PDA

View Full Version : Florida Court Rules Pasting Kids' Faces on Naked Adult Bodies is Not Child Porn




aGameOfThrones
10-01-2011, 05:13 AM
Danny Parker, a Sunday school teacher from Lakeland, Florida, was arrested and eventually convicted on child porn charges in 2009 after he was found to have cut out the faces of children from photos he'd taken and then pasted them on the bodies of explicit photos of adults. Now, a Florida appeals court has overturned the conviction and says that under Florida law he was not technically in possession of child porn.

http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/riptide/2011/09/florida_court_rules_pasting_ki.php

playboymommy
10-01-2011, 06:02 AM
There was a Law and Order SVU episode like that. They took adult photos and digitally modified them to look like children. I stopped watching that show when they portrayed patriots as terrorists.

NYgs23
10-01-2011, 11:07 AM
The correct ruling. If the idea behind banning kiddy porn is that is that it involves child abuse, the production of the image must actually have involved an act of child abuse to be illegal. "Modified" images, cartoons, and young looking adult don't count. Neither do teenaged "sexters" that put their own selves out there.

Voluntary Man
10-01-2011, 12:09 PM
maybe this guy shouldn't be teaching Sunday school, though?

Becker
10-01-2011, 12:16 PM
There was a Law and Order SVU episode like that. They took adult photos and digitally modified them to look like children. I stopped watching that show when they portrayed patriots as terrorists.

what show portrays patriots as good guys? LOL

specsaregood
10-01-2011, 12:18 PM
what show portrays patriots as good guys? LOL
law and order took it to a whole new level the last couple seasons. i won't watch it either any longer.

pcosmar
10-01-2011, 12:23 PM
maybe this guy shouldn't be teaching Sunday school, though?

true, but that is another question and is outside of the courts jurisdiction.

pcosmar
10-01-2011, 12:25 PM
what show portrays patriots as good guys? LOL

Jericho
but it was canceled.

MikeStanart
10-01-2011, 12:26 PM
Creepy? Absolutely. Kiddie Porn? Nope.

Becker
10-01-2011, 12:28 PM
Jericho
but it was canceled.

thanks, i should check that out.

Voluntary Man
10-01-2011, 12:55 PM
true, but that is another question and is outside of the courts jurisdiction.

i wouldn't suggest otherwise. but why should it take a court case to discover this?

aGameOfThrones
10-01-2011, 01:12 PM
law and order took it to a whole new level the last couple seasons. i won't watch it either any longer.

I regularly find myself angry at the cops, judges, da, adas than the "criminals" on the show.

PaulConventionWV
10-01-2011, 01:17 PM
true, but that is another question and is outside of the courts jurisdiction.

The free market will take care of that.

pcosmar
10-01-2011, 01:20 PM
The free market will take care of that.

The Church Elders could take care of that.

Rael
10-01-2011, 07:11 PM
The correct ruling. If the idea behind banning kiddy porn is that is that it involves child abuse, the production of the image must actually have involved an act of child abuse to be illegal. "Modified" images, cartoons, and young looking adult don't count. Neither do teenaged "sexters" that put their own selves out there.

Really, only production of it should be illegal. People who possess it are sick fucks, but possessing photo paper or computer images with unapproved arrangements of pixels is still a victimless crime.

asurfaholic
10-01-2011, 07:46 PM
Wait, so this guy who is readily available to children in the most vulnerable of places - church - can do something as creepy as put a picture of a childs face on a naked body.

BUT I CAN'T SMOKE A JOINT?

This is getting out of hand.