PDA

View Full Version : Over a third of Americans said we would be better off now if Hillary Clinton was in office




QuickZ06
09-16-2011, 03:02 PM
What the heck.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/09/16/poll-americans-optimistic-about-hillary-clinton-presidency/?on.cnn=1

And the picture for the article scares me.

ronpaulfollower999
09-16-2011, 03:05 PM
Americans are fickle. Give them the choice of death by drowning or fire and two years later they'll say they should've done the opposite.

QuickZ06
09-16-2011, 03:16 PM
Haha very good point. Its really sad your right though.

raider4paul
09-16-2011, 03:33 PM
I don't know... These wars are expensive and starting a war once a month when she's in a bad mood for some reason would probably have us worse off.

Not to mention I'd hate to see her give Congress "the look" when they don't pass a bill. At least Obama just creates stupid websites and says they must pass it now.

Fermli
09-16-2011, 03:38 PM
the grass is always greener on the other side.

AuH20
09-16-2011, 03:39 PM
Clinton people basically run his administration. What are these folks thinking?

sevin
09-16-2011, 03:41 PM
If the dems had picked Clinton, today they'd be saying we would have been better off with Obama.

specsaregood
09-16-2011, 03:43 PM
I don't know... These wars are expensive and starting a war once a month when she's in a bad mood for some reason would probably have us worse off.


I'm pretty sure she doesn't experience that once a month bad mood for some reason problem anymore. She is a bit older.

HOLLYWOOD
09-16-2011, 03:54 PM
dupe

jason43
09-16-2011, 05:09 PM
I think we'd be slightly better under Clinton. The Clinton machine is a pragmatic one. They would do whatever it took to fix things and leave ideology aside. I thought Clinton was bad until we had GW and Obama for 12 years. Now I think of the 90's as the good old days. Balanced budget with a surplus under Clinton with a Rep congress. Wouldnt that help now? Wouldnt advance the cause of liberty, but better? I'd argue yes.