with learned helplessness easily gives in her/his goals if s/he fails few times in achieving them. Such persons show apathy, no motivation, depression and pessimism.

Step by step Americans have stood by helplessly as one freedom and liberty guaranteed by their constitution and bill of rights has been taken away and each time they have protested and clamored their outrage they were managed into submissive acceptance. This despite a never ending series of bold faced lies that were later exposed as such that were told to them by the usurpers of their Government as the excuse to get them to accept the legislation for their new enslavement and aquiescence to participation in Wars of naked aggression.

Even when millions of Americans began calling their Congress to prevent the Bank Bailout they were given a one week reprieve only to be told that martial law would be declared if the bill was not passed. Congress rubberstamped it and Americans were given yet another dose of helplessness.

All the while as their way of life has been systamatically stolen from them they have been bombarded with nightmares by fear mongering opportunists who scream with bull horns that things are going to get even worse with their tales of Fema Camps and coffins which in fact were built as props as part of a very real contingency plan with the dual purpose of providing a bit of reality to the brainwashing techniques designed to condition Americans into the mindset of "Learned Helplessness".

Is it any wonder that at some point the goal of learned helplessness would sink in and completely dismantle their will to oppose the takeover of their country by a dictatorship masquerading as a sham democracy?

dolphin

10-22-2011, 07:37 AM

In 1932 the J.P. Morgan Executive Board explained to their Star Junior Executive Norman Dodd...

"We will never see sound banking in the United States again...

Since the end of World War 1 we have been responsable for the
institutionalization of conflicting interests that can never be resolved."
---JP Morgan's Executive Board Members;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUYCBfmIcHM&feature=player_embedded

With that as the backdrop, this is what Norman Dodd says of a conversation he had with the President of the tax-exempt Ford Foundation in 1954 as part of his Congressionally mandated investigation of tax-exempt foundations:

“Mr. Dodd, we’ve asked you to come up here today because we thought that possibly, off the record, you would tell us why the Congress is interested in the activities of the foundations such as ourselves.” Before I could think of how I would reply to that statement, Mr. Gaither then went on and said: “Mr. Dodd, all of us who have a hand in the making of policies here have had experience operating under directives, the substance of which is that we shall use our grant-making power so to alter life in the United States that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.”

ED GRIFFIN: Why do the foundations generously support Communist causes in the United States?

NORMAN DODD: Well, because to them, Communism represents a means of developing what we call a monopoly, that is, an organization of, say, a large-scale industry into an administerable unit.

ED GRIFFIN: Do they think that they will be the ones to benefit?

NORMAN DODD: They will be the beneficiaries of it, yes.

Another ominous thread in the interview is when Dodd reveals of what his lead investigator discovered in the minutes-books of Carnegie Endowment for Peace. According to Norman Dodd, the following was recorded on the old-fashioned dictaphone machine by Katherine Casey as she was browsing the minutes-books in the CEP library:

We are now at the year 1908, which was the year that the Carnegie Foundation began operations. In that year, the trustees, meeting for the first time, raised a specific question, which they discussed throughout the balance of the year in a very learned fashion. The question is: “Is there any means known more effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people?” And they conclude that no more effective means than war to that end is known to humanity.

So then, in 1909, they raised the second question and discussed it, namely: “How do we involve the United States in a war?”

Well, I doubt at that time if there was any subject more removed from the thinking of most of the people of this country than its involvement in a war. There were intermittent shows in the Balkans, but I doubt very much if many people even knew where the Balkans were. Then, finally, they answered that question as follows: “We must control the State Department.” That very naturally raises the question of how do we do that? And they answer it by saying: “We must take over and control the diplomatic machinery of this country.” And, finally, they resolve to aim at that as an objective.

Then time passes, and we are eventually in a war, which would be World War I. At that time they record on their minutes a shocking report in which they dispatched to President Wilson a telegram, cautioning him to see that the war does not end too quickly.

Finally, of course, the war is over. At that time their interest shifts over to preventing what they call a reversion of life in the United States to what it was prior to 1914 when World War I broke out. At that point they came to the conclusion that, to prevent a reversion, “we must control education in the United States.” They realize that that’s a pretty big task. It is too big for them alone, so they approach the Rockefeller Foundation with the suggestion that that portion of education which could be considered domestic be handled by the Rockefeller Foundation and that portion which is international should be handled by the Endowment. They then decide that the key to success of these two operations lay in the alteration of the teaching of American history. …

The Monetary Conspiracy For World Government by Zahir Ebrahim
Posted on November 19, 2008 by dandelionsalad
by Zahir Ebrahim
Project Humanbeingsfirst
http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/the-monetary-conspiracy-for-world-government-by-zahir-ebrahim/

dolphin

10-22-2011, 07:38 AM

Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35
January 10, 1963

Current Communist Goals

EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Thursday, January 10, 1963

http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm

The communitarian synthesis is the final silent move in a well-designed, quietly implemented plot to re-make the world into colonies. To us it doesn't matter if there is some form of ancient religion that propels the plotters, nor does it really matter if it turns out they're aliens (as some suggest). The bottom line is the Hegelian dialectic sets up the scene for state intervention, confiscation, and redistribution in the U.S., and this is against our ENTIRE constitutional based society. The Hegelian dialectic is not a conspiracy theory because the Conspiracy Theory is a fraud. We've all been duped by global elitists who plan to take totalitarian control of all nation's people, property, and produce. Communitarian Plans exist in every corner of the world, and nobody at the local level will explain why there's no national legal avenue to withdraw from the U.N.'s "community" development plans.

For example: If (A) my idea of freedom conflicts with (B) your idea of freedom then © neither of us can be free until everyone agrees to be a slave.

The Soviet Union was based on the Hegelian dialectic, as is all Marxist writing. The Soviets didn't give up their Hegelian reasoning when they supposedly stopped being a communist country. They merely changed the dialectical language to fit into the modern version of Marxist thinking called communitarianism. American author Steve Montgomery explores Moscow's adept use of the Hegelian dialectic in Glasnost-Perestroika: A Model Potemkin Village.

thesis, antithesis, and synthesis

Hegelian conflicts steer every political arena on the planet, from the United Nations to the major American political parties, all the way down to local school boards and community councils. Dialogues and consensus-building are primary tools of the dialectic, and terror and intimidation are also acceptable formats for obtaining the goal. The ultimate Third Way agenda is world government. Once we get what's really going on, we can cut the strings and move our lives in original directions outside the confines of the dialectical madness. Focusing on Hegel's and Engel's ultimate agenda, and avoiding getting caught up in their impenetrable theories of social evolution, gives us the opportunity to think and act our way toward freedom, justice, and genuine liberty for all.

Today the dialectic is active in every political issue that encourages taking sides. We can see it in environmentalists instigating conflicts against private property owners, in democrats against republicans, in greens against libertarians, in communists against socialists, in neo-cons against traditional conservatives, in community activists against individuals, in pro-choice versus pro-life, in Christians against Muslims, in isolationists versus interventionists, in peace activists against war hawks. No matter what the issue, the invisible dialectic aims to control both the conflict and the resolution of differences, and leads everyone involved into a new cycle of conflicts.

We're definitely not in Kansas anymore.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZ6p4PemITA&feature=player_embedded

"Towards the end of 1922 ,on Lenin’s initiative, a meeting was organised at the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow. The aim of the meeting was to clarify the concept of, and give concrete effect to, a Marxist cultural revolution. Amongst those present were Georg Lukacs (a Hungarian aristocrat, son of a banker, who had become a Communist during World War I ; a good Marxist theoretician he developed the idea of ‘Revolution and Eros’ - sexual instinct used as an instrument of destruction) and Willi Munzenberg (whose proposed solution was to ‘organise the intellectuals and use them to make Western civilisation stink. Only then, after they have corrupted all its values and made life impossible, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat’) ‘It was’, said Ralph de Toledano (1916-2007) the conservative author and co-founder of the ‘National Review’, a meeting ‘perhaps more harmful to Western civilization than the Bolshevik Revolution itself.'

The School believed there were two types of revolution: (a) political and ( cultural. Cultural revolution demolishes from within. ‘Modern forms of subjection are marked by mildness’.

They saw it as a long-term project and kept their sights clearly focused on the family, education, media, sex and popular culture.

dolphin

10-22-2011, 07:39 AM

The progressive movement which is really the neocommunist movement in disguise should not be confused with the Soviet or Chinese system. This is what makes this movement so dangerous for all of us that value the traditions of American freedom. The progressive population will always portray that their movement is that of democratic freedom in order to take fear out of the equation. Then, the progressive will portray that their movement represents social security of the highest order in order to attract those who are emotional over financial insecurities. The progressive solution is to have a world order where central governments direct our lives. On paper, it all sounds like the secure way to go. The problem is that the human nature of those in control will never allow the system to work as portrayed. The people that are sucked into the belief that utopia is possible will never conform in the end. Those that gain power through democratic elections will eventually change the rules of the game to suit themselves.

