PDA

View Full Version : Criminal complaint, violation of the patriot act, naming jimmy hoffa




raystone
09-07-2011, 07:31 AM
In response to Hoffa's Labor Day speech...

http://www.facebook.com/#!/notes/warren-gacsi/criminal-complaint-violation-of-the-patriot-act-section-802-naming-jimmy-hoffa-j/218435741547465

-----------------------------

CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, VIOLATION OF THE PATRIOT ACT, SECTION 802, NAMING JIMMY HOFFA, JOE BIDEN, AND BARAK OBAMA
by Warren Gacsi on Tuesday, September 6, 2011 at 6:04am

SUBMITTED TO FBI, 4:00 AM, PDT ON 9/6/02011CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, VIOLATION OF THE PATRIOT ACT, SECTION 802, NAMING JIMMY HOFFA, JOE BIDEN, AND BARAK OBAMA

CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, VIOLATION OF THE PATRIOT ACT, SECTION 802, NAMING JIMMY HOFFA, JOE BIDEN, AND BARAK OBAMA



Jimmy Hoffa, in his address on September 4, 2011, Jimmy Hoffa instructed his union members to"take these son-of-a-bitches out" and declared war on the TEA Party.



Refer to his statements as said in this video: http://nation.foxnews.com/teamsters/2011/09/05/teamsters-boss-declares-war-gop-lets-take-son-bitches-out ( in Mr. Hoffa's own words), which I therefore submit as evidence to this complaint.



Such statements constitutes numerous acts of domestic terrorism under section 802 of the Patriot Act.



Given that Mr. Hoffa holds a position of power and influence in the Teamsters Union, and that the Teamsters have previously been active in inflicting acts of violence, I am therefore concluding that Mr. Hoffa has instructed his union members to inflict further violent acts.



I view Mr. Hoffa's statement to be one of CULPABLE harm.



Section 802 of the Patriot Act: DOMESTIC TERRORISM

5) the term `domestic terrorism' means activities that--

`(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;

`(B) appear to be intended--

`(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;

`(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or

`(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and

`(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.'



I also interpret Mr. Hoffas statements to be intended to instruct his union members to inflict physical harm and mayhem upon those who oppose the Teamster's agenda, and specifically to be inflicted upon those of the TEA Party or those who support the TEA Party.



Therefore, I am filing this criminal complaint upon Jimmy Hoffa. Furthermore, I also file this criminal complaint upon Joe Biden and also Barak Obama who have endorsed the statements of Jimmy Hoffa and request the FBI to file criminal charges upon those three individuals for violations of Section 802 of the Patriot Act.



I will be seeking a Federal Protection Order in Riverside, California District Federal Court, naming Jimmy Hoffa, Joe Biden, and Barak Obama as well as the entire Teamsters Union, and also seek an order from the court to (1) order the teamsters to not infiltrate or seek to disrupt TEA Party events, and to order that the above three named persons, and any member of the Teamsters to refrain from any activities within one thousand feed of my primary residence and place of business.



Sincerely,



Warren Gacsi

Rael
09-07-2011, 07:51 AM
Even assholes like Hoffa have the right to free speech.

Working Poor
09-07-2011, 07:52 AM
Even assholes like Hoffa have the right to free speech.

His words could insight violence though an they still might. Ask yourself How soon would a Ron Paul supporter be locked up for a statement like that?

Rael
09-07-2011, 07:56 AM
His words could insight violence though an they still might. Ask yourself How soon would a Ron Paul supporter be locked up for a statement like that?

A Ron Paul supporter would not be locked up either.

Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), was a United States Supreme Court case based on the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It held that government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless it is directed to inciting and likely to incite imminent lawless action.

Matthew5
09-07-2011, 08:13 AM
Even assholes like Hoffa have the right to free speech.

I think the point is, "what's good for the goose..."