scrosnoe
09-23-2011, 09:20 PM
This came to me via a friend on facebook involved with homeschoolers and associated ministries.
My background on Vision Forum:
Doug Phillips (vision) is Howard Phillips son they are long time third party types always conservative christian and dc based fundraising group-- glad they are landing in the right place this time!
I love the format and the idea that they are doing it for their network which is Christian Evangelically based. See what you think and please thank them if you are connected to their group in any way. We want to encourage them in this effort!
The final grade for Ron Paul is A, for Michele Bachmann gets a B, Cain gets a C, and the rest are Ds.
Here is the opening of the post report provided in pdf format here (http://adv.visionforum.com/email/2011/09/22_reportcard/reportcard.pdf):
http://www.visionforum.com/news/blogs/doug/report-card-banner.jpg
A Constitutional Report Card for the CNN/Tea Party Republican Presidential Debate on 9/12/2011
Prepared by Vision Forum Ministries
BACKGROUND: On September 12, 2011, eight Republican candidates squared off for the sixth Republican presidential debate of this election cycle. The purpose of this document is to provide a report card that will help Christian families evaluate the statements made by the candidates during that debate from a constitutional perspective. This report card is limited in its scope in that it only addresses issues specifically on the table during the September 12 debate. The scores are based on the actual statements made by the candidates during that debate. Candidates’ comments are taken at face value and evaluated without regard to their past statements or policy records, unless the candidates or those posing the questions specifically addressed the past statements and previous policy record of the candidate. Nothing in this report card should be construed as advocacy for a specific presidential candidate.
During the debate, questions were fielded from Tea Party chapters across the United States, from the live audience, and from participants over the Internet. The debate questions ranged from Social Security and health care to the legitimacy of the Federal Reserve and the use of executive orders. The first act of every president is to swear an oath to uphold and defend the United States Constitution. This report card is intended to score each of the eight candidates, on the basis of their own answers, on whether or not their proposals, as stated, are in keeping with their potential duty to uphold and defend the United States Constitution.
Link to complete report here (http://adv.visionforum.com/email/2011/09/22_reportcard/reportcard.pdf)
Link to their website can be ascertained from the pdf link.
My background on Vision Forum:
Doug Phillips (vision) is Howard Phillips son they are long time third party types always conservative christian and dc based fundraising group-- glad they are landing in the right place this time!
I love the format and the idea that they are doing it for their network which is Christian Evangelically based. See what you think and please thank them if you are connected to their group in any way. We want to encourage them in this effort!
The final grade for Ron Paul is A, for Michele Bachmann gets a B, Cain gets a C, and the rest are Ds.
Here is the opening of the post report provided in pdf format here (http://adv.visionforum.com/email/2011/09/22_reportcard/reportcard.pdf):
http://www.visionforum.com/news/blogs/doug/report-card-banner.jpg
A Constitutional Report Card for the CNN/Tea Party Republican Presidential Debate on 9/12/2011
Prepared by Vision Forum Ministries
BACKGROUND: On September 12, 2011, eight Republican candidates squared off for the sixth Republican presidential debate of this election cycle. The purpose of this document is to provide a report card that will help Christian families evaluate the statements made by the candidates during that debate from a constitutional perspective. This report card is limited in its scope in that it only addresses issues specifically on the table during the September 12 debate. The scores are based on the actual statements made by the candidates during that debate. Candidates’ comments are taken at face value and evaluated without regard to their past statements or policy records, unless the candidates or those posing the questions specifically addressed the past statements and previous policy record of the candidate. Nothing in this report card should be construed as advocacy for a specific presidential candidate.
During the debate, questions were fielded from Tea Party chapters across the United States, from the live audience, and from participants over the Internet. The debate questions ranged from Social Security and health care to the legitimacy of the Federal Reserve and the use of executive orders. The first act of every president is to swear an oath to uphold and defend the United States Constitution. This report card is intended to score each of the eight candidates, on the basis of their own answers, on whether or not their proposals, as stated, are in keeping with their potential duty to uphold and defend the United States Constitution.
Link to complete report here (http://adv.visionforum.com/email/2011/09/22_reportcard/reportcard.pdf)
Link to their website can be ascertained from the pdf link.