However, the progressive movement can win if they make you believe that change is needed. The so-called change is really evil in disguise. It will happen slowly at first. It will come with the reshaping of the minds of the new generations in the public school system. Traditional values will be discarded in the school texts. Then, on every economic problem that we may encounter, more reasons will arise for a change leading to further government control. It may even come to the point where the havoc will be contrived. In the end, it will all boil down to the idea that people will be willing to give up certain traditional rights in order to receive protection. The protection will be health care and a socialized job career.

Communist Democracy: The Progressive Movement

Written by Anthony Campos (2/13/10)

The so-called "progressive movement" is misunderstood by most Americans. In brief fashion, let us get it clear right now. The words socialism and Marxist are being thrown around loosely in the media which adds to the confusion. People tend to associate these words with Russia or Red China which is a mistake. In other words, the American people or any free people are making a grave error if they believe that the pure form of communism is like that of Red China or Cuba.

First of all, the United States is a republic by definition of the Founding Fathers. In the Constitution of the U.S. in Article IV, section 4, it says, "The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government,........." It does not say democratic. I am sure that the progressives would love to get that off the Constitution.

In the original pledge of allegiance, it says, "I pledge allegiance to my flag, and the republic for which it stands." It says republic. It does not say democracy. The progressives have already succeeded in stopping the pledge of allegiance in schools.

Communist democracy is the pure form of Marxism which says that people can vote for leadership and then it is the leadership that does what is best for the masses. Doesn't that remind you of Pelosi and Obama? If it does not, then you must be either naive or dumb or both, or if you are a liberal, then you are in denial.

A communist democracy is operated by centralized authority where the government controls the economy and business with centralized regulation. This is the progressive movement. You have already seen examples of this with Obama and Pelosi. Let there be no doubt about it. The progressive will say that this pure form of communism allows for freedom of speech and the right to vote. The progressive actually believes that this can exist in pure form without infringing on the democratic rights of the people. Of course, the progressive does not consider that human nature becomes part of the formula.

The progressive will contend that the communism of the Soviet Union and China is not what Karl Marx had envisioned. The problem as I see it is that the progressives actually believe that the control authority can operate without the abuses that occurred in Russia and China. At this point, I say that it is naive to believe that a communist democracy can exist in its purest form. I further believe that it is naive to believe that a pure form of communism can lead a nation to be great. The Soviet Union crumbled. China will also crumble unless it is reinforced by a progressive United States.

Let us be clear about the progressive movement. These people do believe that the United States should be equalized with other nations based on a distribution of wealth. This is a most dangerous mental disorder. It means that the United States should give up power so that other nations may elevate in power for there to be equalization. This is what George Soros stands for and that is why he supported Obama.

There is a major problem with the progressive utopia. The problem is that of human nature. On paper the ideal world of the Communist Manifesto is possible. In reality, it is not very probable. Power of control breeds arrogance where the end will always justify the means. There will always be deviance to the cause which will justify executions and the need for concentration camps. In the end, the perfect state becomes death itself.

The progressive or pure communist will believe that the government should take full care of us which would lead to stabilization and less expense in the end. The progressive will believe that distribution of wealth will also lead to stabilization by draining wealth into the government treasury where it will be allotted to the population. Reward for achievement would have to come by way of recognition instead of money. In other words, there would be a social ranking system. The incentive would be title and power. Thus, capitalism would no longer be the incentive for crativeness and innovation.

An example of the progressive movement has been the way that the U.S. health care bill has been initiated. The progressive individuals, Obama and Pelosi, decided that they knew what was best for the people. Then, they used their majority power in the House and Senate to pass the bill without debate. If you believe that the method used was correct, then you are a progressive.

Another example of the progressive movement is to destroy all that is traditional. That is what change is all about. The phrase, "In God We Trust" is a target for destruction by the progressive movement. Anything that is spiritual must be destroyed and replaced by what the progressive interprets as the reality of the state. There can only be allegiance to the state.

I also believe that the study of history in the public school system will be revised under the progressive movement. Teachers will be used as pawns to foster the idea that the Founding Fathers are really no longer relevant. In other words, the inspiration of our initial American Revolution is not to be considered more important than the new Progressive Revolution.

I do believe that many Democrats in Congress realize what is occurring and want their traditional party back away from Howard Dean who is indeed a radical. I also believe that many Democrats in congress do not even realize the truth about the heading they are taking by supporting the far-left members.

It now becomes up to us, the people, to do what is right for our nation. It becomes important for us to vote for Republicans, Democrats or Independents that stand for the values of the majority. We must defend the present Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. We must all be observant and aware of the methods that are used by a dangerous minority geared to imprison the minds of the majority. You may not be able to see the forest for the trees in front of you.

You decide what you want to be or support. The important thing here is that the American people should know exactly what the progressive movement entails before they vote. Even more important, the American people should know what is the objective of the progressive movement.

Americans do not seem to realize the danger that they are in, because they do not realize the true definition of the progressive movement.

dolphin

10-22-2011, 07:40 AM

If there is a phrase that best describes the current Synarchist agenda being promoted by the likes of Shultz and Rohatyn, it is: "Schacht without Hitler." And if anyone thinks that this is an improvement on the earlier experience with Nazism and Fascism, they are about to experience a rude awakening, if Synarchy is not stopped.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ul5oQ3wbstQ&feature=player_embedded#!

What is Globalization?

It is the collective effect of purposeful and amoral manipulation that seeks to centralize economic, political, technological and societal forces in order to accrue maximum profit and political power to global banks, global corporations and the elitists who run them. It is rapidly moving toward an full and final implementation of Technocracy.

What is the Trilateral Commission?

Founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski, the Commission set out to create a “New International Economic Order”, namely, Technocracy. The original member*ship consisted of elitists (bankers, politicians, academics, industrialists) from Japan, North America and Europe. Collectively, they have dominated and controlled trade and economic policy in their respective countries since at least 1974.

What is Technocracy?

Technocracy is a movement started in the 1930′s by engineers, scientists and technicians that pro*posed the replacement of capitalism with an energy-based economy. Originally envisioned for North America only, it is now being applied on a global basis. Authors Aldous Huxley and George Orwell believed that Technocracy would result in a Scientific Dictator*ship, as reflected in their books, “Brave New World” and “1984“.

What is Smart Grid?

Smart Grid is the national and global imple*mentation of digital and Wi-fi enabled power meters that enable communication between the appliances in your home or business, with the power provider. This provides control over your appliances and your usage of elec*tricity, gas and water.

http://www.augustforecast.com/

dolphin

10-22-2011, 07:46 AM

A published author by the name of Rothkopf wrote the book on these people.

There are about 7,000 to 10,000 of them world wide.

Rothkopf's credible, if not especially original argument in "Superclass" is that over the past several decades a "global elite" has emerged whose connections to each other have become more significant than their ties to their home nations and governments. They schmooze regularly at conferences like Davos, go to the same schools, serve together on corporate and nonprofit boards, and above all do business with each other constantly -- to the point that they have become a kind of culture in themselves, a "class without a country," as Rothkopf puts it. Furthermore, these people are "the new leadership class for our era."

More Here at Salon.
http://www.salon.com/books/review/2008/03/14/superclass/

Their goal is not to lose their wealth and power to a transnational middle class, but rather to extinguish the notion of a middle class, and transnationalize a lower, uneducated, labour oriented class, through which they will secure ultimate wealth and power.

To fully integrate and internationalize a middle class on a global scale would require industrialization and development in places such as Africa, and certain places in Asia and Latin America, and would represent a massive threat to the Oligarchs, as it would be a valve through which much of their wealth and power would escape them.

The economic crisis served as a cover for them to destroy much of the wealth the middle class holds and as the crisis progresses, or rather, regresses, and then accelerates, the middle classes of the world will suffer, while a great percentage of lower classes of the world, poverty-stricken even prior to the crisis, will suffer the greatest leading to a massive reduction in population levels, particularly in the “developed” or “Third World” states which has been one of their primary goals all along.

