PDA

View Full Version : TX-Houston cops steal pot brownies and eat them. Then text "So HIGH" to each other.




Anti Federalist
09-28-2011, 04:32 PM
Three Houston police officers accused of getting high on duty

http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/in_focus&id=8366204

HOUSTON (KTRK) -- Three Houston police officers are under investigation after claims they got high while on duty. And the claim, made by a man accused of drug possession, are backed up with something undeniable -- the words of the officers themselves.

It sort of jumps off the page.

"'So high' spaced out: h i g h" defense attorney Daniel Cahill said.

The words of a Houston police officer about an hour after arresting Nicholas Hill for marijuana possession.

"It was actually about 10 or 11 at night," Hill said.

Hill was at his Atascocita apartment with friends late one night in May when cops came after someone smelled drugs. On search of the apartment, they allegedly found pot and stumbled on some brownies.

"The other cop came into the bedroom with a tray of brownies and immediately assumed that there was pot or something in it by asking, 'Let me guess what's in this,'" Hill said.

They were not the brownies your mom made, and Hill tells us - and told his lawyers - the cops ate them.

"Sometimes you're told some pretty tall tales," Cahill said.

But Cahill and J Julio Vela, Hill's lawyers, started investigating.

If it were just the word of a 19-year-old accused of drug possession against the integrity of three Houston police officers, there wouldn't be much for lawyers to defend or for us to report.

(And that explains why so many people that are innocent are in prison. - AF)

But it's not just his word.

After allegedly eating the pot brownies and arresting Hill and two others, the officers went downstairs to their patrol car and started typing on their in-car computers.

The city saves all those and we have them:

At 2:44 in the morning one officer -- we aren't naming them -- writes the other, "So HIGH...Good munchies"

The other writes back, "Everything should be open when we get done."

First officer: "Two hours, max."

"Probably, but this will take the whole shift."

"If they actually are true, then we're talking about is destruction of evidence. That's a felony. We're talking about official misconduct. We're potentially talking about police officers driving around the city of Houston high on drugs, conducting official police business while high on drugs. It's a pretty big deal," Cahill said.

The head of the internal affairs division knew about this before we called and told us it's considered a big deal inside the department. The officers involved are still on the job but will be drug tested and investigated.

Who knows what will show up four months after the fact but Executive Assistant Chief Mike Dirden admits, incidents like this can put "the integrity of the department at risk."

"Obviously, they thought we were oblivious to it," Hill said.

As for the drug possession case against the young man, it still stands -- for now. The DA's office tells us they're waiting for results of the internal affairs investigation before it does anything.

phill4paul
09-28-2011, 04:49 PM
If it were just the word of a 19-year-old accused of drug possession against the integrity of three Houston police officers, there wouldn't be much for lawyers to defend or for us to report.

(And that explains why so many people that are innocent are in prison. - AF)

Bolded and colored for emphasis. Because it is truth.

dannno
09-28-2011, 04:59 PM
I have no problem with officers eating pot brownies, hell I think they should eat a lot more.

Putting an innocent kid into the system for pot brownies and then stealing his brownies is really messed up, though.

pcosmar
09-28-2011, 05:05 PM
:D

I beat my only possession arrest because the cop kept some.(substantial)
They had a choice of him or me.

The record is not even on my record.
;)

asurfaholic
09-28-2011, 05:05 PM
No crime committed by the officers, just a minor employer-employee discipline issue....

Move along, nothing to see

phill4paul
09-28-2011, 05:13 PM
I have no problem with officers eating pot brownies, hell I think they should eat a lot more.

Putting an innocent kid into the system for pot brownies and then stealing his brownies is really messed up, though.

REALLY messed up. Bogarts!

madengr
09-28-2011, 05:13 PM
So do cops have to take urine tests?

Sola_Fide
09-28-2011, 05:15 PM
Two week leave of absence, with pay (and brownies).

BuddyRey
09-28-2011, 05:21 PM
Why will the news site name the original suspect, but none of the corrupt officers involved?

Dr.3D
09-28-2011, 05:27 PM
So do cops have to take urine tests?

If they did get caught with a urine test, they would probably be put into a short drug abuse program and then put back on the street, all the while getting paid to do so. While the poor guy who had the brownies gets screwed.

ghengis86
09-28-2011, 05:27 PM
Why will the news site name the original suspect, but none of the corrupt officers involved?

Ruler >> mundane

phill4paul
09-28-2011, 05:30 PM
Why will the news site name the original suspect, but none of the corrupt officers involved?

Probably because he was arrested. They however, despite admission are under "investigation."

mrsat_98
09-28-2011, 06:11 PM
So if one cop picked them up and gave them to another for his use isnt this distribution ?

Kylie
09-28-2011, 06:50 PM
What a crock if shit. Bust in someones house(who is not being violent?) And steal his shit, then kidnap him and put him in a jail.

Theyre going to start getting shot and disappearing over shit like this. I dont want that, after all these guys have famiies too, but they are gonna pull this shiton somebody who doesnt have a thing to lose and they'll die for it.


All over some fucking pot brownies. How do they find any logic in this?

Krugerrand
09-29-2011, 06:17 AM
What a crock if shit. Bust in someones house(who is not being violent?) And steal his shit, then kidnap him and put him in a jail.

Theyre going to start getting shot and disappearing over shit like this. I dont want that, after all these guys have famiies too, but they are gonna pull this shiton somebody who doesnt have a thing to lose and they'll die for it.


All over some fucking pot brownies. How do they find any logic in this?

it's cheaper than making their own.

MoneyWhereMyMouthIs2
09-29-2011, 06:45 AM
I have no problem with officers eating pot brownies, hell I think they should eat a lot more.


I'm having a hard time thinking of other groups that where pot brownies would be more beneficial.

Rael
09-29-2011, 08:10 AM
:D

I beat my only possession arrest because the cop kept some.(substantial)
They had a choice of him or me.

The record is not even on my record.
;)

He got caught keeping it?

AFPVet
09-29-2011, 11:04 AM
This is what's crazy... when I was an Air Force cop, we were piss tested; however, when I was a civi cop, we weren't.....