theczar1776
10-03-2011, 07:34 PM
Here is just a snippet of the article . Fantastic.
"In sum, their allegiance is not to the United States, but to world government with the United States sitting on a global throne. They would have defended King George III in the Revolutionary War, not George Washington. For them to malign Ron Paul as unfit to serve as commander in chief because of his unwavering commitment to an invincible defense of America and repudiation of empire betrays insolence, impertinence and infidelity to the Founding Fathers and the Constitution."
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/02/balanced-budget-or-empire-you-cant-have-both/#ixzz1ZlwkweBT
"In sum, their allegiance is not to the United States, but to world government with the United States sitting on a global throne. They would have defended King George III in the Revolutionary War, not George Washington. For them to malign Ron Paul as unfit to serve as commander in chief because of his unwavering commitment to an invincible defense of America and repudiation of empire betrays insolence, impertinence and infidelity to the Founding Fathers and the Constitution."
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/02/balanced-budget-or-empire-you-cant-have-both/#ixzz1ZlwkweBT