Naturally they will continue to stimulate the crisis to keep us off balance and under control by throwing various threats againt us along the way. Be it global warming, pandemics, war, terrorism, or famine to cause as much poverty and death as they think they can get away with without making it too obvious all the while while using their well practiced Hegallian Psychology to pretend they are trying to stop it by making it look like they are making progress to stave it off and save us when in fact they are merely managing it to continue in a controlled decline (slow burn) to avoid being chased down by angry mobs carrying pitch forks and torches.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14712

dolphin

10-22-2011, 08:00 AM

Antony C. Sutton — Feb. 14, 1925 - June 17, 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Antony Sutton has been persecuted but never prosecuted for his research and subsequent publishing of his findings. His mainstream career was shattered by his devotion towards uncovering the truth. In 1968, his Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development was published by The Hoover Institute at Stanford University. Sutton showed how the Soviet state's technological and manufacturing base, which was then engaged in supplying the North Vietnamese the armaments and supplies to kill and wound American soldiers, was built by US firms and mostly paid for by the US taxpayers. From their largest steel and iron plant, to automobile manufacturing equipment, to precision ball-bearings and computers, basically the majority of the Soviet's large industrial enterprises had been built with the United States help or technical assistance.

Professor Richard Pipes of Harvard said in his book, Survival Is Not Enough: Soviet Realities and America's Future (Simon & Schuster;1984): "In his three-volume detailed account of Soviet Purchases of Western Equipment and Technology . . . [Antony] Sutton comes to conclusions that are uncomfortable for many businessmen and economists. For this reason his work tends to be either dismissed out of hand as 'extreme' or, more often, simply ignored."

The report was too much and Sutton's career as a well-paid member of the academic establishment was under attack and he was told that he "would not survive".

His work led him to more questions than answers. "Why had the US built-up it's enemy? Why did the US build-up the Soviet Union, while we also transferred technology to Hitler's Germany? Why does Washington want to conceal these facts?"

Sutton, following his leads, proceeded to research and write his three outstanding books on Wall Street, FDR, the Rise of Hitler, and The Bolshevik Revolution. Then, someone sent Antony a membership list of Skull and Bones and "a picture jumped out". And what a picture! A multigenerational foreign-based secret society with fingers in all kinds of pies and roots going back to 1830's Germany.

Plenty of Interviews of Sutton at this link.
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Antony+C.+Sutton+&aq=f

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFQD1bAsUlw&feature=player_embedded#!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDyDtYy2I0M

dolphin

10-22-2011, 08:22 AM

Fact Sheet: The Enemy Is Oligarchism
by Jeffrey Steinberg

In November 1940, the Coordinator of Information (COI), the predecessor to the U.S. Office of Strategic Services (OSS), prepared a classified report titled "Synarchie and the policy of the Banque Worms group."

The three-page confidential document began, "In recent reports, there have been several references to the growing political power of the Banque Worms group in France, which includes amongst its members such ardent [Nazi] collaborationists as Pucheu, Benoist-Mechin, Leroy-Ladurie, Bouthillier, and representatives of the big French industrial organizations."

The report continued, "The reactionary movement known as 'Synarchie' has been in existence in France for nearly a century. Its aim has always been to carry out a bloodless revolution, inspired by the upper classes, aimed at producing a form of government by 'technicians' (the founder of the movement was a 'polytechnician'), under which home and foreign policy would be subordinated to international economy. The aims of the Banque Worms group are the same as those of 'Synarchie,' and the leaders of the two groups are, in most cases, identical."

The COI report then went on to detail the political agenda of the international Synarchy, as of August 1940:

"(a) to check the 'Revolution Nationale' insofar as its development might entail the creation of a new social order [At the time, France was under the "social order" of the Nazis, following the Spring 1940 invasion and occupation—ed.];

"(b) to check any new social schemes which might tend to weaken the power of the international financiers and industrialists;

"© to work for the ultimate complete control of all industry by international finance and industry;

"(d) to protect Jewish and Anglo-Saxon interests."

The document went on to note that there is sympathy for this Synarchist scheme among some key Nazi circles in Germany including "both Goering and Dr. Funk [Walther Funk, who was Nazi Minister of Economics, president of the Reichsbank, and Nazi Germany's representative on the Bank for International Settlements, following Hjalmar Schacht—ed.]... It is alleged that certain industrial circles in Great Britain are also in sympathy with the movement. Some headway is claimed to have been made in securing the adhesion of big U.S. industry to the movement."

The document also identified Synarchist plans towards Great Britain: "To bring about the fall of the Churchill government by creating the belief in the country that a more energetic government is needed to prosecute the war ... and to bring about the formation of a new Government including Sir Samuel Hoare, Lord Beaverbrook and Mr. Hore-Belisha. (Note. The source has added that in the Worms group it is believed that those circles in Great Britain who are favorably disposed to their plans, are most critical of Mr. Churchill, Lord Halifax and Captain Margesson.); and through the medium of Sir Samuel Hoare to bring about an agreeement between British industry and the Franco-German 'bloc;' and to protect Anglo-Saxon interests on the continent."

The document concluded, "In regard to Germany, it is hoped ultimately to eliminate Hitler, Goebbels, and Himmler with his Gestapo, from the political scene, thus facilitating the formation of an Anglo-Franco-German economic bloc."

Another insightful snapshot of the trans-Atlantic Synarchist banking apparatus on the eve of World War II appeared, ironically, in Time magazine on July 3, 1939, under the headline, "Insider from Overseas." The article reported on the arrival in New York City of German banker Otto Jeidels, who was named a partner in the New York City branch of Lazard Frères & Co. According to Time : "Lazard Brothers & Co. of London is Aryan and aristocratic, a member of the Bank of England coterie, helps back the appeasment movement in London, favors the theory that concessions to Hitler will bring Dr. Schacht and his orthodox economics back to Berlin. It has a highly lucrative and increasingly important sideline in helping frightened European capitalists put their money into good safe American dollars.

On the receiving end of this flood of gold from Europe is Lazard Freres of Manhattan, not entirely Aryan, not a Wall Street insider, still correspondent (but no longer a partner) of the highly political London and Paris Lazard banks. Lazard's of Manhattan underwrites securities and above all, does a big business in foreign exchange.

Invaluable to this clearing house of new bullion and foreign capital will be Jeidels, who is a friend of Montagu Norman, has access to choice continental pipelines into Hitlerland.... In Germany there is a cynical saying that Schacht has managed to doublecross all save two of his intimates: one of the two is Hitler, the other is Jeidels.

Schacht gave Jeidels the high sign in time for him to leave Germany with his family before the great pogrom of 1938 began.... Schacht was able to protect Jeidels because his contact with British Bank Boss Montagu Norman was useful to Hitler....

Until the spring of 1938, Jeidels functioned perfectly, as much of an insider as Hitler could let any Jewish banker be. He satisfied the British by keeping the debts unrepudiated, the Nazis by keeping them frozen, served as middleman between the Nazis and the British."

These two reports, one, a classified wartime U.S. intelligence dossier, and the other, a widely circulated news magazine story, represented two exemplary pieces from a voluminous archive of documents—public and classified—from the 1930-45 period, that detailed the role of the international banking and industrial cartel, known then—and still, today—as "the Synarchist International."

Wartime OSS Research and Analysis Branch Director William Langer detailed the role of the Synarchy in Vichy France in his 1947 book Our Vichy Gamble . Three years later, James Stewart Martin, a U.S. Justice Department Anti-Trust Division lawyer, who, from 1944-47, headed the de-cartelization unit of the U.S. occupation government in Germany, published his own stunning exposé of the same international Synarchist cartel in his 1950 book, All Honorable Men .

These and other contemporaneous accounts, reflected a deep understanding, within the FDR-led U.S. governing institutions of the time, that a top-down international financial oligarchy had been the chief sponsors of the Nazi and Fascist regimes that brought war and devastation to the Eurasian continent, in a failed effort to create a post-Westphalian world without sovereign nation-states, run by an international bankers dictatorship. But for Franklin Roosevelt's mobilization of the moral and industrial might of the United States, these Synarchists may very well have succeeded in bringing the planet to the abyss of a new Dark Age.

Then and Now

These penetrating wartime intelligence assessments of global Synarchy are of the greatest relevance today. In effect, the COI/OSS and related evaluations of the situation on the European continent were that an Anglo-Saxon and Franco-German cartel of international financiers and industrialists, who comprised a powerful faction financing and controlling the Nazi/Fascist axis, was steering European governments, through agents with little or no loyalty to their nations, but the greatest loyalty to the international Synarchy. As Langer quoted U.S. Ambassador Nicholas Biddle from London, "This group should be regarded not as Frenchmen, any more than their corresponding members in Germany should be regarded as Germans, for the interests of both groups are so intermingled as to be indistinguishable; their whole interest is focussed upon furtherance of their industrial and financial stakes."

