PDA

View Full Version : Tools For Convincing People That Non Interventionism IS NOT Isolationism




Captain Shays
10-20-2011, 02:00 PM
These are just a few quotes from our founding fathers. As the thread develops I would like to expand it to include quotes from progressives whose foreign policy we are now following and to also show the difference between the old style conservatives who opposed the Democrat Wars in contrast to the new style conservatives (neocons) whose foreign policy is the antithesis of that of the founders and exactly like the Democrats.
This will win over the conservatives who have bought into that lie that says unless we are policing the world and maintaining an empire than we're "isolationists". Hopefully if constructed properly this same argument can be used to convince progressives and Democrats that they too have been deceived into thinking that Republicans and conservatives are the war party.


John Quincy Adams on U.S. Foreign Policy (1821)
October 2001
And now, friends and countrymen, if the wise and learned philosophers of the elder world, the first observers of mutation and aberration, the discoverers of maddening ether and invisible planets, the inventors of Congreve rockets and Shrapnel shells, should find their hearts disposed to enquire what has America done for the benefit of mankind?
Let our answer be this: America, with the same voice which spoke herself into existence as a nation, proclaimed to mankind the inextinguishable rights of human nature, and the only lawful foundations of government. America, in the assembly of nations, since her admission among them, has invariably, though often fruitlessly, held forth to them the hand of honest friendship, of equal freedom, of generous reciprocity.
She has uniformly spoken among them, though often to heedless and often to disdainful ears, the language of equal liberty, of equal justice, and of equal rights.
She has, in the lapse of nearly half a century, without a single exception, respected the independence of other nations while asserting and maintaining her own.
She has abstained from interference in the concerns of others, even when conflict has been for principles to which she clings, as to the last vital drop that visits the heart.
She has seen that probably for centuries to come, all the contests of that Aceldama the European world, will be contests of inveterate power, and emerging right.
Wherever the standard of freedom and Independence has been or shall be unfurled, there will her heart, her benedictions and her prayers be.
But she goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy.
She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all.
She is the champion and vindicator only of her own.
She will commend the general cause by the countenance of her voice, and the benignant sympathy of her example.
She well knows that by once enlisting under other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign independence, she would involve herself beyond the power of extrication, in all the wars of interest and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy, and ambition, which assume the colors and usurp the standard of freedom.
The fundamental maxims of her policy would insensibly change from liberty to force....
She might become the dictatress of the world. She would be no longer the ruler of her own spirit....
[America's] glory is not dominion, but liberty. Her march is the march of the mind. She has a spear and a shield: but the motto upon her shield is, Freedom, Independence, Peace. This has been her Declaration: this has been, as far as her necessary intercourse with the rest of mankind would permit, her practice.
When John Quincy Adams served as U. S. Secretary of State, he delivered this speech to the U.S. House of Representatives on July 4, 1821, in celebration of American Independence Day.


I have always given it as my decided opinion that no nation had a right to inter-meddle in the internal concerns of another; and that, if this country could, consistent with its engagements, maintain a strict neutrality and thereby preserve peace. George Washington - Letter to James Monroe, August 25, 1796


Observe good faith and justice toward all nations. Cultivate peace and harmony with all. ...The nation which indulges toward another an habitual hatred or an habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interest. George Washington - Farewell Address, September 17, 1797

Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none should be our motto. Thomas Jefferson - First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1801

If there be one principle more deeply rooted than any other in the mind of every American, it is that we should have nothing to do with conquest. Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) Letter to William Short, 1791

We certainly cannot deny to other nations that principle whereon our own government is founded, that every nation has a right to govern itself internally under what forms it pleases, and to change these forms at its own will. Thomas Jefferson - To Thomas Pinckney, December 30, 1792

Europe, by her arms and by her negotiations, by force and by fraud, has extended her dominion over them all, Africa, Asia, an America have successively felt her domination. The superiority she has long maintained has tempted her to plume herself as the Mistress of the World, and to consider the rest of mankind as created for her benefit.*
Alexander Hamilton on Colonialism, The Federalist Papers 1787

My ardent desire is to keep the United States free from political connections with every other country, to see them independent of all and under the influence of none. George Washington (Letter to Patrick Henry, October 9, 1795)

We mistake the object of our government, if we hope or wish that it is to make us respectable abroad. Conquest or superiority among other powers is not or ought not ever to be the object of republican systems. Charles Pinckney (1757-1824) Constitutional Convention, June 25, 1787

harikaried
10-20-2011, 02:08 PM
Someone made this comparison that seems to get most of the distinction.

Isolationism: North Korea
Non-interventionism: China

Captain Shays
10-20-2011, 02:10 PM
Someone made this comparison that seems to get most of the distinction.

Isolationism: North Korea
Non-interventionism: China

It wasn't me. My rant is
Isolationism= North Korea
Non interventionism= Switzerland

Captain Shays
10-20-2011, 07:11 PM
If you guys have any other good quotes to outline the foreign policy of our founding fathers or other prominent conservatives who agree with Ron Paul please post them here.

GeorgiaAvenger
10-20-2011, 07:19 PM
http://users.etown.edu/m/mcdonaldw/Lect321.html
http://www.imaginativeconservative.org/2011/03/foreign-policy-for-conservatives-robert.html#more
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/07/22/eveningnews/main1826838.shtml

Kirk, Taft, Buckley

centure7
10-20-2011, 08:57 PM
Wow OP, that is way way too lengthy! Its actually a piece of cake to prove Paul is not an isolationist as follows:

1. Does making new friends make a country more isolated or less isolated? Switzerland proves well that keeping out of other countries business actually INCREASES the number of friends, and therefore leads to a *less* isolated country. Ron Paul wants to keep troops our of other countries, therefore is against empire-building isolationism.

Is China making new friends by expressing interest in expanding their empire? No, they are becoming more ISOLATED. Likewise, America is also building up animosity in a number of countries it places troops in.

2. Does opening trade with other countries increase isolation or decrease isolation? Opening trade with other countries decreases isolation. Ron Paul wants to open trade with other countries, which is is the POLAR OPPOSITE of isolationism because it decreases isolation.

3. Does opening immigration to other countries increase isolation or decrease isolation? Opening up immigration *decreases* isolation. ron Paul wishes to open up immigration allowances. That is the POLAR OPPOSITE of isolationism because it decreases isolation.

That is a point you should skip in a conservative audience because they tend to be thoughtless and nationalist jerks when it comes to allowing immigration.

Some dictionaries will imply that isolationism is the process of opening up to new friends and trading partners while decreasing military aggression. That is idiotic beyond belief... obviously wrong! By increasing the number of friends, and decreasing the number of enemies, you open up new friendships and expand on diplomatic relationships.

Here is an example conversation that could go on:
Person A: "I like Ron Paul's policies except for the ones that are isolationist."
You: "Thats a false rumor that Paul's opponents always use... he's actually the opposite of that on three different points."
Person B: "I heard Ron Paul say he wants to pull out the troops."
You: "Right, Paul wants to pull out the troops to increase our number of friends around the world so we become less isolated. Paul also advocates open trade with many foreign countries to further decrease our level of isolation. And finally Paul plans to increase immigration quotas which completely destroys any remaining traces of isolationism. So, while most Republicans are Isolationists, Ron Paul combats that as strongly as he possibly could.

NEVER ARGUE WITH PEOPLE OVER THIS! Simply put those three ideas out there and allow them to either accept or reject that. If they reject it, quickly gloss over to the next point immediately.