Reason
10-20-2011, 10:52 PM
This is the argument that was handed to me when I brought up some of the nasty ingredients in Flu shots...
The argument went something along the lines of...
"I have Kaiser, Kaiser makes the most money when I am not sick, I pay XXX dollars per month regardless if I get sick or not, if choose not to get the flu shot & I got the flu & had to be treated then I would not be giving Kaiser any more money but Kaiser would be spending a ton more money on my treatment; yet Kaiser offers these shots for free & puts a decent amount of effort into advertising them to their members"
It seems semi-logical but I can't get over some of the seriously nasty stuff in those shots...
Recently read this LRC post about Flu shots...
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/96800.html
The argument went something along the lines of...
"I have Kaiser, Kaiser makes the most money when I am not sick, I pay XXX dollars per month regardless if I get sick or not, if choose not to get the flu shot & I got the flu & had to be treated then I would not be giving Kaiser any more money but Kaiser would be spending a ton more money on my treatment; yet Kaiser offers these shots for free & puts a decent amount of effort into advertising them to their members"
It seems semi-logical but I can't get over some of the seriously nasty stuff in those shots...
Recently read this LRC post about Flu shots...
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/96800.html