It was this combination of international bankers, then, who had financed Mussolini and then Hitler, and had steered Eurasia on a path of war and near self-annihilation, in order to secure their own dominance over global economic and financial affairs, no matter what the outcome of the war.

This apparatus was aligned, in the United States, with the very JP Morgan and DuPont interests that had been foiled in their several coup d'état attempts against President Roosevelt. The more extended network of FDR enemies included the Brown Brothers Harriman interests—including Prescott Bush, Sr., the grandfather of the current President of the United States—that had openly bankrolled the Nazi Party, and the Dillon Reed and Sullivan and Cromwell Wall Street axis that had structured the international steel, coal, and petroleum cartels, which included such key Nazi institutions as IG Farben, the Keppler Circle, and the Cologne Stein Bank of Algemeine SS financier Kurt von Schröder.

The head of Dillon Reed during the interwar period, William Draper, became chief of the economic division of the postwar U.S. occupation government in Germany, and crushed James Stewart Martin's effort, promoting Martin's resignation and his writing of All Honorable Men . As Martin discovered, the intention of the Synarchists was to assure the survival and prosperity of their cartel no matter what the outcome of the war.

Upon the death of Franklin Roosevelt, in April 1945, the Synachist vise-grip on the White House was soon, albeit temporarily, established, with the swearing in of Harry S Truman as President, and Truman's 1946 embrace of Winston Churchill's "Iron Curtain" declaration of war against FDR's wartime ally, the Soviet Union. By 1948, most of the French and German financiers at the heart of the wartime Synarchy were freed from jail, acquitted from charges of treason.

The Banque Worms group emerged among the principal French financiers and stalwarts of the Congress for Cultural Freedom, the post-war cultural warfare front at the heart of the trans-Atlantic "Red scare." Hjalmar Schacht, himself, acquitted at Nuremberg, resumed his role as a leading financial "wizard." André Meyer, the Paris Lazard banker who relocated to Manhattan's Lazard Brothers a year after Jeidels' arrival in New York, perpetuated the London-Paris-New York Synarchy, and soon designated Felix Rohatyn as his hand-picked successor, whom he considered "as my son."

Thus, the Synarchy has maintained a continuity through to the present day. Through individuals like Felix Rohatyn and George Pratt Shultz, the Synarchy has penetrated both of the major U.S. political parties, and through this penetration, has planted Synarchist agents, witting and unwitting, into the pores of the Federal government, from the Oval Office to the halls of Congress, to the courts, and virtually every Cabinet agency.

The neo-conservative movement, with its roots in the philosophical tradition of Leo Strauss, Alexandre Kojève, and Carl Schmitt, is one major spore of the present-day Synarchist International. But in some respects, the case of George Shultz provides the most clinical profile of the Synarchy in action today.

The Economic Hit Men

In 2004, a book was published by Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., which caused a significant stir. John Perkins' Confessions of an Economic Hit Man provided a first-hand account of the role of the present-day international cartel of banks and multinational corporations, which work in concert to loot the developing sector of its strategic raw-materials wealth and other national patrimony. The principal strategy employed by the Economic Hit Men (EHM), according to Perkins' first-hand account, was to build up massive debt by developing-sector governments, to trap them in a straitjacket of World Bank and IMF diktats, while multinational corporations such as Bechtel and Halliburton loot them blind, under the guise of "development."

Perkins identified George Shultz, former Bechtel president, U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, and Secretary of State, as the reigning Economic Hit Man—the Capo dei Tutti Capi of the very Synarchist apparatus that earlier brought the world to the brink of self-annihilation from 1922-1945.

Whether or not Perkins was 100% accurate about Shultz's formal title as the reigning boss of the EHM, Shultz definitely represents the embodiment of the Synarchy. Shultz's ultimate allegiances are suggested by his close relationship to Jacob Rothschild of Great Britain, to whom he, along with Berkshire Hathaway's Warren Buffett, delivered the California gubernatorial candidate Arnold Schwarzenegger, for inspection and approval.

Shultz is also one of the leading proponents in the United States of the radical free-trade dogmas of the Synarchists' Mont Pelerin Society. His University of Chicago mentor, W. Allen Wallis, was the founding treasurer of Mont Pelerin. Shultz is still a director of the Bechtel Group, chairman of the JP Morgan Chase International Council, a director of the Fremont Group and Accenture Energy, a company involved in mega-mergers and acquisitions in the oil and gas sector, with close ties to Anglo-American Corp.

Today, Shultz is not only the "godfather" of the Bush-Cheney Administration, having hand-picked the Vulcans, the team of initial George W. Bush tutors and Executive Branch moles, responsible for the Iraq War disaster. He, along with R. James Woolsey, revived the Committee on the Present Danger, to promote a post-Westphalia world of preventive wars, suited to the fulfillment of the Synarchist agenda.

In partnership with Felix Rohatyn, Shultz has promoted the privatization of war, through the proliferation of Private Military Corporations (PMCs), which, they openly boasted at an October 2004 Middlebury College conference, represented a return to the "neo-feudal" system, represented by the 18th- and 19th-Century British East India Company.

Shultz and Rohatyn typify the mid-level Synarchist operative, who works within and around government institutions, on behalf of a thoroughly alien agenda and ideology. Their allegiances are to the Anglo-Dutch/Venetian system of usury, globalization, population reduction, and slavery.

December 1971

George Shultz was Labor Secretary, head of the Office of Management and Budget, and Treasury Secretary under President Richard Nixon. He personally pulled the plug on the Bretton Woods system of FDR. When Lyndon LaRouche labelled the dumping of Bretton Woods as the beginning of a descent into a fascist Hell, he was branded a "potential danger" to the newly launched global tyranny.

In a December 1971 debate at Queens College in New York City, the last such event in which he would ever be invited to participate, LaRouche induced his opponent, Prof. Abba Lerner, to unmask himself as a proponent of Schachtian economics. Confronted by LaRouche with the evidence of the lawful consequences of ending the system of global fixed exchange rates, and opening the world's currencies to speculative manipulation, Lerner had blurted out, "If they had listened to Schacht, we wouldn't have needed Hitler."

If there is a phrase that best describes the current Synarchist agenda being promoted by the likes of Shultz and Rohatyn, it is: "Schacht without Hitler." And if anyone thinks that this is an improvement on the earlier experience with Nazism and Fascism, they are about to experience a rude awakening, if Synarchy is not stopped.

NewRightLibertarian

10-22-2011, 08:30 AM

Good stuff.

pcosmar

10-22-2011, 08:34 AM

Someone Asked

What was the question again?

dolphin

10-22-2011, 08:36 AM

Someone Asked

What was the question again?

It was in the OP.

Why haven't more people taken up the fight? Why haven't the majority of the American people woken up to what is going on? I really don't know why I wrote this, but I just felt an urging to. Maybe it came off as just another rant, but I hope you got something from this.

I find it VERY Sad... (PLEASE READ)
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?325070-I-find-it-VERY-Sad...-(PLEASE-READ)

AtomiC

10-22-2011, 08:37 AM

copypasta, but good post!

dolphin

10-22-2011, 08:44 AM

copypasta, but good post!

Noone capable of comprehending and absorbing the information in this thread could possibly vote for anyone except Ron Paul unless they are an internationalist who wants to see a global totolitarian government imposed upon the world and billions of people murdered off.

It is interesting to note that Ron Paul knows all this stuff and plenty more, but wisely avoids mention of it publicly. Ignorance of these facts makes it very easy to paint the truth as a conspiracy theory.

I posted it as an archive.

It could take people years to paint the picture that the posts I have made will give them in a very short time. If you have a friend sitting on the fence, or sitting on their butt give them a link to this thread and ask them to spend a week absorbing everything in it.

"Democracy is not a panacea. It cannot organize everything and it is unaware of its own limits. These facts must be faced squarely. Sacrilegious though this may sound, democracy is no longer well suited for the tasks ahead. The complexity and the technical nature of many of today’s problems do not always allow elected representatives to make competent decisions at the right time.”

“The common enemy of humanity is man.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.
The real enemy then, is humanity itself."

The above quotes are Excerpted from "The First Global Revolution " which is a publication of "The Club of Rome"

Made the best seller list in 1991

Here is the whole book.
http://books.google.com/books?id=8RNKHGbzUuAC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false

The Club of Rome directs NATO Policy and acts as the Public Relations arm of the Bilderberger Group.

pcosmar

10-22-2011, 08:45 AM

It was in the OP.

Question seemed vague, but I'll take a shot.
As part of the Social Engineering they have successfully convinced the majority of people that Questioning or Examining the ruling elite,, their methods and motives is nothing more than Conspiracy Theory. And it should be ignored.

