Elwar
10-20-2011, 08:02 AM
The reeling housing market has come to this: To shore it up, two Senators are preparing to introduce a bipartisan bill Thursday that would give residence visas to foreigners who spend at least $500,000 to buy houses in the U.S.
The provision is part of a larger package of immigration measures, co-authored by Sens. Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.) and Mike Lee (R., Utah), designed to spur more foreign investment in the U.S.
(http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203752604576641421449460968.html?m od=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories)http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203752604576641421449460968.html?m od=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories
(http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203752604576641421449460968.html?m od=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories)
My take on this...
Laws on roads to citizenship are one of the few powers of Congress.
Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 (http://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A1Sec8.html#C4)
To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;
My thoughts on the best form of "taxation" was in paying for citizenship. Almost like paying to join a club. Once you are in, you are in. But in order to get in, there should be some compensation paid in order to get in.
The better law would be to charge $500,000 for citizenship. For 2010 with 1 million immigrants that would come out to $500,000,000,000 which would be plenty for our national defense and justice system with no further taxation necessary for citizens.
But this is close. It is not citizenship, it is a residency visa which creates a path toward citizenship. But I can see some downfall in that you just have to own the home to gain residency but once you become a citizen you could just sell it. This is a boost to the banks as foreigners essentially pay banks rent for a home for a few years until they get residency and then dump the house.
I assume Ron Paul would vote against it as it is basically the government picking and choosing which industry that money should flow to, which never helps. But on a personal note. If this passed, I would likely put my house up for sale for $500,000 (a few hundred more than the value) and once it sold to a foreigner I would take the excess money from the sale and move to Costa Rica (unless Ron Paul wins).
The provision is part of a larger package of immigration measures, co-authored by Sens. Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.) and Mike Lee (R., Utah), designed to spur more foreign investment in the U.S.
(http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203752604576641421449460968.html?m od=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories)http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203752604576641421449460968.html?m od=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories
(http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203752604576641421449460968.html?m od=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories)
My take on this...
Laws on roads to citizenship are one of the few powers of Congress.
Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 (http://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A1Sec8.html#C4)
To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;
My thoughts on the best form of "taxation" was in paying for citizenship. Almost like paying to join a club. Once you are in, you are in. But in order to get in, there should be some compensation paid in order to get in.
The better law would be to charge $500,000 for citizenship. For 2010 with 1 million immigrants that would come out to $500,000,000,000 which would be plenty for our national defense and justice system with no further taxation necessary for citizens.
But this is close. It is not citizenship, it is a residency visa which creates a path toward citizenship. But I can see some downfall in that you just have to own the home to gain residency but once you become a citizen you could just sell it. This is a boost to the banks as foreigners essentially pay banks rent for a home for a few years until they get residency and then dump the house.
I assume Ron Paul would vote against it as it is basically the government picking and choosing which industry that money should flow to, which never helps. But on a personal note. If this passed, I would likely put my house up for sale for $500,000 (a few hundred more than the value) and once it sold to a foreigner I would take the excess money from the sale and move to Costa Rica (unless Ron Paul wins).