Enjoy your bread and circus, and do not question.
:(

FreeTraveler

10-22-2011, 08:56 AM

tl;dr

dolphin

10-22-2011, 08:57 AM

Still, President Lyndon B. Johnson apparently couldn’t be sure that his predecessor (John F. Kennedy) hadn’t commissioned the Iron Mountain Report. According to US News and World Report, the President “hit the roof” upon learning of it and ordered that the report be “bottled up for all time”.'

However, it was not until five years later that the Iron Mountain Report was confirmed to be a hoax. In 1972, fretting how the Pentagon Papers and other documents about the Vietnam War "read like parodies of Iron Mountain rather than the reverse"[1], Dr. Kurt Lewin confessed (he lied) in the March 19 New York Times Book Review that he had written the entire report. It was even listed in the Guinness Book of World Records as the "Most Successful Literary Hoax." of all time.

On November 26, 1976, the Iron Mountain Report was reviewed again in the book section of the Washington Post by Herschel McLandress, which was the pen name for Harvard Professor John Kenneth Galbraith. Galbraith, who also had been a member of the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) and an advisor to President Kennedy, said that he knew firsthand of the report's authenticity because he had been invited to participate in it. Although he was unable to be part of the official group, he was consulted from time to time and had been asked to keep the project a secret. Furthermore, while he doubted the wisdom of letting the public know about the report, he agreed totally with its conclusions.

He wrote: 'As I would put my personal repute behind the authenticity of this document, so would I testify to the validity of its conclusions. My reservation relates only to the wisdom of releasing it to an obviously unconditioned public.'

TEXT: THE REPORT FROM IRON MOUNTAIN
http://www.mega.nu:8080/ampp/ironmtn.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cj9tkhCVfao

GoogleVideo Full Version of Iron Mountain.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6745627342652553091#

dolphin

10-22-2011, 09:12 AM

I came across this document years ago and had serious doubts that it was for real. I spent a considerable amount of time tracking down where it originated from and if it was in fact authentic.

It was written and published by one of those upper class Elite Clubs in the UK. It was most definately for real.

Evidently someone stole a copy from Gephardt's office.

MIDWEST PUBLIC HEARING ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT

HOUSE CHAMBERS, STATE CAPITOL
DES MOINES, IOWA
SEPTEMBER 22, 1991

STATE OF IOWA
Executive Department
---
[Senator Gephardt's telephone number]
---
[Parts "THE PRESSING NEED" and "WHAT MUST BE DONE" were shown in the video 1992 movie of George Hunt]

THEREFORE THE FOLLOWING POLICY MUST BE IMPLEMENTED:

A. The Security Council of the UN led by the Anglo-Saxon major Nation powers, will decree that henceforth, the Security Council will inform all nations that its sufferance on population has ended, that all nations have quotas for reduction on a yearly basis, which will be enforced by the Security Council by selective or total embargo of credit, items of trade including food an medicine, or by military force, when required.
B. The security Council of the UN will inform all nations that outmoded notions of national sovereignty will be discarded and that the Security Council has complete legal, military, and economic jurisdiction in any region in the world and that this will be enforced by the Major Nations of the Security Council
C. The security Council of the UN will take possession of all natural resources, including the watersheds and great forests, to be used and preserved for the good of the Major nations of the Security Council.
D. The Security Council of the UN will explain that not all races and peoples are equal, nor should they be. Those races proven superior by superior achievements ought to rule the lesser races, caring for them on sufferance that they cooperate with the Security Council. Decision-making, including banking, trade, currency rates, and economic development plans, will be made in stewardship by the Major Nations.
E. All of the above constitute the New World Order, in which Order, all nations, regions and races will cooperate with the decisions of the Major Nations of the Security Council.

The purpose of this document is to demonstrate that action delayed could well be fatal. All could be lost if mere opposition by minor races is tolerated and the unfortunate vacillations or our closest comrades is cause for our hesitations. Open declaration of intent followed by decisive force is the final solution. This must be done before any shock hits our financial markets, tarnishing our credibility and perhaps diminishing our force.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SR0HMpuNZSM

Before dismissing it due to how preposterous it sounds consider this and research to verify it for yourself.

A small California biotech company, Epicyte, in 2001 announced the development of genetically engineered corn which contained a spermicide which made the semen of men who ate it sterile. At the time Epicyte had a joint venture agreement to spread its technology with DuPont and Syngenta, two of the sponsors of the Svalbard Doomsday Seed Vault. Epicyte was since acquired by a North Carolina biotech company. Astonishing to learn was that Epicyte had developed its spermicidal GMO corn with research funds from the US Department of Agriculture, the same USDA which, despite worldwide opposition, continued to finance the development of Terminator technology, now held by Monsanto.

In the 1990’s the UN’s World Health Organization launched a campaign to vaccinate millions of women in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines between the ages of 15 and 45, allegedly against Tentanus, a sickness arising from such things as stepping on a rusty nail. The vaccine was not given to men or boys, despite the fact they are presumably equally liable to step on rusty nails as women.

Because of that curious anomaly, Comite Pro Vida de Mexico, a Roman Catholic lay organization became suspicious and had vaccine samples tested. The tests revealed that the Tetanus vaccine being spread by the WHO only to women of child-bearing age contained human Chorionic Gonadotrophin or hCG, a natural hormone which when combined with a tetanus toxoid carrier stimulated antibodies rendering a woman incapable of maintaining a pregnancy. None of the women vaccinated were told.

It later came out that the Rockefeller Foundation along with the Rockefeller’s Population Council, the World Bank (home to CGIAR), and the United States’ National Institutes of Health had been involved in a 20-year-long project begun in 1972 to develop the concealed abortion vaccine with a tetanus carrier for WHO. In addition, the Government of Norway, the host to the Svalbard Doomsday Seed Vault, donated $41 million to develop the special abortive Tetanus vaccine. 12

* In 2005 and 2006, researchers at the Russian Academy of Sciences reported that female rats who were fed glyphosate-tolerant GM soya produced an excessive number of stunted pups with over 50% of them dying within three weeks. The other half were all sterile. This experiment was repeated several times with the same result [3].

* Between 2005 and 2006 in the Warangal district of Andhra Pradech in India, thousands of sheep died while grazing on residues from Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis, which is a type of bacteria which is toxic to some types of insects) cotton crops [4].

* In 2003, villagers in the Philippines' south suffered mysterious illnesses when a Monsanto Bt maize hybrid came into flower. At least five have died and many villagers tested positive for antibodies to the Bt protein while others still remain chronically ill [5].

* Between 2001 and 2002, 12 cows died in Hesse, Germany after consuming Syngenta GM maize (Bt176), while many others had to be slaughtered due to mysterious illnesses [6].

* From 2002 to 2005, researchers from four Italian universities published articles indicating that GM soya adversely affected pancreatic, hepatic (liver) and testicular cells in young mice [5].

* In 2005, Australian researchers at the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization in Canberra reported that a harmless protein in beans (alpha-amylase inhibitor-1) caused inflammation in the lungs of mice and elicited increased dietary sensitivities to other proteins when transferred to peas [7].

* In 1998, researchers reported damage to every organ system of young rats who were fed GM potatoes containing snowdrop lectin [8]. In the same year, researchers in Egypt found analogous effects on the guts of mice fed Bt potato [9].

* In 2002, Aventis, later named Cropscience, submitted research to regulators in the U.K. reporting that chicken fed glufosinate-tolerant GM maize Chardon LL were twice as likely to die prematurely than chickens in the control group [10].

Not sure about this DOD document, but it is troubleing.
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/aids.pdf

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWU2K8VBS28

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tM8gk8C69M

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wg-52mHIjhs

Johnny Appleseed

10-22-2011, 09:20 AM

I think the industrial revolution was the beginning of the end. What we need now is an agrarian revolution forced upon us by nature.

dolphin

10-22-2011, 09:26 AM

I think the industrial revolution was the beginning of the end. What we need now is an agrarian revolution forced upon us by nature.

I disagree. What were dealing with are Malthusian Sociopaths who embrace eugenics.

Its called Genetic Engineering today, but its the same thing.

Overpopulation is as much a hoax as was Global Warming in my considered opinion based on years of research and thoughtful consideration.

Give a studdied consideration to my following entries.

Listen to the Doctor : Dr. Jacqueline Kasun: The Population Problem

Popular opinion is that science supports evidence of a crisis in overpopulation and environmental degradation, which supposedly threatens the very existance of people around the world. As Dr. Jacqueline Kasun reveals in The Population Problem, nothing could be further from the truth! This talk will arm you with the ammunition you need to refute the overpopulation myth and fight the population control movement. You will learn facts like:

•Everyone in the world could move to the state of Texas and be able to live in the amount of space a person gets in the average American household.

•Only 1% of the earth's land surface is occupied by people.

•Fertility in Europe and the U.S. is below replacement level.

•World Bank projections of global population peaking at 10 billion would mean that people may take up an entire 2% of the land surfacve of the earth and use 1/5 of it for crop production!

Knowledge is important in the fight for truth. And this talk will help you to spread the truth of the population myth before the extreme population control and environmental movements advance further in their quest to degrade the value of the human person! As Dr. Kasun said, "People are not pollution."

Listen to the audio of her lecture.
http://www.hli.org/index.php/video-audio/audiopodcasts/687-dr-jacqueline-kasun-the-population-problem

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqi5F5MqqTQ&feature=player_embedded

“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”
---Ted Turner, founder of CNN and major UN donor

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyEC_HLA9dc&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sq3WlRxfWC0&feature=player_embedded

dolphin

10-22-2011, 09:30 AM

Safe nuclear power does exist

The reactor has an amazing safety feature,” said Kirk Sorensen, a former NASA engineer at Teledyne Brown and a thorium expert.

“If it begins to overheat, a little plug melts and the salts drain into a pan. There is no need for computers, or the sort of electrical pumps that were crippled by the tsunami. The reactor saves itself,” he said.

“They operate at atmospheric pressure so you don’t have the sort of hydrogen explosions we’ve seen in Japan. One of these reactors would have come through the tsunami just fine. There would have been no radiation release.”

Professor Robert Cywinksi from Huddersfield University said thorium must be bombarded with neutrons to drive the fission process. “There is no chain reaction. Fission dies the moment you switch off the photon beam. There are not enough neutrons for it continue of its own accord,” he said.

Dr Cywinski, who anchors a UK-wide thorium team, said the residual heat left behind in a crisis would be “orders of magnitude less” than in a uranium reactor.

The earth’s crust holds 80 years of uranium at expected usage rates, he said. Thorium is as common as lead. America has buried tons as a by-product of rare earth metals mining. Norway has so much that Oslo is planning a post-oil era where thorium might drive the country’s next great phase of wealth. Even Britain has seams in Wales and in the granite cliffs of Cornwall. Almost all the mineral is usable as fuel, compared to 0.7pc of uranium. There is enough to power civilization for thousands of years. US physicists in the late 1940s explored thorium fuel for power. It has a higher neutron yield than uranium, a better fission rating, longer fuel cycles, and does not require the extra cost of isotope separation.

The plans were shelved because thorium does not produce plutonium for bombs, nor does it cause cancer in the general population and since the powers that be want increased mortality rates its a no brainer why they stay with the current insane technology.

Last but not least and perhaps most importantly...

As a happy bonus, it can burn up plutonium and toxic waste from old reactors, reducing radio-toxicity and acting as an eco-cleaner.

Imagine that. The global nuclear weapons stockpiles as well as all the spent fuel rods now being stored could be turned into energy and disposed of at the same time.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/8393984/Safe-nuclear-does-exist-and-China-is-leading-the-way-with-thorium.html

Thorium reactors would be cheap. The primary cost in nuclear reactors traditionally is the huge safety requirements. Regarding meltdown in a thorium reactor, Rubbia writes, “Both the EA and MF can be effectively protected against military diversions and exhibit an extreme robustness against any conceivable accident, always with benign consequences. In particular the -decay heat is comparable in both cases and such that it can be passively dissipated in the environment, thus eliminating the risks of “melt-down”. Thorium reactors can breed uranium-233, which can theoretically be used for nuclear weapons. However, denaturing thorium with its isotope, ionium, eliminates the proliferation threat.

Like any nuclear reactor, thorium reactors will be hot and radioactive, necessitating shielding. The amount of radioactivity scales with the size of the plant. It so happens that thorium itself is an excellent radiation shield, but lead and depleted uranium are also suitable. Smaller plants (100 megawatts), such as the Department of Energy’s small, sealed, transportable, autonomous reactor (SSTAR) will be 15 meters tall, 3 meters wide and weigh 500 tonnes, using only a few cm of shielding.

Because thorium reactors present no proliferation risk, and because they solve the safety problems associated with earlier reactors, they will be able to use reasonable rather than obsessive standards for security and reliability. If we can reach the $145-in-1971-dollars/kW milestone experienced by Commonwealth Edison in 1971, we can decrease costs for a 1-gigawatt plant to at most $780 million, rather than the $1,100 million to build such a plant today. In fact, you might be able to go as low as $220 million or below, if 80% of reactor costs truly are attributable to expensive anti-meltdown measures. A thorium reactor does not, in fact, need a containment wall. Putting the reactor vessel in a standard industrial building is sufficient.

Because thorium reactors will make nuclear reactors more decentralized. Because of no risk of proliferation or meltdown, thorium reactors can be made of almost any size. A 500 ton, 100MW SSTAR-sized thorium reactor could fit in a large industrial room, require little maintenance, and only cost $25 million. A hypothetical 5 ton, truck-sized 1 MW thorium reactor might run for only $250,000 but would generate enough electricity for 1,000 people for the duration of its operating lifetime, using only 20 kg of thorium fuel per year, running almost automatically, and requiring safety checks as infrequently as once a year. That would be as little as $200/year after capital costs are paid off, for a thousand-persons worth of electricity! An annual visit by a safety inspector might add another $200 to the bill. A town of 1,000 could pool $250K for the reactor at the cost of $250 each, then pay $400/year collectively, or $0.40/year each for fuel and maintenance. These reactors could be built by the thousands, further driving down manufacturing costs.

Smaller reactors make power generation convenient in two ways: decreasing staffing costs by dropping them close to zero, and eliminating the bulky infrastructure required for larger plants. For this reason, it may be more likely that we see the construction of a million $40,000, 100 kW plants than 400 $300 million, 1GW plants. 100 kW plants would require minimal shielding and could be installed in private homes without fear of radiation poisoning. These small plants could be shielded so well that the level of radiation outside the shield is barely greater than the ambient level of radiation from traces of uranium in the environment. The only operating costs would be periodic safety checks, flouride salts, and thorium fuel. For a $40,000 reactor, and $1,000/year in operating costs, you get enough electricity for 100 people, which is enough to accomplish all sorts of antics, like running thousands of desktop nanofactories non-stop.

Even smaller reactors might be built. The molten salt may have a temperature of around 1,400°F, but as long as it can be contained by the best alloys, it is not really a threat. The small gasoline explosions in your automobile today are of a similar temperature. In the future, personal vehicles may be powered by the slow burning of thorium, or at least, hydrogen produced by a thorium reactor. Project Pluto, a nuclear-powered ramjet missile, produced 513 megawatts of power for only $50 million. At that price ratio, a 10 kW reactor might cost $1,000 and provide enough electricity for 10 persons/year while consuming only 1 kg of thorium every 5 years, itself only weighing 1000kg - similar to the weight of a refrigerator. I’m not sure if miniaturization to that degree is possible, or if the scaling laws really hold. But it seems consistent with what I’ve heard about nuclear power in the past.

The primary limitation with nuclear reactors, as always, is containment of radiation. But alloys and materials are improving. We will be able to make reactor vessels which are crack-proof, water-proof, and tamper-proof, but we will have to use superior materials. We should have those materials by 2030 at the latest, and they will make possible the decentralized nuclear energy vision I have outlined here. I consider it probable unless thorium is quickly leapfrogged by fusion power.

The greatest cost for thorium reactors remains their initial construction. If these reactors can be made to last hundreds of years instead of just 60, the cost per kWh comes down even further. If we could do this, then even if there were a disaster that brought down the entire industrial infrastructure, we could use our existing reactors with thorium fuel for energy until civilization restarts. We could send starships to other solar systems, powered by just a few tons of thorium. We will simultaneously experience the abundance we always wanted from nuclear power with the decentralization we always wanted from solar power. We will build self-maintaining “eternal structures” that use thorium electricity to power maintenance robots capable of working for thousands of years without breaks.
http://www.thorium.tv/en/thorium_reactor/thorium_reactor_1.php

[b]National Academy of Sciences
National Research Council
NUCLEAR SCIENCE SERIES
http://www.energyfromthorium.com/pdf/NAS-NS-3004.pdf

Announcing ThEC11 - the Thorium Energy Conference
http://www.itheo.org/

"The Green Alternative"
Thorium: "The Lemhi Pass district has the largest known resource of thorium veins in the United States”
US Geological Survey
http://www.thoriumenergy.com/

dolphin

10-22-2011, 09:40 AM

Nuclear Facts

A very clued in professional who will not be bought or intimidated into silence:

Dr Helen Caldicott, true to style, tells it as it is. As she sees it, you wont usually hear the truth so listen up..

Nuclear fallout from Japan and Canada,

You won't hear this on the news!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMXvpWoHzeE&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8p0d05M5JpY&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pb5HItRpDY8&feature=player_embedded

dolphin

10-22-2011, 10:02 AM

1 MILLION pounds of Food on 3 acres. 10,000 fish 500 yards compost

Growing power seem to have a winning combo going. I underestimated what they are doing. If the information in these videos is true then on 3 acres they are producing 1,000,000 pounds of food each year! How are they doing this?

10,000 fish
300-500 yards worm compost
3 acres of land in green houses
Grow all year using heat from compost piles.
Using vertical space
Simple 1 pump aquaponics

A packed greenhouse produces a crop value of $5 Square Foot! ($200,000/acre). That is if the whole acre was under greenhouse.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jV9CCxdkOng&feature=player_embedded

refrigerator that doesn’t need electricity

A Russian-Cuban child aged 11 has astounded Russia’s scientific community with various revolutionary inventions like a 3-D image television and a refrigerator that doesn’t need electricity.

Ernesto Yevgueni Sánchez Shaida, the son of a Russian mother and Cuban father and resident in the Siberian region of Altai, was announced in his region as the great revelation of a scientific conference and the outright winner of a competition among talented youth.

The scientists at the conference in the Technical University of Barnaul, the regional capital, were amazed when the child presented around a dozen industrial inventions, some of them unprecedented.

The central pieces for the experts, including Russian academics of international renown and foreign scientists from France to Finland, was the television with the three-dimensional images and a refrigeration system that works without electricity.

The main Russian television networks screened footage of the university experts’ council session in which the child demonstrated the key aspects of his inventions to the specialists.

INVENTIONS BASED ON NEED

The child has designed a refrigeration installation that operates without a compressor and does not require electricity, an invention that is more than useful in a region where the energy restrictions affecting many areas of Russia, or even in his father’s homeland, have been felt.

“I devoted myself to this because our fridge at home broke down and I asked my dad to explain how the systems works, and then found other materials in the library until I found a way of solving the problem,” he explained to the NTV network.

In reference to his TV he said that his set is distinguished from existing ones in terms of the stereoscopic effect in which the 3-D images are found with liquid crystal indicators and thus, “exist in reality,” giving the effect of volume.

The Technical University of Barnaul is to take charge of organizing the patents for the two inventions, unique in their genre, as the official news agency Itar-Tass was informed by Vladimir Yevstigneyev, dean of the institute and president of the organizing committee.

The application will be made by the council of experts at the University’s Physics, Technology and Astronomy Center, which fulfilled one of Ernesto’s lifelong dreams by presenting him with a personal computer with an Internet connection.

Interviewed by television stations and news agency throughout Russia the child confided that when he finishes his studies he wants to devote himself to research and fulfill two dreams: to get a computer to patent his inventions and to travel to Cuba, his father’s homeland.

Ernesto is the son of Tatiana Shaida and Ernesto Enrique Sánchez – a naval engineer – who met in 1981 in Odessa, now the Ukraine, but 10 years later when the USSR collapsed, moved to Siberia.

Ernesto was born that same year and four years later, his sister Magarita Dania.

Ernesto Yevgueni is a genius and is known as such by everyone in his school in Rubtsovsk in southern Siberia, where next year he will complete his secondary studies despite his youth, comments the Interfax agency.

But now his case is being examined by scientists and professors from the Center for the Assistance of Super-Gifted Children at Barnaul, after the verification that Ernesto is a consummate inventor of the most complicated mechanisms.

He has already demonstrated his capacity as a child prodigy, as he learnt to read at two years and seven months and soon displayed a great love for physics and math books, as well as the narrative of Siberian author Vasili Shutshin.

When his teachers perceived his intellectual capacity, they advanced him three years and now, without help, he is learning the manuals corresponding to the final years of secondary school.

“He’s a genius, he has a talent for everything, as he’s not only an inventor but also paints, composes music and writes poetry and prose,” a fascinated Nina Ilichova, dean of the State University of Altai, told a television channel.

(Taken from the digital press)

dolphin

10-22-2011, 04:48 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWPz1Qdq1uI

MelissaWV

10-22-2011, 04:52 PM

tl;dr

Yeah... this kind of defines that.

emazur

10-22-2011, 05:01 PM

I know of several of the things you've posted about, but even if they were all false I think it comes down to this: the greater the welfare state, the more malleable the people

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V31B2YHIXUo

Anti Federalist

10-22-2011, 05:17 PM

dolphin

10-22-2011, 05:44 PM

I know of several of the things you've posted about, but even if they were all false I think it comes down to this: the greater the welfare state, the more malleable the people

Its a great video, but all it is explaining is the psychology behind one of the methods used to subvert our Republic.

It does not address who is behind the subversion, or what the intention of the subversion is meant to allow them to bring about..

The posts I have placed throughout this thread answers those questions with details and I am capable of expounding upon it with further details upon request.

dolphin

10-22-2011, 05:48 PM

Endgame:

A domesticated global population unwilling or unable to resist.

Enter the Malthusians.

Release a world wide killer pandemic.

Domesticated global population unable to resist, even unable to realize what is happening to them as they die.

300 - 500 million people left.

Of that, an elite of roughly 10 percent control all the technology and knowledge, leaving the rest in a polite state of slavery, servicing the elite.

In other words...

The Omega Project :
by Joseph George Caldwell, PhD

The Rational

...the establishment of a sustainable New World Order.

The Vision

o A single-nation global human population of 500,000,000 million in the coming years.
o Restoration of the biosphere to its state of five hundred years ago, within a century

The Mission

o To accomplish the Vision, by facilitating the establishment of a single-nation world government that embraces the vision.

Assessment of the Current State of the World, and a Proposed Long-Term-Sustainable Human Population

Grand Strategy for Implementation of a Minimal-Regret Population for Earth

•Do not undertake a direct attempt to overtake the world’s political establishment by force. Any sort of “frontal attack” would be quickly attacked and quashed. Wait until the industrial world cripples itself in global war, or engineer a global economic collapse, or a global ecological disaster, or a combination of catastrophes and then act.

•Establish a moral basis for the establishment of a minimal-regret population (e.g., The Church of Nature).

•Establish a number of alternative plans for accomplishing the desired goal. (Science fiction readers may reflect on the role of Isaac Asimov’s Second Foundation.)

•Publicize widely the fact that the industrial world is coming to an end, and that, of the various alternatives, a minimal-regret population is the best planetary organization to replace it. Make it very clear that the next phase of human existence on the planet can be very rewarding, if a minimal-regret population is established. Show what the world can transition to. Show that the transition is a game that any world leader surviving global war would want to play.

•Make the appeal of a minimal-regret population so strong to the surviving nations of the global catastrophes that, whoever they may be, they will embrace the concept.

•Develop contingency plans for the survivors of the catastrophes, so that they may examine them in advance and make preparations to implement them when global catastrophes occur. Suggested plans will be public. Which countries choose to implement them will be hidden from public view. All it takes is one country, or Globalist Cabal with the foresight to seize the initiative after the global catastrophes, to establish a new, viable, world order to replace the industrial world that is ravaging the planet and engendering human misery on a massive scale.
Some amplification on point four…. At the present time, no world leaders are willing to acknowledge that the industrial world is drawing to a close, or doing anything significant about stopping the destruction of the biosphere by industrialization and large human numbers. Current world leaders are quite comfortable with the “game” that they are playing. They are highly successful at it. The fact that all of nature is being destroyed by the current system (industrialization, globalization, large human population) does not concern them. They are, understandably, not the least bit interested in a world in which their culture and milieu for success is gone.

Their attitude is not surprising. World history has seen again and again the failure of political, military, and social leaders to plan for world changes that eliminate the society (nation, culture, religion) of which they are in charge. If war comes and they are no longer in charge, so be it, but they have no interest at all in planning for a future in which they or their children have no place. Because of this universal attitude, however, implementation of a plan for world domination / planetary management in which there is no place for them will not be easy. They will reject any significant actions, or even plans, to set up a post-industrial world, because it is not their world.

Most people relate solely to the current social context in which they find themselves. When global war occurs, current world leaders will either be dead or discredited. This is a major factor explaining why current leaders have no interest in addressing the environmental and ecological problems facing the world. The destroyed world of the next year or decade is of no interest to them – even discussion of it is objectionable, because it shows the irrelevance or wrongness of what they are doing.

If The Omega Project (described at this website) is to be successful, it will be because of planning on the part of exceptional leaders who realize that the current world situation cannot continue for very much longer, and who choose to prepare for a sustainable new world order in which human beings may live in harmony with nature.

The End of the World, and the New World Order

Joseph George Caldwell, PhD
http://www.foundationwebsite.org/

My personal e-mail exchange with Dr.Joseph George Caldwell, PhD at this link:
http://engforum.pravda.ru/index.php?/topic/223375-the-omega-project/

dolphin

10-22-2011, 06:48 PM

Originally Posted by FreeTraveler
tl;dr

Yeah... this kind of defines that.

What is "tl;dr"

Anti Federalist

10-22-2011, 07:15 PM

What is "tl;dr"

Too Long;Didn't Read

dolphin

10-22-2011, 09:04 PM

Too Long;Didn't Read

Imagine telling that to your University Professor when he asks if you read your homework?

Ignorance is Bliss.

I do recall recommending to take a least a week to go through all of it.

MelissaWV

10-22-2011, 09:14 PM

dolphin

10-22-2011, 09:19 PM

It might be why I left college. I couldn't stand the droning on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on...

Most people are not converted by massive walls of text that it takes a week to go through, imo.

Take a few months then. As long as you need. It took me years to gather, research, and cross reference everything I posted in this thread to determine the strength of validity and credibility by exhaustively cross checking no end of sources.

Rest assured what I have archived in this thread for everyone I chose very carefully among a much larger archive I have compiled over the years.

I tried to keep it to a minimum, but with enough to paint a clear picture that should result in someone taking it serious enough to pursue the subject on their own and teach others. Knowledge is power.

dolphin

10-23-2011, 05:07 PM

The Disappearing Male

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3450754654538943#

WarNoMore

10-23-2011, 05:47 PM

Why did you(or whoever wrote what you posted) call Alan Watts the leader of a zen buddhist cult? His work is quite good, and is not something nefarious.

dolphin

10-23-2011, 06:17 PM

Why did you(or whoever wrote what you posted) call Alan Watts the leader of a zen buddhist cult? His work is quite good, and is not something nefarious.

I am not sure what you mean, but since you mentioned him let me offer you a great interview with him in it that I have listened to that bears on the topic of this thread. My best assessment based on my observations of him is that he is a Rosicrucian.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WO_k5LvY5b0&feature=related

WarNoMore

10-23-2011, 07:32 PM

That's Alan Watt who's work is also quite good. But what you posted referred to Alan Watts(misspelled as Allen Watts), who was a zen philosopher. The claim was he was recruited by Huxley and led a Zen Buddhist cult in California. Seems negative and accusatory, without much(any?) evidence to support such statements. It was in post #6, I quoted the portion below.

In the 1940’s, British writer Aldous Huxley, who wrote “Brave New World”, went to the U.S. He recruited Allen Watts who became the guru of a nationwide Zen Buddhist cult in California in the 1950s and 1960s. He founded the “Pacifica Foundation” which sponsored two radio stations that pushed the “Liverpool sound”. This was the British imported “hard” rock twang of the Rolling Stones, the Beatles and the Animals. They also pioneered “acid rock” and eventually “psychotic punk rock”.

pcosmar

10-23-2011, 07:42 PM

dolphin

10-24-2011, 08:53 PM

Gorbachev Calls For American Perestroika -- OWS Shows Need For Global Government
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?324964-Gorbachev-Calls-For-American-Perestroika-OWS-Shows-Need-For-Global-Government

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3331772831275072579#

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3331772831275072579#docid=-6780131431454234916

CaptainAmerica

10-24-2011, 09:00 PM

FrankRep

10-24-2011, 09:02 PM

Norman Dodd On Tax Exempt Foundations

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/316hKy9ZM3L._SL500_AA300_.jpg (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0925591289/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=libert0f-20&linkCode=as2&camp=217145&creative=399369&creativeASIN=0925591289)

Foundations: Their Power and Influence (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0925591289/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=libert0f-20&linkCode=as2&camp=217145&creative=399369&creativeASIN=0925591289)
- Rene A. Wormser

A searching analysis of some of America's most powerful tax-exempt foundations, their actions as opposed to their stated purposes, the interlocking groups of men who run them, and their influences on the country at large. First published in 1958.

Amazon.com: Editorial Reviews

Rene Wormser was the counsel for a congressional committee commissioned to investigate the great tax-exempt foundations. Despite opposition from the media and the financial elite, the committee discovered that the Rockefeller, Ford, and Carnegie Foundations were working in education, government, and the media to convert our country into a socialist nation. This book documents the power of the Tax-Exempt foundations and how they used that power to subvert a nation.

dolphin

12-13-2011, 03:59 AM

"OBAMANOMICS"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2whSmoYyTs

At the very end of that interview listen to what he says about guaranteed profits for select corporations due to government intervention to destroy competition. (As in Government sponsored Monopolies.)

Then put it together with this.

In 1932 the J.P. Morgan Executive Board explained to their Star Junior Executive Norman Dodd who years later was put in charge of the Congressional Reese Committee.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Select_Committee_to_Investigat e_Tax-Exempt_Foundations_and_Comparable_Organizations

"We will never see sound banking in the United States again...

Since the end of World War 1 we have been responsable for the
institutionalization of conflicting interests that can never be resolved."
---JP Morgan's Executive Board Members;

In other words perpetual chaos to facilitate social engineering. (Order out of Chaos.)

With that as the backdrop, this is what Norman Dodd says of a conversation he had with the President of the tax-exempt Ford Foundation in 1954 as part of his Congressionally mandated investigation of tax-exempt foundations:

“Mr. Dodd, we’ve asked you to come up here today because we thought that possibly, off the record, you would tell us why the Congress is interested in the activities of the foundations such as ourselves.” Before I could think of how I would reply to that statement, Mr. Gaither then went on and said: “Mr. Dodd, all of us who have a hand in the making of policies here have had experience operating under directives, the substance of which is that we shall use our grant-making power so to alter life in the United States that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.”

ED GRIFFIN: Why do the (Tax Exempt) Foundations (Rockefeller, Ford, Carnegie etc...) generously support Communist causes in the United States?

NORMAN DODD: Well, because to them, Communism represents a means of developing what we call a monopoly, that is, an organization of, say, a large-scale industry into an administerable unit.

ED GRIFFIN: Do they think that they will be the ones to benefit?

NORMAN DODD: They will be the beneficiaries of it, yes.

Another ominous thread in the interview is when Dodd reveals of what his lead investigator discovered in the minutes-books of Carnegie Endowment for Peace. According to Norman Dodd, the following was recorded on the old-fashioned dictaphone machine by Katherine Casey as she was browsing the minutes-books in the CEP library:

We are now at the year 1908, which was the year that the Carnegie Foundation began operations. In that year, the trustees, meeting for the first time, raised a specific question, which they discussed throughout the balance of the year in a very learned fashion. The question is: “Is there any means known more effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people?” And they conclude that no more effective means than war to that end is known to humanity.

So then, in 1909, they raised the second question and discussed it, namely: “How do we involve the United States in a war?”

Well, I doubt at that time if there was any subject more removed from the thinking of most of the people of this country than its involvement in a war. There were intermittent shows in the Balkans, but I doubt very much if many people even knew where the Balkans were. Then, finally, they answered that question as follows: “We must control the State Department.” That very naturally raises the question of how do we do that? And they answer it by saying: “We must take over and control the diplomatic machinery of this country.” And, finally, they resolve to aim at that as an objective.

Then time passes, and we are eventually in a war, which would be World War I. At that time they record on their minutes a shocking report in which they dispatched to President Wilson a telegram, cautioning him to see that the war does not end too quickly.

Finally, of course, the war is over. At that time their interest shifts over to preventing what they call a reversion of life in the United States to what it was prior to 1914 when World War I broke out. At that point they came to the conclusion that, to prevent a reversion, “we must control education in the United States.” They realize that that’s a pretty big task. It is too big for them alone, so they approach the Rockefeller Foundation with the suggestion that that portion of education which could be considered domestic be handled by the Rockefeller Foundation and that portion which is international should be handled by the Endowment. They then decide that the key to success of these two operations lay in the alteration of the teaching of American history. …

The Monetary Conspiracy For World Government by Zahir Ebrahim
Posted on November 19, 2008 by dandelionsalad
by Zahir Ebrahim
Project Humanbeingsfirst
http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2008/11/19/the-monetary-conspiracy-for-world-government-by-zahir-ebrahim/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUYCBfmIcHM&feature=player_embedded